Zage group affirms 51.5% Grindr (GRND) stake and caps voting at 44.9%
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
G. Raymond Zage III and affiliated entities update their beneficial ownership disclosure for Grindr Inc. The filing reports that Tiga Investments Eighty-Eight Pte Ltd and Tiga Investments Pte. Ltd. each beneficially own 85,926,333 shares of Grindr common stock, or about 46.4% of the outstanding shares, while Big Timber Holdings, LLC owns 1,385,507 shares, or about 0.7%.
In total, Mr. Zage is deemed to beneficially own 95,425,123 shares, representing approximately 51.5% of Grindr’s outstanding common stock, based on 185,147,713 shares outstanding. Tiga 88 has pledged 85,926,333 shares as collateral under a loan, and the remaining shares held by the reporting persons are in margin or similar arrangements.
The amendment also discloses that, in connection with litigation, Mr. Zage submitted an affidavit on May 15, 2025, confirming he will refrain from voting Grindr shares above roughly 44.9% of the company’s voting power, unless he provides the court and plaintiff 30 days’ written notice.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- None.
Insights
Filing details Zage’s majority economic stake in Grindr and a court-linked cap on his voting power.
The amendment shows that entities affiliated with G. Raymond Zage III beneficially own 95,425,123 Grindr shares, or about 51.5% of outstanding common stock. This establishes him as a majority economic holder while clarifying which entities directly hold and pledge shares.
Tiga 88 has pledged 85,926,333 shares as collateral under a loan, and other shares are held in margin or similar accounts. These financing structures mean a portion of the stake is encumbered, which can matter for stability if market or lender conditions change, though the filing does not describe any default.
The affidavit tied to litigation commits Mr. Zage to limit his voting power to about 44.9% of Grindr’s outstanding voting power unless he gives 30 days’ written notice to the court and plaintiff. This creates a formalized gap between his economic ownership and voting control, with any change in that cap likely appearing in future court or company disclosures.