STOCK TITAN

Tovecimig Demonstrates Statistically Significant Benefit in COMPANION-002 Randomized Phase 2/3 Study in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer

Rhea-AI Impact
(High)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Positive)

Compass Therapeutics (Nasdaq: CMPX) reported COMPANION-002 results showing tovecimig plus paclitaxel met key secondary PFS and primary ORR endpoints in second-line biliary tract cancer. Median PFS was 4.7 vs 2.6 months (HR=0.44, p<0.0001). ORR was 17.1% vs 5.3% (p=0.031). OS was confounded by 54% crossover; pooled median OS was 8.9 months. Safety: hypertension and neutropenia were notable. Company plans an FDA meeting ahead of a planned BLA and will present full data at a medical conference.

Loading...
Loading translation...

AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.

Positive

  • Median PFS improved to 4.7 months (HR=0.44, p<0.0001)
  • Overall response rate 17.1% versus 5.3% (p=0.031)
  • Pooled median OS across study population of 8.9 months

Negative

  • Overall survival endpoint not met due to 54% crossover
  • Grade ≥3 hypertension in 44% of patients
  • Grade ≥3 neutropenia in 36% of patients

News Market Reaction – CMPX

-64.41%
57 alerts
-64.41% News Effect
-84.0% Trough in 4 hr 9 min
-$1.64B Valuation Impact
$905.84M Market Cap
1.5x Rel. Volume

On the day this news was published, CMPX declined 64.41%, reflecting a significant negative market reaction. Argus tracked a trough of -84.0% from its starting point during tracking. Our momentum scanner triggered 57 alerts that day, indicating high trading interest and price volatility. This price movement removed approximately $1.64B from the company's valuation, bringing the market cap to $905.84M at that time.

Data tracked by StockTitan Argus on the day of publication.

Key Figures

Median PFS (combo vs control): 4.7 vs 2.6 months PFS hazard ratio: HR=0.44, p<0.0001 Overall response rate: 17.1% vs 5.3% +5 more
8 metrics
Median PFS (combo vs control) 4.7 vs 2.6 months COMPANION-002 key secondary endpoint, BICR-confirmed
PFS hazard ratio HR=0.44, p<0.0001 Tovecimig + paclitaxel vs paclitaxel alone
Overall response rate 17.1% vs 5.3% Primary ORR endpoint, p=0.031, BTC second-line
Crossover OS benefit 12.8 vs 6.1 months Median OS in crossover vs non-crossover control patients, HR=0.54, p=0.04
PFS2 improvement in crossover 3.5 vs 1.9 months Median PFS2 vs PFS1 in 31 crossover patients, HR=0.36, p=0.0016
Pooled median OS 8.9 months All patients in COMPANION-002 (85% received tovecimig)
Patients receiving tovecimig 85% (142 of 168) Proportion of trial participants exposed to combo
US BTC incidence 26,500 patients annually Estimated annual biliary tract cancer cases in the United States

Market Reality Check

Price: $1.8300 Vol: Volume 3,928,716 is above...
normal vol
$1.8300 Last Close
Volume Volume 3,928,716 is above the 20-day average of 2,955,010, indicating elevated trading interest before this update. normal
Technical Price at $5.02 is trading above the 200-day MA of $4.63 but remains 27.03% below the 52-week high of $6.88.

Peers on Argus

CMPX was down 3.45% while only one momentum peer (ORKA) screened, moving 19.69% ...
1 Up

CMPX was down 3.45% while only one momentum peer (ORKA) screened, moving 19.69% higher without same-day BTC news, and other listed peers showed mixed moves. The pre-news weakness in CMPX appears more stock-specific than sector-driven.

Previous Clinical trial Reports

2 past events · Latest: Nov 04 (Positive)
Same Type Pattern 2 events
Date Event Sentiment Move Catalyst
Nov 04 Preclinical data update Positive +1.3% Presented encouraging preclinical CTX-10726 data showing strong anti-tumor activity.
Apr 01 BTC trial milestone Positive +17.9% Tovecimig BTC trial met primary ORR endpoint with significant efficacy improvement.
Pattern Detected

Clinical trial headlines have previously coincided with positive price reactions for CMPX.

Recent Company History

Over the last year, CMPX has released multiple clinical trial updates, especially around its bispecific antibody programs. On Apr 1, 2025, tovecimig’s Phase 2/3 BTC trial met its primary ORR endpoint, and the stock rose 17.89%. On Nov 4, 2025, preclinical CTX-10726 data at SITC led to a 1.34% gain. Today’s COMPANION-002 PFS/OS update extends that BTC story, moving from initial ORR success to fuller survival and durability readouts.

Historical Comparison

+9.6% avg move · Clinical trial updates for CMPX have previously averaged a 9.62% move, with BTC-focused tovecimig da...
clinical trial
+9.6%
Average Historical Move clinical trial

Clinical trial updates for CMPX have previously averaged a 9.62% move, with BTC-focused tovecimig data drawing the strongest past reaction.

Clinical news has progressed from tovecimig’s initial BTC ORR success to broader survival and preclinical bispecific data, reinforcing Compass’s oncology platform.

Market Pulse Summary

The stock dropped -64.4% in the session following this news. A negative reaction despite strong PFS ...
Analysis

The stock dropped -64.4% in the session following this news. A negative reaction despite strong PFS and ORR data would fit a pattern where CMPX has sometimes sold off around news or corporate events, even when fundamentals appeared constructive. The complex OS readout, crossover design, and prior volatility around BTC updates could contribute to skepticism. If the stock moved well below the pre-news $5.02 level, that would contrast with earlier positive responses to clinical catalysts.

Key Terms

progression-free survival (pfs), overall survival (os), overall response rate (orr), hazard ratio, +4 more
8 terms
progression-free survival (pfs) medical
"key secondary endpoint of median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.7 months"
Progression-free survival (PFS) measures the length of time in a clinical trial or treatment period during which a patient’s disease does not get worse. Investors watch PFS because longer PFS in trials can signal a drug’s effectiveness, influence regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions, and affect commercial value—think of it as how long a product keeps a problem from returning, which helps estimate future sales and competitive advantage.
overall survival (os) medical
"Secondary endpoint analyses of overall survival (OS) were confounded by both high crossover"
Overall survival (OS) is the length of time from the start of a treatment or clinical study until death from any cause, essentially measuring how long patients live after a therapy begins. Investors watch OS because it is the most direct evidence a treatment extends life; stronger OS results can drive regulatory approvals, wider use and higher revenue expectations, much like sales figures proving a product actually works.
overall response rate (orr) medical
"met the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) in the study with an ORR of 17.1%"
Overall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of trial participants whose disease measurably improves—typically tumor shrinkage or disappearance—according to predefined medical criteria. Investors watch ORR because it provides an early, concrete signal of a therapy’s effectiveness and commercial potential, similar to seeing what share of products in a test batch actually work before deciding to back wider production.
hazard ratio medical
"providing a 56% reduction in the risk of progression (hazard ratio=0.44, p<0.0001)"
A hazard ratio is a way scientists compare the chance of something happening over time between two groups, like patients taking different medicines. If the ratio is high, it means one group is more likely to experience the event sooner or more often, which helps determine how effective a treatment is or how risky a situation might be.
bispecific antibody medical
"Tovecimig (a DLL4 x VEGF-A bispecific antibody) in combination with paclitaxel"
A bispecific antibody is a specially designed protein that can attach to two different targets at the same time. Think of it as a custom-made connector that brings two things together—such as a disease cell and an immune system component—helping the body fight illnesses more effectively. For investors, understanding bispecific antibodies is important because they represent innovative therapies that could lead to new treatments and potentially lucrative market opportunities.
biologics license application (bla) regulatory
"meeting with FDA in advance of a planned Biologics License Application (BLA) submission"
A biologics license application (BLA) is a formal request to a government agency seeking approval to sell a biological medicine, such as vaccines or gene therapies, in the market. It is similar to a detailed report that proves the product is safe, effective, and manufactured properly. For investors, a BLA signifies a critical step toward commercial availability, often impacting a company's valuation and market prospects.
blinded independent central review (bicr) medical
"All responses were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR)."
A blinded independent central review (BICR) is a process in clinical trials where outside experts, who do not know which patients received the experimental treatment, centrally re-check key medical data (often images or test results) to confirm outcomes. Investors care because BICR reduces bias and disagreement in trial results—think of neutral referees reviewing game footage without team colors—so findings are more credible for regulators, partners and valuation decisions.
rank-preserving structural failure time (rpsft) medical
"In the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) OS analysis, the combination also had"
A rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model is a statistical method used in clinical trials to estimate how long patients would have survived or remained event-free if they had not switched from their originally assigned treatment. It matters to investors because it helps produce fairer comparisons of a drug’s effectiveness when patients cross over between therapies, which can affect trial outcomes, regulatory decisions and the perceived market value of a treatment—think of it as adjusting a race result to account for runners who changed lanes mid-race.

AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.

  • Tovecimig (a DLL4 x VEGF-A bispecific antibody) in combination with paclitaxel demonstrated a highly statistically significant improvement versus paclitaxel alone in the key secondary endpoint of median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.7 months versus 2.6 months, providing a 56% reduction in the risk of progression (hazard ratio=0.44, p<0.0001). 
  • Secondary endpoint analyses of overall survival (OS) were confounded by both high crossover (54%) and notably prolonged survival in crossover patients randomized to the control arm then treated with tovecimig and, therefore, did not meet statistical significance. In a subset analysis of the patients in the control arm, the median OS of the crossover patients was 12.8 months vs. 6.1 months in patients who did not crossover (hazard ratio=0.54, p=0.04).
  • 85% of patients in the study received tovecimig with a pooled median OS of 8.9 months.
  • As previously disclosed, tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel met the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) in the study with an ORR of 17.1% vs. 5.3% in the paclitaxel control arm (p=0.031).
  • The Company looks forward to meeting with FDA in advance of a planned Biologics License Application (BLA) submission.
  • Company to host webcast today, April 27, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. ET.

BOSTON, April 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: CMPX), a clinical-stage, oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company developing proprietary antibody-based therapeutics, today announced that it met the key secondary endpoint of PFS and showed additional compelling results in the randomized COMPANION-002 study, which evaluated tovecimig plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in patients with unresectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated in the second-line setting. The complete dataset, including Duration of Response (DoR), will be presented at a medical conference later this year.

“In this study, tovecimig showed an impressive overall response rate which translated into a clinically meaningful and highly statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients with previously treated BTC. The remarkable 56% reduction in the risk of disease progression is unprecedented in this patient population without an actionable mutation in their tumor,” said Thomas Schuetz, MD, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Compass. “It is also notable that the 31 crossover patients survived a median of 12.8 months, similar to the median OS seen in front-line studies in this setting. Including crossover, 85% of patients in the study received tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel and the pooled median OS for all patients in the study was 8.9 months, which is also substantially longer than chemotherapy benchmarks of approximately 6 months.”

“These findings reinforce our belief that tovecimig can address a significant unmet need for patients with limited and insufficient treatment options. We are immensely grateful to the patients, investigators, and clinical teams who made this study possible, and we look forward to presenting the full dataset at an upcoming medical meeting. We are now focused on engaging with the FDA to bring this much needed therapy to the cholangiocarcinoma community as quickly as possible.”

“Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer have an urgent need for better treatment options,” said Juan Valle, MD, Chief Medical Officer of the Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation. “These results are a significant step forward and I anticipate that, if approved, it will meaningfully change the way physicians care for these patients. I also applaud Compass for putting patients first in the design of this study by allowing patients to crossover to receive treatment with tovecimig. These patients clearly benefited from this innovative therapy. I look forward to supporting Compass as they work to bring tovecimig to patients with cholangiocarcinoma.”

COMPANION-002 Data Summary:

Primary Endpoint (previously announced in April 2025):

  • Overall Response Rate: 17.1% ORR for tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel (19 of 111 patients) including one complete response, compared to 5.3% for paclitaxel alone (3 of 57 patients), in patients with BTC in the second line setting. This 11.8% improvement in ORR for those receiving tovecimig was statistically significant (p=0.031). All responses were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

Key Secondary Endpoints:

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in median PFS of 4.7 months compared to 2.6 months for paclitaxel alone (HR=0.44, p<0.0001). Progression was confirmed in each case by BICR.
  • Overall Survival (OS): Tovecimig did not meet the OS secondary endpoint due to high crossover from the control arm (31 of 57 patients, or 54%) and prolonged survival of those crossover patients after receiving tovecimig, as further described below. As a result of this crossover, 85% (142 of 168) of patients in the study received tovecimig plus paclitaxel with a pooled OS in the study of 8.9 months.

    In the ITT OS analysis, tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel had a median OS of 8.9 months compared to 9.4 months for the control arm, which included 26 patients (46%) who received paclitaxel alone and 31 patients (54%) who crossed over to receive tovecimig in combination with paclitaxel (HR=1.05, p=0.78). In the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) OS analysis, the combination also had a median OS of 8.9 months compared to 9.4 months for paclitaxel alone (HR=1.13, p=0.65). Though the RPSFT analysis is intended to adjust for crossover, its validity depends on certain assumptions that were not met in this study and thus its results here are largely uninterpretable.
  • Progression-Free Survival of Crossover Patients (PFS2): An additional, pre-specified secondary endpoint analyzed PFS in the patients in the paclitaxel arm who crossed over to receive tovecimig plus paclitaxel. In this analysis, the pre-crossover PFS (PFS1) on paclitaxel alone was compared to PFS with tovecimig post-crossover (PFS2) in the same crossover patients (n=31). In this subset, tovecimig demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with median PFS2 of 3.5 months after treatment with tovecimig compared to median PFS1 of 1.9 months for paclitaxel (HR=0.36, p=0.0016).

Post Hoc Subset Analyses:

  • OS of Paclitaxel Control Arm (Crossover vs. Non-Crossover): In an analysis of OS in all patients randomized to the paclitaxel control arm (n=57), crossover patients who subsequently received tovecimig demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in median OS of 12.8 months compared to 6.1 months for non-crossover patients who received only paclitaxel (HR=0.54, p=0.04).
  • PFS of Paclitaxel Control Arm (Crossover vs. Non-Crossover): Another analysis of these same patients randomized to the paclitaxel control arm (n=57) demonstrated that the crossover patients initially progressed faster on paclitaxel monotherapy compared to the non-crossover patients, with a median PFS of 1.9 months versus 3.6 months (HR=2.31, p=0.007). Thus, notably, despite progressing more quickly on initial paclitaxel monotherapy, crossover patients still demonstrated a statistically significant median 12.8 months OS after being treated with tovecimig.

Safety:

  • Tovecimig was generally well tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with previously reported data from prior studies, with no new safety signals. The most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events in the tovecimig combination arm were hypertension (69%) and fatigue (67%). The most common related treatment-emergent adverse events of Grade 3 or higher included hypertension (44%) and neutropenia (36%).

BTC is estimated to affect approximately 26,500 patients annually in the United States. For the vast majority of patients with BTC whose tumors do not harbor an actionable mutation with an approved targeted therapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment in the second line setting. The therapeutics most commonly used in this setting, which are not labeled or approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with BTC, generally have an ORR of ~5% or less and patients face a median OS of approximately six months.

In the coming months, Compass intends to meet with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss these data in advance of a planned BLA submission.

Webcast Information
Compass will host a webcast today, Monday, April 27, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. ET to provide a review of the tovecimig secondary endpoints COMPANION-002 data. Interested parties may register for the call-in advance via https://viavid.webcasts.com/starthere.jsp?ei=1761459&tp_key=efc315f5a6.

A replay of the webcast will be available via the Investors section of the Compass website at investors.compasstherapeutics.com.

About COMPANION-002
COMPANION-002 is a Phase 2/3 randomized, controlled study of tovecimig in patients with unresectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancers who have received one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen (clinical trial information: NCT05506943). The study enrolled 168 adult patients, randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive tovecimig plus paclitaxel (n=111) or paclitaxel alone (n=57). All patients were dosed with 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Patients in the tovecimig arm were also dosed with 10 mg/kg of tovecimig on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the trial is ORR as confirmed by blinded independent central radiology review and secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and DoR, among others. Patients in the paclitaxel-only arm who progressed could cross over to the tovecimig plus paclitaxel arm after centrally confirmed progression if they also still met the enrollment criteria for the study.

About Tovecimig (CTX-009)
Tovecimig is an investigational bispecific antibody that is designed to simultaneously block Delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) signaling pathways, which are critical to angiogenesis and tumor vascularization. Preclinical and clinical data of tovecimig suggest that blockade of both pathways provides robust anti-tumor activity across several solid tumors, including colorectal, gastric, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer.

About Compass Therapeutics
Compass Therapeutics, Inc. was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Boston, MA. Compass is a clinical-stage, oncology-focused biopharmaceutical company discovering and developing proprietary antibody-based therapeutics to treat multiple diseases. The company’s scientific focus is on the relationship between angiogenesis, the immune system and tumor growth. Compass has a robust pipeline of novel product candidates designed to target multiple key biological pathways to drive an effective anti-tumor response, including angiogenesis modulation, immune activation within the tumor microenvironment, and reduction of tumor-driven immunosuppression. The company is advancing discovery candidates through clinical development to commercial-stage assets. For more information, visit www.compasstherapeutics.com.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding Compass’s product candidates, including the potential of tovecimig to provide a treatment option for patients with BTC in the second-line setting, additional results of the COMPANION-002 study, and the timing and nature of any regulatory interactions and subsequent approval pathways, including Compass’s intention to discuss the data in the COMPANION-002 Randomized Phase 2/3 Study with the FDA in advance of a planned BLA submission, and the expectation to present the complete dataset at a medical conference this year. Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to numerous factors. Such factors include, among others, Compass’s ability to raise the additional funding it will need to continue to pursue its business and product development plans, the inherent uncertainties associated with developing product candidates and operating as a development stage company, Compass’s ability to identify additional product candidates for development, Compass’s ability to develop, complete clinical trials for, obtain approvals for and commercialize any of its product candidates, competition in the industry in which Compass operates and market conditions. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and Compass assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Investors should consult all of the information set forth herein and should also refer to the risk factor disclosure set forth in the reports and other documents Compass files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available at www.sec.gov, including without limitation Compass’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC.

Investor Contact
ir@compasstherapeutics.com

Media Contact
Anna Gifford, Chief of Staff
media@compasstherapeutics.com
617-500-8099


FAQ

What did Compass Therapeutics announce for CMPX on April 27, 2026?

They announced COMPANION-002 results showing tovecimig plus paclitaxel improved median PFS to 4.7 months. According to the company, ORR was 17.1% versus 5.3% and pooled median OS was 8.9 months, with OS confounded by 54% patient crossover.

How significant was the PFS benefit for CMPX in COMPANION-002?

PFS improved from 2.6 to 4.7 months with a 56% risk reduction (HR=0.44). According to the company, the PFS result was highly statistically significant (p<0.0001) and confirmed by blinded independent central review.

Why did CMPX not show an overall survival benefit in COMPANION-002?

OS did not meet statistical significance because 54% of control-arm patients crossed over to receive tovecimig. According to the company, crossover and prolonged survival after crossover confounded ITT and RPSFT OS analyses.

What safety issues did Compass report for tovecimig in COMPANION-002?

Tovecimig was generally tolerated but had high rates of hypertension and neutropenia. According to the company, hypertension occurred in 69% overall and Grade ≥3 hypertension and neutropenia occurred in 44% and 36% respectively.

What are next steps for CMPX after the COMPANION-002 results?

Compass plans to meet with the FDA ahead of a planned BLA submission and will present full dataset at a medical conference. According to the company, a webcast reviewing the data occurred April 27, 2026 and full details will follow at the meeting.