STOCK TITAN

Activist urges WLFC (WLFC) shareholders to oppose tripling authorized shares

Filing Impact
(Neutral)
Filing Sentiment
(Neutral)
Form Type
PX14A6G

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Four Tree Island Advisory LLC urges WLFC stockholders to oppose most items at the Annual Meeting, arguing the board seeks to triple authorized shares (Proposal 2) and that a recent convertible note issuance materially harmed shareholder value. The letter cites a May 13, 2026 share close of $211.67, a two‑day later close of $180.03 (about 15% decline), an alleged market cap impact of roughly $255 million, plus $6.0 million underwriting fee and $0.9 million offering expenses. The firm highlights the notes' $268.80 conversion price and an asserted ~9.3% potential dilution of the current fully diluted share count if conversion occurs.

The communication recommends voting AGAINST all proposals except the auditor ratification, citing concerns about dilution, stock‑based compensation, board governance, and the convertible financing's economic effect.

Positive

  • None.

Negative

  • None.

Insights

Activist raises governance and dilution concerns tied to a proposed share‑authorization increase.

The submission argues Proposal 2 would triple authorized shares, increasing the company’s capacity to issue equity; the letter links that ask to a recent convertible note financing and quantified near‑term costs (underwriting fee and offering expenses).

Key dependencies include board disclosure of planned use of authorized shares and the company’s rationale for the convertible notes; subsequent filings may clarify whether authorized shares would be used to satisfy conversions or other issuances.

Activist quantifies immediate market impact around the convertible note pricing and asserts potential dilution if conversion occurs.

The letter cites a $268.80 conversion price and calculates a ~9.3% dilution of fully diluted shares upon conversion; it also cites a share‑price drop from $211.67 to $180.03 around the offering and lists $6.0M underwriting fees and $0.9M offering expenses.

Cash‑flow treatment and exact dilution mechanics depend on the notes' conversion terms and any offsetting retirements or buybacks disclosed in company filings.

Share close (pre-pricing) $211.67 Close on <date> May 13, 2026
Share close (two trading days later) $180.03 Close two trading days after May 13, 2026
Estimated lost market capitalization $255 million Estimated based on fully diluted shares and the cited price decline
Underwriting fee $6.0 million Fee cited related to the convertible notes offering
Additional offering expenses $0.9 million Offering expenses cited in the letter
Conversion price $268.80 per share Conversion price of the 5‑year convertible notes
Potential dilution on conversion 9.3% Approximate dilution of the current fully diluted share count if converted
Proposal 2 effect Triple authorized shares Proposal 2 would triple the number of authorized shares
authorized shares financial
"Proposal 2 would triple the number of authorized shares"
Authorized shares are the maximum number of shares a company is allowed to issue according to its official plan. Think of it as a company’s set limit on how many pieces of its ownership it can distribute to investors. This number helps investors understand the potential for future growth or change in the company's ownership structure.
convertible notes financial
"The 5-year convertible notes feature a conversion price of $268.80 per share"
Convertible notes are a type of short-term loan that a company receives from investors, which can later be turned into company shares instead of being paid back in cash. They matter to investors because they offer a way to support a company early on while giving the potential to own a stake in its success if the company grows and later raises more funding.
convertible arbitrage market
"presence of convertible arbitrage investors is likely to increase volatility"
A trading strategy that buys a convertible security — a bond or preferred that can be turned into shares — while shorting the company’s stock to lock in a price difference and reduce market risk. Think of it as buying a ticket that can be exchanged for concert seats while betting the ticket’s value won’t fall, aiming to profit from mispricing rather than stock direction. Investors care because it affects demand and volatility for both the convertible and the underlying shares, and it can influence returns and capital flows in credit and equity markets.
say-on-pay governance
"say-on-pay votes only once every three years"
A say-on-pay is a shareholder vote that gives investors a chance to approve or disapprove a company’s executive compensation packages, typically held at annual meetings. It matters because the vote signals investor satisfaction with how leaders are paid—like customers rating how well managers are rewarded—and can push boards to change pay plans, reducing governance risk and affecting investor confidence and stock value even though the vote is usually advisory rather than legally binding.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

NOTICE OF EXEMPT SOLICITATION

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)

 

(Amendment No. )

 

1.Name of the Registrant:

Willis Lease Finance Corporation
2.Name of Person Relying on Exemption:

Four Tree Island Advisory LLC
3.Address of Person Relying on Exemption:

126 Daniel Street, Suite 120
Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801
4.Written Materials. The following written materials are attached:

Press Release, dated May 18, 2026.

* * *

Written material is submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-6(g)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This is not a solicitation of authority to vote any proxy. Four Tree Island Advisory LLC is not asking for your proxy card and will not accept proxy cards if sent. The cost of this filing is being borne entirely by Four Tree Island Advisory LLC and its affiliates.

PLEASE NOTE: Four Tree Island Advisory LLC is not asking for your proxy card and cannot accept your proxy card. Please DO NOT send us your proxy card.

 

(Written material follows on next page)

 

 

 

Four Tree Island Notes Leading Independent Proxy Advisors Recommend Willis Lease Finance Stockholders Vote “AGAINST” Director and Executive Compensation Proposals at Upcoming Annual Meeting

 

Believes the Company’s Dramatic Underperformance Relative to its Closest Peer, Soaring SG&A Expenses and Pattern of Dilution also Warrants Opposition to Proposal 2

 

Calls on Stockholders to Send a Clear Message of Dissatisfaction by Opposing All Proposals Other than Ratification of Independent Auditor

 

PORTSMOUTH, N.H., May 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Four Tree Island Advisory LLC (“Four Tree Island”), a top-10 stockholder of Willis Lease Finance Corporation (NASDAQ:WLFC) (“WLFC” or the “Company”) based on public information, today announced that leading independent proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC (“Glass Lewis”) have recommended that stockholders vote AGAINST the election of Stephen Jones and approval of the Company’s executive compensation at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on May 26, 2026 (the “Annual Meeting”). Four Tree Island continues to urge fellow stockholders to vote AGAINST all proposals other than the ratification of the independent auditor.

 

In its report, ISS noted “unmitigated pay-for-performance misalignment,” “problematic one-time awards” and that “the chairman’s base salary is relatively high, annual bonuses are outsized and discretionary, with undisclosed performance goals.”1

 

Similarly, in its report, Glass Lewis noted that “shareholders may reasonably question the substantial one-off grants provided to Mr. Charles Willis for a multitude of reasons” and that “the aggregate value of the non-forfeited grants also provides cause for substantial concern.”2

 

As stockholders consider the Company’s May 15th letter seeking investor support at the Annual Meeting, we believe it is critical to look past the headline performance claims and focus on what is really driving results and dilution at WLFC.

 

1.Revenue growth has come with negative operating leverage and outsized compensation

 

The Board points to revenue growth of roughly 160% over the last five years as evidence of “outstanding” performance. What it does not highlight is that, over the same period, EBITDA has increased only 89%, while SG&A – which is where stock-based and other compensation resides – has grown approximately 236%. In other words, compensation and overhead are growing dramatically faster than revenue and profits. This is not operating leverage in stockholders’ favor. It is management and the Willis family extracting value from the business through materially excessive, ever-expanding perquisites, equity and cash compensation.


1 Permission to quote ISS was neither sought nor received.

2 Permission to quote Glass Lewis was neither sought nor received.

 

 

2.WLFC has severely lagged its most relevant peer, FTAI Aviation

 

The Board cites WLFC’s total shareholder return vs. the Russell 3000, but that benchmark obscures the real issue. There is one truly relevant public comparable for WLFC: FTAI Aviation (FTAI). Over the last three- and five-year periods (through the date of the Company’s May 15th letter), WLFC has dramatically underperformed FTAI’s total shareholder returns by approximately 431% and 629%, respectively. We continue to believe this stark underperformance is a direct result of poor corporate governance, entrenched family control and compensation practices that prioritize insiders over common stockholders.

3.Proxy advisors’ support for the split does not cure governance and pay failures

 

The Board emphasizes that ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended in favor of the forward stock split and related increase in authorized shares, but that is only part of the story. First, we do not believe the proxy advisory firms have fully weighed the Company’s history of persistent, excessive dilution and stock-based compensation, or how the proposed increase in share authorization could further enable that pattern. Second, the Board conveniently omits that, as highlighted above, both ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended voting AGAINST the election of Stephen Jones and approval of the Company’s executive compensation. Glass Lewis further exposed the Company’s lack of efforts to address the stockholder concerns that led to low stockholder support for the say-on-pay proposal when it was last held three years ago. Rather than provide stockholders with regular input on its egregious pay practices – particularly those benefiting Willis family members – the Board continues to hold say-on-pay votes only once every three years, minimizing opportunities for stockholder dissent.

4.The recent convertible debt offering is a costly and dilutive use of the capital structure

 

Proposal 2 would triple the number of authorized shares and give the Company greater capacity to dilute existing investors. Stockholders should view this in the context of the Company’s recent convertible note transaction. On May 13, 2026, WLFC’s stock closed at $211.67, prior to the pricing of the new convertible notes. Two trading days later, the stock closed at $180.03 – a decline of roughly 15%, representing about $255 million of lost market capitalization based on fully diluted shares. Layer on the $6 million underwriting fee and $0.9 million in additional offering expenses, the total negative impact to stockholders approaches $262 million.

The 5-year convertible notes feature a conversion price of $268.80 per share. Economically, WLFC has effectively signaled that it does not expect to grow intrinsic value per share by much more than 4.9% annually over the next five years; any compounded return above that level will drive conversion and result in dilution of approximately 9.3% of the current fully diluted share count. In addition, the presence of convertible arbitrage investors is likely to increase volatility in WLFC’s stock as they trade around hedge positions. We struggle to see how using scarce equity capacity and incurring roughly $262 million of value impact, primarily to pay down a revolving credit facility and potentially cultivate additional Wall Street research coverage, is an acceptable outcome for long-term stockholders.

 

 

Taken together, these realities paint a very different picture from the one presented in WLFC’s May 15th letter. Revenue growth has been accompanied by deteriorating operating leverage and runaway compensation, the stock has significantly underperformed its closest peer, governance and pay practices remain deeply misaligned with stockholder interests, and the Company has just completed a highly dilutive and value-destructive convertible note financing while asking investors to authorize a tripling of the share count.

Four Tree Island Advisory therefore continues to urge WLFC stockholders to vote AGAINST all proposals at the Annual Meeting, except the ratification of the independent auditor.

THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF AUTHORITY TO VOTE YOUR PROXY AND DOES NOT REQUEST OR SEEK THE POWER TO ACT AS A PROXY FOR ANY STOCKHOLDER. DO NOT SEND US YOUR PROXY CARD. FOUR TREE ISLAND IS NOT ASKING FOR YOUR PROXY CARD AND WILL NOT ACCEPT PROXY CARDS IF SENT. FOUR TREE ISLAND IS NOT ABLE TO VOTE YOUR PROXY, NOR DOES THIS COMMUNICATION CONTEMPLATE SUCH AN EVENT.

 

Contact

Four Tree Island Advisory LLC

info@fourtreeislandadvisory.com

(603) 427-8053

 

FAQ

What does Four Tree Island urge WLFC (WLFC) shareholders to do?

Four Tree Island urges WLFC shareholders to vote AGAINST all proposals except auditor ratification, citing dilution, compensation, governance, and convertible note concerns in its solicitation letter.

How much market value does the letter attribute to the convertible note transaction?

The letter attributes about $255 million of lost market capitalization from a price decline and adds $6.0 million underwriting fee plus $0.9 million offering expenses, totaling roughly $262M in asserted impact.

What conversion terms and dilution figures are cited for the new notes?

The submission states the convertible notes carry a $268.80 conversion price and asserts conversion would create approximately 9.3% dilution of the current fully diluted share count if conversion occurs.

What governance and pay issues does Four Tree Island highlight at WLFC?

The communication criticizes persistent dilution, elevated stock‑based compensation, infrequent say‑on‑pay votes (every three years), and ISS/Glass Lewis recommendations against a director and prior compensation practices, per the letter.