BluSky AI (OTC: BSAI) pivots to AI data centers amid $4.5M loss
BluSky AI Inc., formerly mining-focused Inception Mining Inc., has pivoted to developing modular, AI-centric data centers under its “Neocloud” SkyMod concept, targeting 1–60 MW powered sites and GPU-as-a-Service offerings across multiple U.S. locations.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, BluSky AI reported a net loss of $4,515,516, significantly wider than 2024, on operating expenses driven largely by consulting and investor relations. Current assets were $1,122,661 (including $960,436 in cash) against current liabilities of $3,416,051, resulting in a working capital deficit and a stockholders’ deficit of $930,493. Accumulated deficit reached $34,378,880, and auditors expressed substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Positive
- None.
Negative
- Substantial 2025 net loss and deterioration: BluSky AI recorded a net loss of $4,515,516 for the year ended December 31, 2025, a sharp increase from $949,782 in 2024, driven by higher operating expenses and significant losses on extinguishment of debt.
- Going-concern warning and balance sheet deficits: As of December 31, 2025, the company reported a working capital deficit of $2,293,390, stockholders’ deficit of $930,493, and accumulated deficit of $34,378,880, leading auditors to express substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Insights
Pivot to AI data centers is bold but overshadowed by mounting losses and going-concern risk.
BluSky AI has exited legacy mining, rebranded, and is repositioning as a modular AI data center “Neocloud” provider using its SkyMod concept. Strategically, this aligns the company with fast-growing AI compute demand and leverages powered land and GPU-as-a-Service plans, but most initiatives remain at the planning and early-site-control stage.
Financially, the picture is strained. The 2025 net loss of $4,515,516 is a major deterioration versus 2024, driven by sharply higher general and administrative spending and heavy non-cash losses on debt extinguishment. As of December 31, 2025, current assets of $1,122,661 versus current liabilities of $3,416,051 leave a significant working capital deficit and stockholders’ deficit of $930,493.
Auditors have issued a going-concern warning based on recurring losses, negative operating cash flow of $1,156,258 in 2025, and limited cash. The company relied on equity and high-yield convertible debt, including 2025 Reg D notes converted into stock with sizeable losses on extinguishment. Execution of the AI strategy, future capital-raising terms, and any updates to the going-concern assessment in subsequent periods will be central to understanding its long-run viability.
Key Figures
Key Terms
Neocloud technical
SkyMod technical
going concern financial
penny stock regulatory
powered land technical
Reg D regulatory
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the fiscal year ended
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission
File No. –
(Name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
INCEPTION MINING INC.
(Former name of registrant)
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company:
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ||
| Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
If
securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant
included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D(b). ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
The
aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2025, was approximately $
The
number of shares of common stock outstanding on March 31, 2026, was
Documents Incorporated by Reference
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| PART I | ||
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS | 3 |
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 11 |
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 19 |
| ITEM 1C. | CYBERSECURITY | 19 |
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES | 20 |
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 20 |
| ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 20 |
| PART II | ||
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES | 21 |
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 23 |
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 23 |
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK | 28 |
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 29 |
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 29 |
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 29 |
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION | 30 |
| ITEM 9C. | DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS | 30 |
| PART III | ||
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 31 |
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 33 |
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 35 |
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 37 |
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES | 38 |
| PART IV | ||
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS | 39 |
| SIGNATURES | 40 |
| 2 |
| Table of Contents |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” refer to BluSky AI Inc., a Nevada corporation formerly known as Inception Mining Inc.
Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements.
Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (1) discussions about data centers, artificial intelligence, and high-performance computing, (2) our projected sales and profitability, (3) our growth strategies, (4) anticipated trends in our industry, (5) our future financing plans, (6) our anticipated needs for working capital, (7) our lack of operational experience and (8) the benefits related to ownership of our common stock. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements constitute forward-looking statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause results to vary include, without limitation, the following: economic, social and political conditions, global economic downturns resulting from extraordinary events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and other securities industry risks; interest rate risks; liquidity risks; credit risk with clients and counterparties; risk of liability for errors in clearing functions; systemic risk; systems failures, delays and capacity constraints; network security risks; competition; reliance on external service providers; new laws and regulations affecting our business; net capital requirements; extensive regulation, regulatory uncertainties and legal matters; failure to maintain relationships with employees, customers, business partners or governmental entities; the inability to achieve synergies or to implement integration plans and other consequences associated with risks and uncertainties detailed in our filings with the SEC, including our most recent filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” as well as in this filing generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under Item 1A below and other risks and matters described in this filing and in our other SEC filings. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur as projected. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
BluSky AI Inc. is a pre-fabricated modular data center provider specializing in artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC) that was originally formed in Nevada on July 2, 2007. The company is dedicated to delivering state-of-the-art infrastructure and solutions tailored to meet the demands of modern AI applications and computational workloads with a focus on innovation, scalability, and environmental sustainability.
Previously known as Inception Mining Inc., the company underwent a significant transformation and rebranding in March 2025 to align with its new strategic direction. This change reflects BluSky AI Inc.’s commitment to advancing technology and providing unparalleled services in the data center industry. The Company is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Historically, we operated within the mining industry, serving as a consultant to mining companies and as an operator of a mine engaged in the production of precious metals. From 2015 through January 24, 2023, the Company operated the Clavo Rico mine in Honduras through its wholly owned subsidiary, Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A de C.V. (“CMCS”) and other mining concessions.
| 3 |
| Table of Contents |
2023 Divestiture of the Clavo Rico Mine and Legacy Mining Matters
On January 12, 2023, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) with Mother Lode Mining, Inc. (“MLM” or “Mother Lode Mining”). The LOI became binding on January 24, 2023, when the final installment of initial payment set forth under the LOI was received by the Company.
Pursuant to the terms of the LOI, the Company agreed to sell all of the shares of its wholly owned subsidiary, Compañía Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A. de C.V. (“CMCS”), to MLM. CMCS is the Honduran-based company that owns the Clavo Rico mine.
Following the divestiture of the Clavo Rico Mine, the Company operated as a consultant and advisor to the mining industry, including to Mother Lode Mining in connection with the Clavo Rico mine. It also had an ongoing financial interest in the Clavo Rico Mine under the LOI. Pursuant to the terms of the LOI, the Company was entitled to receive cash payments totaling $2,700,000 through January 2025. These payments were secured by a 10% net smelter royalty on production from the Clavo Rico mine. The Company also held a carried-forward net profits interest royalty equal to 5% of mine production until cumulative payments reached $1,000,000, subject to certain allowable Clavo Rico operating expense offsets.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company did not receive any payments under the LOI, the Company believed Mother Lode Mining was in default, the Company recorded a full allowance for the outstanding receivable, and the Company pursued litigation to enforce its rights and recover amounts it believed it was owed under the LOI.
On February 4, 2026, the Company and Mother Lode Mining entered into a settlement agreement resolving all disputes in connection with the LOI and the Clavo Rico mine. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to a mutual dismissal with prejudice of all claims, counterclaims, and causes of action asserted or that could have been asserted in United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Case No. 2:24-cv-00171-TS-CMR, or in any other forum. As part of the settlement, the parties executed a mutual general release of all claims and potential claims against the other parties and their affiliates. Following the settlement, no further amounts are expected to be collected under the LOI.
Current Operations
BluSky AI Inc. is rapidly emerging as a pivotal force in the Neocloud ecosystem, with plans to deliver high-performance infrastructure tailored for artificial intelligence workloads. Unlike traditional hyperscalers, BluSky AI Inc. is a Neocloud purpose-built for artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) and high-performance computing (HPC). BluSky AI’s core infrastructure is defined by its rapidly deployable SkyMod data centers. SkyMods next-generation, scalable AI Factories provide speed-to-market and energy optimization to support high-performance machine learning workloads. BluSky AI plans to empower small, mid-sized, enterprise, and academic entities from start-up to scale-up to drive innovation without compromise.
SkyMods are pre-configured AI “factories” engineered to meet the surging demand for compute power driven by generative models, machine learning inference, and large-scale training pipelines. With operations anchored in Salt Lake City, BluSky AI is positioning itself as a nimble alternative to legacy cloud providers, offering speed-to-market and network scalability through planned multiple locations without the multi-year buildout timelines.
At the heart of BluSky AI’s offering is its GPU-as-a-Service model, which will provide clients with flexible access to top-tier GPUs, including plans for numerous configurations. This consumption-based model allows enterprises, research institutions, and startups to scale their AI workloads without the capital burden of owning and maintaining hardware. Each SkyMod unit—will be available in various configurations— and will come fully assembled and ready for plug-and-play operations, dramatically reducing deployment friction. BluSky AI’s planned infrastructure is optimized for low-latency networking, supporting model parallelism and high-throughput inference across multi-tenant environments.
As a Neocloud provider, BluSky AI is part of a new generation of AI-first infrastructure companies that prioritize performance, transparency, and agility. Neoclouds are defined by their ability to deliver bare-metal GPU access, simplified pricing, and orchestration tools that support hybrid and multi-cloud environments. BluSky AI’s approach aligns with this ethos, offering transparent hourly GPU rates and integrated support for AI-ready networking solutions from industry leaders. This plan positions BluSky AI to serve not just commercial clients, but also government and academic institutions seeking sovereign AI infrastructure with predictable cost structures.
| 4 |
| Table of Contents |
Operationally, BluSky AI plans to expand its Neocloud footprint through strategic site acquisitions and partnerships, which signals the company’s intent to scale its modular deployments across energy-rich regions. By leveraging existing energy infrastructure and deploying SkyMods in various zones, BluSky AI has the potential to sidestep the bottlenecks that plague traditional data center development. This decentralized, modular strategy not only has the potential to accelerate time-to-value for clients, but also could align with ESG goals around energy optimization and infrastructure reuse. In a market racing to meet AI’s insatiable demand, BluSky AI Inc. plans to build the backbone behind the intelligence to meet the industry’s needs as they continue to grow.
BluSky AI’s planned operational footprint includes a growing portfolio of strategically located sites across the western and central United States, each selected for power availability, scalability, and proximity to key transmission infrastructure. The company currently controls or has executed letters of intent for multiple properties intended to support near term and long-term deployment of its modular SkyMod AI Factory systems.
BluSky AI maintains a growing portfolio of development stage sites selected for power availability, scalability, and alignment with the company’s modular deployment strategy. In Milford, Utah, the Company controls 51 acres under a ground lease and is pursuing power to support initial deployment activities. The Company has also announced a letter of intent for a 0.375 acre site in Nephi, Utah, with an estimated 4 MW of available power.
In addition to these Utah locations, BluSky AI has entered into 9 additional letters of intent to acquire or lease sites totaling more than 100 acres. These prospective sites provide an estimated potential power capacity exceeding 150 MW and are intended to support the company’s continued expansion of its modular AI infrastructure footprint.
Collectively, these locations reflect BluSky AI’s strategy of targeting energy-rich, infrastructure-ready regions to accelerate deployment and meet rising demand for AI compute. Across its current portfolio, the Company’s potential power capacity exceeds 250 MW, supporting both near-term activation and scalable long-term growth.
BluSky AI Operations
The Company is focusing its operations on artificial intelligence compute infrastructure and participating in the dynamic and expanding AI industry. The Company has plans to grow its AI operations organically. BluSky AI was established by drawing on extensive industry expertise, insights from outside experts, and a careful evaluation of current conditions in the data center markets. The innovative concept is built around a pre-fabricated modular design that leverages existing power infrastructure. BluSky AI plans to develop multiple modular data center sites across various U.S. jurisdictions, with artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) focus, specifically targeting facilities with the potential to develop power capacity or utilize existing power capacities. Many of these sites may have been in process for years. This strategy enables a potentially faster time to market, scalable deployment, and a cost-effective approach that meets the evolving needs of the data center market.
BluSky AI is planning to revolutionize the artificial intelligence compute landscape by addressing the immediate global supply shortage with a cutting-edge, turnkey solution. Our strategy centers on rapidly deployable, plug-and-play, modular compute centers called SkyMods on powered land assets—sites that already possess permitted energy infrastructure. This approach not only accelerates time to market but also positions BluSky AI as a premier AI compute infrastructure provider dedicated to meeting the surging demand for advanced AI services.
BluSky AI’s Neocloud—A Next-Generation Compute Infrastructure
BluSky AI Inc. is planned as a Neocloud purpose-built for artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) and high-performance computing (HPC). BluSky AI’s planned core infrastructure is defined by its rapidly deployable SkyMod data centers. SkyMods next-generation, scalable AI Factories provide speed-to-market and energy optimization to support high-performance machine learning workloads. With plans to scale across multiple sites and deliver high compute capacity (ranging from 1 MW to 60 MW per site), BluSky AI plans to provide a client-tailored scalability to empower small, mid-sized, enterprise, and academic partners from start-up to scale-up to drive innovation without compromise.
| 5 |
| Table of Contents |
The company’s mission is to empower AI innovators by eliminating infrastructure bottlenecks and accelerating time-to-compute with energy-efficient, scalable solutions.
Meeting the AI Compute Shortfall
BluSky AI’s plan is to design leading AI compute provisioning. By placing our modular units on strategic locations, with existing power where available, and plans will provide the essential backbone for AI inferences—enabling trained AI models to recognize patterns and draw conclusions on demand. Our unique offering may minimize technical deployment risks while maximizing opportunities for immediate incremental revenue generation and rapid market capture.
Our Neocloud developing portfolio of SkyMod AI factories plans to serve as a core infrastructure asset for the massive need for AI compute that is currently 3x the amount of the current data center capacity, providing strategic growth and innovation in the era of IoT and big data.
We are targeting initial sites ranging from 1 MW to 60 MW across various states, targeting robust geographic diversification to capture regional and global demand.
We are committed to delivering cutting-edge, environmentally conscious, and modular compute solutions that will empower AI companies to realize their full potential, driving the next generation of AI applications and safeguarding data with the industry leading-level security.
We believe BluSky AI’s unique approach to its future operations—combining turnkey-powered land assets, rapid deployment, and scalable modular compute centers— could deliver the critical infrastructure needed to bridge the AI compute gap that exists in the marketplace today. While today’s market focus is primarily on the 80% demand coming from Large Language and Training Models, 80% of the future demand will rely on inferencing needing low-latency millisecond compute. Our solutions not only address today’s pressing needs but also lay a solid foundation for AI inference for sustained growth and technological advancement in the future of AI.
BluSky AI’s plans are built around a revenue model focused on delivering modular data center solutions that leverage existing power infrastructure for rapid, scalable, and cost-effective deployments. The company will generate revenue primarily through:
| ● | Leasing and Subscription Services: BluSky AI plans to provide a modular, turnkey data center solutions to customers on a subscription or leasing basis. These planned services include the design, deployment, and ongoing management of facilities tailored to support power capacities of less than 50MW, which accelerates time to market and reduces capital expenditure compared to traditional builds. | |
| ● | Integrated Infrastructure Services: Beyond physical infrastructure, BluSky AI plans to offer advanced operational monitoring, predictive maintenance, and energy management analytics. These value-added services may help clients optimize performance and minimize downtime, creating additional revenue streams. | |
| ● | Strategic Partnerships and Government Contracts: With a growing demand for secure, sustainable, and energy-efficient data center operations, BluSky AI plans to position itself to serve a diverse customer base—including private enterprises and governmental agencies. Current negotiations are underway with chip partners and others who have client bases that they also need to serve through potential BluSky AI’s solutions. This dependency on revenue-generating activities from both commercial and public sectors is key to its expansion strategy. |
| 6 |
| Table of Contents |
Key plans for products and service families revolve around pre-fabricated modular data center designs, scalable power and cooling solutions, and integrated management systems—all aimed at delivering predictable quality and cost efficiency. This planned operational focus not only drives revenue but also underpins the company’s broader strategy to expand its footprint across multiple U.S. jurisdictions while meeting the evolving needs of high-value clients, including government, education, and others.
BluSky AI plans include accelerating its development efforts to enhance its suite of SkyMod AI factories. The company’s R&D team is developing new modules that integrate advanced power management, enhanced cooling, and remote monitoring capabilities, which are designed to improve deployment speed and scalability. These enhancements target facilities with existing power infrastructure under 60MW, a segment that is seeing robust market demand due to the growing need for sustainable, cost-effective, and rapidly deployable data centers.
Market trends indicate a steady increase in demand for modular data centers driven by rising energy efficiency requirements and the need for quicker, scalable solutions. Competitive conditions are intensifying as traditional hyperscale data center operators and emerging off-grid, sustainable providers vie for market share. In response, BluSky AI is strategically refining its business plans and product offerings and operational efficiencies while building relationships to forge key partnerships with both commercial enterprises and governmental customers. This dual focus not only supports its revenue generation strategy but also positions the company to remain competitive in a dynamic and rapidly evolving market landscape.
Pricing Program for Modular AI Data Center
Our pricing program in development will be structured to provide flexibility and transparency for AI workloads. It balances resource utilization with modular scalability, catering to training, inference, and mixed AI workflows.
Development plans include:
Base Structure
Individual blocks of power support a defined compute capacity, which is billed based on:
-Resource Usage (Compute Time, Memory, and Storage)
-Workload Type (Training vs. Inference)
-Service Plan (On-Demand vs. Reserved)
Key Benefits
Key benefits may include:
1. Scalability: Modular increments allow gradual scaling up to meet demand.
2. Cost Efficiency: Discounts for reserved plans and spot pricing reduce long-term costs.
3. Flexibility: Tailored configurations for training, inference, or mixed workloads.
4. Sustainability: Carbon-neutral options available, appealing to ESG-conscious clients.
Usage Metrics
BluSky AI data centers plans to offer usage metrics calculated by the amount of compute time utilized, measured in CPU and GPU hours. Customers will be billed according to the number of hours their CPUs or GPUs are in use, with GPU pricing typically being higher than CPU pricing due to the greater processing power offered by GPUs.
Compute Time (CPU/GPU Hours)
- Customers are billed based on the number of hours the CPUs or GPUs are used.
- GPU pricing is typically higher than CPU pricing due to greater processing power.
| 7 |
| Table of Contents |
Resource Allocation
Resource allocation charges are determined by the number of cores, GPUs, or accelerators allocated, as well as their respective performance levels. High-performance GPUs incur higher costs compared to entry-level models due to their enhanced capabilities.
Memory Usage
Memory usage charges may be based on the amount of RAM used per hour or the specific memory tier utilized for training or inference workloads.
Storage Costs
Storage costs include charges for high-speed storage used during compute processes, such as NVMe SSDs, as well as fees for long-term data storage.
Type of Workload
The type of workload affects pricing, with training and inference being the primary factors. Training large models, such as deep learning networks, requires significantly more resources and is priced higher. In contrast, inference, which involves deploying models for predictions, is less resource-intensive and generally incurs lower costs.
Reserved vs. On-Demand Pricing
With On-Demand pricing, customers pay a premium for immediate access to resources without any long-term commitment. In contrast, reserved or subscription pricing provides discounts for reserving resources for a longer period or for bulk usage.
Pricing tiers for specific hardware configurations
The Standard tier offers low-cost, general-purpose resources suitable for small-scale tasks. The High-Performance tier, on the other hand, comes with premium pricing for advanced GPUs or clusters, designed to handle complex AI workloads.
Location and Energy Costs
Location and energy costs play a significant role in pricing. Regions with lower energy costs or tax incentives for renewable energy typically offer lower pricing. However, carbon-neutral or sustainable data centers may charge a premium for green computing initiatives.
Additional Costs
Additional costs may include networking fees for data transfer in and out of the data center or between regions, as well as charges for software licenses related to proprietary AI frameworks, tools, or libraries. Additionally, support services such as technical assistance, managed services, or custom optimization may incur extra fees.
Colocation Data Centers
Colocation data centers typically charge flat fees for rack space, power, and cooling, with additional charges applied for compute usage.
Emerging Trends
Emerging trends in data center pricing and operations include several innovative approaches. Pay-As-You-Go pricing is ideal for startups or workloads with unpredictable demands, allowing customers to pay only for the resources they use. Spot Pricing offers discounts for utilizing idle resources during non-peak times, which can help reduce costs. Custom AI Accelerators, like Google’s TPU, are increasingly being used in data centers, offering competitive pricing tailored for specific AI tasks.
| 8 |
| Table of Contents |
BluSky AI’s approach to building its modular data centers will rely on a complex, carefully managed supply chain and sourcing strategy. BluSky AI has already developed key vendor relationships and solution partners over the prior years of working in the hyperscale environment. The company will leverage existing on-site power infrastructures and renewable energy options, such as solar, hydrogen, or even alternative on-site grid systems. This helps to accelerate deployments and reduce the need for extensive new power installations, although securing reliable, sustainable power often involves long lead times for specialized components like hydrogen fuel cells or advanced renewable integration systems, and can be impacted by regional regulatory constraints.
BluSky AI plans to focus on sites in various U.S. jurisdictions, specifically targeting facilities with power capacities under 50MW. However, acquiring suitable land with the necessary zoning, infrastructure, and environmental clearances can be time-consuming and competitive, as prime locations are in high demand.
For equipment sourcing, BluSky AI will need to procure critical items such as transformers, switch gear, servers, CPUs, GPUs, LPUs, racks, and cooling solutions. These components are essential for ensuring efficient power distribution and supporting high-performance computing workloads. However, these items often come with long lead times due to their customizability, regulatory compliance requirements, and the current global supply chain constraints, such as semiconductor shortages. Specialized racks and advanced cooling systems, like rear-door heat exchangers and liquid cooling modules, are also vital for handling the substantial heat loads generated by modern AI deployments. These systems require extensive engineering and have lengthy procurement cycles.
By balancing these sourcing strategies and navigating industry constraints, BluSky AI is targeting to deliver scalable, efficient, and cost-effective data center solutions that meet the evolving needs of its diverse customer base, including revenue-generating activities from commercial and governmental clients.
BluSky AI’s operational model is being built on leveraging open standards and modular, scalable solutions that do not hinge on proprietary intellectual property rights. In fact, the company does not currently hold patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, or concessions that affect its core operations. This approach provides several advantages:
| ● | Flexibility and Agility: By not being tied to a proprietary IP portfolio, BluSky AI can rapidly adapt to technological advances and market shifts without concerns about the expiration or enforcement of specific patents or licenses. | |
| ● | Open Standards & Collaboration: The company embraces open-source frameworks and industry best practices—such as those embodied in the AT Protocol—allowing for interoperability and a more transparent development environment. This strategy reduces reliance on exclusive technologies and minimizes risks associated with the duration or changes in IP rights. | |
| ● | Cost Efficiency: Avoiding significant investments in proprietary IP frees up resources that can be redirected toward R&D, scaling operations, and forming strategic partnerships. The operational model thus remains cost-effective and resilient in a competitive, fast-evolving market. |
Overall, BluSky AI does not see an impact on its operations related to the duration or effect of patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, or concessions, allowing it to focus on innovation and scalable deployment without being encumbered by restrictive intellectual property concerns.
BluSky AI faces several risks associated with its modular data center model, reliance on GPUs, and constraints in the U.S. energy grid, as well as potential exposure to government contract renegotiation or termination.
In summary, BluSky AI’s planned operations are designed to meet constant, year-round needs. This non-seasonal nature is a significant strength, allowing the company to focus on scalable, long-term growth while mitigating risks associated with fluctuating market cycles. Grandview Research estimates a 35.9% annual CAGR in this market over the next 7 years.
| 9 |
| Table of Contents |
BluSky AI plans to operate in a highly competitive data center market that is rapidly evolving alongside the surge in demand for AI computing, particularly GPU on demand services. Here are some key points regarding the competitive landscape and growth prospects:
| ● | Competitive Environment in Data Centers: | |
| BluSky AI faces competition from traditional hyperscale data center providers (like AWS, Google, and Microsoft) as well as specialized modular data center firms. Its focus on deploying pre-fabricated modular solutions that integrate with existing power infrastructure gives it a competitive edge that may offer faster deployment, lower capital costs, and scalability. However, the market is crowded, and large players benefit from economies of scale and long-established supply chains. | ||
| ● | GPU on Demand and AI Workloads: | |
| The demand for GPUs has skyrocketed as AI workloads intensify. BluSky AI plans to target this growing segment with the intent to offer flexible, high-density computing solutions. Despite robust market growth, global semiconductor supply constraints and fierce competition from major GPU vendors such as NVIDIA and AMD present challenges. BluSky AI is investing in supply chain resilience and strategic partnerships with multiple vendors to secure a steady supply of GPUs to meet customer needs. | ||
| ● | Growth Dynamics: | |
| With the increasing importance of AI across industries, the overall market for data centers and GPU-powered infrastructure is expected to continue growing. BluSky AI’s pre-fabricated modular approach may allow it to capture a portion of this growth by meeting the rising demand for energy-efficient, rapidly deployable data centers that can scale as client requirements evolve. This growth is fueled by the need for continuous, non-seasonal computing capacity, particularly in sectors like government, finance, and healthcare. | ||
| ● | Risks and Strategic Considerations: | |
| While BluSky AI is well-positioned, it must navigate industry challenges such as long lead times for critical components, energy grid constraints in certain regions, and potential disruptions in the semiconductor supply chain. Additionally, competitive pressures may force frequent innovations or strategic adjustments, particularly as larger players ramp up their AI and GPU offerings. |
Compliance with Government Regulation
Since the divestiture of CMCS and the Clavo Rico mine in January 2023, we are no longer subject to the mining regulations of Honduras.
The Company’s policy is to conduct our business in a manner that safeguards public health and mitigates the environmental effects of our business activities. To comply with these laws and regulations, we have made, and in the future may be required to make, capital and operating expenditures.
In the U.S., federal guidelines like the Federal Data Center Enhancement Act focus on cybersecurity, resiliency, and energy efficiency. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/933/text
In 2023, the European Union introduced the revised Energy Efficiency Directive (EED, EU/2023/1791) that requires data centers to report energy efficiency data to the European Commission. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en
| 10 |
| Table of Contents |
Data centers have a significant environmental footprint, and compliance with environmental regulations is critical, including with respect to the following:
- Air Quality: Backup generators require air permits and adherence to emission standards.
- Water Management: Cooling systems often need permits for water usage and discharge.
- Hazardous Materials: Proper storage and disposal of materials like batteries and used oil are essential.
Capital Equipment and Research & Development Expenditures
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we did not incur any expenses related to research and development.
Employees
As of the date of this filing, we currently employ 5 full-time employees and 4 part-time employees in the United States. We have contracts with various independent contractors and consultants to fulfill additional needs, including investor relations and other administrative functions, and may staff further with employees as we expand activities and bring new projects online. We are negotiating managed services contracts with top vendors to utilize their employees and expertise in data management to negate the need to initially expand a large BluSky AI’s staff with growth.
Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts
We do not currently own any patents or trademarks. Also, we are not a party to any license or franchise agreements, concessions, or labor contracts arising from any patents. trademarks, or royalty agreements.
Company Information
The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov. Further information about the Company may be found at its website: www.bluskyaidatacenters.com. The Company makes available its filings to investors, free of charge, on this website.
Reports to Security Holders
You may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also find all the reports that we have filed electronically with the SEC at their Internet site www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following risks, along with all of the other information included in this report, before deciding to buy our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. If we are unable to prevent events that have a negative effect from occurring, then our business may suffer.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY
We rely on third parties and disruptions in the supply chain could cause significant delays.
One of the primary risks comes from its reliance on modular data center providers. Any disruptions in the supply chain, such as delays in manufacturing, installation, or shipping, could affect deployment schedules. Furthermore, standardization challenges across different jurisdictions may require design adjustments, increasing both costs and deployment times. The need for specialized equipment, such as liquid cooling systems for high-performance AI workloads, also introduces compatibility risks with various modular providers. Another significant risk revolves around the GPU supply chain and performance. GPUs are essential for BluSky AI’s high-performance computing infrastructure, particularly for AI and machine learning workloads. However, the global semiconductor supply chain remains volatile, with shortages, geopolitical restrictions, and high demand from cloud and AI companies impacting availability and pricing. BluSky AI’s dependence on a few major GPU manufacturers, such as NVIDIA and AMD, increases procurement risks, as delays or price hikes from these suppliers can directly affect operational costs and scalability.
| 11 |
| Table of Contents |
We rely on the existing U.S. energy grid.
Additionally, there are risks related to the U.S. energy grid. The growing demand for data centers, combined with aging energy infrastructure in some regions, poses a risk to BluSky AI’s ability to secure reliable power for its facilities. Regulatory restrictions on energy consumption and sustainability requirements may also affect site selection and operational costs. Power-intensive AI workloads require stable energy supplies, and any potential grid instabilities could necessitate costly backup solutions, such as on-site renewables or energy storage systems. For BluSky AI’s government contracts, any portion of its business tied to these agreements may be subject to renegotiation of profits or termination at the government’s discretion. Changes in federal or state regulations, budget reallocations, or shifts in policy could impact existing agreements, and government contracts often include termination clauses, meaning the government can end agreements without cause, potentially leading to financial losses. Additionally, the company must comply with evolving security and data protection requirements in government contracts, which may require additional investment in infrastructure and regulatory compliance measures.
We operate in a highly competitive and growing market.
BluSky AI operates in a highly competitive data center market that is rapidly evolving in response to the growing demand for AI computing, particularly GPU on-demand services. The company faces competition from traditional hyperscale data center providers like AWS, Google, and Microsoft, as well as specialized modular data center firms.
The demand for GPUs has skyrocketed with the intensifying AI workloads, and BluSky AI targets this expanding segment by offering flexible, high-density computing solutions. However, global semiconductor supply constraints and fierce competition from major GPU vendors such as NVIDIA and AMD present challenges. BluSky AI must navigate industry challenges such as long lead times for critical components, energy grid constraints, and potential disruptions in the semiconductor supply chain. Moreover, competitive pressures may force frequent innovations or strategic adjustments, especially as larger players ramp up their AI and GPU offerings.
An occurrence of an uncontrollable event such as the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations.
The occurrence of an uncontrollable event such as the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations. A pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantine, and this may limit access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors. These factors, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for our goods and services but our overall ability to react timely to mitigate the impact of this event. Also, it may hamper our efforts to comply with our filing obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We have incurred losses since our inception in 2007 and may never be profitable, which raises doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Since our inception in 2007, we have incurred operating losses. As of December 31, 2025, our accumulated deficit since inception was $34,378,880. We have substantial current obligations and at December 31, 2025, we had $3,416,051 of current liabilities as compared to $1,122,661 of current assets. During the year ending December 31, 2025, we have been able to raise minimal capital, and we have minimal cash on hand. Accordingly, the Company does not have sufficient cash resources or current assets to pay its current obligations, and we have been meeting many of our obligations through the issuance of our common stock to our employees, consultants, and advisors as payment for goods and services.
Our management continues to search for additional financing; however, considering the difficult U.S. and global economic conditions along with the substantial turmoil in the capital and credit markets, there is a significant possibility that we will be unable to obtain financing to continue our operations.
| 12 |
| Table of Contents |
These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which is further described in an explanatory paragraph to our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, investors will likely lose all of their investment in our company.
We are Subject to Legal Proceedings.
We are subject to legal proceedings and litigation, which can be expensive and unpredictable.
We do not currently carry any property or casualty insurance.
Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally, including but not limited to potential disruptions from natural disasters, such as earthquakes or floods, which could impact data center operations. Cybersecurity threats pose another significant risk, as data centers are prime targets for malicious attacks. Additionally, the company must navigate regulatory compliance challenges, particularly in meeting environmental standards and data protection laws. Market volatility and competition in the rapidly evolving AI and HPC sectors also present operational risks.
Such occurrences could result in damage to our properties, equipment, and infrastructure, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. You could lose all or part of your investment if any such catastrophic event occurs. We do not carry any property or casualty insurance at this time (but we will carry all insurances that we are required to by law, such as motor vehicle and workers’ compensation, plus other coverage that may be in the best interest of the Company). Even if we do obtain insurance, it may not cover all of the risks associated with our operations. Insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and operations are often not available to us or to other companies in our business on acceptable terms. Should any events against which we are not insured occur, we may become subject to substantial losses, costs, and liabilities, which will adversely affect our financial condition.
We face high competition in the AI compute data center industry.
The data center industry is characterized by intense competition. BluSky AI Inc. faces rivals ranging from large, established players to nimble emerging companies. These competitors generally have more extensive financial resources, advanced technology, and larger technical staffs, placing BluSky AI at a relative disadvantage.
We face resource acquisition challenges due to our size and recent expansion into these operations.
Competing companies often have the greater financial muscle to secure highly desirable properties, equipment, and technical expertise. This imbalance may hinder BluSky AI’s ability to compete for necessary capital and strategic partnerships, ultimately affecting growth prospects.
The existing scarcity of Powered Lands makes our potential acquisitions more expensive and we face increased competition in making acquisitions.
“Powered land” in the context of data centers refers to land that is pre-equipped with a committed power infrastructure, often including a signed agreement with a utility provider. This ensures that the site has a guaranteed power load available, typically ranging from 50 to 1000 MW, before construction begins. Such arrangements significantly reduce delays and risks associated with securing power during the development phase.
There is a limited availability of quality properties that would be potential business targets for our business.
BluSky AI’s business model depends on securing powered lands and valuable mineral properties for data center exploration. However, there is a limited supply of such lands, especially in high-demand regions like the United States. Larger competitors, with established networks and deeper pockets, are often better positioned to claim or lease these sites.
| 13 |
| Table of Contents |
We face acquisition disadvantages due to our size and lack of funding.
The competitive market for mineral lands means BluSky AI may face higher acquisition costs or be unable to secure properties that meet its operational requirements. This scarcity can delay project timelines and limit geographic expansion, thereby reducing the company’s competitive edge.
We face ongoing challenges in retaining talent and recruiting contractors with expertise in our industry.
In addition to competing for physical assets, BluSky AI faces stiff competition in recruiting and retaining skilled professionals. Larger companies can offer more attractive compensation packages and benefits, which may impede BluSky AI’s efforts to build and maintain a high-caliber technical and operational team. The inability to secure or retain top talent not only affects day-to-day operations but also limits the company’s ability to innovate and execute its long-term strategy. This talent gap can lead to delays in property development and operation, further disadvantaging the company relative to its competitors.
Our operations require high infrastructure costs.
Developing and operating data centers is capital-intensive. BluSky AI must invest heavily in infrastructure to compete effectively. Limited financial resources, compared to competitors, can constrain the company’s ability to fund rapid expansion and state-of-the-art technology deployment.
We may experience difficulty raising capital to fund our operations
The need for continuous investment in property acquisition, infrastructure development, and talent recruitment increases the company’s dependency on raising capital. Difficulty in securing adequate funding could lead to reduced operational capacity, stalled expansion plans, and, ultimately, material adverse effects on business performance.
We depend on our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and the loss of this individual could adversely affect our business.
Our company is completely dependent on Trent D’Ambrosio, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. D’Ambrosio is also a member of our Board of Directors. The loss of Mr. D’Ambrosio could significantly and adversely affect our business and could even result in a complete failure of the Company. We do not carry any life insurance on the life of Mr. D’Ambrosio.
Rapid technological change may result in our technology becoming obsolete or in our competitors having an advantage.
BluSky AI’s reliance on cutting-edge AI compute technology, including quantum encryption and advanced GPU chip technology, exposes the company to the risk of rapid technological obsolescence. New developments by competitors or unforeseen technical challenges may render current solutions less competitive or require significant reinvestment.
The timelines for integration and deployment may cause uncertainty and unpredictability in our results of operations.
While the modular container centers are designed for rapid deployment, any delays in installation, integration of renewable energy sources, or unforeseen engineering challenges may extend timelines and impair revenue recognition.
Our component and infrastructure dependency may result in supply chain delays and disruption.
The Company’s model depends heavily on securing critical components—from renewable energy infrastructure (solar, wind, geothermal) to GPU chips. Disruptions in these supply chains or changes in supplier terms could lead to increased costs or reduced capacity expansion.
| 14 |
| Table of Contents |
We rely on strategic partnerships with third parties to advance our business strategy.
Partnerships with key technology suppliers and energy infrastructure providers are central to BluSky AI’s strategy. Any breakdown or change in these relationships could impact deployment capabilities and market competitiveness.
There is uncertainty that the markets will adopt AI compute infrastructure as it is a relatively new industry.
While demand for AI compute infrastructure is surging, there remains uncertainty about the pace of market adoption, customer retention, and the ability to scale operations profitably amid evolving client needs.
We face a changing regulatory landscape and increasing compliance costs that must be paid to continue our operations.
Operating on powered land assets and harnessing renewable energy exposes the company to diverse regulatory and permitting environments. Changes in local, state, or federal regulations—especially those related to energy use and environmental standards—could delay project timelines or increase costs.
Ensuring compliance with evolving industry, environmental, and cybersecurity standards may necessitate additional investments in technology and personnel, impacting overall margins.
We face advanced security requirements and risks due to cybersecurity and data protection regulations.
Although BluSky AI leverages quantum encryption to enhance data protection, the integration of such advanced security measures is not without risk. Potential vulnerabilities in the evolving technology or sophisticated cyberattacks could compromise client data and damage the company’s reputation.
We require additional, significant capital to fund our expansion; none of which is committed at this time.
Rapid deployment across multiple sites and the significant capital expenditure required for modular scalability might strain financial resources. Inadequate funding or unfavorable capital market conditions could hamper growth and increase dilution risks for current shareholders. Difficulties in coordinating large-scale, geographically diverse projects may result in inefficiencies and increased operational costs.
Our commitment to sustainability adds additional costs and obligations to our business.
The focus on green power and renewable energy, while a competitive differentiator, also exposes the company to risks if renewable energy prices fluctuate or if new environmental regulations are enacted that affect operational costs.
We face reputational risks if we experience bad publicity or adverse results in our operations.
As a public company, BluSky AI’s commitment to sustainability and security must be consistently upheld. Any lapses in ESG performance or publicized operational failures could lead to reputational damage and reduced investor confidence.
We face regional operational challenges that may result in additional administrative expense and complexity in our operations.
While geographic diversification offers resilience, it also introduces complexity. Variations in local regulatory environments, infrastructure readiness, and market demand across different states or regions may result in inconsistent performance and increased management challenges.
These risk factors, while not exhaustive, highlight key areas where BluSky AI Inc. may face uncertainties that could impact its business model, operational performance, and financial outcomes. Investors and stakeholders should consider these factors alongside the company’s strategic initiatives and market opportunities when evaluating its long-term prospects.
| 15 |
| Table of Contents |
Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In their audit opinion issued in connection with our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2025, and our related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern given our recurring net losses, negative cash flows from operations and the limited amount of funds on our balance sheet. We have prepared our financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence. This could make it more difficult to raise capital in the future.
Risks Associated with Our Common Stock
Trading on the Over-the-Counter markets may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.
Our common stock is quoted on the OTCID Basic Market tier of the OTC Link ATS (alternative trading system), the over-the-counter markets administered by OTC Markets Group, Inc., under the symbol “BSAI,” but the common stock is currently not eligible for proprietary broker-dealer quotations. Trading in stock quoted on over-the-counter markets is often thin, volatile, and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due to many factors that may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the Over-the-Counter markets are not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the over-the-counter markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on other stock exchanges such as the NASDAQ Stock Market, NYSE American stock exchange. Accordingly, our shareholders may have difficulty reselling any of their shares.
Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations and the FINRA’s sales practice requirements, which may limit a stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock.
Our stock is a penny stock. The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. The term accredited investor refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customers’ account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage broker-dealer and investor interest in, and limit the marketability of, our common stock.
Our common stock may be affected by limited trading volume and price fluctuation which could adversely impact the value of our common stock.
There has been limited trading in our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active trading market in our common stock will either develop or be maintained. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. These fluctuations may also cause short sellers to periodically enter the market in the belief that we will have poor results in the future. We cannot predict the actions of market participants and, therefore, can offer no assurances that the market for our common stock will be stable or appreciated over time.
| 16 |
| Table of Contents |
FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock.
In addition to the penny stock rules promulgated by the SEC, which are discussed in the immediately preceding risk factor, FINRA rules require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit the ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market value for our shares.
Because the SEC imposes additional sales practice requirements on brokers who deal in shares of penny stocks, some brokers may be unwilling to trade our securities. This means that you may have difficulty reselling your shares, which may cause the value of your investment to decline.
Our shares have recently been classified as penny stocks and are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities in this offering or in the aftermarket. For sales of our securities, broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination and receive a written agreement prior from you to making a sale on your behalf. Because of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices, it is possible that broker-dealers will not want to make a market in our common stock. This could prevent you from reselling your shares and may cause the value of your investment to decline.
A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital, it may adversely impact our ability to continue operations and we may go out of business.
A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because we may attempt to acquire a significant portion of the funds we need in order to conduct our planned operations through the sale of equity securities, or convertible debt instruments, a decline in the price of our common stock could be detrimental to our liquidity and our operations because the decline may cause investors to not choose to invest in our stock. If we are unable to raise the funds we require for all our planned operations, we may be forced to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may suffer a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. As a result, our business may suffer, and not be successful and we may go out of business. We also might not be able to meet our financial obligations if we cannot raise enough funds through the sale of our common stock and we may be forced to go out of business.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The stock market in general has experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
| ● | changes in our industry; | |
| ● | competitive pricing pressures; | |
| ● | our ability to obtain working capital financing; | |
| ● | additions or departures of key personnel; | |
| ● | limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market prices of our common stock; |
| 17 |
| Table of Contents |
| ● | sales of our common stock; | |
| ● | our ability to execute our business plan; | |
| ● | operating results that fall below expectations; | |
| ● | loss of any strategic relationship; | |
| ● | regulatory developments; | |
| ● | economic and other external factors; and | |
| ● | period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results. |
In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future.
We have not paid a cash dividend on our common stock to date, and we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends will depend on our ability to successfully develop one or more properties and generate revenue from operations. Notwithstanding, we will likely elect to retain any earnings, if any, to finance our growth. Future dividends may also be limited by bank loan agreements or other financing instruments that we may enter into in the future. The declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which, shareholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
Federal legislation, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, among others, has resulted in the adoption of various corporate governance measures designed to promote the integrity of the corporate management and the securities markets. Some of these measures have been adopted in response to legal requirements. Others have been adopted by companies in response to the requirements of national securities exchanges, such as the NYSE or The NASDAQ Stock Market, on which their securities are listed. Among the corporate governance measures that are required under the rules of national securities exchanges and NASDAQ are those that address board of directors’ independence, audit committee oversight and the adoption of a code of ethics. We have not yet adopted any of these corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not listed on a national securities exchange or NASDAQ, we are not required to do so. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, shareholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of audit, nominating and compensation committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.
Difficulties we may encounter managing our growth could adversely affect our results of operations.
As our business needs expand, we may need to hire a significant number of employees. This expansion may place a significant strain on our managerial and financial resources. To manage the potential growth of our operations and personnel, we will be required to:
| ● | improve existing, and implement new, operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures; | |
| ● | install enhanced management information systems; and | |
| ● | train, motivate, and manage our employees. |
| 18 |
| Table of Contents |
We may not be able to install adequate management information and control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and our current or planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, our business would be seriously harmed.
If we lose key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully manage our business and achieve our objectives.
We believe our future success will depend upon our ability to retain our key management, primarily Mr. D’Ambrosio, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We may not be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining our employees in the future.
Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market upon the expiration of any statutory holding period, under Rule 144, or issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY
Data security within a data center:
Is provided by a combination of dedicated security personnel, advanced technologies, and stringent protocols. This includes physical security measures like access control systems, surveillance, and security personnel, as well as cybersecurity measures like firewalls, intrusion detection, and data encryption.
1. Physical Security:
| ● | Access Control: Only authorized personnel are allowed access to specific areas of the data center, often using biometric scanners, keycards, and PIN codes. | |
| ● | Surveillance: CCTV cameras and motion sensors monitor the premises around the clock, deterring unauthorized access and identifying suspicious activities. | |
| ● | Security Personnel: Trained security guards patrol the perimeter and inside the building, ensuring 24/7 protection. | |
| ● | Perimeter Security: Fencing, security gates, and other measures restrict access to the data center facility. | |
| ● | Key Management: Strict procedures are in place for issuing, controlling, and auditing physical keys, ensuring they are not lost or misused. |
| 19 |
| Table of Contents |
2. Cybersecurity:
| ● | Firewalls and Intrusion Detection Systems: These technologies monitor network traffic and block unauthorized access, protecting against cyberattacks. | |
| ● | Data Encryption: Sensitive data is encrypted both in transit and at rest, making it unreadable to unauthorized parties. | |
| ● | Network Segmentation: Isolating different parts of the network to prevent the spread of malware and other threats. | |
| ● | Security Operations Centers (SOCs): Dedicated teams monitor the data center for security incidents and respond to threats in real-time. | |
| ● | Vulnerability Management: Regular assessments and patching of systems and software to address security vulnerabilities. | |
| ● | Compliance: Adherence to industry standards and regulations, such as PCI DSS for processing payment card information. | |
| ● | Remote Security Management: Cloud-based security management systems enable staff to monitor and manage security remotely from secure devices. | |
| ● | Secure Building Management Systems: Securing access to remote technicians who maintain the building, and ensuring that the systems that manage the building are also secured. |
Risk Management and Strategy
As one of the critical elements of our overall ERM approach, our cybersecurity efforts are focused on the following key areas:
| ● | Governance:
| |
| ● | Collaborative Approach: We have implemented a cross-functional approach to identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats and incidents, while also implementing controls and procedures that provide for the prompt escalation of certain cybersecurity incidents so that decisions regarding the public disclosure and reporting of such incidents can be made by management in a timely manner. | |
| ● | Technical Safeguards: We deploy technical safeguards that are designed to protect our information systems from cybersecurity threats, including firewalls, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware functionality and access controls, which are evaluated and improved through vulnerability assessments and cybersecurity threat intelligence. |
Third
parties also play a role in our cybersecurity. We engage
While
we have experienced cybersecurity threats in the past in the normal course of business and expect to continue to experience such threats
from time to time, to date,
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Corporate Headquarters
We currently maintain our corporate offices at 5330 South 900 East, Suite 280, Murray, Utah, 84117, in the Salt Lake City area. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we paid monthly rent of approximately $1,557 for use of the corporate office.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Except as set forth below, we are currently not aware of any such pending or threatened legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.
On or about March 4, 2024, the Company filed a complaint against Mother Lode Mining, Inc., a Canadian company, and Robert Salna (the “Defendants”), seeking damages in an amount of not less than $2,237,800 (plus interest, additional costs and attorneys’ fees) due from Defendants as a result of their breach of their obligations and duties arising from the sale of Compañía Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A. de C.V. in 2023 (the “Sale”). The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division (Case No. 2:24-cv-00171-TS-CMR, the “Case”). On February 4, 2026, the Company and the Defendants entered into a settlement agreement resolving all disputes in connection with the Sale. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to a mutual dismissal with prejudice of all claims, counterclaims, and causes of action asserted or that could have been asserted in the Case or in any other forum. As part of the settlement, the parties executed a mutual general release of all claims and potential claims against the other parties and their affiliates.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
| 20 |
| Table of Contents |
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is not traded on any exchange. Our common stock is quoted on the OTCID Basic Market tier of the OTC Link ATS (alternative trading system), the over-the-counter markets administered by OTC Markets Group, Inc., under the trading symbol “BSAI,” but the Company’s stock is not eligible for proprietary broker-dealer quotations. We cannot assure you that there will be a market in the future for our common stock.
OTC securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers. OTC issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a national or regional stock exchange.
Classes of Stock
We have two classes of stock: common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. On August 30, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to Article II of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, approved the designation of fifty-one (51) shares of its authorized capital stock as “Series A Preferred Stock”. The Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock was filed on August 31, 2016. These shares have preferential voting rights and no conversion rights.
Holders
As of March 19, 2026, there were 1,505 holders of record of our common stock and one holder of record for our preferred stock.
Dividends
To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of our common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
Equity Compensation Plans
As of the date of this Annual Report, we have an equity compensation plan: the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We claimed exemption from registration under the Securities Act for the sales and issuances of securities in the following transactions were made in reliance on Sections 3(a)(9) and 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as the common stock was issued in exchange for debt securities of the Company held by each shareholder, there was no additional consideration for the exchange, there was no remuneration for the solicitation of the exchange, there was no general solicitation, and the transactions did not involve a public offering.
On April 1, 2025, the Company issued 200,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to an individual for services rendered at the market price of $0.51 per share for a total value of $102,000.
On June 10, 2025, the Company issued 1,100,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to five individuals for services rendered at the market price of $0.401 per share for a total value of $441,100. With 600,000 shares issued to related parties.
| 21 |
| Table of Contents |
On June 24, 2025, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to an individual for services rendered at the market price of $1.60 per share for a total value of $800,000.
On July 7, 2025, BluSky AI Inc., entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”), a Wyoming limited liability company, whose managing member, Trent D’Ambrosio, is also the Company’s CEO. DAM assigned to the Company its exclusive right to utilize solar and grid-interconnected power at a data center project located in the Milford area of Beaver County, Utah. In exchange for the assignment of the Power Commitment in the Acquisition Agreement, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to DAM. The Company had this solar power asset valued by a valuation specialist. Per this valuation, the solar power asset was valued at $1,289,309.
In August and September 2025, the Company raised $1,735,000 through a Reg D campaign from 13 lenders. These notes had a 15.0% interest rate and matured in 12 months. These notes had a mandatory conversion feature if the Company’s common stock traded above $8.00. In mid-August 2025, the Company’s common stock traded above the mandatory conversion price, so all notes were automatically converted into 433,750 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2,103,750 on these conversions.
On September 4, 2025, the Company issued 25,500 shares of common stock to five consultants per consulting agreements. These shares were valued at $6.00 per share and the Company recognized consulting fees of $153,000.
On September 24, 2025, the Company issued 9,408 shares of common stock to D. D’Ambrosio for the conversion of accrued interest of $47,042. These shares were valued at $5.50 per share for a total value of $51,744 and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $4,702.
On September 30, 2025, the Company issued 13,007 shares of common stock to Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”), a related entity, for the conversion of accrued interest of $29,129 and accounts payable of $35,908. These shares were valued at $5.98 per share for a total value of $77,782 and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $12,745.
On September 30, 2025, the Company issued 11,000 shares of common stock to a lender for the conversion of a note payable with a balance of $55,000. These shares were valued at $5.98 per share for a total value of $65,780 and the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $10,780.
| 22 |
| Table of Contents |
On October 31, 2025, the Company issued 5,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to an individual for services rendered at the market price of $4.06 per share for a total value of $20,300.
On December 12, 2025, the Company issued 13,441 shares of Common Stock to a lender on a Reg D convertible note payable. These shares were valued at $5.66 per share for a total of $76,077. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $26,077 on this conversion.
On December 15, 2025, the Company issued 2,500 restricted shares of Common Stock to an individual for services rendered at the market price of $6.20 per share for a total value of $15,500.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward Looking Statements
Except for historical information, the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve certain risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (a) our projected sales and profitability, (b) our growth strategies, (c) anticipated trends in our industry, (d) our future financing plans, (e) our anticipated needs for working capital, (f) our lack of operational experience and (g) the benefits related to ownership of our common stock. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Description of Business,” as well as in this Report generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and matters described in this Report generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Report will in fact occur as projected.
Overview
BluSky AI Inc., is a pioneering company in AI-driven data center solutions, combining innovation with regulatory compliance and sustainability. The Company is a Neocloud with plans to offer rapidly scalable pre-fabricated modular data centers specializing in artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) providing high-performance computing infrastructure, strategic site selection, and operational risk management. The company is dedicated to delivering state-of-the-art infrastructure and solutions tailored to meet the demands of modern AI applications and computational workloads in an environment where computational demands are accelerating twofold every 9 months. The Company operates with a focus on innovation, scalability, and environmental sustainability.
Previously known as Inception Mining Inc., the company underwent a significant transformation and rebranding in March 2025 to align with its new strategic direction. This change reflects BluSky AI Inc.’s commitment to advancing technology and providing unparalleled services in the data center industry. The Company is headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Historically, we have operated within the mining industry, serving as a consultant to mining companies and as an operator of a mine engaged in the production of precious metals. On January 12, 2023, the Company entered into an agreement through which the Company divested its ownership interest in the Clavo Rico mine, resulting in the transfer of operations to Mother Lode Mining and full control of the Clavo Rico mine asset.
| 23 |
| Table of Contents |
Current Operations
The Company is focused on artificial intelligence compute infrastructure and participating in the dynamic and expanding AI industry predicted to be $1.81 trillion by 2030 by Grandview Research. The Company has plans to grow its AI operations organically within the Company. BluSky AI was established by drawing on extensive industry expertise, insights from outside experts, and a careful evaluation of current conditions in the data center markets. The innovative concept is built around a pre-fabricated modular design that may leverage existing power infrastructure. BluSky AI plans to develop multiple data center sites across various U.S. jurisdictions, with artificial intelligence (AI) focus, specifically targeting facilities with the ability to develop power capacity or utilize existing power capacities. This strategy enables a faster time to market, scalable deployment, and a cost-effective approach that meets the evolving needs of AI and the high compute data center market.
BluSky AI plans to revolutionize the artificial intelligence compute landscape by addressing the immediate global supply shortage with a cutting-edge, turnkey solution called SkyMods. Our strategy centers on rapidly deployable, plug-and-play, pre-fabricated modular compute centers on powered land assets—sites that already possess permitted energy infrastructure. This approach not only accelerates time to market but also positions BluSky AI as a premier AI compute infrastructure provider dedicated to meeting the surging demand for advanced AI services.
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024
We had a net loss of $4,515,516 for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was $3,565,734 more than the net loss of $949,782 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This change in our results over the two periods is primarily the result of an increase in general and administrative expenses of $2,145,511, decrease in interest expense of $344,059 and an increase in loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,962,881. The following table summarizes key items of comparison and their related increase (decrease) for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| Years Ended December, | Increase/ | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
| General and Administrative | $ | 2,665,889 | $ | 520,378 | $ | 2,145,511 | ||||||
| Depreciation and Amortization Expenses | - | 727 | (727 | ) | ||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 2,665,889 | 521,105 | 2,144,784 | |||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations | (2,665,889 | ) | (521,105 | ) | (2,144,784 | ) | ||||||
| Other Income (expense) | 96 | - | 96 | |||||||||
| Interest Income | 15,590 | - | 15,590 | |||||||||
| Change in Derivative Liabilities | 182,394 | 196,321 | (13,927 | ) | ||||||||
| Initial Derivative Expense | - | (193,582 | ) | 193,582 | ||||||||
| Loss on Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment | - | (2,531 | ) | 2,531 | ||||||||
| Loss on Extinguishment of Debt | (1,975,924 | ) | (13,043 | ) | (1,962,881 | ) | ||||||
| Interest Expense | (71,783 | ) | (415,842 | ) | 344,059 | |||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations Before Taxes | (4,515,516 | ) | (949,782 | ) | (3,565,734 | ) | ||||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | - | - | - | |||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | (4,515,516 | ) | $ | (949,782 | ) | $ | (3,565,734 | ) | |||
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $2,665,889 and $521,105, respectively. The increase in operating expenses for 2025 compared to 2024 were comprised primarily of an increase in consulting fees and investor relations expenses.
| 24 |
| Table of Contents |
Other Income (Expenses)
Other income (expenses) for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were ($1,849,627) and ($428,677), respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2025, other income (expenses) was comprised primarily of $182,394 for change in derivative liability, ($1,975,924) for loss on extinguishment of debt and ($71,783) for interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2024, other income (expenses) was comprised primarily of $196,321 for change in derivative liability, ($193,582) in initial derivative expenses, ($13,043) for loss on extinguishment of debt and ($415,842) for interest expense.
Net Loss
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $4,515,516 while the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $949,782.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our balance sheet as of December 31, 2025, reflects current assets of $1,122,661. As we had cash in the amount of $960,436 and a working capital deficit in the amount of $2,293,390 as of December 31, 2025, we do not have sufficient working capital to enable us to carry out our stated plan of operation for the next twelve months.
Working Capital
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Current assets | $ | 1,122,661 | $ | - | ||||
| Current liabilities | 3,416,051 | 3,346,850 | ||||||
| Working capital deficit | $ | (2,293,390 | ) | $ | (3,346,850 | ) | ||
We anticipate generating losses and, therefore, may be unable to continue operations in the future. If we require additional capital, we will have to issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party.
Going Concern Consideration
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $34,378,880. In addition, there is a working capital deficiency of $2,293,390 and a stockholder’s deficiency of $930,493 the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Cash Flows
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities | $ | (1,156,258 | ) | $ | (127,139 | ) | ||
| Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities | - | - | ||||||
| Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | 2,116,694 | 127,137 | ||||||
| Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash | $ | 960,436 | $ | (2 | ) | |||
Operating Activities
Net cash flow used in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2025, was $1,156,258, an increase of $1,029,119 from the $127,139 net cash used in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease is mostly due to the net loss in 2025 versus the net loss in 2024.
| 25 |
| Table of Contents |
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025, was $0, a change of $0 from the $0 net cash used during the year ended December 31, 2024. This change was due to no new investments.
Financing Activities
Financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025, provided $2,116,694, an increase of $1,989,557 from the $127,137 provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the company received $362,906 in notes payable from related parties, $1,885,000 in convertible notes payable and made payments of $131,212 in cash on notes payable – related parties. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the company received $174,396 in notes payable from related parties, $150,000 in convertible notes payable, made payments of $98,475 in cash on notes payable – related parties, and payments of $98,784 in cash on convertible notes.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Going Concern - The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements during year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded a net loss of $4,515,516 and used $1,156,258 in cash from operating activities. The Company has an accumulated net loss since inception of $34,378,880. In addition, there is a working capital deficiency of $2,293,390 and a stockholder’s deficiency of $930,493 as of December 31, 2025. These factors among others indicate that the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance of these financial statements.
The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company’s financing efforts will result in profitable operations or the resolution of the Company’s liquidity problems. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management is currently working to make changes that will result in profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources to meet the Company’s need for cash during the next twelve months and beyond.
Basis of Presentation - The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Use of Estimates – In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates may include those pertaining to allowances on notes receivable, deferred tax assets, derivative assets and liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities.
Notes Receivable – Notes receivable include amounts due to the Company pursuant to financial agreements stipulating interest rates, payment terms and maturity dates. The Company uses payment history, timeliness of payments, economic environment and potential disagreements with noteholder and debtor and other potential indicators to evaluate the collectability of the note receivable and to determine if an allowance for doubtful notes is required.
Fair Value Measurements - The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including the party’s own credit risk.
| 26 |
| Table of Contents |
Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed and is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts payable, short-term borrowings (including convertible notes payable), and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term maturity.
The Company recognizes its derivative liabilities as level 3 and values its derivatives using the methods discussed below. While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values using the methods discussed below are that of volatility and market price of the underlying common stock of the Company.
Long-Lived Assets - We review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is not considered recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flows.
Properties, Plant and Equipment - We record properties, plant and equipment at historical cost. We provide depreciation and amortization in amounts sufficient to match the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives or productive value. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that significantly extend the useful life of an asset. We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to operations when incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows:
| Building | 7 to 15 years | |
| Vehicles and equipment | 3 to 7 years | |
| Processing and laboratory | 5 to 15 years | |
| Furniture and fixtures | 2 to 3 years |
Derivative Liabilities - Derivative liabilities are recorded at fair value when issued and the subsequent change in fair value each period is recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. We do not hold or issue any derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
At December 31, 2025, the Company marked to market the fair value of the debt derivatives and determined a fair value of $14,516. The Company recorded a gain from change in fair value of debt derivatives of $182,394 for the year ended December 31, 2025. The fair value of the embedded derivatives was determined using the Monte Carlo Valuation Model. The Monte Carlo Valuation Model was based on the following assumptions: (1) expected volatility of 100.0%, (2) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.47% and (3) expected life of 0.80 – 1.00 years.
| 27 |
| Table of Contents |
Income Taxes - The Company’s income tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, the Company develops assumptions including the amount of future state and federal pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is using to manage the underlying businesses. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which the Company does not consider the realization of such deferred tax assets to be more likely than not.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Operating Lease – The Company leases its corporate headquarters and administrative offices in Salt Lake City, Utah. This lease expired in August 2024 and is now a month-to-month lease. The Company made cash payments of $18,006 and $22,484 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively on this lease. The Company incurred rent expense of $18,006 and $22,484 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
On July 11, 2025, the Company entered into a Ground Lease with an Option to Purchase (the “Lease”) with Wild Mustang Ventures LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Landlord”), through which the Company leased 51.6 acres in Milford, Utah (the “Milford Land”) for a two-year term. The base rent is $90,000 annually, which shall accrue until the earlier of the expiration of the lease or until the Company exercises its option to purchase the Milford Land. The Lease contains standard other provisions and includes a mutual indemnification clause which requires that the parties indemnify each other except in the case of gross negligence or willful misconduct. The Company made cash payments of $0 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively for this lease. The Company incurred rent expense of $45,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Non-Controlling Interest Policy – Non-controlling interest (NCI) is the portion of equity ownership in a subsidiary not attributable to the parent company, who has a controlling interest and consolidates the subsidiary’s financial results with its own. The amount of equity relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified in the equity section of the balance sheet and the amount of the net income (loss) relating to the non-controlling interest is separately identified on the statement of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For recent accounting pronouncements, please refer to the notes to the financial statements section of this Annual Report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
None.
| 28 |
| Table of Contents |
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements of the Company required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X are attached to this report, beginning at page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or 1934 Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the 1934 Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees and due to reasons listed below, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2025.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements of the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO-2013”). Based on our evaluation and the material weaknesses described below, management concluded that the Company’s internal controls were not effective based on financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO framework criteria. Management has identified control deficiencies regarding the lack of segregation of duties. Management of the Company believes that these material weaknesses are due to the small size of the Company’s management and accounting staff and reliance on outside consultants for external reporting. The small size of the Company’s accounting staff may prevent adequate controls in the future and the internal controls may continue to be not effective, such as segregation of duties, due to the cost/benefit of such remediation.
To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and outside accounting consultants. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework.
These control deficiencies could result in a misstatement of account balances that would result in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, we have determined that these control deficiencies as described above together constitute a material weakness.
| 29 |
| Table of Contents |
In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analyses and procedures in order to conclude that our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were fairly stated in accordance with US GAAP. Accordingly, management believes that despite our material weaknesses, our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with US GAAP.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Controls
During the year ended December 31, 2025, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
| 30 |
| Table of Contents |
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Identification of Directors and Executive Officers
Our Bylaws state that our authorized number of directors shall be one or more and shall be set by resolution of our Board of Directors. We currently have two directors.
Our current directors and officers are as follows:
| Name and Business Address | Age | Position | ||
| Trent D’Ambrosio | 60 | CEO, CFO and Director | ||
| Whit Cluff | 74 | Director | ||
| Dan Gay | 64 | COO and Director |
Our directors will serve in that capacity until our next annual shareholder meeting or until a successor is elected and qualified. Officers hold their positions at the will of our Board of Directors. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.
Trent D’Ambrosio, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
Mr. D’Ambrosio has been a Director of the Company since February 28, 2013. From October 2011 through March 2013, Mr. D’Ambrosio held the positions of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Inception Holdings LLC, a resource exploration company, and was the responsible for the overall strategic direction for the organization. His professional record includes 25 years of management and financial services experience with companies ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start-ups. Mr. D’Ambrosio holds a B.S. in Business Management, an MBA and a Certificate of Mining Studies.
Dan Gay, Chief Operating Officer and Director
Mr. Gay brings over 30 years of experience in data center innovation, enterprise IT strategy, and AI-driven technologies to the Board. Since 2023, Mr. Gay has served as the Fractional Chief Marketing and Sales Officer for Catapult Solutions. From 2018 to 2023, Mr. Gay served as the Chief Marketing and Sales Officer for BlockCerts Blockchain. He also served as the VP and Chief Marketing Officer for iThrive Health from 2010-2016. Other noteworthy roles include the Director of National Accounts and the Director of Small Business for MCI, as the Vice President of Sales for Qwest, and the Chief Marketing Officer of Montana Power. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing and Advertising from Arizona State University.
Whit Cluff, Director
Mr. Cluff has over 35 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Mr. Cluff has been involved in all disciplines of real estate land development, mixed-use development, retail tenant representation, developer representation, industrial property procurement and asset management. Mr. Cluff has an extensive background in public and private businesses giving him strong analytical, planning, and organization ability with effective negotiation skills. From 2003 through the present, Mr. Cluff has worked in commercial real estate. Mr. Cluff attended the University of Utah and served in the United States Army.
Other Directorships
Other than as set forth above, none of our directors hold any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Board of Directors and Director Nominees
Since our Board of Directors does not include a majority of independent directors, the decisions of the Board regarding director nominees are made by persons who have an interest in the outcome of the determination. The Board will consider candidates for directors proposed by security holders, although no formal procedures for submitting candidates have been adopted. Unless otherwise determined, at any time not less than 90 days prior to the next annual Board meeting at which a slate of director nominees is adopted, the Board will accept written submissions from proposed nominees that include the name, address and telephone number of the proposed nominee; a brief statement of the nominee’s qualifications to serve as a director; and a statement as to why the security holder submitting the proposed nominee believes that the nomination would be in the best interests of our security holders. If the proposed nominee is not the same person as the security holder submitting the name of the nominee, a letter from the nominee agreeing to the submission of his or her name for consideration should be provided at the time of submission. The letter should be accompanied by a résumé supporting the nominee’s qualifications to serve on the Board, as well as a list of references.
| 31 |
| Table of Contents |
The Board identifies director nominees through a combination of referrals from different people, including management, existing Board members and security holders. Once a candidate has been identified, the Board reviews the individual’s experience and background and may discuss the proposed nominee with the source of the recommendation. If the Board believes it to be appropriate, Board members may meet with the proposed nominee before making a final determination whether to include the proposed nominee as a member of the slate of director nominees submitted to security holders for election to the Board.
Some of the factors, which the Board considers when evaluating proposed nominees, include their knowledge of and experience in business matters, finance, capital markets and mergers and acquisitions. The Board may request additional information from each candidate prior to reaching a determination, and it is under no obligation to formally respond to all recommendations, although as a matter of practice, it will endeavor to do so.
Conflicts of Interest
Our directors are not obligated to commit their full time and attention to our business and, accordingly, they may encounter a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and those of other businesses. In the course of their other business activities, they may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in business activities similar to those we intend to conduct.
In general, officers and directors of a corporation are required to present business opportunities to the corporation if:
| ● | the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity; | |
| ● | the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and | |
| ● | it would be unfair to the corporation and its stockholders not to bring the opportunity to the attention of the corporation. |
We plan to adopt a code of ethics that obligates our directors, officers and employees to disclose potential conflicts of interest and prohibits those persons from engaging in such transactions without our consent.
Significant Employees
Other than as described herein, we do not expect any other individuals to make a significant contribution to our business.
Legal Proceedings
None of our directors, executive officers or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:
| ● | any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; | |
| ● | any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); | |
| ● | being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or |
| 32 |
| Table of Contents |
| ● | being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, where the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated. |
No Audit Committee or Financial Expert
The Company does not have an audit committee or a financial expert serving on the Board of Directors. The Company plans to form and implement an audit committee as soon as practicable.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our officers, directors, or persons nominated for such positions.
Code of Ethics
We have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, but intend to do so this year.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the year ended December 31, 2025, Forms 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2024, and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2025, our executive officers and directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that Trent D’Ambrosio’s and Dan Gay’s Form 4’s were filed late.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Our Board of Directors has not established a separate compensation committee. Instead, the Board of Directors reviews and approves executive compensation policies and practices, reviews salaries and bonuses for our officer(s), decides on benefit plans, and considers other matters as may, from time to time, be referred to it. We do not currently have a Compensation Committee Charter. Our Board continues to emphasize the important link between our performance, which ultimately benefits all shareholders, and the compensation of our executives. Therefore, the primary goal of our executive compensation policy is to closely align the interests of the shareholders with the interests of the executive officer(s). In order to achieve this goal, we attempt to (i) offer compensation opportunities that attract and retain executives whose abilities and skills are critical to our long-term success and reward them for their efforts in ensuring our success and (ii) encourage executives to manage from the perspective of owners with an equity stake in us.
| 33 |
| Table of Contents |
Summary Executive Compensation Table
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trent D’Ambrosio, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, | 2025 | 300,000 | - | 200,500 | (2) | - | - | - | - | 500,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President, Secretary, and Director | 2024 | 300,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Whit Cluff, | 2025 | - | - | 40,100 | (3) | - | - | - | - | 40,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Director | 2024 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dan Gay, | 2025 | 65,000 | - | 102,000 | (4) | - | - | - | - | 167,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Operating Officer and Director | 2024 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Mr. D’Ambrosio’s employment agreement entitles him to a salary of $300,000 per year. However, the Company did not pay him that full amount during fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, he was paid $0, and the Company recorded $300,000 as deferred salary payable in each fiscal year. |
| (2) | Consists of 500,000 shares on June 10, 2025. |
| (3) | Consists of 100,000 shares on June 10, 2025. |
| (4) | Consists of 200,000 shares on April 1, 2025. |
Employment Agreements
The Company previously entered into multiple employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer, Trent D’Ambrosio. In 2019, it entered into another employment agreement with Mr. D’Ambrosio that was effective as of April 1, 2019, and provided for compensation of $300,000 annually. The agreement was effective for 60 months. The agreement was renewed February 2023, and then again in December 2024, as described below. These employment agreements provide for Mr. D’Ambrosio to be receive benefits and an optional annual bonus to be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company.
On or about December 1, 2024, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2024, between the Company and Mr. D’Ambrosio. This agreement amended and restated in full the prior employment agreements entered into between the Company and Mr. D’Ambrosio in April 2019, and it superseded all other agreements between the parties, including a February 25, 2013 employment agreement that was later amended in part on August 1, 2015, and any other prior employment agreements.
On or about April 1, 2025, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dan Gay, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Gay provided advisory, business development, and operational restructuring services to the Company, and was to be compensated $5,000 per month and be issued 200,000 shares of Company common stock. On or about September 1, 2025, the Company entered into a new consulting agreement with Mr. Gay, pursuant to which Mr. Gay’s base compensation was increased to $10,000 per month.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
None.
| 34 |
| Table of Contents |
Compensation of Directors
We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their services. We have no formal plan to compensating our directors in the future in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our Board of Directors or by any compensation committee that may be established.
Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans
There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to our directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit-sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof.
Compensation Committee
We do not currently have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors or a committee performing similar functions. All members of the Board of Directors participate in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following tables list, as of March 19, 2026, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using beneficial ownership‚ concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.
| 35 |
| Table of Contents |
The percentages below are calculated based on 24,992,505 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2026. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o BluSky AI, Inc., 5330 South 900 East, Suite 280, Murray, UT 84117.
| Amount and | ||||||||||
| Nature of | ||||||||||
| Title of | Beneficial | Percent of | ||||||||
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Class | Ownership (1) | Class (2) | |||||||
| Trent D’Ambrosio | Common Stock | 20,476,799 | (3) | 81.9 | % | |||||
| Trent D’Ambrosio | Series A Preferred Stock | 51 | (4) | 100 | % | |||||
| Whit Cluff | Common Stock | 264,730 | (5) | 1.1 | % | |||||
| Dan Gay | Common Stock | 400,000 | (6) | 1.6 | % | |||||
| All Officers and Directors as a Group | Common Stock | 21,141,529 | 84.6 | % | ||||||
| All Officers and Directors as a Group | Series A Preferred Stock | 51 | 100 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Percentage of ownership is based on 24,992,505 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2026. The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under the rules of the SEC and the ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares, which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table. | |
| (2) | SEC Rule 13d-3 generally provides that beneficial owners of securities include any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power and/or investment power with respect to such securities, and any person who has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such security within 60 days. Any securities not outstanding which are subject to such options, warrants or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities owned by that person. Such securities are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person. At the present time there are no outstanding options or warrants. | |
| (3) | Consists of (i) 369,328 shares of common stock held directly in Trent D’Ambrosio’s name, (ii) 32,609 shares held in the name of Debra D’Ambrosio, Trent D’Ambrosio’s spouse, and (iii) 20,074,862 shares held in the name of Digital Asset Medium LLC, which is controlled by Trent D’Ambrosio. | |
| (4) | Consists of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock held directly in Trent D’Ambrosio’s name. | |
| (5) | Consists of (i) 243,158 shares held directly by Whit Cluff, (ii) 16,429 shares held in the name of Fran Rich, Whit Cluff’s spouse, and (iii) 5,143 shares held in the name of the Cluff-Rich 401K, which is controlled by Whit Cluff and his spouse. | |
| (6) | Consists of 400,000 shares held directly in Dan Gay’s name. |
SEC Rule 13d-3 generally provides that beneficial owners of securities include any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power and/or investment power with respect to such securities, and any person who has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such security within 60 days. Any securities not outstanding which are subject to such options, warrants or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities owned by that person. Such securities are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person. At the present time there are no outstanding options or warrants held by directors or officers of the Company.
| 36 |
| Table of Contents |
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2025, we have no equity compensation plans.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Related Party Transactions
Consulting Agreement – In February 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with stockholder/director Trent D’Ambrosio. The Company agreed to pay $18,000 per month for twelve months. This agreement was renegotiated in October 2017 and the Company agreed to pay the stockholder/director $25,000 per month starting in October 2017. This agreement was superseded by an Employment Agreement as of April 1, 2019 (see Employment Agreements below). As of December 31, 2025, there is $1,386,788 in deferred salaries in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Mr. Cluff currently serves as a director of the Company and has a separate agreement as a consultant of the Company effective as of October 2, 2015.
Employment Agreements – The Company has an employment agreement with its chief executive officer, Trent D’Ambrosio. The employment agreement was effective as of April 1, 2019 and provides for compensation of $300,000 annually.
Notes Payable –The Company took one short-term note payable from Debra D’Ambrosio, an immediate family member related party and one short-term note payable from Digital Asset Medium, LLC, an affiliate of a director, during the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company received $362,906 in cash from related parties, made payments of $131,978 in cash to related parties and $125,000 was paid directly to another lender to settle their outstanding notes (See Notes 8 and 9 for more details).
Accounts Payable –Two officers/directors of the Company have been paying expenses for the Company on their personal credit cards. The Company has recorded these expenses and accrued the amounts in accounts payable to the individuals. As of December 31, 2025, there is $25,722 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
On June 10, 2025, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Trent D’Ambrosio for services rendered at the market price of $0.401 per share for a total value of $200,500.
On June 10, 2025, the Company issued 100,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Whit Cluff for services rendered at the market price of $0.401 per share for a total value of $40,100.
On July 7, 2025, BluSky AI Inc., entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”), a Wyoming limited liability company, whose managing member, Trent D’Ambrosio, is also the Company’s CEO (see Note 5). In exchange for the assignment of the Power Commitment in the Acquisition Agreement, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to DAM. The Company used a large block stock valuation model to value this stock issuance, which resulted in a valuation of $9,800,000. The solar power asset, which was reviewed by a valuation specialist, was valued at $1,289,309. The difference of $8,510,691 has been treated as a deemed dividend by the Company. Normally, this dividend would be recorded in retained earnings. However, the Company has a negative retained earnings balance, so the difference was recorded against additional paid-in capital.
Director Independence
Our securities are quoted on the OTC Markets, which does not have any director independence requirements. Once we engage further directors and officers, we plan to develop a definition of independence and scrutinize our Board of Directors with regard to this definition.
| 37 |
| Table of Contents |
Parents of the Smaller Reporting Company
We have no parents.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by our principal accountants during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
| Fee Category | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Audit Fees | $ | 107,538 | $ | 55,250 | ||||
| Audit-related Fees | - | - | ||||||
| Tax Fees | - | - | ||||||
| All Other Fees | - | - | ||||||
| Total Fees | $ | 107,538 | $ | 55,250 | ||||
Audit Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q and Form 10-K or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related Fees - Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees.”
Tax Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees - Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit fees,” “Audit-related fees,” and “Tax fees” above.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
We have not adopted an Audit Committee; therefore, there is no Audit Committee policy in this regard. However, we do require approval in advance of the performance of professional services to be provided to us by our principal accountant. Additionally, all services rendered by our principal accountant are performed pursuant to a written engagement letter between us and the principal accountant.
| 38 |
| Table of Contents |
PART IV
ITEM 15: EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| (a)(1)(2) | Financial Statements. See the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025 contained in Item 8 above which are incorporated herein by this reference. | |
| (a)(3) | Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report: |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | |
| 3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-1 filed October 31, 2007) | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment, effective March 5, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed March 10, 2010) | |
| 3.3 | Certificate of Amendment, effective June 23, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed June 28, 2010) | |
| 3.4 | Articles of Merger, effective May 17, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed May 20, 2013) | |
| 3.5 | Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-1 filed October 31, 2007) | |
| 10.1 | Employment Agreement with Trent D’Ambrosio (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Form S-1 filed June 3, 2019) | |
| 10.2 | Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form S-1 filed June 3, 2019) | |
| 10.3 | Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Form S-1 filed June 3, 2019) | |
| 10.4 | Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Form S-1 filed June 3, 2019) | |
| 10.5 | Settlement Agreement with Antilles Family Office, LLC dated January 18, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed January 25, 2023) | |
| 10.6 | Letter of Intent with Mother Lode Mining, Inc. effective as of January 24, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2023) | |
| 10.7 | Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Management, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 1-A filed February 11, 2026) | |
| 10.8 | Consulting Agreement with Dan Gay dated April 1, 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 1-A filed February 11, 2026) | |
| 10.9 | Consulting Agreement with Dan Gay dated September 1, 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 1-A filed February 11, 2026) | |
| 31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
| 32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Schema Document | |
| 101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
| * | Filed or furnished herewith. |
| 39 |
| Table of Contents |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| BLUSKY AI, INC. | ||
| Date: March 31, 2026 | By: | /s/ Trent D’Ambrosio |
| Name: | Trent D’Ambrosio | |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
| Date: March 31, 2026 | By: | /s/ Trent D’Ambrosio |
| Name: | Trent D’Ambrosio | |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| SIGNATURE | TITLE | DATE | ||
| /s/ Trent D’Ambrosio | ||||
| Trent D’Ambrosio | Director | March 31, 2026 | ||
| /s/ Dan Gay | ||||
| Dan Gay | Director | March 31, 2026 | ||
| /s/ Whit Cluff | ||||
| Whit Cluff | Director | March 31, 2026 |
| 40 |
| Table of Contents |
BLUSKY AI, INC.
(fka INCEPTION MINING, INC.)
CONTENTS
| PAGE | F-2 | REPORT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PCAOB ID: |
| PAGE | F-4 | BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2025 AND 2024 |
| PAGE | F-5 | STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 AND 2024 |
| PAGE | F-6 | STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT |
| PAGE | F-7 | STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 AND 2024 |
| PAGES | F-8 – F-22 | NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
| F-1 |
| Table of Contents |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BluSky AI Inc., formerly known as Inception Mining, Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BluSky AI Inc., formerly known as Inception Mining, Inc. (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Explanatory Paragraph Regarding Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) related to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
| F-2 |
| Table of Contents |
Valuation of Solar Power Asset
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 6 to the financial statements, on July 7, 2025, the Company entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”), a Wyoming limited liability company whose managing member is also the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Under the Agreement, DAM assigned to the Company its exclusive right to utilize 9.3 megawatts of solar and grid-interconnected power at a data center project in Beaver County, Utah, at DAM’s existing cost of $0.068 per kilowatt-hour for the estimated 20-year life of the project. In exchange, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to DAM.
Auditing the valuation of this intangible asset was especially challenging and required a high degree of subjective auditor judgment, given the common control nature of the transaction and the subjectiveness of the model used to value the asset, as well as the judgment required in determining the inputs to the discounted cash flow model and the fair value of the shares issued as consideration.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of the solar power intangible asset included, among others, evaluating the appropriateness of the Company’s accounting framework, including its determination that the agreement represents a finite-lived intangible asset under ASC 350, that fair value measurement was appropriate given the absence of a historical cost basis at DAM, and that the excess consideration should be characterized as a deemed dividend. We assessed the related-party and common control aspects of the transaction and evaluated management’s rationale for each significant accounting conclusion.
With respect to the fair value measurements, we assessed the professional qualifications and independence of the Company’s valuation specialist, in evaluating the reasonableness of the valuation methodology, significant assumptions, and calculations underlying the fair value of the intangible asset and the restricted shares issued.
Our procedures in this area included, among others:
| ■ | Evaluated the appropriateness of the income approach (discounted cash flow method) used to value the intangible asset and assessed whether the methodology was consistent with the fair value standard under U.S. GAAP and appropriate for the nature of the agreement. | |
| ■ | Tested and/or confirmed sources for the significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model, including projected electricity market pricing, expected energy production volumes and degradation rates, the assumed data center operational start date, and the discount rate, by comparing them to available market data, industry information, and the terms of underlying agreements. | |
| ■ | Assessed the reasonableness of the fair value concluded for the restricted shares, including evaluation of the base share price, assessment of a reasonable blockage discount, and assessment of a reasonable discount for lack of marketability, considering appropriate fair value methodologies, trading history, share restrictions under Rule 144, and relevant market data. | |
| ■ | Evaluated the Company’s qualitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2025, and the reasonableness of management’s conclusion that no impairment indicators existed during the period from acquisition through year-end. | |
| ■ | Reviewed the financial statement disclosures related to the intangible asset, the related-party transaction, the deemed dividend, and the fair value measurement for completeness and consistency with applicable accounting standards. |
Professionals with specialized skills and knowledge were utilized by the Firm to assist in the testing of the value of the intangible solar power asset, the restricted shares issued, and the resulting implied deemed dividend.
/s/
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
March 31, 2026
| F-3 |
| Table of Contents |
Blusky AI, Inc.
(fka Inception Mining, Inc.)
Balance Sheets
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | - | |||||||
| Other current assets | - | |||||||
| Total Current Assets | - | |||||||
| Solar power asset | - | |||||||
| Right of use operating lease asset | - | |||||||
| Other assets | ||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued interest - related parties | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability | - | |||||||
| Note payable | ||||||||
| Notes payable - related parties | ||||||||
| Notes payable | ||||||||
| Convertible notes payable - net of discount | ||||||||
| Derivative liabilities | ||||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability, net of current portion | - | |||||||
| Total Liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies | - | - | ||||||
| Stockholders’ Deficit | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $ | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Stockholders’ Deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit | $ | $ | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
| F-4 |
| Table of Contents |
Blusky AI, Inc.
(fka Inception Mining, Inc.)
Statements of Operations
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| General and administrative | $ | $ | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | - | |||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Loss from Operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Other Income/(Expenses) | ||||||||
| Other income (expense) | - | |||||||
| Interest income | - | |||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ||||||||
| Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Initial derivative expense | - | ( | ) | |||||
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | - | ( | ) | |||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Other Income/(Expenses) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net Loss from Operations before Income Taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Provision for Income Taxes | - | - | ||||||
| Net Loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Deemed Dividend | ( | ) | - | |||||
| Net Loss attributable to Shareholders | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Net loss per share - Basic and Diluted | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - Basic and Diluted | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
| F-5 |
| Table of Contents |
Blusky AI, Inc.
(fka Inception Mining, Inc.)
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Deficiency | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | Common stock | Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($0.00001Par) | ($0.00001Par) | Paid-in | Accumulated | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Deficiency | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued with extinguishment of debt | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the Year | - | - | - | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2024 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rounding shares issued with reverse split | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of notes payable | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of accrued liabilities | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for power purchase agreement | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the Year | - | - | - | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
| F-6 |
| Table of Contents |
Blusky AI, Inc.
(fka Inception Mining, Inc.)
Statements of Cash Flows
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | - | |||||||
| Common stock issued for services | - | |||||||
| Loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment | - | |||||||
| (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | ||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Default penalty additions | - | |||||||
| Expenses paid in behalf of the company by related party | - | |||||||
| Amortization of right-of-use asset | ||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount | ||||||||
| Initial derivative expense | - | |||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other assets | ( | ) | - | |||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||||||||
| Operating lease liabilities | - | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities - related parties | ||||||||
| Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities | - | - | ||||||
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||
| Repayment of notes payable-related parties | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Repayment of convertible notes payable | - | ( | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from notes payable-related parties | ||||||||
| Proceeds from convertible notes payable | ||||||||
| Net Cash Provided by Continuing Financing Activities | ||||||||
| Net Change in Cash | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash at Beginning of Period | - | |||||||
| Cash at End of Period | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | - | $ | |||||
| Cash paid for taxes | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
| Common stock issued for conversion of debt | $ | $ | ||||||
| Common stock issued for power purchase agreement | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Origination of operating lease | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Accounts payable issued for settlement of note payable | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Recognition of debt discounts on convertible notes payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Note payable issued to related party for settlement of convertible note payable | $ | $ | - | |||||
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
| F-7 |
| Table of Contents |
Blusky AI, Inc.
(fka Inception Mining, Inc.)
Notes to Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024
1. Nature of Business
BluSky AI Inc, (formerly know as Inception Mining, Inc.) (formerly known as Gold American Mining Corp.) was incorporated under the name of Golf Alliance Corporation and under the laws of the State of Nevada on July 2, 2007. Inception Mining, Inc. was a precious metal mineral acquisition, exploration and development company. Inception Development, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho on January 28, 2013.
Golf Alliance Corporation pursued its original business plan to provide opportunities for golfers to play on private golf courses normally closed to them due to the membership requirements of the private clubs. During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Company decided to redirect its business focus toward precious metal mineral acquisition and exploration.
On
March 5, 2010, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to (1) to change its name to Silver America, Inc. and (2) increased
its authorized common stock from
On June 23, 2010, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Gold American Mining Corp.
On
November 21, 2012,
On
February 25, 2013, Gold American Mining Corp. and its majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”), and its wholly-owned
subsidiary,
On May 17, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Inception Mining, Inc. (“Inception” or the “Company”).
On
October 2, 2015, the Company consummated a merger with Clavo Rico Ltd. (“Clavo Rico”). Clavo Rico is a privately held Turks
and Caicos company with principal operations in Honduras, Central America. Clavo Rico operates the Clavo Rico mining concession through
its subsidiaries Compañía Minera Cerros del Sur, S.A de C.V. and Compañía Minera Clavo Rico, S.A. de C.V.
and holds other mining concessions. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued of
| F-8 |
| Table of Contents |
On
January 11, 2016, the Company implemented a
On January 12, 2023, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) with Mother Lode Mining, Inc. (“MLM”). The LOI became binding on January 24, 2023.
Pursuant to the terms of the LOI, the Company agreed to sell all of the shares of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Compañía Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A. de C.V. (“CMCS”), to MLM. CMCS is the Honduran-based company that owns the Clavo Rico mine.
Following the divestiture of the Clavo Rico mine, the Company operated as a consultant and advisor to the mining industry, including to MLM, the new owner of the Clavo Rico mine, through 2025.
The Company is currently focused on artificial intelligence compute infrastructure and participating in the dynamic and expanding AI industry. BluSky AI plans to develop multiple data center sites across various U.S. jurisdictions, with artificial intelligence (AI) focus, specifically targeting facilities with the ability to develop power capacity or utilize existing power capacities.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Going
Concern – The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates
the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements during year ended December 31, 2025, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $
The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources. There can be no assurance that the Company’s financing efforts will result in profitable operations or the resolution of the Company’s liquidity problems. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management is currently working to make changes that will result in profitable operations and to obtain additional funding sources to meet the Company’s need for cash during the next twelve months and beyond.
Use of Estimates – In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates may include those pertaining to valuation of the estimated useful lives and valuation of properties, plant and equipment, solar power asset, deferred tax assets, convertible preferred stock, derivative assets and liabilities, stock-based compensation and payments, and contingent liabilities.
Basis of Presentation – The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company had
| F-9 |
| Table of Contents |
Settlement of Contracts in Company’s Equity– In accordance with ASC 815-40-25, the Company must meet certain requirements in order to report contracts as equity versus liabilities. These requirements must be met by the Company or the contracts need to be reported as liabilities. The Company has adopted the sequencing approach as guidance on contracts that permit partial net share settlement. The Company evaluates the contracts based on the earliest issuance date. Currently, the Company doesn’t have any items that are reported as equity instead of liabilities.
Fair Value Measurements – The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including the party’s own credit risk.
Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is disclosed and is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The carrying value of the Company’s cash, accounts payable, short-term borrowings (including convertible notes payable), and other current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term maturity.
The fair value of financial instruments on December 31, 2025 are summarized below:
Schedule of Fair Value of Financial Instruments
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Debt derivative liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | $ | ||||||||||
The fair value of financial instruments on December 31, 2024 are summarized below:
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Debt derivative liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | $ | - | $ | - | $ | $ | ||||||||||
The Company recognizes its derivative liabilities as level 3 and values its derivatives using the methods discussed below in Note 3. While the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, it recognizes that the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The primary assumptions that would significantly affect the fair values using the methods discussed below in Note 3 are that of volatility and market price of the underlying common stock of the Company.
| F-10 |
| Table of Contents |
Notes
Receivable – Notes receivable include amounts due to the Company pursuant to financial agreements stipulating interest rates,
payment terms and maturity dates. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, notes receivable balances include amounts the Company believed were
due from Mother Lode Mining, Inc. (“MLM”) in the amounts of $
Long-Lived Assets – We review the carrying amount of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever there are negative indicators of impairment. An asset is considered impaired when estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In the event the carrying amount of such asset is not considered recoverable, the asset is adjusted to its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on discounted future cash flows.
Properties, Plant and Equipment – We record properties, plant and equipment at historical cost. We provide depreciation and amortization in amounts sufficient to match the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives or productive value. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that significantly extend the useful life of an asset. We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to operations when incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows:
Schedule of Property and Equipment Useful Lives
| Building | ||
| Vehicles and equipment | ||
| Processing and laboratory | ||
| Furniture and fixtures |
Stock Issued for Goods and Services – Common and preferred shares issued for goods and services are valued based upon the fair market value of our common stock or the goods and services received.
Stock-Based Compensation – For stock-based transactions, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, based on the estimated fair value on the grant date of the award.
Income
(Loss) per Common Share – Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss), less the preferred
stock dividends, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive income (loss) per share includes any additional
dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock options and warrants, and convertible instruments, if the impact is not anti-dilutive.
The following tables summaries the changes in the net earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Schedule of Net Earnings Per Common Share
| For the Years Ended | ||||||||
| Numerator | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||
| Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Gain on Extinguishment of Debt | - | - | ||||||
| Interest Expense | - | - | ||||||
| Loss on Conversion | - | - | ||||||
| Change in Derivative Liabilities | - | - | ||||||
| Deemed Dividend | ( | ) | - | |||||
| Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Denominator | Shares | Shares | ||||||
| Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Dilutive Shares | - | - | ||||||
| Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Diluted Net Loss per Share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| F-11 |
| Table of Contents |
Derivative Liabilities – Derivatives liabilities are recorded at fair value when issued and the subsequent change in fair value each period is recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. We do not hold or issue any derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
Income Taxes – The Company’s income tax expense and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and expense. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover its deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable income, the Company develops assumptions including the amount of future state and federal pretax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is using to manage the underlying businesses. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which the Company does not consider realization of such deferred tax assets to be more likely than not.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Business Segments – The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
Operating
Lease – The Company leases its corporate headquarters and administrative offices in Salt Lake City, Utah.
On
July 11, 2025, the Company entered into a Ground Lease with an Option to Purchase (the “Lease”) with Wild Mustang
Ventures LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Landlord”), through which the Company leased
The supplemental balance sheet information related to the operating lease for the periods is as follows:
Schedule of Balance Sheet Operating Lease
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Operating leases | ||||||||
| Long-term right-of-use assets | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Short-term operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | - | |||||
| Long-term operating lease liabilities | - | |||||||
| Total operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | - | |||||
| F-12 |
| Table of Contents |
Maturities of the Company’s undiscounted operating lease liabilities are as follows:
Schedule of Maturities Undiscounted Operating Lease Liabilities
| Year Ending | Operating Leases | |||
| 2026 | $ | |||
| 2027 | ||||
| 2028 | ||||
| 2029 | ||||
| Total lease payments | ||||
| Less: Imputed interest/present value discount | ( | ) | ||
| Present value of lease liabilities | $ | |||
The
Company made cash payments of $
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements – From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.
The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 – “Income Tax Disclosures” required for periods beginning after December 31, 2024. The Company has provided additional disclosures in the income tax footnote (see Note 12) as required.
3. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company adopted the provisions of ASC subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”) on January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of non-performance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities as of December 31, 2025:
Schedule of Changes in Fair Value of the Company’s Level 3 Financial Liabilities
Debt Derivative Liabilities | ||||
| Balance, December 31, 2024 | $ | |||
| Transfers in upon initial fair value of derivative liabilities | ||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities and warrant liability | ( | ) | ||
| Balance, December 31, 2025 | $ | |||
Derivative Liabilities – The Company issued convertible promissory notes which are convertible into common stock, at holders’ option, at a discount to the market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to these notes relating to certain anti-dilutive (reset) provisions. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of debenture and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date.
| F-13 |
| Table of Contents |
At
December 31, 2025, the Company marked to market the fair value of the debt derivatives and determined a fair value of $
Based upon ASC 815-40, the Company has adopted a sequencing approach regarding the application of ASC 815-40 to its outstanding convertible notes. Pursuant to the sequencing approach, the Company evaluates its contracts based upon earliest issuance date.
4. Note Receivable
On January 12, 2023, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) with Mother Lode Mining, Inc. (“MLM”). The LOI became binding on January 24, 2023 when the final installment of initial payment set forth under the LOI was received by the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the LOI, the Company agreed to sell all of the shares of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Compañía Minera Cerros Del Sur, S.A. de C.V. (“CMCS”), to MLM. CMCS is the Honduran-based company that owns the Clavo Rico mine.
The
purchase price for the sale of CMCS by the Company to MLM consisted of the following cash consideration (a) $
In
addition to the amounts already delivered under the LOI, an additional amount of $
On February 4, 2026, the Company and MLM entered into a settlement agreement resolving all disputes in connection with the LOI. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to a mutual dismissal with prejudice of all claims, counterclaims, and causes of action asserted or that could have been asserted in United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Case No. 2:24-cv-00171-TS-CMR, or in any other forum. As part of the settlement, the parties executed a mutual general release of all claims and potential claims against the other parties and their affiliates. Following the settlement, no further amounts are expected to be collected under the LOI.
| F-14 |
| Table of Contents |
The following table summarizes the note receivable of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Schedule of Note Receivable
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Note Receivable from Mother Lode Mining, Inc. pursuant to a Letter of Intent dated effective January 12, 2023, in the original principal amount of $ | $ | $ | ||||||
| Less: Payments received | - | - | ||||||
| Total Note Receivable outstanding | ||||||||
| Less: Allowance for Doubtful Note Receivable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Note Receivable | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
5. Properties, Plant and Equipment, Net
Properties, plant and equipment of continuing operations at December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
Schedule of Properties Plant and Equipment, Net
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Machinery and Equipment | $ | - | $ | |||||
| Office Equipment and Furniture | - | |||||||
| Property Plant and Equipment Gross | - | |||||||
| Less Accumulated Depreciation | - | ( | ) | |||||
| Less Loss on Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment | - | ( | ) | |||||
| Total Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
During
the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized depreciation expense of $
6. Solar Power Asset
On
July 7, 2025, BluSky AI Inc., entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC
(“DAM”), a Wyoming limited liability company, whose managing member, Trent D’Ambrosio, is also the Company’s
CEO. DAM assigned to the Company its exclusive right to utilize solar and grid-interconnected power at a data center project located
in the Milford area of Beaver County, Utah. In exchange for the assignment of the Power Commitment in the Acquisition Agreement, the
Company issued
7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts Payable and accrued liabilities of continuing operations at December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of the following:
Schedule of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Accounts Payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued Interest Payable | - | |||||||
| Accrued Salaries and Benefits | ||||||||
| Total Accrued Liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| F-15 |
| Table of Contents |
8. Notes Payable
Notes payable were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Schedule of Notes Payable
| Notes Payable | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||
| Phil Zobrist | $ | $ | ||||||
| Antczak Polich Law LLC | - | |||||||
| Total Notes Payable | ||||||||
| Less Short-Term Notes Payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Long-Term Notes Payable | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Phil
Zobrist – On January 11, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured Promissory Note to Phil Zobrist in the principal amount of $
Antczak
Polich Law, LLC – On March 21, 2023, the Company issued an unsecured Promissory Note (“Note”) to Antczak Polich
Law, LLC (“Antczak”), in the principal amount of $
9. Notes Payable – Related Parties
Notes payable – related parties were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Schedule of Related Parties Notes Payable
| Notes Payable - Related Parties | Relationship | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Cluff-Rich PC 401K | $ | $ | ||||||||
| Whit Cluff | ||||||||||
| Digital Asset Medium, LLC | - | |||||||||
| Debra D’ambrosio | ||||||||||
| Francis E. Rich | ||||||||||
| Pine Valley Investments | ||||||||||
| Total Notes Payable - Related Parties | ||||||||||
| Less Short-Term Notes Payable - Related Parties | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total Long-Term Notes Payable - Related Parties | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
| F-16 |
| Table of Contents |
Cluff-Rich
PC 401K (Affiliate – Director) – On June 29, 2022, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note to Cluff-Rich PC 401K in the principal
amount of $
Digital
Asset Medium, LLC (Affiliate – Director) – On January 9, 2025, the Company formalized an unsecured Short-Term Promissory
Notes to Digital Asset Medium, LLC in principal amounts totaling $
D.
D’Ambrosio (Immediate Family Member of Director) – On January 1, 2023, there were six notes outstanding with outstanding
balance of the Notes of $
D.
D’Ambrosio (Immediate Family Member of Director) –During June through September, 2024, the Company received funds in
the amount of $
D.
D’Ambrosio (Immediate Family Member of Director) –During October through December, 2024, the Company received funds in
the amount of $
D.
D’Ambrosio (Immediate Family Member of Director) –On January 1, 2025, the Company formalized an unsecured Short-Term
Promissory Notes to D. D’Ambrosio in principal amounts totaling $
On
September 24, 2025, the Company issued
Francis
E. Rich (Immediate Family Member of Director) – On January 1, 2023, there were two notes outstanding with outstanding
balance of the Notes of $
| F-17 |
| Table of Contents |
Pine
Valley Investments, LLC (Affiliate – Shareholder) – On January 1, 2023, there were three Notes outstanding with
outstanding balance of the Notes of $
Whit
Cluff (Affiliate – Director) – On March 28, 2024, the Company issued an unsecured Short-Term Promissory Note to
Cluff-Rich PC 401K in the principal amount of $
10. Convertible Notes Payable
Convertible notes payable were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Schedule of Convertible Notes Payable
| Convertible Notes Payable | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||
| 1800 Diagonal Lending | $ | - | $ | |||||
| Lowell Fuller | - | |||||||
| Robert Knoop | - | |||||||
| Total Convertible Notes Payable | ||||||||
| Less Unamortized Discount | ( | ) | - | |||||
| Total Convertible Notes Payable, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount | ||||||||
| Less Short-Term Convertible Notes Payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Long-Term Convertible Notes Payable, Net of Unamortized Debt Discount | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
1800
Diagonal Lending LLC– On January 23, 2024, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”)
to 1800 Diagonal Lending, LLC (“1800”), in the principal amount of $
1800
Diagonal Lending LLC– On May 3, 2024, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) to 1800
Diagonal Lending, LLC (“1800”), in the principal amount of $
| F-18 |
| Table of Contents |
On
January 9, 2025, the Company negotiated the settlement of both notes with the lender and agreed to pay $
In
August and September 2025, the Company raised $
From
October through December 2025, the Company raised $
11. Stockholders’ Deficit
Common Stock
On
August 2, 2024 upon the conversion of $
On
April 1, 2025, the Company issued
On
June 10, 2025, the Company issued
On
June 24, 2025, the Company issued
On
July 7, 2025, BluSky AI Inc., entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”),
a Wyoming limited liability company, whose managing member, Trent D’Ambrosio, is also the Company’s CEO (see Note 5). In
exchange for the assignment of the Power Commitment in the Acquisition Agreement, the Company issued
In
August and September 2025, the Company raised $
| F-19 |
| Table of Contents |
On
September 4, 2025, the Company issued
On
September 24, 2025, the Company issued
On
September 30, 2025, the Company issued
On
September 30, 2025, the Company issued
On
October 31, 2025, the Company issued
On
December 12, 2025, the Company issued
On
December 15, 2025, the Company issued
12. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for U.S. income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The provision for income tax expense (recovery) is comprised the following amounts:
Schedule of Provision for Income Tax Expense Recovery
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Federal tax benefit at the statutory rate | $ | ( | ) | % | $ | ( | ) | % | ||||||||
| State tax benefit, net of federal income tax benefit | ( | ) | % | ( | ) | % | ||||||||||
| Unallowed deductions | - | % | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ( | ) | % | ( | ) | % | ||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on settlement of debt | - | % | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Accrued interest expense | - | % | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount | - | % | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | - | % | - | % | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
The components of deferred income tax in the accompanying balance sheets are as follows:
Schedule of Components of Deferred Income Tax
| December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforward | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total gross deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Less: Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total net deferred taxes | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| F-20 |
| Table of Contents |
As
of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately
$
The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carry-forwards before they will expire through the year 2045.
The Company is subject to income tax in the U.S. federal jurisdiction. The Company has not been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in connection with income taxes. The Company’s tax years beginning with the year ended June 30, 2012 through December 31, 2025 generally remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service until its net operating loss carry-forwards are utilized and the applicable statutes of limitation have expired.
13. Related Party Transactions
Consulting
Agreement – In February 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with stockholder/director Trent D’Ambrosio.
The Company agreed to pay $
Mr. Cluff currently serves as a director of the Company and has a separate agreement as a consultant of the Company effective as of October 2, 2015.
Employment
Agreements – The Company has an employment agreement with its chief executive officer, Trent D’Ambrosio. The employment
agreement was effective as of April 1, 2019 and provides for compensation of $
Notes
Payable –The Company took one short-term note payable from Debra D’Ambrosio, an immediate family member related party
and one short-term note payable from Digital Asset Medium, LLC, an affiliate of a director, during the year ended December 31, 2025.
The Company received $
Accounts
Payable –Two officers/directors of the Company have been paying expenses for the Company on their personal credit cards. The
Company has recorded these expenses and accrued the amounts in accounts payable to the individuals. As of December 31, 2025, there is
$
On
June 10, 2025, the Company issued
On
June 10, 2025, the Company issued
| F-21 |
| Table of Contents |
On
July 7, 2025, BluSky AI Inc., entered into an Acquisition and Power Assignment Agreement with Digital Asset Medium, LLC (“DAM”),
a Wyoming limited liability company, whose managing member, Trent D’Ambrosio, is also the Company’s CEO (see Note 5). In
exchange for the assignment of the Power Commitment in the Acquisition Agreement, the Company issued
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company at times is subject to other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The following is a summary of pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the results of operations of the Company.
On
or about March 4, 2024, the Company filed a complaint against Mother Lode Mining, Inc., a Canadian company, and Robert Salna (the “Defendants”),
seeking damages in an amount of not less than $
15. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated subsequent events, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” through the date which the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued and there are no material subsequent events, except as noted below.
On
January 10, 2026, the Company issued
On February 4, 2026, the Company and Mother Lode Mining entered into a settlement agreement resolving all disputes in connection with the LOI and the Clavo Rico mine. Under the settlement, the parties agreed to a mutual dismissal with prejudice of all claims, counterclaims, and causes of action asserted or that could have been asserted in United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Case No. 2:24-cv-00171-TS-CMR, or in any other forum. As part of the settlement, the parties executed a mutual general release of all claims and potential claims against the other parties and their affiliates. Following the settlement, no further amounts are expected to be collected under the LOI.
| F-22 |