STOCK TITAN

Turquoise Hill announces completion of 2020 Oyu Tolgoi Feasibility Study, updated Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, and an improved liquidity outlook

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Neutral)
Tags
Rhea-AI Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources has updated its Mineral Resources and Reserves following the Oyu Tolgoi Feasibility Study (OTFS20), which introduces a new block cave design for the Hugo North mine. This redesign has led to a decrease in the Mineral Reserves estimate due to structural pillars aimed to protect infrastructure. A substantial expansion capital cost of US$2.2 billion is anticipated, with total costs for the project ranging from US$1.3 to US$1.8 billion. The company noted ongoing COVID-19 impacts affecting operations. The NPV8 is projected at US$10 billion, maintaining a mine life of 31 years.

Positive
  • Updated Mineral Resources and Reserves increase operational flexibility.
  • NPV8 projected at US$10 billion suggests strong future cash flows.
  • Mine life extended to 31 years provides long-term value.
Negative
  • Mineral Reserves reduced due to structural pillars.
  • Expansion capital costs increased by approximately US$1.5 billion.
  • Ongoing COVID-19 impacts have slowed project operations.

MONTREAL, July 2, 2020 /PRNewswire/ - Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. ("Turquoise Hill" or the "Company") today announced its updated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and CIM definition standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014), an improved liquidity outlook and deferral of the Company's interim financing discussions.

The Company's updated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are being announced further to the completion of an updated Oyu Tolgoi Feasibility Study ("OTFS20") that incorporates the new mine design for Hugo North Lift 1 Panel 0. This new design reduces the Mineral Reserve estimate for the Hugo North underground mine due to the inclusion of two structural pillars, to the north and south of Panel 0 to protect ore handling infrastructure. 

The Company's project manager has advised that it is expected that part of the ore contained in these pillars will be recoverable at a later stage following additional studies which are currently underway. Pending the completion of this work in 2021, the material contained in the pillars has been converted from Mineral Reserves to Mineral Resources.

The Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves also include minor updates to the Oyut open pit resource model and account for depletions to December 31, 2019, as disclosed in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019 ("2019 AIF"). 

In support of the changes, an updated technical report ("2020 OTTR") prepared in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101 will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release under Turquoise Hill's profile at www.sedar.com.

Turquoise Hill notes that Oyu Tolgoi LLC is in the process of submittting OTFS20 with the Government of Mongolia in order to comply with local regulatory requirements. OTFS20 incorporates an update to the first sustainable production schedule and capital cost estimates for the underground mine development based on the updated Panel 0 mine design announced by the Company on May 13, 2020. Estimated total expansion capital for the underground project is in line with the recently disclosed range of US$1.3 billion to US$1.8 billion in excess of the Oyu Tolgoi 2016 Feasibility Study ("OTFS16") estimate, of which US$3.8 billion has been spent as of March 31, 2020. A further, more detailed cost and schedule update will be provided in connection with the definitive estimate review, expected to be completed before the end of the year.

OTFS20 does not reflect the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic which are ongoing and continue to be assessed. A number of work fronts are directly impacted including Shafts 3 and 4 being put on care and maintenance and work on Primary crusher 1 being slowed due to the lack of availability of critical resources and restrictions on site workforce numbers.

"With the updated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves now completed, we remain focused first and foremost on delivering the underground project safely and remaining within the guidance ranges on cost and schedule we have previously announced", stated Ulf Quellmann, Chief Executive Officer of Turquoise Hill.  "At the same time, the team is looking carefully at options for recovering material within the structural pillars and to optimise the mine plan for Panels 1 and 2 to maximise value for our shareholders."

The following table provides a summary of key outputs from OTFS20. Unless otherwise stated, all items are presented in real terms on an after-tax basis and only include Mineral Reserves.

Description

Units

OTFS20

Material Processed

bt

1.2

Copper Headgrade

%

0.82

Gold Headgrade

g/t

0.30

Silver Headgrade

g/t

1.89

Recoverable Copper

blb

19.5

Recoverable Gold

Moz

8.4

Recoverable Silver

Moz

51.7

Mine Life

Years

31

Expansion Capital

US$b

2.2

Payback Period

Years

6

NPV8 After Tax

US$b

10.0

Notes:


1.

All financial metrics reflect the Company's financial analysis of OTFS20 metrics.

2.

NPV8 is Net Present Value of mineral reserves at a discount rate of 8% for all years, calculated at January 1, 2021 based on expected cash flows from and after that date.

3.

For mine planning the metal prices used as part of OTFS20 to calculate block model Net Smelter Returns (NSR) were copper at $3.08/lb; gold at $1,292/oz and silver at $19.00/oz. For the open pit processing and general administration, the following operating costs have been used to determine cut-off grades: Southwest at $8.37/t, Central Chalcocite, Central Covellite, and Central Chalcopyrite at $7.25/t and the underground costs are based on $15.34/t.

4.

OTFS20 NPV8 uses long-term metal prices of: copper at $3.03/lb; gold at $1,474/oz; and silver at $17.85/oz. The analysis has been calculated with assumptions for smelter refining and treatment charges, deductions and payment terms, concentrate transport, metallurgical recoveries and royalties.

5.

NPV8 and Payback period analysis uses the Mineral Reserves reported in OTFS20 that are set out in this announcement. 

6.

NPV8 is calculated as of January 1, 2021 and excludes expansion capital up December 31, 2020 of approximately $4.6b. Expansion capital costs include only direct project costs and exclude interest expense, capitalised interest, debt repayments, tax pre-payments and forex adjustments.

7.

The estimate of Mineral Reserves may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues including risks set forth in the 2019 AIF and other filings made with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available at www.sedar.com. These updated estimates differ from those reported in the 2019 AIF and reflect incorporation of changes in the Hugo North Panel 0 design.

8.

Payback period and mine life are calculated from January 1, 2021 and are rounded to years.

9.

OTTR16 can be accessed under Turquoise Hill's profile at www.sedar.com.

10.

Expansion capital numbers are presented inclusive of VAT.

Refined Hugo North Lift 1 Mine Design Lowers Execution Risk

On May 13, 2020, Turquoise Hill announced a new block cave mine design for Panel 0 with an anticipated delay to sustainable production of approximately 25 months (with a range of 21 to 29 months), and an increase in development capital cost of approximately US$1.5 billion (with a range of US$1.3 billion to US$1.8 billion), subject to further studies and any additional scheduling delays or increases in capital costs arising from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

For the development of the Panel 0 mine design, Turquoise Hill engaged subject matter experts to undertake an external and independent assurance process that focused on a technical review of the proposed mine re-design options, and a review of the schedule and estimating process.

The Hugo North Lift 1 mine plan incorporates the development of three panels and in order to reach the full sustainable production rate of 95,000 tonnes per day from the underground operations, all three panels need to be in production. During the ramp-up phase through to full capacity of the underground operations, the Oyut open pit will continue to provide the incremental ore to achieve the expected 105,000 to 115,000 tonnes per day throughput for the life of Hugo North Lift 1.

The design change results in a more resilient mine plan able to effectively operate within the Panel 0 geotechnical conditions as now understood. The 2020 OTTR will incorporate and reflect these updates.

The block cave design incorporated in OTFS20 varies from the OTFS16 design through:

  • 120m structural pillars included to the north and south of Panel 0, protecting ore handling infrastructure and increasing the optionality of sequencing Panel 1 and Panel 2;
  • Ore handling facilities moved into the structural pillars, improving excavation stability;
  • Drawpoint spacing updated from 28m x15m to 31m x 18m, improving extraction level stability; and
  • Modified panel initiation approach for Panel 0, minimising stress damage to extraction level.

The Company believes the existing feasibility study designs for Panel 1 and Panel 2 remain executable based on the current orebody understanding. However, with the introduction of structural pillars, the remaining panels become independent, allowing for much greater operational flexibility. This provides an opportunity to:

  • Optimise the extraction level elevation for each panel independently;
  • Evaluate the potential to convert Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources below the current Lift 1 extraction level to Probable Mineral Reserves;
  • Complete additional confirmatory drilling and data collection in support of potential Panel 1 and Panel 2 design refinements; and
  • Include structural pillar recovery level(s) in the integrated Hugo North Lift 1 mine design.

Panel 1 and Panel 2 design optimisation studies have been initiated to explore these opportunities.  These studies are not expected to delay the ramp up of Panel 1 or Panel 2 Drilling work is underway and the resulting updates to geotechnical modelling and mine design review are expected to continue into 2021.

Sensitivity Estimates

Economic sensitivity of the project relating to a number of key variables set forth in OTFS20 are outlined in the figures below:

Reserve Case Price Sensitivities

NPV8$billions

Copper Price

$US, 2020 Real

-15%

-10%

-5%

Base Case

+5%

+10%

+15%

Gold
Price

-15%

5.9

7.1

8.3

9.3

10.3

11.3

12.3

-10%

6.2

7.4

8.5

9.5

10.5

11.5

12.5

-5%

6.4

7.6

8.8

9.8

10.7

11.7

12.7

Base Case

6.7

7.9

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

12.9

+5%

7.0

8.1

9.2

10.2

11.2

12.2

13.1

+10%

7.2

8.4

9.4

10.4

11.4

12.4

13.3

+15%

7.5

8.6

9.7

10.6

11.6

12.6

13.6

Notes:


1.

NPV8 is Net Present Value at a discount rate of 8%, valued as of January 1, 2021.

2.

All values are presented on a $US, real 2020 basis.

3.

Base case copper price is based on consensus estimates with a long-term forecast of $3.03/lb.

4.

Base case gold price is based on consensus estimates with a long-term forecast of $1,474/oz.

 

Oyu Tolgoi Reserve Case Sensitivities

Impact on NPV8 ($m)


Cu Price

Au Price

Opex

CAPEX

+/- 1% Discount Rate

+10%

1,990

466

663

186

1,016

-10%

(2,096)

(434)

(657)

(186)

(912)

Notes:

1.

NPV8 is Net Present Value at a discount rate of 8%, valued as of January 1, 2021.

2.

All values are presented on a $US, real 2020 basis.

3.

Base case copper price is based on consensus estimates with a long-term forecast of $3.03/lb.

4.

Base case gold price is based on consensus estimates with a long-term forecast of $1,474/oz.

5.

Costs considered are forward as of January 1, 2021.

Updated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

OTFS20 incorporates updated Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for Hugo North Lift 1 and there has been no change to the Oyut open pit Mineral Reserves relative to those set forth in the 2019 AIF. Mineral Resource estimates for Hugo North have been updated  since the 2019 AIF, while the Mineral Resources for Hugo South, Oyut open pit and Heruga remain unchanged.

2020 Oyu Tolgoi Mineral Reserves

Oyut Deposit Open Pit Mineral Reserves as of December 31st, 2019

Classification

Ownership

Mineral Reserves

Contained Metal

Ore

Cu

Au

Ag

Copper 

Gold

Silver

(Mt)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(Mt)

(Moz)

(Moz)

Proven

Oyu Tolgoi LLC

307

0.52

0.39

1.32

1.6

3.8

13.0

Probable

Oyu Tolgoi LLC

477

0.39

0.23

1.14

1.9

3.5

17.4

Total (Proven + Probable)

Oyu Tolgoi LLC

783

0.44

0.29

1.21

3.5

7.2

30.5


Oyut Stockpile Mineral Reserves as of December 31st, 2019

Classification

Ownership

Mineral Reserves

Contained Metal

Ore

Cu

Au

Ag

Copper 

Gold

Silver

(Mt)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(Mt)

(Moz)

(Moz)

Proven

Oyu Tolgoi LLC

48

0.33

0.12

0.93

0.2

0.2

1.4


Hugo North Deposit Underground Mineral Reserves as of December 31st, 2019 (updated June 30th, 2020)

Classification

Ownership

Mineral Reserves

Contained Metal

Ore

Cu

Au

Ag

Copper 

Gold

Silver

(Mt)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(Mt)

(Moz)

(Moz)

Probable

Oyu Tolgoi LLC

400

1.51

0.29

3.11

6.0

3.8

40.0

Probable

EJV

40

1.54

0.53

3.63

0.6

0.7

4.6

Total Probable


440

1.51

0.32

3.16

6.7

4.5

44.7


Oyu Tolgoi Project Mineral Reserves as of December 31st, 2019 (updated June 30th, 2020)

Classification

Mineral Reserves

Contained Metal

Ore

Cu

Au

Ag

Copper 

Gold

Silver

(Mt)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(Mt)

(Moz)

(Moz)

Proven

355

0.49

0.35

1.27

1.7

4.0

14.5

Probable

917

0.93

0.27

2.11

8.5

7.9

62.1

Total (Proven + Probable)

1272

0.81

0.29

1.87

10.3

11.9

76.6

Notes:


1.

CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (2014) were used for reporting of Mineral Reserves.

2.

NSR values used for Mineral Reserves estimation are based on forecast long-term copper, gold, and silver prices of $3.08/lb; $1,292/oz; and $19.00/oz respectively.

3.

Assumptions for smelting refining and treatment charges, deductions and payment terms, concentrate transport, metallurgical recoveries and royalties are included in the NSR values.

4.

Processing and general administration costs used to determine cut-off NSR values vary between $7.18/t and $10.87/t depending on the ore type processed.

5.

For the Hugo North Mineral Reserves, a NSR shut off grade of $17.84/t is used to determine the point at which each underground drawpoint is closed. This NSR value is based on estimated mining, processing and G&A costs ranging from $17.27/t to $17.90/t across five independent ore types.

6.

For the Oyut Mineral Reserves, only measured Mineral Resources were used to report proven Mineral Reserves, and only indicated Mineral Resources were used to report Probable Mineral Reserves.

7.

For the Hugo North Mineral Reserves, Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources were used to report probable Mineral Reserves.

8.

The effective date of the Mineral Reserve estimates is December 31, 2019.

9.

EJV is the Entrée Joint Venture. The Shivee Tolgoi License and the Javkhlant License are held by Entrée. The Shivee Tolgoi License and the Javkhlant License are planned to be operated by Oyu Tolgoi LLC. Oyu Tolgoi LLC will receive 80% of cash flows after capital and operating costs for material originating below 560 m, and 70% above this depth. The Company holds a 7.9% interest in Entrée Resources Ltd.

10.

The estimate of Mineral Reserves may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues including risks set forth in the 2019 AIF and other filings made with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available at www.sedar.com. These updated estimates differ from those reported in the  2019 AIF and reflect changes in the Hugo North Panel 0 design.

11.

Totals may not add due to rounding.

Hugo North Lift 1 Mineral Reserve Comparison 2019 AIF to OTFS20

The Hugo North Lift 1 Mineral Reserves have been updated to reflect the new Panel 0 design. The new design resulted in the conversion of the material contained in the structural pillars from mineral reserves to mineral resources. Principally as a result of the conversion, the estimated probable Mineral Reserves at December 31, 2019 at Hugo North are approximately 6.7 million tonnes of copper and 4.5 million ounces of gold, compared with the previously disclosed 7.9 million tonnes of copper and 5.4 million ounces of gold.

While this update reflects the current Panel 0 mine status, it does not reflect any opportunities that may arise from the recovery of the structural pillars or Panel 1 and Panel 2 optimisation studies, expected to continue into 2021.

FAQ

What is the significance of the updated Mineral Resources by Turquoise Hill (TRQ)?

The updated Mineral Resources indicate a redesigned block cave for Hugo North, impacting future outputs and operational flexibility.

What are the estimated expansion capital costs according to Turquoise Hill's latest PR?

The estimated expansion capital costs for the underground project are projected between US$1.3 billion and US$1.8 billion.

How long is the mine life for Turquoise Hill's Oyu Tolgoi project?

The projected mine life for the Oyu Tolgoi project is 31 years.

What is the projected NPV8 for Turquoise Hill's Oyu Tolgoi project?

The projected NPV8 for the Oyu Tolgoi project is US$10 billion.

How has COVID-19 impacted Turquoise Hill's operations?

COVID-19 has caused slowdowns in operations, affecting critical resources and workforce availability.

TRQ

NYSE:TRQ

TRQ Rankings

TRQ Latest News

TRQ Stock Data

Dimension Stone Mining and Quarrying
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
Link

Hugo North Deposit Underground Mineral Reserves Comparison

Classification & Report

Ownership

Mineral Reserves

Contained Metal

Ore

Cu

Au

Ag

Copper 

Gold

Silver

(Mt)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(Mt)

(Moz)

(Moz)