McEwen Mining: Fenix Project Feasibility Study Report Filed
McEwen Mining (NYSE: MUX) has filed a technical report for its Fenix Project, located in Sinaloa, Mexico, in accordance with NI 43-101 standards. The report reveals a 9.5-year mine life, with an attractive after-tax IRR of 28% at $1,500/oz gold, scaling up to 51% at $1,800/oz. The project plans to produce an average of 26,000 oz of gold annually in Phase 1 and 4.5 million oz of silver equivalent in Phase 2. Permits for Phase 1 are secured, and detailed engineering and financing evaluations are underway. The project proposes innovative tailings management methods to enhance safety and lower costs.
- Fenix Project demonstrates a strong after-tax IRR of 28% at $1,500/oz gold and 51% at $1,800/oz.
- Projected average annual production of 26,000 oz gold in Phase 1 and 4.5 million oz silver equivalent in Phase 2.
- Confirmed permits for Phase 1 of the project indicate regulatory compliance and progress.
- The project includes environmentally friendly tailings management techniques improving safety and reducing costs.
- Further advancements for Phase 2 are contingent on obtaining additional permits.
TORONTO, Feb. 16, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) (“McEwen” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the filing of a technical report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), for its
“The Fenix Feasibility Study envisions a 9.5-year mine life with an attractive after-tax IRR of
The project will incorporate an environmentally progressive method of tailings management, using in-pit storage that creates multiple benefits such as improved safety, smaller environmental footprint, lower capital and operating costs, and improved reclamation outcomes.
Average annual production is projected at 26,000(1) oz gold in Phase 1 and 4,500,000(4) oz silver equivalent in Phase 2. The critical path environmental permits are in hand for the first phase of production. In addition, the El Gallo Complex infrastructure remains in place, as well as an established, well-experienced local workforce. Our next steps will involve detailed engineering, assessment of procurement options, and the evaluation of financing alternatives,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
Fenix FS Highlights
Base Case(1) | Spot Case | Upside Case | ||||||
After-Tax IRR | ||||||||
After-Tax NPV ( | ||||||||
After-Tax Payback Period | 3.6 years | 2.9 years | 2.8 years | |||||
Average After-Tax Cash Flow per Year of Full Production | ||||||||
The FS for project Fenix development involves two phases: | ||||||||
Phase 1: Years 1 to 6, Gold Production | ||||||||
• | Average Annual Gold Production 26,000 oz Au | |||||||
• | ||||||||
• | ||||||||
Phase 2: Years 7 to 9.5, Silver Production | ||||||||
• | Average Annual Silver Production 4,500,000 oz AgEq.(4) | |||||||
• | ||||||||
• |
Feasibility Study Report
The complete Fenix Project FS NI 43-101 Technical Report is available on www.sedar.com and www.mcewenmining.com. The FS was prepared by GR Engineering Services Limited (“GRES”) in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”) and SEC Industry Guide 7.
Permits
The current operation at El Gallo Gold is a fully permitted site; permit for the Phase 1 was granted by the Federal Environmental Authority (SEMARNAT) in September 2019, for the addition of a mill and leach circuit in the location of the existing facilities for the reprocessing of the heap leach pad material. The permit amendment also includes the backfilling of a previously mined pit with mill tailings, as part of an integrated concurrent closure plan for the El Gallo Gold Mine. In-pit tailings storage provides a number of key benefits to the project, including:
- Lower construction and operating cost compared to a conventional tailings dam or dry-stack facility.
- Much improved safety and long-term tailing and pit stability.
- Reduced footprint minimizes surface disturbance and maximizes reclamation results.
- Promotes the re-use of process water, reducing groundwater demand.
- Reduces reclamation and management costs.
Further project advancement for Phase 2 is subject to permit approvals. Phase 2 project permitting will require authorization to expand the process plant footprint at El Gallo Gold and the haul road, and to augment the tailings volume to be deposited at the depleted pit.
The Fenix Project has CONAGUA approval for the extraction of groundwater and land-use permits for the construction of wells required for the life of Fenix Project.
Resource Estimates
Estimated resources for the Fenix Project are comprised only of material within the boundaries of conceptual pit shells, except for the El Gallo heap leach pad, which is considered completely available for reprocessing.
For the purposes of mine scheduling, the contained gold ounces in the Heap Leach Material have been depleted from the drill-defined resource model estimate by an amount of 23 koz Au, to account for the production from heap leach operations and gold in circuit assessments between the timing of the resource estimate up until the reserve estimate date of December 2020.
Table 1: Fenix Project Resources Estimate(5)(6)
Heap Leach Material(7) | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold |
Potential COG = 0 g/t Au | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz |
Measured | 8.8 | 2 | 451 | 0.59 | 167 |
Indicated | 1.2 | 2 | 67 | 0.60 | 23 |
Measured and Indicated | 10.0 | 2 | 518 | 0.59 | 190 |
Inferred | 0.1 | 2 | 7 | 0.66 | 3 |
El Gallo Silver | |||||
In Optimized Pit Shell | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold |
Potential COG = 58 g/t Ag | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz |
Measured | 1.0 | 155 | 4,791 | 0.08 | 3 |
Indicated | 3.5 | 127 | 14,228 | 0.13 | 15 |
Measured and Indicated | 4.5 | 133 | 19,019 | 0.12 | 18 |
Inferred | 0.1 | 129 | 286 | 0.14 | 0.3 |
COMBINED RESOURCES | |||||
In Optimized Pit Shells | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold |
Potential COGs variable | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz |
Measured | 9.8 | 17 | 5,242 | 0.54 | 170 |
Indicated | 4.7 | 95 | 14,295 | 0.25 | 38 |
Measured and Indicated | 14.5 | 42 | 19,536 | 0.45 | 208 |
Inferred | 0.2 | 47 | 293 | 0.48 | 3 |
Table 2: Fenix Project Reserves Estimate December 31, 2020 (8)
Heap Leach Material | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold |
Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz | |
Proven | 8.9 | 2 | 451 | 0.52 | 149 |
Probable | 1.2 | 2 | 67 | 0.52 | 20 |
Proven + Probable | 10.1 | 2 | 518 | 0.52 | 170 |
El Gallo Silver | |||||
Proven | 0.7 | 166 | 3,708 | 0.05 | 1 |
Probable | 3.7 | 127 | 15,017 | 0.13 | 16 |
Proven + Probable | 4.4 | 133 | 18,725 | 0.12 | 17 |
COMBINED RESERVES | |||||
Proven | 9.6 | 13 | 4,159 | 0.48 | 150 |
Probable | 4.9 | 95 | 15,084 | 0.23 | 36 |
Proven + Probable | 14.5 | 41 | 19,243 | 0.39 | 187 |
Table 3: Assumptions for Heap Leach Pad and El Gallo Silver Pit Optimization Phase 2 (6)(9)
Assumptions for Resource Pit Shell Optimizations | Deposits | Values | |
Gold Price | All | ||
Silver Price | All | ||
Mining Cost | Heap Leach Pad | ||
El Gallo Silver | |||
Processing and G&A | Heap Leach Pad | ||
El Gallo Silver – Oxides | |||
El Gallo Silver– Sulfides | |||
Recovery - Au | Heap Leach Pad | ||
El Gallo Silver | |||
Recovery - Ag | Heap Leach Pad | ||
El Gallo Silver – Oxides | |||
El Gallo Silver– Sulfides | |||
Cut-Off Grade | Heap Leach Pad | 0 g/t Au | |
El Gallo Silver | 58 g/t Ag | ||
Inter-Ramp Pit Slope Angle | El Gallo Silver | 45 degrees |
FOOTNOTES | |
(1) | The Base Case utilizes the three-year moving average prices for gold and silver (approximate value). Estimated 26,000 oz Au per annum production assumes full production from years 2023 to 2027. Average after-tax cash flow per annum from full production years 2023 to 2031 is approximately |
(2) | Cash cost is calculated by dividing total life-of-mine production costs, general and administrative expenses and royalties by total ounces produced. |
(3) | All-in sustaining costs (AISC) are calculated by dividing the sum of all cash costs plus sustaining capital and reclamation costs by total ounces produced. |
(4) | All references to AgEq are based on an 88 Ag oz to 1 Au oz ratio. For Phase 1 silver accounts for < |
(5) | Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves. Numbers in the table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and may not sum due to rounding. |
(6) | Resources stated as contained within a potentially economically minable open pit; pit optimization parameters are, USD |
(7) | The heap leach pad spent ore resource number assumes a cut-off grade that permits processing of the entire pad, whereas blocks within the leach pad model will be mobilized while mining, which will make them difficult to segregate; sub-cut-off leach pad material will inherently have potential acid generating sulfide liabilities if placed in our waste dumps and so it will be prudent to process the entire leach pad and place tailings in a previously mined pit at an overall environmental and economic benefit. |
(8) | The reserves stated here satisfy the requirements of the CIM Definition Standards, and the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines of November 2019, and have been converted only from those portions of the Mineral Resources that are classified as Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource categories after having been evaluated with consideration of all known modifying factors affecting economic viability. The reserves cut-off grade and cashflow models are based on |
(9) | Cut-off grades vary by pit according to economic, recovery and metallurgical parameters. |
The technical contents of this news release has been reviewed and approved by G. Peter Mah, P.Eng., COO of McEwen Mining and a Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects."
The technical information in this news release related to resource and reserve estimates has been reviewed and approved by Luke Willis, P.Geo., McEwen Mining’s Director of Resource Modelling and Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects."
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO US INVESTORS REGARDING RESOURCE ESTIMATION
McEwen Mining presently prepares its resource estimates in accordance with standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum referred to in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). These standards are different from the standards permitted in reports filed with the SEC under Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”). Under NI 43-101, McEwen Mining reports measured, indicated and inferred resources, measurements which are generally not permitted in filings made with the SEC under Guide 7. The estimation of measured and indicated resources involve greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into economically mineable reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources. Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. Therefore, U.S. investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of inferred resources exist, or that they can be legally or economically mined.
Canadian regulations permit the disclosure of resources in terms of “contained ounces” provided that the tonnes and grade for each resource are also disclosed; however, under Guide 7, the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces. Under Guide 7, the tonnage and average grade described herein would be characterized as mineralized material. We provide such disclosure about our properties to allow a means of comparing our projects to those of other companies in the mining industry, many of which are Canadian and report pursuant to NI 43-101, and to comply with applicable disclosure requirements.
CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements and information, including "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements and information expressed, as at the date of this news release, contain McEwen Mining Inc.'s (the "Company") estimates, forecasts, projections, expectations or beliefs as to future events and results. Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, risks and contingencies, and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements and information. Risks and uncertainties that could cause results or future events to differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, fluctuations in the market price of precious metals, mining industry risks, political, economic, social and security risks associated with foreign operations, the ability of the corporation to receive or receive in a timely manner permits or other approvals required in connection with operations, risks associated with the construction of mining operations and commencement of production and the projected costs thereof, risks related to litigation, the state of the capital markets, environmental risks and hazards, uncertainty as to calculation of mineral resources and reserves, and other risks. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information included herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to reissue or update forward-looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date hereof except as may be required by law. See McEwen Mining's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the caption "Risk Factors", for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information regarding the Company. All forward-looking statements and information made in this news release are qualified by this cautionary statement.
The NYSE and TSX have not reviewed and do not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the contents of this news release, which has been prepared by management of McEwen Mining Inc.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING
McEwen Mining is a diversified gold and silver producer and explorer focused in the Americas with operating mines in Nevada, Canada, Mexico and Argentina. It also owns a large copper deposit in Argentina.
CONTACT INFORMATION: | ||
Investor Relations: | Website: www.mcewenmining.com | 150 King Street West |
(866)-441-0690 Toll Free | Suite 2800, P.O. Box 24 | |
(647)-258-0395 | Facebook: facebook.com/mcewenmining | Toronto, ON, Canada |
Facebook: facebook.com/mcewenrob | M5H 1J9 | |
Mihaela Iancu ext. 320 | ||
Twitter: twitter.com/mcewenmining | ||
info@mcewenmining.com | Twitter: twitter.com/robmcewenmux | |
Instagram: instagram.com/mcewenmining |
FAQ
What is McEwen Mining's Fenix Project's after-tax IRR at different gold prices?
What is the estimated annual gold production for Fenix Project's Phase 1?
Where can I find the technical report for McEwen Mining's Fenix Project?
What are the next steps for the Fenix Project after filing the technical report?