Hecla Acquires Alexco Resource
Hecla Mining Company (NYSE:HL) has reached a definitive agreement to acquire all outstanding shares of Alexco Resource Corp. (NYSE American:AXU) not already owned by Hecla. Each Alexco shareholder will receive 0.116 Hecla shares, valuing Alexco shares at US$0.47, a 23% premium over the recent trading price. Hecla plans to provide interim financing for ongoing development at Keno Hill and has terminated a silver streaming interest with Wheaton Precious Metals for US$135 million of its shares. This acquisition is set to enhance Hecla's silver reserves by 19% and position it as Canada's largest silver producer.
- Acquisition increases Hecla's silver reserves by 19% to 237 million ounces.
- Keno Hill's fully permitted property includes a 400 tonne per day mill and significant infrastructure.
- Strategic acquisition positions Hecla as a potential leader in Canadian silver production.
- Interim financing allows for continued development and exploration at Keno Hill.
- Alexco has experienced delays in achieving commercial production at Keno Hill, impacting its share price.
- Transaction complexity may create uncertainties during the integration phase.
America’s largest and highest-grade silver producer adding Canada’s largest and highest-grade silver reserve
Hecla has also entered into an agreement with Wheaton Precious Metals Corporation (WPM) to terminate its silver streaming interest at Alexco’s
Benefits to Hecla Shareholders
-
A large, high-grade silver property in the
Yukon , a top 10 rated jurisdiction by theFraser Institute - A fully permitted property with infrastructure that includes a 400 tonne per day mill, on-site camp facility, all-season highway access, and connection to the hydropower grid
-
Increases Hecla’s silver exposure by increasing proven and probable silver reserves
19% to 237 million ounces, measured and indicated resources24% to 257 million ounces and inferred resources7% to 523.7 million ounces - Potential to be Canada’s largest silver producer
Benefits to Alexco Shareholders
- Delivers an immediate up-front premium to Alexco shareholders
- Allows advancement of Keno Hill’s development with an immediate and non-dilutive interim financing
- Partners with the United States’ largest silver producer
- Transitions from a single asset and its development risk to a diversified production base of long-lived mines and a portfolio of high-quality exploration projects
- A strong balance sheet to invest in Keno Hill and continue its history of resource expansion
- Enhanced capital markets profile with increased analyst coverage and trading liquidity
“At Hecla, we have followed the Keno Hill project closely for a number of years, as it is one of the very few deposits that fit seamlessly into Hecla’s strategy of owning and operating high-grade properties in tier one jurisdictions,” said
“This transaction delivers significant benefits to our stakeholders,” said
Terms of the Transaction
The agreement provides Alexco shareholders with 0.116 of a Hecla share for each Alexco common share they hold as of the effective date of the agreement. Hecla will issue approximately 18 million common shares to Alexco shareholders. Upon completion of the transactions with both WPM and Alexco, and assuming the
Hecla is providing Alexco with a
Board of Directors’ Recommendations
The Board of Directors of Alexco and Hecla have both unanimously approved the transaction. The Board of Directors of Alexco unanimously recommends that Alexco shareholders vote in favor of the transaction. Alexco’s directors and officers support the transaction and have entered into customary voting support agreements with Hecla agreeing to vote their Alexco shares in favor of the transaction. WPM has also entered into a voting support agreement with Hecla to vote its Alexco shares in favor of the transaction, resulting in approximately
Transaction Conditions and Timing
The transaction will be implemented by a Court-approved plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (
The Alexco-Hecla and WPM-Hecla transactions are each subject to applicable regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. The agreement provides for customary deal-protection provisions, including a non-solicitation covenant on the part of Alexco, a right for Hecla to match any superior proposal and a termination fee of
It is anticipated that the special meeting will be held in
Advisors and Counsel
Conference Call Details
Hecla will host a conference call on
About Hecla
Founded in 1891,
About Alexco
Alexco is the owner and operator of the historic
Important Additional Information About the transaction and Where to Find It
This material relates to Hecla’s proposed acquisition (the “Transaction”) of Alexco. Shares of Hecla’s common stock (the “Hecla Shares”) issued in connection with the proposed Transaction may be registered pursuant to a registration statement to be filed with the
In connection with the proposed transaction, Alexco will file proxy soliciting materials with the
Proxy solicitation materials will be mailed to Alexco’s shareholders seeking their approval of the Transaction. Anyone may also obtain a copy of such materials free of charge once available by directing a request to:
Participants in Solicitation
Hecla, Alexco, their respective directors and certain of their respective executive officers may be considered participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of Hecla is set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Cautionary Statements to Investors on Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-Looking Statements relating to Hecla
This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections and other applicable laws, including Canadian securities laws. When a forward-looking statement expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “project,” “target,” “indicative,” “preliminary,” “potential” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this news release may include, without limitation statements or information regarding the completion of Hecla’s acquisition of Alexco and that it will close in the third quarter, the termination of WPM’s stream on the Keno Hill project, the listed “benefits to Hecla shareholders,” the listed “benefits to Alexco shareholders,” and that Hecla has the organizational expertise and financial strength to build
Estimates or expectations of future events or results are based upon certain assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect, which could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements. Such assumptions, include, but are not limited to: (i) there being no significant change to current geotechnical, metallurgical, hydrological and other physical conditions; (ii) permitting, development, operations and expansion of the Company’s projects being consistent with current expectations and mine plans; (iii) political/regulatory developments in any jurisdiction in which the Company operates being consistent with its current expectations; (iv) the exchange rate for the USD/CAD and USD/MXN, being approximately consistent with current levels; (v) certain price assumptions for gold, silver, lead and zinc; (vi) prices for key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (vii) the accuracy of our current mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; (viii) the Company’s plans for development and production will proceed as expected and will not require revision as a result of risks or uncertainties, whether known, unknown or unanticipated; (ix) counterparties performing their obligations under hedging instruments and put option contracts; (x) sufficient workforce is available and trained to perform assigned tasks; (xi) weather patterns and rain/snowfall within normal seasonal ranges so as not to impact operations; (xii) relations with interested parties, including
In addition, material risks that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) gold, silver and other metals price volatility; (ii) operating risks; (iii) currency fluctuations; (iv) increased production costs and variances in ore grade or recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans; (v) community relations; (vi) conflict resolution and outcome of projects or oppositions; (vii) litigation, political, regulatory, labor and environmental risks; (viii) exploration risks and results, including those mineral resources are not mineral reserves, they do not have demonstrated economic viability and there is no certainty that they can be upgraded to mineral reserves through continued exploration; (ix) the failure of counterparties to perform their obligations under hedging instruments; (x) we take a material impairment charge on our
Forward-Looking Statements Relating to Alexco
Some statements (“forward-looking statements”) in this news release contain forward-looking information concerning Alexco’s anticipated results and developments in Alexco’s operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future, made as of the date of this news release. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the completion of Hecla’s acquisition of Alexco and that it will close in the third quarter, the termination of WPM’s stream on the Keno Hill project, the listed “benefits to Hecla shareholders,” the listed “benefits to Alexco shareholders,” and that Hecla has the organizational expertise and financial strength to build
Cautionary Statements to Investors on Reserves and Resources
This news release uses the terms “mineral resources,” “measured mineral resources,” “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources.” Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. You should not assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. Further, inferred mineral resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically, and an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project, and may not be converted to a mineral reserve. On
Qualified Person (QP)
The disclosure of all scientific and technical information in this news release concerning Alexco’s mineral properties has been reviewed and approved
Information in this news release about Hecla has been provided by, and is the responsibility of, Hecla. For further information about Hecla, please refer to Hecla’s
Table A |
|||||||||||
Hecla’s Mineral Reserves – |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Proven Reserves(1) |
|||||||||||
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
||
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
2 |
9.6 |
0.08 |
1.7 |
4.5 |
- |
18 |
0.1 |
30 |
80 |
- |
|
4,691 |
13.9 |
- |
8.4 |
3.4 |
- |
65,313 |
- |
395,290 |
159,360 |
- |
|
4,763 |
- |
0.10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
453 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (2,5) |
923 |
- |
0.16 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
143 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
10,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
65,331 |
596 |
395,320 |
159,440 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probable Reserves(6) |
|||||||||||
|
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
|
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
11,074 |
11.3 |
0.09 |
2.5 |
6.6 |
- |
125,201 |
946 |
282,220 |
725,830 |
- |
|
765 |
12.3 |
- |
7.5 |
2.8 |
- |
9,386 |
- |
57,160 |
21,650 |
- |
|
13,371 |
- |
0.07 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
928 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (2,5) |
1,695 |
- |
0.15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
259 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
26,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
134,587 |
2,133 |
339,380 |
747,480 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|||||||||||
|
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
|
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
11,076 |
11.3 |
0.09 |
2.5 |
6.6 |
- |
125,219 |
946 |
282,250 |
725,920 |
- |
|
5,456 |
13.7 |
- |
8.3 |
3.3 |
- |
74,699 |
- |
452,440 |
181,020 |
- |
|
18,134 |
- |
0.08 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,381 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (2,5) |
2,618 |
- |
0.15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
403 |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
37,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
199,918 |
2,730 |
734,690 |
906,940 |
- |
(1) The term “reserve” means an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is an economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. The term “proven reserves’ means the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource. Reserves are reported in accordance with Section 1300 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and NI 43-101. See footnotes 7 and 8 below. |
|
(2) Mineral reserves are based on |
|
(3) The reserve NSR cut-off grades for |
|
(4) The reserve NSR cut-off grades for |
|
(5) The average reserve cut-off grades at Casa Berardi are 0.101 oz/ton gold (3.47 g/tonne) for underground and 0.037 oz/ton (1.27 g/tonne) for open pit. Metallurgical recovery (actual 2021): |
|
(6) The term “probable reserves” means the economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some cases, a measured mineral resource. See footnotes 8 and 9 below. |
|
Totals may not represent the sum of parts due to rounding |
Hecla’s Mineral Resources – |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Measured Resources(8) |
|||||||||||
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
||
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
8,652 |
7.6 |
- |
4.9 |
2.5 |
- |
65,752 |
- |
425,100 |
213,480 |
- |
|
96 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (11,14) |
2,272 |
- |
0.15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
351 |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
20 |
0.7 |
0.50 |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
|
18 |
4.9 |
0.59 |
- |
- |
- |
87 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
Midas (16,19) |
2 |
7.6 |
0.68 |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Heva (20) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Hosco (20) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Star (21) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
11,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
65,867 |
377 |
425,100 |
213,480 |
- |
Indicated Resources(9) |
|||||||||||
|
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
|
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
8,355 |
12.8 |
0.10 |
3.0 |
8.4 |
- |
106,670 |
836 |
250,040 |
701,520 |
- |
|
1,841 |
7.6 |
- |
5.1 |
2.4 |
- |
14,010 |
- |
93,140 |
44,120 |
- |
|
420 |
- |
0.03 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (11,14) |
4,976 |
- |
0.14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
685 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1,453 |
6.5 |
0.09 |
- |
- |
- |
9,430 |
135 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1,187 |
5.5 |
0.01 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
1.2 |
6,579 |
16 |
22,420 |
34,100 |
14,650 |
|
113 |
1.0 |
0.45 |
- |
- |
- |
114 |
51 |
- |
- |
- |
|
70 |
1.9 |
0.58 |
- |
- |
- |
130 |
40 |
- |
- |
- |
Midas (16,19) |
76 |
5.7 |
0.42 |
- |
- |
- |
430 |
32 |
- |
- |
- |
Heva (20) |
1,266 |
- |
0.06 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
76 |
- |
- |
- |
Hosco (20) |
29,287 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,201 |
- |
- |
- |
Star (21) |
1,126 |
2.9 |
- |
6.2 |
7.4 |
- |
3,301 |
- |
69,900 |
83,410 |
- |
Total |
50,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
140,663 |
3,088 |
435,500 |
863,150 |
14,650 |
Measured & Indicated Resources |
|||||||||||
|
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
|
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
8,355 |
12.8 |
0.10 |
3.0 |
8.4 |
- |
106,670 |
836 |
250,040 |
701,520 |
- |
|
10,493 |
7.6 |
- |
4.9 |
2.5 |
- |
79,762 |
- |
518,240 |
257,600 |
- |
|
516 |
- |
0.03 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground (11,14) |
7,248 |
- |
0.14 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,036 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1,453 |
6.5 |
0.09 |
- |
- |
- |
9,430 |
135 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1,187 |
5.5 |
0.01 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
1.2 |
6,579 |
16 |
22,420 |
34,100 |
14,650 |
|
134 |
1.0 |
0.46 |
- |
- |
- |
128 |
61 |
- |
- |
- |
|
88 |
2.5 |
0.58 |
- |
- |
- |
217 |
51 |
- |
- |
- |
Midas (16,19) |
78 |
5.7 |
0.43 |
- |
- |
- |
444 |
33 |
- |
- |
- |
Heva (20) |
1,266 |
- |
0.06 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
76 |
- |
- |
- |
Hosco (20) |
29,287 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,201 |
- |
- |
- |
Star (21) |
1,126 |
2.9 |
- |
6.2 |
7.4 |
- |
3,301 |
- |
69,900 |
83,410 |
- |
Total |
61,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
206,530 |
3,464 |
860,600 |
1,076,630 |
14,650
|
Inferred Resources(10) |
|||||||||||
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
Silver |
Gold |
Lead |
Zinc |
Copper |
||
Asset |
Tons
|
(oz/ton) |
(oz/ton) |
% |
% |
% |
(000 oz) |
(000 oz) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
(Tons) |
|
2,152 |
12.8 |
0.08 |
2.8 |
6.8 |
- |
27,508 |
164 |
60,140 |
146,020 |
- |
|
5,377 |
7.8 |
- |
5.8 |
2.4 |
- |
41,872 |
- |
311,850 |
129,600 |
- |
|
7,886 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
383 |
- |
- |
- |
Casa Berardi Underground 11,14) |
2,239 |
- |
0.18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
408 |
- |
- |
- |
|
3,490 |
6.4 |
0.05 |
- |
- |
- |
22,353 |
182 |
- |
- |
- |
|
385 |
4.2 |
0.01 |
1.6 |
2.3 |
0.9 |
1,606 |
5 |
6,070 |
8,830 |
3,330 |
|
765 |
0.5 |
0.51 |
- |
- |
- |
394 |
392 |
- |
- |
- |
|
74,584 |
0.1 |
0.03 |
- |
- |
- |
5,232 |
2,178 |
- |
- |
- |
|
642 |
3.0 |
0.42 |
- |
- |
- |
1,916 |
273 |
- |
- |
- |
Midas (16,19) |
1,232 |
6.3 |
0.50 |
- |
- |
- |
7,723 |
615 |
- |
- |
- |
Heva (20) |
2,787 |
- |
0.08 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
216 |
- |
- |
- |
Hosco (20) |
17,726 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
663 |
- |
- |
- |
Star (21) |
3,157 |
2.9 |
- |
5.6 |
5.5 |
- |
9,432 |
- |
178,670 |
174,450 |
- |
San Juan Silver (23) |
3,594 |
11.3 |
0.01 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
- |
40,716 |
36 |
51,750 |
40,800 |
|
|
913 |
0.3 |
0.14 |
- |
- |
- |
271 |
131 |
- |
- |
- |
|
100,086 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
- |
0.7 |
148,736 |
- |
- |
- |
658,680 |
Montanore (26) |
112,185 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
- |
0.7 |
183,346 |
- |
- |
- |
759,420 |
Total. |
339,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
491,103 |
5,644 |
608,480 |
499,700 |
1,421,430 |
Note: All estimates are in-situ except for the proven reserves at |
|
(7) The term "mineral resources" means a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. Resources are reported in accordance with Section 1300 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and NI 43-101. |
|
(8) The term "measured resources" means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit Because a measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve. |
|
(9) The term "indicated resources" means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve. |
|
(10) The term "inferred resources" means that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project and may not be converted to a mineral reserve. |
|
(11) Mineral resources are based on |
|
(12) The resource NSR cut-off grades for |
|
(13) The resource NSR cut-off grades for |
|
(14) The average resource cut-off grades at Casa Berardi are 0.089 oz/ton gold (3.06 g/tonne) for underground and 0.036 oz/ton (1.22 g/tonne) for open pit; metallurgical recovery (actual 2021): |
|
(15) Indicated resources for most zones at |
|
(16) Mineral resources for |
|
(17) |
|
(18) |
|
(19) Midas mineral resources are reported at a gold equivalent cut-off grade of 0.237 oz/ton. Metallurgical recoveries: |
|
(20) Measured, indicated and inferred resources at Heva and Hosco are based on |
|
Metallurgical recovery: Heva: |
|
(21) Indicated and Inferred resources at the Star property are reported using |
|
(22) Inferred open-pit resources for |
|
Open pit resources are calculated at |
|
(23) Inferred resources reported at a minimum mining width of 6.0 feet for Bulldog and a cut-off grade of 6.0 equivalent oz/ton silver and 5.0 feet for Equity and North Amethyst vein at a cut-off grade of |
|
Metallurgical recoveries based on grade dependent recovery curves: recoveries at the mean resource grade average |
|
(24) Inferred resource at |
|
(25) Inferred resource at |
|
Resources adjusted based on mining restrictions as defined by |
|
(26) Inferred resource at Montanore reported at a minimum thickness of 15 feet and a cut-off grade of |
|
Resources adjusted based on mining restrictions as defined by |
|
Totals may not represent the sum of parts due to rounding |
Table B |
|||||||||
Alexco’s Mineral Reserves |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Probable Reserves |
|||||||||
|
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc |
Gold |
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc |
Gold |
|
Deposit |
Tonnes |
(g/t) |
% |
% |
(g/t) |
(000 oz) |
(M lbs) |
(M lbs) |
(000 oz) |
Bellekeno |
12,809 |
936 |
13.0 |
7.3 |
- |
385 |
4 |
2 |
- |
Bellekeno Surface Deposits |
3,397 |
1,150 |
21.7 |
4.5 |
- |
126 |
2 |
- |
- |
|
70,648 |
1,269 |
2.7 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
2,883 |
4 |
2 |
- |
Flame & Moth |
721,322 |
672 |
2.7 |
6.2 |
0.5 |
15,590 |
43 |
99 |
11 |
|
640,173 |
899 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
0.1 |
18,209 |
31 |
18 |
3 |
Total |
1,438,349 |
804 |
2.6 |
3.8 |
0.3 |
37,193 |
84 |
122 |
14 |
Notes: |
||
1. |
Mineral Reserves reported herein are dated |
|
2. |
Mineral Reserves are reported herein based on an NSR cutoff value using estimated metallurgical recoveries, assumed metal prices and smelter terms, which include payable factors, treatment charges, penalties, and refining charges. |
|
3. |
Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold and silver ounces are reported as troy ounces. |
|
4. |
The Bellekeno, |
|
5. |
|
Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content. |
Alexco’s Mineral Resources |
||||||
|
||||||
Indicated Resources |
||||||
|
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc |
Gold |
Silver |
|
Deposit |
Tonnes |
(g/t) |
% |
% |
(g/t) |
(000 oz) |
Bellekeno |
213,000 |
620 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
n/a |
4,246 |
|
132,300 |
1,167 |
2.4 |
1.6 |
0.2 |
4,964 |
Flame & Moth |
1,679,000 |
498 |
1.9 |
5.3 |
0.4 |
26,883 |
Onek |
700,200 |
191 |
1.2 |
11.9 |
0.6 |
4,300 |
|
1,562,700 |
939 |
2.6 |
1.7 |
0.2 |
47,210 |
Total |
4,287,200 |
635 |
2.2 |
5.0 |
0.3 |
87,603 |
Inferred Resources |
||||||
|
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc |
Gold |
Silver |
|
Deposit |
Tonnes |
(g/t) |
% |
% |
(g/t) |
(000 oz) |
Bellekeno |
302,000 |
359 |
2.5 |
5.4 |
n/a |
3,486 |
|
257,900 |
473 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
3,922 |
Flame & Moth |
365,200 |
356 |
0.5 |
4.3 |
0.3 |
4,180 |
Onek |
285,100 |
118 |
1.2 |
8.3 |
0.4 |
1,082 |
|
843,400 |
735 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
19,930 |
Total |
2,053,600 |
494 |
1.6 |
3.3 |
0.2 |
32,600 |
Notes: |
||
1. |
|
All Mineral Resources are classified following the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves ( |
2. |
|
Indicated Mineral Resources are inclusive of Probable Mineral Reserves estimates. |
3. |
|
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. All numbers have been rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. |
4. |
|
The Mineral Resource estimates comprising |
5. |
|
The Mineral Resource estimate for the |
6. |
|
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Lucky Queen, Flame & Moth and Onek deposits have an effective date of |
7. |
|
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Bellekeno deposit is based on an internal Mineral Resource estimate completed by |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220705005297/en/
Hecla:
Vice President - Investor Relations and Treasurer
800-HECLA91 (800-432-5291)
Investor Relations
Email: hmc-info@hecla-mining.com
Website: www.hecla-mining.com
Alexco:
Investor Relations and Communications Lead
Phone: (778) 945-6577
Email: info@alexcoresource.com
Website: www.alexcoresource.com
Source:
FAQ
What is the acquisition deal between Hecla and Alexco about?
What are the expected benefits of the Hecla and Alexco acquisition?
When is the special meeting related to the acquisition scheduled?
What financial implications does the acquisition have for Hecla and Alexco shareholders?