STOCK TITAN

Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Desktop Metal’s Motion for an Expedited Trial; Trial to be Set for February; Desktop Metal Files Second Lawsuit Against Nano Dimension for Breach of Merger Agreement

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Neutral)

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) has secured an expedited trial in Delaware Court of Chancery for its lawsuit against Nano Dimension, scheduled for February 24, 2025. The lawsuit, filed December 16, 2024, alleges Nano Dimension breached merger agreement obligations by failing to obtain regulatory approval efficiently.

Additionally, Desktop Metal filed a second lawsuit on December 31, 2024, against both Nano Dimension and Markforged, concerning Nano Dimension's September 2024 agreement to acquire Markforged. Desktop Metal claims this acquisition would increase the risk of regulatory prohibition and delay their merger's consummation. The company seeks to prevent the Markforged Transaction from closing until after their merger completes.

Initially, Desktop Metal didn't expect the Markforged deal to impact their merger, assuming their transaction would close first. However, due to Nano Dimension's delays in obtaining CFIUS approval, circumstances have changed.

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) ha ottenuto un processo accelerato nel Tribunale della Cancelleria del Delaware per la causa intentata contro Nano Dimension, programmata per il 24 febbraio 2025. La causa, presentata il 16 dicembre 2024, accusa Nano Dimension di aver violato le obbligazioni del contratto di fusione non ottenendo l'approvazione normativa in modo efficiente.

Inoltre, Desktop Metal ha presentato una seconda causa il 31 dicembre 2024, contro sia Nano Dimension che Markforged, riguardante l'accordo di Nano Dimension del settembre 2024 per acquisire Markforged. Desktop Metal sostiene che questa acquisizione aumenterebbe il rischio di divieto normativo e ritarderebbe la conclusione della loro fusione. L'azienda cerca di impedire la chiusura della Transazione Markforged fino a dopo il completamento della loro fusione.

Inizialmente, Desktop Metal non si aspettava che l'accordo con Markforged potesse influenzare la loro fusione, supponendo che la loro transazione si sarebbe conclusa prima. Tuttavia, a causa dei ritardi di Nano Dimension nel ottenere l'approvazione del CFIUS, le circostanze sono cambiate.

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) ha obtenido un juicio acelerado en el Tribunal de Cancillería de Delaware para su demanda contra Nano Dimension, programada para el 24 de febrero de 2025. La demanda, presentada el 16 de diciembre de 2024, alega que Nano Dimension violó las obligaciones del acuerdo de fusión al no obtener la aprobación regulatoria de manera eficiente.

Además, Desktop Metal presentó una segunda demanda el 31 de diciembre de 2024, contra tanto Nano Dimension como Markforged, relacionada con el acuerdo de Nano Dimension de septiembre de 2024 para adquirir Markforged. Desktop Metal sostiene que esta adquisición aumentaría el riesgo de prohibición regulatoria y retrasaría la consumación de su fusión. La empresa busca evitar que la Transacción Markforged se cierre hasta que finalice su fusión.

Inicialmente, Desktop Metal no esperaba que el acuerdo con Markforged impactara su fusión, asumiendo que su transacción se cerraría primero. Sin embargo, debido a los retrasos de Nano Dimension en obtener la aprobación del CFIUS, las circunstancias han cambiado.

데스크탑 메탈 (NYSE: DM)이 델라웨어 채권자 법원에서 나노 디멘션을 상대로 제기한 소송에 대해 신속한 재판을 확보했습니다. 재판은 2025년 2월 24일로 예정되어 있습니다. 2024년 12월 16일에 제기된 이 소송은 나노 디멘션이 인수 계약상의 의무를 위반하고 효율적으로 규제 승인 을 받지 않았다는 내용을 담고 있습니다.

또한 데스크탑 메탈은 2024년 12월 31일 나노 디멘션과 마크포지드 모두를 상대로 두 번째 소송을 제기했습니다. 이 소송은 나노 디멘션의 2024년 9월 마크포지드를 인수하기 위한 계약과 관련이 있습니다. 데스크탑 메탈은 이 인수가 규제 금지 위험을 증가시킬 것이며, 그들의 합병 완료를 지연시킬 것이라고 주장하고 있습니다. 이 회사는 그들의 합병이 완료될 때까지 마크포지드 거래의 성사를 막고자 하고 있습니다.

처음에 데스크탑 메탈은 마크포지드 거래가 그들의 합병에 영향을 미칠 것이라는 예상하지 않았습니다. 그들은 자신의 거래가 먼저 완료될 것이라고 가정했기 때문입니다. 그러나 나노 디멘션이 CFIUS 승인을 받는 데 지연되면서 상황이 바뀌었습니다.

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) a obtenu un procès accéléré devant la Cour de Chancellerie du Delaware pour sa poursuite contre Nano Dimension, prévu pour le 24 février 2025. La poursuite, déposée le 16 décembre 2024, allègue que Nano Dimension a violé ses obligations contractuelles de fusion en n'obtenant pas l'approbation réglementaire de manière efficace.

De plus, Desktop Metal a déposé une seconde poursuite le 31 décembre 2024, contre à la fois Nano Dimension et Markforged, concernant l'accord de Nano Dimension de septembre 2024 pour acquérir Markforged. Desktop Metal affirme que cette acquisition augmenterait le risque d'interdiction réglementaire et retarderait la conclusion de leur fusion. L'entreprise cherche à empêcher la réalisation de la transaction Markforged jusqu'à ce que leur fusion soit achevée.

Au départ, Desktop Metal ne s'attendait pas à ce que l'accord avec Markforged ait un impact sur leur fusion, supposant que leur transaction serait conclue en premier. Cependant, en raison des retards de Nano Dimension pour obtenir l'approbation du CFIUS, les circonstances ont changé.

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) hat einen beschleunigten Prozess vor dem Chancery Court in Delaware für seine Klage gegen Nano Dimension gesichert, die für den 24. Februar 2025 angesetzt ist. Die Klage, die am 16. Dezember 2024 eingereicht wurde, behauptet, dass Nano Dimension gegen die Verpflichtungen des Fusionsvertrags verstoßen hat, indem es die regulatorische Genehmigung nicht effizient eingeholt hat.

Zusätzlich hat Desktop Metal am 31. Dezember 2024 eine zweite Klage gegen sowohl Nano Dimension als auch Markforged eingereicht, die sich auf die Vereinbarung von Nano Dimension im September 2024 zur Übernahme von Markforged bezieht. Desktop Metal behauptet, dass diese Übernahme das Risiko eines regulatorischen Verbots erhöhen und die Vollziehung ihrer Fusion verzögern würde. Das Unternehmen strebt an, die Markforged-Transaktion bis nach dem Abschluss ihrer Fusion zu verhindern.

Ursprünglich erwartete Desktop Metal nicht, dass das Markforged-Geschäft ihre Fusion beeinträchtigen würde, da angenommen wurde, dass deren Transaktion zuerst abgeschlossen würde. Aufgrund der Verzögerungen von Nano Dimension bei der Erlangung der CFIUS-Genehmigung haben sich die Umstände jedoch geändert.

Positive
  • Expedited trial granted, potentially accelerating resolution of merger disputes
  • Legal actions demonstrate proactive defense of shareholder interests
Negative
  • Ongoing delays in obtaining CFIUS approval for merger
  • Legal complications with Nano Dimension potentially affecting merger completion
  • Risk of regulatory prohibition due to Markforged acquisition

Insights

<p>The expedited trial grant and dual lawsuits mark a critical legal escalation in Desktop Metal's <money>$450M</money> merger saga with Nano Dimension. The February trial timeline is remarkably swift for Delaware Chancery Court, indicating the court's recognition of the matter's urgency. The first lawsuit's focus on <b>reasonable best efforts</b> in obtaining CFIUS approval presents a compelling case, as this standard is well-established in Delaware merger jurisprudence. The second lawsuit targeting the Markforged acquisition introduces a complex antitrust dimension, potentially creating a <b>triple-merger deadlock</b> that could attract heightened regulatory scrutiny. The legal strategy appears designed to force Nano Dimension's hand, either to expedite CFIUS approval or abandon the Markforged deal. For simplified understanding: Picture three companies trying to merge while two separate deals are happening simultaneously - this creates a legal traffic jam that needs to be resolved in a specific order.</p>

<p>The merger complications reveal deeper strategic implications for the 3D printing industry consolidation. Desktop Metal's aggressive legal stance suggests they view Nano's Markforged pursuit as a potential <b>poison pill</b> to their own merger agreement. The CFIUS approval delays are particularly concerning as they could impact Desktop Metal's <b>market position</b> and valuation, especially given their sub-<money>$100M</money> market cap. The timing of Nano's Markforged agreement raises questions about their commitment to the Desktop Metal merger. In simple terms: It's like trying to buy two houses simultaneously while still needing bank approval for the first purchase - it complicates both deals and could potentially derail both transactions. This situation could reshape the competitive landscape in the additive manufacturing sector, potentially forcing a reassessment of valuations across the industry.</p>

BURLINGTON, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Desktop Metal, Inc. (NYSE: DM) (“Desktop Metal”) today announced that at a hearing held in the Delaware Court of Chancery on December 30, 2024, the Court granted Desktop Metal’s motion for an expedited trial in the lawsuit Desktop Metal filed on December 16, 2024 against Nano Dimension Ltd. (“Nano Dimension”). In the lawsuit, Desktop Metal alleged that Nano Dimension has breached its obligation under the merger agreement between Desktop Metal and Nano Dimension (the “Merger Agreement”) to use reasonable best efforts to obtain regulatory approval and close the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”) as soon as reasonably possible. The trial is expected to be scheduled for the week of February 24, 2025.

In addition, Desktop Metal announced that on December 31, 2024, it filed a second lawsuit against Nano Dimension, which also named Markforged Holding Corporation (“Markforged”) as a defendant, in the Court of Chancery, alleging that Nano Dimension’s September 2024 agreement (the “Markforged Agreement”) to acquire Markforged (the “Markforged Transaction”), if consummated, would constitute a breach of Nano Dimension’s obligation in the Merger Agreement to not consummate acquisitions that would reasonably be expected to (i) increase, in any material respect, the risk of a governmental entity entering an order prohibiting, or (ii) materially delay, the consummation of the Merger. At the time it was announced, Desktop Metal did not anticipate that the Markforged Transaction would impact the closing of the Merger because all parties anticipated that the Merger would close before the Markforged Transaction could close. Due to events that occurred after that time, specifically Nano Dimension’s ongoing delays in obtaining CFIUS approval for the Merger, Desktop Metal believes that the consummation of the Markforged Transaction would materially increase the risk of a governmental entity preventing or delaying the consummation of the Merger. Desktop Metal is therefore seeking an order restraining Nano Dimension and Markforged from closing the Markforged Transaction until after the Merger has closed.

The Merger between Desktop Metal and Nano Dimension represents a significant strategic opportunity for both companies, combining complementary strengths to create value for shareholders, employees and customers. Desktop Metal remains focused on upholding the contractual obligations agreed upon by both parties, closing the transaction and delivering on the potential of the Merger. Desktop Metal is confident that a closing of the Merger may be completed expeditiously.

About Desktop Metal

Desktop Metal (NYSE: DM) is driving Additive Manufacturing 2.0, a new era of on-demand, digital mass production of industrial, medical, and consumer products. Its innovative 3D printers, materials, and software deliver the speed, cost, and part quality required for this transformation. Desktop Metal is home to the original inventors and world leaders of the 3D printing methods it believes will empower this shift, binder jetting and digital light processing. Today, Desktop Metal’s systems print metal, polymer, sand and other ceramics, as well as foam and recycled wood. Manufacturers use its technology worldwide to save time and money, reduce waste, increase flexibility, and produce designs that solve the world’s toughest problems and enable once-impossible innovations. Learn more about Desktop Metal and its #TeamDM brands at www.desktopmetal.com.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Such forward-looking statements include statements relating to the proposed transaction between Desktop Metal and Nano Dimension, including statements regarding the scheduling of a trial, closing of the Merger, and all other statements other than statements of historical fact that address activities, events or developments that Desktop Metal intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Such statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions made based on information currently available to management. All statements in this communication, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements that may be identified by the use of the words “outlook,” “guidance,” “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “should,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “projects,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” “potential,” “continue,” “plan,” “target,” or the negative of these words or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause Desktop Metal’s actual results and performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that may cause Desktop Metal’s actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, (i) the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the proposed transaction; (ii) the ability to satisfy closing conditions to the completion of the proposed transaction; and (iii) other risks related to the completion of the proposed transaction, the pending litigation and actions related thereto.

The forward-looking statements included in this communication are made only as of the date hereof. Desktop Metal does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.

Investors:

(857) 504-1084

DesktopMetalIR@icrinc.com

Source: Desktop Metal, Inc.

FAQ

When is Desktop Metal's (DM) expedited trial against Nano Dimension scheduled?

The trial is expected to be scheduled for the week of February 24, 2025, in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

Why did Desktop Metal (DM) file a second lawsuit against Nano Dimension?

Desktop Metal filed the second lawsuit on December 31, 2024, alleging that Nano Dimension's planned Markforged acquisition would increase regulatory risks and potentially delay their merger's completion.

What is the main issue with CFIUS approval in the Desktop Metal (DM) merger?

According to the lawsuit, Nano Dimension is experiencing ongoing delays in obtaining CFIUS approval, which is necessary for the merger's completion.

How does the Markforged acquisition affect Desktop Metal's (DM) merger with Nano Dimension?

Desktop Metal claims the Markforged acquisition could materially increase the risk of regulatory prohibition and delay the merger's consummation.

Desktop Metal, Inc.

NYSE:DM

DM Rankings

DM Latest News

DM Stock Data

99.02M
20.51M
38.49%
35.26%
7.31%
Computer Hardware
Special Industry Machinery, Nec
Link
United States of America
BURLINGTON