Cleveland-Cliffs and the United Steelworkers Union Jointly Comment on the Tin Mill Products Final Report Released by the ITC
- None.
- Continuation of unfair trade practices in the tin mill products market
- Negative impact on the domestic industry and workers due to U.S. Steel's lack of cooperation with the ITC
Insights
The ITC's negative injury determination in the tin mill products trade case is a significant event for the industry. It essentially means that the anti-dumping and countervailing duties proposed by the Department of Commerce will not be enforced. This has implications for the domestic market, as it could potentially lead to a continuation of what Cleveland-Cliffs and the USW describe as 'unfair trade practices.' In the context of trade law, anti-dumping and countervailing duties are mechanisms designed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition that is considered to be traded unfairly, either due to being sold below market value (dumping) or being heavily subsidized by governments (countervailable subsidies).
From a legal perspective, the lack of participation by a key industry player, such as U.S. Steel, in the investigation process could indeed impact the ITC's ability to gather comprehensive data. The absence of critical information can lead to an incomplete understanding of the market dynamics and may result in decisions that do not fully address the concerns of domestic producers. The decision underscores the importance of cooperation and thorough data provision in trade investigations to ensure that the ITC can make informed decisions.
The decision by the ITC has broader economic implications beyond the tin mill products sector. By not imposing the recommended duties, the domestic market remains open to imported tin mill products, which could lead to increased competition for domestic producers. On one hand, this could benefit consumers through potentially lower prices due to the competition. On the other hand, it might negatively impact domestic producers like Cleveland-Cliffs, potentially leading to job losses and economic downturns in communities dependent on this industry.
Furthermore, the surge of imports, especially from countries with lower production costs like China and Japan, can exert significant pressure on the U.S. tin mill industry. If domestic producers are unable to compete effectively, this could lead to a long-term decline in the industry and a loss of domestic capabilities in this sector, which may have strategic implications for the U.S. economy.
The tin mill products market is a niche but vital part of the metals industry, supplying material for packaging, automotive components and electronics. The ITC's decision could shift market dynamics, influencing not only the domestic supply chain but also the pricing and availability of tin mill products. Market research would focus on tracking import volumes, pricing trends and the response of domestic producers to these changes.
From a market perspective, it's important to monitor how Cleveland-Cliffs and other domestic producers adapt to the competitive pressures. Will they seek cost reductions, innovate to create higher value-added products, or lobby for political support? These strategies will determine the market's direction and the future health of the domestic industry. Additionally, the decision may influence investor sentiment towards the metals sector, particularly affecting companies like Cleveland-Cliffs that are directly involved in the trade case.
Lourenco Goncalves, Cleveland-Cliffs' Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, stated, "It is now clear that the decision by United States Steel Corporation not to participate as a petitioner in this trade case -- or provide a substantive response to the ITC’s request for further information on the idling of tin lines in
Mr. Goncalves continued, “U.S. Steel’s January 2022 announcement that it would shut down its UPI tin mill in
“USW members across the tin mill industry can compete with anyone on a level playing field,” said USW International President David McCall. “Unfortunately, the ITC’s decision continues to leave them and their families vulnerable to unfair trade, threatening their livelihoods and imperiling the communities in which they live and work.
“Dumped and illegally subsidized tin mill products have already cost far too many good, American jobs, and USW members understand as well as anyone that without relief, foreign producers will continue to undercut our market until we are wholly dependent on them.
“It’s clear that our nation urgently needs strategic reform of our broken trade system so that domestic workers and industries aren’t forced to fight on a case-by-case basis to ensure they have a future.”
About Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
Cleveland-Cliffs is the largest flat-rolled steel producer in
About the United Steelworkers
The USW represents 850,000 workers employed in metals, mining, pulp and paper, rubber, chemicals, glass, auto supply and the energy-producing industries, along with a growing number of workers in health care, public sector, higher education, tech and service occupations.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240229790051/en/
MEDIA CONTACTS:
Patricia Persico
Senior Director, Corporate Communications
(216) 694-5316
Jess Kamm
USW Communications Director
412-562-2444
INVESTOR CONTACT:
James Kerr
Director, Investor Relations
(216) 694-7719
Source: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
FAQ
What was the outcome of the U.S. International Trade Commission's determination in the tin mill products trade case involving Cleveland-Cliffs and USW?
Why did Lourenco Goncalves mention U.S. Steel in relation to the negative determination by the ITC?
How did the closure of U.S. Steel's UPI tin mill in Pittsburg impact the tin mill products market?
What did USW International President David McCall emphasize in response to the ITC's decision?
What is the current state of the tin mill industry according to the PR?
Who were the co-petitioners in the tin mill products trade case mentioned in the PR?
What role did U.S. Steel play in the ITC's determination according to the PR?
What impact did the surge of imported tin mill products have on the U.S. market?
Why did Lourenco Goncalves express gratitude towards the USW in the PR?
What did the ITC's report discount according to the PR?
What is the urgent need highlighted in the PR regarding the trade system?