Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Shareholder Urges Fellow Shareholders to Withhold Support for CEO Peter Greenleaf
Lucien Selce, who owns 2.2% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: AUPH), has urged shareholders to withhold support for CEO Peter Greenleaf and the current Board of Directors in the upcoming AGM on June 14, 2024. Selce accuses the Board of manipulating AGM dates to benefit from stock-based compensation and depriving certain shareholders of their voting rights. A leading proxy advisory firm, ISS, has also recommended withholding support for three directors and voting against proposed executive compensation. Selce highlights the stock's decline from $10.71 to $5.42 and suggests a new Board and CEO to rejuvenate Aurinia's performance and governance.
- Lucien Selce owns 2.2% of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals shares, indicating significant stakeholder interest.
- A leading proxy advisory firm, ISS, recommended withholding support for three directors and voting against executive compensation.
- Selce suggests a new Board and CEO to rejuvenate Aurinia's performance and governance.
- There is support from an experienced investment bank familiar with Aurinia and Mr. Greenleaf.
- Potential new leadership team with a track record of success in the biotech industry.
- Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' stock price dropped from $10.71 to $5.42 within a year.
- Selce accuses the Board of manipulating AGM dates to benefit from stock-based compensation.
- Disenfranchisement of certain shareholders due to proxy statement release timing.
- Past underperformance and value destruction under the current Board and CEO.
- Concerns about Armistice Capital's relationship with CEO Peter Greenleaf and potential conflicts of interest.
Removing CEO and Director Peter Greenleaf from the Company Would Pave the Way for a Superior Board and Strategy That Would Rejuvenate Aurinia
June 3, 2024
Fellow Shareholders,
Ahead of Aurinia’s June 14 Annual General Meeting (“AGM”), I am writing to share my concerns regarding the Board of Directors’ (the “Board”) anti-shareholder actions and CEO Peter Greenleaf’s outsized influence over the current directors.
-
Aurinia’s Board has maneuvered to entrench and further enrich itself at the expense of shareholders.
I believe that the date of the AGM was voluntarily delayed compared to last year. This appears to have been done to allow vesting of a batch of options and restricted share units (“RSUs”) before the AGM. These options and RSUs would have been lost if the AGM was held on an earlier date and if the current directors were not reelected.
Also, I find it highly suspicious that Aurinia’s proxy statement for the AGM was released after the “cut-off” date set by the Company for shareholders to be able to vote their shares. The Board knows very well that a number of shares are held through derivative contracts, which do not allow voting of the underlying shares. The Board also knows that, with sufficient notice, holders of such contracts can arrange to turn these contracts into physical shares in time to hold them to vote at the AGM. By acting the way it did, the Board has deprived certain holders from voting their shares. This is unethical and dishonest.
-
A leading proxy advisory firm, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), has recommended that shareholders withhold support for three directors: Daniel Billen, R. Hector MacKay-Dunn and Brinda Balakrishnan.
In addition to recommending shareholders withhold support for these three directors, ISS also recommended shareholders vote against Aurinia’s proposed executive compensation. In its report, ISS noted the Board’s compensation committee “demonstrated poor responsiveness to shareholder concerns following last year’s failed say-on-pay support.”1
Last year, ISS recommended that shareholders vote for the Board. One year later, Aurinia’s stock languishes at ,2 down from$5.42 3 on the day of the 2023 AGM.$10.71
Given this level of value destruction and the governance and strategic issues that currently plague the Company, I believe shareholders should go a step further and withhold support for the entire Board, including – most importantly – Mr. Greenleaf.
I believe it is impossible to justify supporting a CEO and directors that have overseen significant operational and stock underperformance, while at the same time diluting said shareholders to grant themselves ever larger quantities of stock-based compensation.
-
Shareholders should be concerned about Armistice Capital’s relationship with Mr. Greenleaf.
I have observed that, as of March 31, 2024, Armistice Capital (“Armistice”) added 2.72 million shares, positioning itself as the largest shareholder of the Company.
It has come to my attention that Armistice believes that Mr. Greenleaf’s interests are aligned with shareholders’ and that Armistice will support both the Board and management team at the upcoming AGM.
It is common knowledge that Armistice was an investor in Mr. Greenleaf’s previous companies and has ties to him. It is my view that given the timing of Armistice’s stake increase, the firm is acting in cahoots with Mr. Greenleaf, as a quid pro quo for who knows what! The rest of Aurinia’s shareholders should be very concerned about this.
-
There is a superior path for Aurinia and its shareholders.
If shareholders vote against the reelection of the incumbent Board, I intend to propose a slate of new directors to replace the current Board. In order to select candidates that fully represent the best interests of all shareholders, I intend to consult with ILJIN SNT Co., Ltd., a long-term shareholder of more than5% of Aurinia.
I have also been in touch with an investment bank that is very active in the biotech space and is highly familiar with Aurinia and Mr. Greenleaf. From my exchanges with the firm, as well as based on his track record of value destruction, I am now convinced that removing Mr. Greenleaf is the first step to rejuvenating Aurinia and resurrecting its stock price.
There is a highly performing team, who successfully developed and sold a mid-sized biotech company that is willing and able to step in should the Board remove Mr. Greenleaf as CEO.
The investment bank is also willing and able to assist with implementing a new strategy, and has expressed its confidence that, without Mr. Greenleaf, Aurinia remains an attractive target for a buyer.
I urge the Board to embrace the solutions I have proposed to improve Aurinia’s performance, governance and future strategy.
If the Board is successfully voted off at the AGM, I will provide more details regarding the suggested path forward for Aurinia.
Sincerely,
Lucien Selce
____________________________ | |
1 |
Permission to quote ISS was neither sought nor obtained. |
2 |
As of market close on May 31, 2024. |
3 |
As of market close on May 17, 2023. |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240603944069/en/
Lucien Selce
Lucienselce@gmail.com
Source: On behalf of Lucien Selce
FAQ
Why is Lucien Selce urging Aurinia Pharmaceuticals shareholders to withhold support for CEO Peter Greenleaf?
What are the key issues highlighted by Lucien Selce regarding Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' Board?
What has Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) recommended for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals shareholders?
How has Aurinia Pharmaceuticals' stock performed in the past year?