Paladin Phase 4 Study Confirms Safety of Durable ILUVIEN® Treatment and Reduces Burden of Care For DME Patients
Alimera Sciences recently presented promising data from the PALADIN Phase 4 Study at the ASRS conference, highlighting the effectiveness of ILUVIEN (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.19 mg in treating diabetic macular edema (DME). The study confirms ILUVIEN's safety and its ability to reduce treatment frequency while enhancing visual acuity. Key findings include an average vision gain of 4.5 ETDRS letters post-treatment and reduced retinal thickness variability.
All outcomes reflect ILUVIEN's potential as a durable treatment option.
- The PALADIN Phase 4 Study demonstrates ILUVIEN's safety and efficacy for diabetic macular edema.
- Patients experienced an average vision gain of 4.5 ETDRS letters after ILUVIEN treatment.
- Treatment frequency was significantly reduced to an average of 1.7 yearly treatments post-ILUVIEN administration.
- Many patients achieved a dry retina with improved visual acuity and reduced retinal thickness variability.
- None.
Data from the recent 0.19 mg FAc implant Phase 4 observational real-world study were presented at the annual American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) conference
ATLANTA, July 26, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alimera Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: ALIM) (“Alimera”), a global pharmaceutical company whose mission is to be invaluable to patients, physicians, and partners concerned with retinal health and maintaining better vision longer, announced today that the PALADIN Phase 4 Study confirms the safety of ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.19 mg sustained release intravitreal implant and provides a durable treatment option that reduces the frequency of recurrence for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
“We are very excited to have had the opportunity to have great data from our PALADIN Study of ILUVIEN presented at the recent ASRS Annual Meeting,” added Rick Eiswirth, President and CEO of Alimera. “For the last few years, we have been refocusing our messaging on the ability of ILUVIEN to treat DME consistently to gain better control. Dr. Riemann’s abstract correlating reduced retinal thickness variability and better visual acuity demonstrates the value of ILUVIEN’s CONTINUOUS MICRODOSINGTM.”
The three-year, phase IV, real-world observational PALADIN study evaluated the long-term safety of ILUVIEN for patients with DME. This study confirms the benefit of using a prior course of corticosteroid to mitigate the risk of uncontrolled IOP elevations. The study also reported secondary outcomes of vision improvement and reduction in treatment burden and retinal thickness variability.
The results were presented for two of the abstracts at the annual ASRS conference held in New York, NY from July 13 – 16, and one is available on the online demand portal and these include -
• Dr. Christopher Riemann, a vitreoretinal surgeon at the Cincinnati Eye Institute in Ohio,
presented the abstract he authored titled “Three-Year Outcomes of the PALADIN Phase IV Study: Comparison of Anatomical Metrics, Efficacy, and Treatment Burden Post FAc.”
- Dr. Victor Gonzalez, a retina specialist at Valley Retina Institute in McAllen, Texas presented a second abstract, titled “0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Leads to Superior Vision, Anatomical, and Treatment Burden Outcomes in Eyes with Better Baseline Visual Acuity (≤20/40).”
- Pauline Merrill, MD, physician emeritus with Illinois Retina and Associate Professor, Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, "Three Year Outcomes from the PALADIN Phase IV Study: A Deep Dive into Eyes Requiring IOP Lowering Surgery."
Amongst the exploratory findings presented in these abstracts were –
- Eyes were under treated with 3.5 mean yearly treatments during the three years prior to the administration of ILUVIEN and lost on average 6.4 ETDRS letters during that time. Following the administration of ILUVIEN, eyes gained 4.5 ETDRS letters on average and treatment frequency was reduced to 1.7 mean yearly treatments.
- Significantly more eyes were able to achieve a dry retina (central subfield thickness (CST) ≤ 300 µm) following FAc administration when compared to baseline.
- Eyes experienced significantly less retinal thickness variability post-FAc treatment compared to baseline, as measured by retinal thickness amplitude (RTA) and standard deviation (RTSD).
- Reduced retinal thickness variability was shown to correlate with improved visual outcomes and better disease control.
- Eyes were able to maintain or improve their vision after receiving the 0.19 mg FAc implant regardless of their baseline visual acuity.
- Eyes with a baseline BCVA ≥20/40 maintained their good vision (baseline: mean 77.5 letters; month 36: mean 75.5 letters)
- Eyes with a baseline visual acuity < 20/40 significantly improved their vision by 8.2 letters on average (baseline: mean 53.1 letters; month 36: mean 61.3 letters)
- Better baseline visual acuity was also associated with a lower incidence of incisional IOP surgery and led to numerically fewer IOP-related events.
- In the eyes requiring IOP-lowering surgery (6 eyes), the IOP was managed and eyes gained 7.3 letters on average by the end of the study.
“The data verify that ILUVIEN provides physicians with a much-needed tool for safe and durable treatment of DME,” said Dr. Riemann. “The ILUVIEN implant lessens the burden of care for our patients, reducing their inflammation with fewer doctor visits while maintaining or even improving their vision.”
ASRS is among the largest gatherings of retinal specialists held annually in the field of ophthalmology. Annual meeting educational content is planned by the ASRS program committee, and ASRS does not endorse, promote, approve or recommend the use of any products, devices or services.
About PALADIN
The PALADIN study is a phase 4, open-label, prospective, observational study conducted over 36 months at 41 sites across the United States. This study was designed and developed to confirm the benefit of using a prior course of corticosteroid as indicated in the ILUVIEN U.S. label to mitigate the risk of uncontrolled IOP elevation. Researchers enrolled 202 eyes in 159 patients with DME who had previously received corticosteroid treatment without a clinically significant rise in IOP. All eyes were treated with ILUVIEN and patients were followed for up to 36 months. Additionally, secondary outcomes confirmed improvement in vision and reduction in treatment burden and retinal thickness variability.
About ILUVIEN
www.ILUVIEN.com
The Company’s sole product is ILUVIEN (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.19 mg sustained release intravitreal implant, injected into the back of the eye. With its CONTINUOUS MICRODOSING™ technology, ILUVIEN is designed to release sub-microgram levels of fluocinolone acetonide, a corticosteroid, for 36 months, to reduce the recurrence of disease and number of treatments required, enabling patients to maintain vision longer with fewer injections. ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.19 mg is indicated in the U.S. for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients who have been previously treated with a course of corticosteroids and did not have a clinically significant rise in intraocular pressure. For safety information please visit https://iluvien.com/#isi and scroll down the page.
About Alimera
Alimera is a global pharmaceutical company whose mission is to be invaluable to patients, physicians, and partners concerned with retinal health and maintaining better vision longer. For more information, please visit www.alimerasciences.com.
| For press inquiries: Cassy Dump for Alimera 619-971-1887 cassy.dump@precisionvh.com | For investor inquiries: Scott Gordon for Alimera scottg@coreir.com |
FAQ
What were the results of the PALADIN Phase 4 Study presented by Alimera Sciences?
How does ILUVIEN benefit patients with diabetic macular edema?
What is the significance of the ASRS conference for Alimera Sciences?
What is the treatment frequency before and after ILUVIEN administration?
What outcomes were observed in the PALADIN Study regarding retinal thickness variability?
