STOCK TITAN

Agios Showcases RISE UP Phase 3 Results at EHA 2026 Plenary Session Reinforcing Strong Anti-Hemolytic Profile of Mitapivat in Sickle Cell Disease

(Positive)

Agios (Nasdaq: AGIO) presented detailed 52-week Phase 3 RISE UP results for oral PK activator mitapivat in sickle cell disease at EHA 2026.

Mitapivat showed statistically significant hemoglobin responses, clinically meaningful reductions in transfusion burden and healthcare utilization for hemoglobin responders, and a safety profile similar to placebo with no treatment-related deaths.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • 40.6% hemoglobin response rate with mitapivat vs 2.9% with placebo (p<0.0001)
  • 41.1% relative reduction in proportion requiring transfusions vs placebo (23.9% vs 40.6%)
  • 55.9% relative reduction in average RBC units transfused per patient (0.70 vs 1.59)
  • Hemoglobin responders: 26% lower annualized SCPC rate vs non-responders (2.20 vs 2.98)
  • Hemoglobin responders: 34% fewer SCPC-related hospitalizations (1.16 vs 1.76)
  • Hemoglobin responders: 53% fewer SCPC-related ER visits (1.11 vs 2.33)
  • Hemoglobin responders: 37% fewer SCPC hospitalization days (7.83 vs 12.34)
  • Fatigue improvement in hemoglobin responders exceeded 4.1-point clinically meaningful threshold (-5.19 vs -2.55)
  • Mitapivat safety similar to placebo (treatment-emergent AEs 97.1% vs 98.6%); no treatment-related deaths

Negative

  • Primary endpoint of SCPC rate reduction vs placebo did not reach statistical significance overall
  • No overall difference between mitapivat and placebo for key secondary patient-reported fatigue endpoint
  • High incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in both arms (97.1% mitapivat; 98.6% placebo)

Market Context

This announcement delivers a comprehensive look at the 52‑week RISE UP Phase 3 results, highlighting...
Analysis

This announcement delivers a comprehensive look at the 52‑week RISE UP Phase 3 results, highlighting strong anti‑hemolytic effects, reduced transfusion burden, and better patient‑reported outcomes for mitapivat responders. It builds on earlier mitapivat successes across hemolytic anemias and follows submission of an sNDA in sickle cell disease. Investors may watch for regulatory milestones, additional subgroup analyses, and how Agios uses its effective S-3ASR shelf alongside advancing its broader rare‑disease portfolio.

Key Figures

Transfusion patients: 23.9% vs 40.6% RBC units transfused: 0.70 vs 1.59 units Hemoglobin responders: 40.6% vs 2.9% +5 more
8 metrics
Transfusion patients 23.9% vs 40.6% Patients requiring transfusions: mitapivat vs placebo in RISE UP Phase 3
RBC units transfused 0.70 vs 1.59 units Average red blood cell units per patient: mitapivat vs placebo
Hemoglobin responders 40.6% vs 2.9% Patients achieving hemoglobin response: mitapivat vs placebo
Hemoglobin increase 1.6 g/dL Mean hemoglobin change in mitapivat hemoglobin responders, Weeks 24–52
SCPC rate reduction 2.20 vs 2.98 Annualized sickle cell pain crises: responders vs non-responders
ER visit rate 1.11 vs 2.33 Annualized ER visits for SCPCs: responders vs non-responders
Fatigue score change -5.19 vs -2.55 PROMIS Fatigue 13a change: responders vs non-responders (4.1-point threshold)
AE incidence 97.1% vs 98.6% Patients with any treatment-emergent adverse event: mitapivat vs placebo

Previous Clinical trial Reports

5 past events · Latest: Nov 19 (Positive)
Same Type Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment 24h Move Catalyst
Nov 19 RISE UP topline data Positive -50.9% Topline Phase 3 RISE UP met hemoglobin response and key anti-hemolytic endpoints.
Feb 13 Pediatric PK trial Positive +1.5% Phase 3 ACTIVATE-Kids in pediatric PK deficiency met primary hemoglobin response endpoint.
Dec 08 ENERGIZE-T results Positive -21.1% Phase 3 ENERGIZE-T showed significant transfusion burden reduction in thalassemia.
Oct 23 RISE UP enrollment done Neutral -2.3% Completed enrollment for Phase 3 RISE UP in sickle cell disease ahead of topline data.
Aug 01 ACTIVATE-KidsT topline Negative -4.1% ACTIVATE-KidsT did not meet prespecified primary endpoint criterion despite clinically meaningful benefit.

24h Move is the share-price change in the day after each event; other market factors may also have contributed.

Pattern Detected

Clinical trial updates for mitapivat have often been followed by negative price reactions, even when efficacy endpoints were met.

Recent Company History

Over recent years, Agios has repeatedly reported positive mitapivat clinical data across sickle cell disease, thalassemia, and PK deficiency. Events such as the RISE UP topline results and ENERGIZE‑T transfusion data showed meaningful efficacy yet were followed by share declines of up to -50.89%. Today’s detailed RISE UP analysis at EHA 2026 extends the same efficacy narrative—hemoglobin response and transfusion burden improvements—against a backdrop of historically cautious market responses to similar updates.

Key Terms

pyruvate kinase (pk) activator, indirect bilirubin, sickle cell pain crises, treatment-emergent adverse events, +4 more
8 terms
pyruvate kinase (pk) activator medical
"mitapivat, an oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, in patients aged 16 years"
A pyruvate kinase (PK) activator is a type of drug that increases the activity of the pyruvate kinase enzyme, which helps cells generate energy from glucose; think of it as priming a stalled engine so cells, especially red blood cells, can work properly. For investors, these drugs matter because successful trial results or approvals can unlock treatments for blood and metabolic disorders, creating potential revenue streams while carrying development, regulatory and market-risk implications.
indirect bilirubin medical
"improvements in hemoglobin concentration and indirect bilirubin, a marker of hemolysis"
Indirect bilirubin is a form of bilirubin produced when old red blood cells are broken down; the liver normally converts it into a form that can be excreted. Elevated indirect bilirubin levels signal that the liver or the blood is not handling waste properly — like a garbage truck falling behind — and can affect demand for diagnostics, therapies, or trigger safety/regulatory scrutiny that matters to investors tracking healthcare or drug companies.
sickle cell pain crises medical
"annualized rate of sickle cell pain crises (SCPCs) compared with placebo"
Sudden, intense episodes of pain caused when abnormally shaped red blood cells block small blood vessels and reduce blood flow to tissues; these events can last hours to days and often require emergency care or hospitalization. Investors should care because the frequency and severity of these crises drive demand for treatments, influence healthcare costs, affect hospital use and insurance payouts, and are a primary endpoint for drug development and regulatory decisions—much like a recurring equipment failure that shapes demand for repairs and insurance.
treatment-emergent adverse events medical
"percentage of patients with any reported treatment-emergent adverse events was similar"
Events or symptoms that either appear for the first time or get worse after a patient starts a treatment; think of new or intensified side effects that show up once medicine or a medical device is used. Investors watch these closely because they affect whether a therapy can gain regulatory approval, be prescribed widely, or face legal and commercial setbacks—similar to how early customer complaints can sink a new product’s prospects.
patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (promis) medical
"as measured by change from baseline in average Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)"
A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is a set of standardized, scientifically developed questionnaires that let patients report their own symptoms, function, and quality of life—similar to a customer survey for health. Investors care because PROMIS data can influence clinical trial results, regulatory approvals, reimbursement decisions and market acceptance of therapies or devices, making it a measurable signal of a product’s real-world value and commercial prospects.
ascq-me medical
"Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me) Pain Impact"
ASCQ‑Me is a standardized set of patient questionnaires used to measure health status and quality of life specifically for adults with sickle cell disease. It translates patients’ experiences—pain, fatigue, emotional impact—into consistent scores researchers, regulators and payers can use, similar to how a customer survey converts feelings into numbers. Investors watch ASCQ‑Me results because they can support clinical claims, labeling and reimbursement decisions that influence a therapy’s market potential.
euroqol-5 dimension visual analog scale (eq-5d vas) medical
"EuroQol-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS): The mean change from baseline"
A patient-rated health score from the EQ-5D instrument that asks people to mark their overall health on a 0–100 scale, where 0 is the worst imaginable health and 100 is the best. Investors use it as a simple, standardized way to quantify how much a treatment or intervention improves patients’ daily well‑being; like a customer satisfaction rating for health, it can influence cost-effectiveness analyses, reimbursement, regulatory decisions and commercial uptake.
least squares mean (lsm) technical
"with a least squares mean (LSM) difference of -1.04 (95% confidence interval"
An least squares mean (LSM) is an adjusted average calculated from a statistical model that accounts for other factors so different groups can be fairly compared. For investors, LSMs matter because they give a clearer picture of a drug’s or product’s effect by removing the influence of unrelated differences (think comparing students’ test scores after adjusting for study time), which helps assess the credibility and size of reported results.

AI-generated analysis. How Rhea-AI works. Not financial advice.

See more from StockTitan in Google Search and AI answers. Adds StockTitan as a preferred source · opens Google
Add on Google
  • Mitapivat demonstrated statistically significant improvement in hemoglobin response compared with placebo, with rapid onset and durable effects
  • New analyses showed patients in mitapivat arm had clinically meaningful reduction in transfusion burden compared with placebo
  • Patients in mitapivat arm who achieved hemoglobin response had clinically meaningful benefits across measures of sickle cell pain crises, fatigue, and other patient-reported outcomes
  • Mitapivat was well-tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with previous trials of mitapivat in sickle cell disease
  • Company to host investor conference call and webcast today at 9:00 a.m. ET (3:00 p.m. CEST)

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., June 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: AGIO), a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on delivering innovative medicines for patients with rare diseases, today presented detailed results from the 52-week double-blind period of the global RISE UP Phase 3 trial of mitapivat, an oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, in patients aged 16 years or older with sickle cell disease. These efficacy and safety results, which include new transfusion burden and hemoglobin responder analyses reinforcing the strong anti-hemolytic profile of mitapivat, were presented during the distinguished Plenary Abstracts Session at the 31st European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress (EHA 2026) in Stockholm, Sweden.

In November 2025, topline results from RISE UP demonstrated a significant improvement in the trial’s primary endpoint of hemoglobin response with mitapivat compared with placebo. The trial also met two key secondary endpoints, showing rapid and durable improvements in hemoglobin concentration and indirect bilirubin, a marker of hemolysis (red blood cell destruction). Although mitapivat showed a reduction in the annualized rate of sickle cell pain crises (SCPCs) compared with placebo, this primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance, and there was no overall difference between mitapivat and placebo for the key secondary endpoint measuring patient-reported fatigue. However, patients in the mitapivat arm who achieved a hemoglobin response experienced clinically meaningful reductions in the annualized rate of SCPCs and related hospitalizations, as well as improvements in fatigue.

New RISE UP analyses, not previously disclosed by the company, further highlight the potential for mitapivat to offer clinical benefits for patients with sickle cell disease, as evidenced by a clinically meaningful reduction in transfusion burden and, for hemoglobin responders in the mitapivat arm, improvements observed across additional measures of pain and physical function.

“Patients living with sickle cell disease are in critical need of new treatments that can effectively manage the debilitating impact of their condition,” said Biree Andemariam, M.D., Professor of Medicine and American Red Cross Endowed Chair in Transfusion Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, and a RISE UP trial investigator. “The RISE UP Phase 3 data presented today showcase the strong anti-hemolytic profile of mitapivat, with rapid and durable improvements in both hemoglobin and indirect bilirubin as well as a meaningful reduction in transfusion burden. Importantly, this anti-hemolytic effect is translating to clear clinical benefits, including improvements for hemoglobin responders across measures of sickle cell pain crises, pain, sleep, and physical function compared with non-responders. Together, these data reinforce the potential for mitapivat to improve the relentless physical toll that comes with living with sickle cell disease.”

New RISE UP Phase 3 Trial Results at EHA 2026
Reduction in Transfusion Burden
New analyses from RISE UP show that mitapivat was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in transfusion burden compared with placebo. Patients in the mitapivat arm had a 41.1% relative reduction in the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusions compared with placebo (23.9% with mitapivat vs. 40.6% with placebo), as well as a 55.9% relative reduction in average red blood cell units transfused per patient compared with placebo (0.70 units with mitapivat vs. 1.59 with placebo). These benefits were observed regardless of whether patients were also taking hydroxyurea. A reduction in transfusion burden in sickle cell disease can reflect decreased dependence on supportive care.

Hemoglobin Responders Post-Hoc Analysis
As previously reported, 40.6% of patients in the mitapivat arm achieved the primary endpoint of hemoglobin response (≥1.0 g/dL increase from baseline in average hemoglobin from Week 24 through Week 52) compared with 2.9% in the placebo arm, a statistically significant improvement (2-sided p<0.0001). Among these hemoglobin responders, the mean change from baseline in average hemoglobin concentration from Week 24 through Week 52 was 1.6 g/dL.

A post-hoc analysis showed patients in the mitapivat arm who achieved a hemoglobin response also experienced clinically meaningful reductions in pain crises and related hospitalizations, including a 26% reduction in the annualized rate of SCPCs (2.20 for responders vs. 2.98 for non-responders) and 34% fewer related hospitalizations (1.16 for responders vs. 1.76 for non-responders). These patients also had improvements in healthcare utilization, with a 53% reduction in the annualized rate of emergency room visits for SCPCs (1.11 for responders vs. 2.33 for non-responders) and a 37% decrease in the annualized rate of hospitalization days for SCPCs (7.83 for responders vs. 12.34 for non-responders).

Hemoglobin responders in the mitapivat arm also reported greater improvements in patient-reported fatigue scores than non-responders (-5.19 for responders vs. -2.55 for non-responders), as measured by change from baseline in average Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue 13a Short Form scores from Week 24 through Week 52. The magnitude of this improvement in hemoglobin responders exceeded the predefined 4.1-point threshold required to be considered clinically meaningful.

In the mitapivat arm, improvements across several additional patient-reported outcomes, including measures of pain, sleep, and physical function, were observed for hemoglobin responders compared with non-responders:

  • PROMIS Pain Intensity 1a: The mean change from baseline was -1.63 points for hemoglobin responders and -0.59 for non-responders, with a least squares mean (LSM) difference of -1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.66 to -0.42), favoring hemoglobin responders. The LSM difference is used throughout to represent the model-adjusted difference between hemoglobin responders and non-responders.
  • Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me) Pain Impact: The mean change from baseline was 4.09 points for hemoglobin responders and 0.85 for non-responders, with an LSM difference of 3.24 (95% CI: 1.18 to 5.30), favoring hemoglobin responders.
  • PROMIS Physical Functioning 8a: The mean change from baseline was 5.30 points for hemoglobin responders and 1.79 for non-responders, with an LSM difference of 3.51 (95% CI: 0.62 to 6.39), favoring hemoglobin responders.
  • ASCQ-Me Sleep Impact: The mean change from baseline was 2.39 points for hemoglobin responders and -0.48 for non-responders, with an LSM difference of 2.87 (95% CI: 0.22 to 5.53), favoring hemoglobin responders.
  • EuroQol-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS): The mean change from baseline was 3.27 points for hemoglobin responders and -6.77 for non-responders, with an LSM difference of 10.04 (95% CI: 2.41 to 17.66), favoring hemoglobin responders.

“Having the opportunity to present these comprehensive results during the EHA 2026 Plenary Session highlights the strength of the RISE UP Phase 3 data – the first pivotal trial to validate pyruvate kinase activation as a new treatment approach in sickle cell disease,” said Sarah Gheuens, M.D., Ph.D., Chief Medical Officer and Head of R&D, Agios. “Building on over a decade of clinical experience with mitapivat across several hemolytic anemias, these results reinforce both its consistent benefits and its well-established safety profile, which is supported by over 1,300 patient-years of data. Taken together, mitapivat represents a differentiated anti-hemolytic approach that can provide meaningful clinical benefits for patients with sickle cell disease – an underserved population in desperate need of innovative therapies.”

Safety Profile
Mitapivat was well-tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with previous trials of mitapivat in sickle cell disease. The percentage of patients with any reported treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the mitapivat and placebo arms (97.1% vs. 98.6%, respectively). No treatment-related deaths occurred during the trial.

EHA 2026 Investor Event
Agios will host a conference call and live webcast during EHA 2026 today, June 13, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. ET (3:00 p.m. CEST). The live webcast will be accessible on the Investors section of the company’s website (www.agios.com) under the “Events & Presentations” tab. A replay of the webcast will be available on the company’s website approximately two hours after the event.

About Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle cell disease is a rare, inherited blood disorder caused by the production of abnormal hemoglobin that disrupts the ability of red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body. As a result, red blood cells become rigid and sickle-shaped, causing deformation of red blood cell membranes and the premature death of the cells. These effects lead to chronic hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusion, and a cascade of severe and life-threatening complications, including long-term damage to the lungs, kidneys, and cardiovascular system. Due to its physical toll, sickle cell disease imposes a profound burden on patients and their families, marked by increased healthcare needs and early mortality.

About Mitapivat in Sickle Cell Disease
Mitapivat, an oral pyruvate kinase (PK) activator, is designed to enhance the process by which red blood cells produce energy. This approach has the potential to improve red blood cell health by increasing ATP levels to support increased energy demands and lowering levels of a molecule called 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG). In sickle cell disease, increased stress on red blood cells results in elevated levels of 2,3-DPG, which raises the likelihood that red blood cells develop the abnormal “sickle” shape that triggers vaso-occlusive crises. In May 2026, Agios announced the submission of a supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the accelerated approval of mitapivat in sickle cell disease.

About the RISE UP Phase 3 Trial
The global RISE UP Phase 3 trial (NCT05031780) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in patients with sickle cell disease aged 16 years or older, representative of the global population. The trial included a 52-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled period, in which 207 participants were randomized 2:1 to receive oral mitapivat (100 mg) twice daily (n=138) or matched-placebo (n=69).

To comprehensively evaluate objective measures of hemolysis alongside other clinically relevant outcomes in sickle cell disease, the double-blind period of RISE UP included two primary endpoints – hemoglobin response and annualized rate of sickle cell pain crises – as well as five key secondary endpoints:

  • Average change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration from Week 24 through Week 52
  • Average change from baseline in indirect bilirubin from Week 24 through Week 52
  • Average change from baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Fatigue 13a (PROMIS Fatigue) Short Form scores from Week 24 through Week 52
  • Annualized frequency of hospitalizations for sickle cell pain crises
  • Average change from baseline in percent reticulocyte levels from Week 24 through Week 52

Of the 176 participants who completed the double-blind period of the trial, nearly all (n=174/176) opted to transition into a 216-week open-label extension (OLE) period, during which all participants receive mitapivat.

About Agios: Fueled by Connections to Transform Rare Diseases™
At Agios, our vision is to redefine the future of rare disease treatment. Fueled by connections, we build trusted partnerships with communities – collaborating to develop and deliver innovative medicines that have the potential to transform lives. With a foundation in hematology, we combine biological expertise with real-world insights to advance a growing pipeline of rare disease medicines that reflect the priorities of the people we serve. Agios is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. To learn more, visit www.agios.com and follow us on LinkedIn and X.

Available Information about Agios
To achieve broad dissemination, Agios may disclose information to the public through a variety of disclosure channels including press releases, SEC filings, and public conference calls and webcasts. Some of the information distributed through these disclosure channels may be considered material information. Investors and others should note that Agios plans to use its website (www.agios.com) as a distribution channel to announce and give notice of Agios’ upcoming events and presentations (including, but not limited to, presentations at medical or healthcare conferences). Such information, which may be deemed material, will be available on the Investors section of the company’s website under the “Events & Presentations” tab. In addition, you may sign up to automatically receive email alerts about Agios’ upcoming events and presentations (“Calendar Alerts”) by visiting the “Email Alerts” option under the “IR Resources” tab of the Investors section of the company’s website and submitting your email address.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those regarding the potential benefits of mitapivat and the potential benefits of Agios’ strategic plans and focus. The words “anticipate,” “expect,” “goal,” “hope,” “milestone,” “plan,” “potential,” “possible,” “strategy,” “will,” “vision,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Such statements are subject to numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from Agios’ current expectations and beliefs. For example, there can be no guarantee that any product candidate Agios is developing will successfully commence or complete necessary preclinical and clinical development phases, or that development of any of Agios’ product candidates will successfully continue. There can be no guarantee that any positive developments in Agios’ business will result in stock price appreciation. Management's expectations and, therefore, any forward-looking statements in this press release could also be affected by risks and uncertainties relating to a number of other important factors, including, without limitation: risks and uncertainties related to the impact of pandemics or other public health emergencies to Agios’ business, operations, strategy, goals and anticipated milestones, including its ongoing and planned research activities, ability to conduct ongoing and planned clinical trials, clinical supply of current or future drug candidates, commercial supply of current or future approved products, and launching, marketing and selling current or future approved products; Agios’ results of clinical trials and preclinical studies, including subsequent analysis of existing data and new data received from ongoing and future studies; the content and timing of decisions made by the U.S. FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities, investigational review boards at clinical trial sites and publication review bodies; Agios’ ability to obtain and maintain requisite regulatory approvals and to enroll patients in its planned clinical trials; unplanned cash requirements and expenditures; competitive factors; Agios' ability to obtain, maintain and enforce patent and other intellectual property protection for any product candidates it is developing; Agios’ ability to establish and maintain key collaborations; uncertainty regarding any royalty payments related to the sale of its oncology business or any milestone or royalty payments related to its in-licensing of AG-236 or cevidoplenib, and the uncertainty of the timing of any such payments; uncertainty of the results and effectiveness of the use of Agios’ cash and cash equivalents; and general economic and market conditions. These and other risks are described in greater detail under the caption "Risk Factors" included in Agios’ public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date hereof, and Agios expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Contacts:
Investor Contact
Morgan Sanford, Vice President, Investor Relations
Agios Pharmaceuticals
morgan.sanford@agios.com

Media Contact
Eamonn Nolan, Senior Director, Corporate Communications
Agios Pharmaceuticals
eamonn.nolan@agios.com


FAQ

What were the main RISE UP Phase 3 mitapivat results Agios (AGIO) presented at EHA 2026?

Mitapivat improved hemoglobin response and showed anti-hemolytic benefits in sickle cell disease. According to Agios, 40.6% of mitapivat patients achieved hemoglobin response vs 2.9% on placebo, with durable hemoglobin and indirect bilirubin improvements over 52 weeks.

How did mitapivat impact transfusion burden in the RISE UP Phase 3 sickle cell trial (AGIO)?

Mitapivat reduced transfusion burden compared with placebo in RISE UP. According to Agios, mitapivat cut the proportion needing transfusions by 41.1% and reduced average red blood cell units transfused per patient by 55.9%, regardless of concurrent hydroxyurea use.

What clinical benefits did hemoglobin responders see with mitapivat in Agios RISE UP Phase 3?

Hemoglobin responders on mitapivat experienced better clinical outcomes than non-responders. According to Agios, responders had lower annualized sickle cell pain crises, fewer related hospitalizations and ER visits, fewer hospitalization days, and clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, pain, sleep, physical function, and quality-of-life scores.

Did mitapivat reduce sickle cell pain crises in the overall RISE UP Phase 3 population?

Mitapivat numerically reduced pain crises but did not reach statistical significance overall. According to Agios, the primary endpoint based on annualized sickle cell pain crisis rate versus placebo was not statistically significant, though hemoglobin responders showed lower crisis and hospitalization rates than non-responders.

What was the safety profile of mitapivat in Agios RISE UP Phase 3 sickle cell study?

Mitapivat was generally well-tolerated with a safety profile similar to placebo. According to Agios, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 97.1% on mitapivat and 98.6% on placebo, and no treatment-related deaths were reported during the 52-week double-blind period.

When is Agios (AGIO) hosting its EHA 2026 investor webcast on RISE UP results?

Agios is hosting an EHA 2026 investor call and webcast on June 13, 2026. According to Agios, the event starts at 9:00 a.m. ET (3:00 p.m. CEST) with a replay available later on the company’s investor relations website.