Three In Five Australian Construction Leaders Say Data Analysis Helps Reduce Project Defects
Procore Technologies (NYSE: PCOR) released new research indicating that over half (53%) of Australian construction leaders find it challenging to monitor quality assurance without integrated data management tools. This marks an increase from 2020. The survey of 153 leaders highlights a growing recognition of data's role in enhancing project quality and compliance. Despite three-quarters of respondents using some software, reliance on paper records remains a concern, particularly in health and safety management. A push for improved data utilization is evident, with many identifying cost-saving potential through better data analytics.
- 53% of surveyed construction leaders acknowledge difficulty in monitoring quality assurance without integrated data systems.
- 76% of respondents utilize some form of software for data capture in construction.
- 61% believe data analysis is crucial for achieving quality assurance outcomes.
- 36% state improved compliance significantly benefits from data capture, increasing to 66% among larger companies.
- 27% of businesses see potential to reduce operational costs by at least 20% through better data utilization.
- 38% of respondents report data collection is managed by different departments, causing fragmentation.
- 21% manage quality and compliance on paper, despite acknowledging it as impractical.
- Only 11% of small businesses use specialized software for quality control, limiting effectiveness.
New research from
Software use is growing, while paper persists (Graphic: Business Wire)
This research release is the second from a survey of 153 construction leaders around
“Technology and data will play a central role as the Australian construction industry continues to transform and focus on uplifting building quality,” comments Tom Karemacher, Vice President, APAC at
Software use is growing, while paper persists
As the construction industry continues its accelerated adoption of digital solutions, three quarters of all respondents surveyed (
-
Of all onsite processes, respondents were most likely to use paper to manage Health and Safety (
24% ) -
One in five respondents manage Quality and Compliance on paper (
21% ) despite56% agreeing that paper-based Quality Assurance (QA) processes are impractical and increase the risk of re-work. -
Most respondents (
58% ) use standard office software for quality control inspections and certifications, and a further23% of respondents use specialist software for these processes.
The increased use of specialist software for quality control and compliance is encouraging, however there is a widening gap between smaller and larger companies. Nearly half of the larger businesses (100+ employees) surveyed use specialist software for these processes (
Business barriers to data capture
Parts of the industry are still lagging in digital transformation, and inconsistent digital data capture across business processes and sizes could be the result of various factors.
The most common challenge is that different teams often manage their affairs separately within an organisation, meaning there is no central, up-to-date repository for documentation across the business.
Survey respondents identified the collection of data by subdivisions as the biggest barrier to accessing data, with
Benefits of data analysis for QA processes
There are clear benefits of using data analysis for QA processes. Larger businesses stand out for their recognition of the drawbacks from paper-based QA processes (
-
53% of respondents agree it is difficult to effectively monitor QA without an integrated data management platform (up from45% in 2020) -
61% of respondents agree data analysis delivers insights that are crucial to QA outcomes -
60% say defects are less likely to occur in sites where data analysis guides processes -
Improved compliance was identified as the second most common area benefiting a great deal from data capture and analysis (
36% ), rising to be the greatest area of benefit for66% of Large companies.
The case for data-driven construction
Data is a tool that can allow processes to run faster and more efficiently, with a greater level of scrutiny. Construction leaders almost universally recognise the potential for more consistent and standardised data to benefit their business, but larger companies are most aware of the breadth of these potential benefits. Overall, data appreciation has grown since 2020, with
All respondents recognise operational cost savings as a clear advantage in using data to drive decision-making, and many feel there is the potential to record further savings through more effective data usage. More than a quarter of companies (
“As Procore continues to track technology adoption in the construction industry, it is encouraging to see a growing appreciation for the value of data-driven business insights to improve project and business outcomes. The next step is to ensure all Australian construction companies have access to project information, data insights and benchmarks at their fingertips, reducing complexity and allowing quality and compliance needs to be easily met,” Karemacher concludes.
To learn about the most common mistakes that lead to rework and key strategies to improve construction quality, download Your Guide to Zero Defects here: https://www.procore.com/en-au/ebooks/meet-the-guide-thats-redefining-quality
About
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210908005171/en/
procore@espressocomms.com.au
Source:
FAQ
What did Procore's latest research reveal about data in Australian construction?
How many construction leaders were surveyed in Procore's research?
What percentage of Australian construction leaders use software for data capture?
What challenges do construction leaders face regarding data usage, according to Procore's research?