New Study Validates Signatera™ in Endometrial Cancer
- None.
- None.
Insights
The recent study underlining the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as assessed by Natera's Signatera test in endometrial cancer represents a significant stride in oncology. The ability to detect molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery is a critical factor in determining the likelihood of disease recurrence. The high hazard ratio (HR=18.9) reported for MRD positivity underscores the substantial risk of recurrence in MRD-positive patients compared to those who are MRD-negative.
This test could be instrumental in guiding adjuvant therapy, which is treatment given after primary therapy to increase the chance of a cure. In cases where ctDNA is detected, indicating residual disease, clinicians might opt for more aggressive adjuvant treatment. Conversely, a negative Signatera test could spare patients from unnecessary side effects of additional therapy. This personalized approach to cancer treatment is in line with the current trend towards precision medicine, which aims to tailor healthcare, with medical decisions and treatments tailored to individual patients.
From a research perspective, the validation of Signatera in a real-world study enhances its credibility as a diagnostic tool. The study's findings suggest that Signatera could potentially redefine the adjuvant treatment pathway for endometrial cancer, which is significant given the rising incidence and mortality rates of this malignancy. The ability of Signatera to stratify patients based on MRD status rather than just clinicopathological factors could lead to a more nuanced understanding of individual patient risk and better-tailored treatment regimens.
It is important to note that the study encompassed a diverse cohort, including multiple histological subtypes and risk groups, which adds to the generalizability of the findings. The reported sensitivity of Signatera in detecting recurrence aligns with the industry's push towards more sensitive and specific cancer diagnostics. However, further studies would be beneficial to assess the long-term outcomes of patients whose treatment was guided by MRD status, as well as to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating such testing into standard clinical practice.
The introduction and validation of innovative diagnostic tools like Signatera could have significant implications for the market landscape of cancer diagnostics. As precision medicine gains traction, the demand for personalized diagnostic tests is likely to increase. This could lead to a competitive advantage for Natera in the cell-free DNA testing market, potentially impacting its market share and financial performance.
Investors and stakeholders should monitor the adoption rate of Signatera in clinical settings, as well as any partnerships or collaborations Natera may establish with healthcare providers and insurers. The economic impact of MRD testing on healthcare systems and its potential to reduce overall treatment costs by preventing overtreatment could also influence market dynamics. While the immediate financial impact might be difficult to quantify, the long-term growth prospects for Natera hinge on the clinical adoption and reimbursement landscape for tests like Signatera.
Study shows ctDNA positivity is the most prognostic factor, demonstrating the potential for Signatera to redefine adjuvant treatment pathways in endometrial cancer
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in
This real-world study analyzed 267 plasma samples drawn after surgery from 101 patients with EC. The patient cohort was composed of multiple histological subtypes, with patients stratified based on clinicopathological risk factors into high-risk (
-
Patients who tested Signatera MRD-positive at either a single time point or longitudinally experienced significantly higher rates of recurrence than those who remained Signatera-negative (
58% and52% , vs.6% and0% , respectively), regardless of mismatch repair (MMR) or p53 status. - Signatera MRD status was the only significant risk factor for recurrence when adjusted for clinicopathological risk groups and molecular subgroups such as MMR and p53 status (HR=18.9, p=.001).
“This study provides clinical validation of Signatera as a powerful post-surgical biomarker of recurrence risk for patients with endometrial cancer,” said Minetta Liu, MD, chief medical officer of oncology at Natera. “Use of Signatera in clinical workflows may help physicians and patients tailor their adjuvant treatment decisions based on direct evidence of molecular residual disease.”
About Signatera
Signatera is a personalized, tumor-informed, molecular residual disease test for patients previously diagnosed with cancer. Custom-built for each individual, Signatera uses circulating tumor DNA to detect and quantify cancer left in the body, identify recurrence earlier than standard of care tools, and help optimize treatment decisions. The test is available for clinical and research use and is covered by Medicare for patients with colorectal cancer, breast cancer (stage IIb and higher) and muscle invasive bladder cancer, as well as for immunotherapy monitoring of any solid tumor. Signatera has been clinically validated across multiple cancer types and indications, with published evidence in more than 60 peer-reviewed papers.
About Natera
Natera™ is a global leader in cell-free DNA testing, dedicated to oncology, women’s health, and organ health. We aim to make personalized genetic testing and diagnostics part of the standard of care to protect health, and inform earlier, more targeted interventions that help lead to longer, healthier lives. Natera’s tests are validated by more than 180 peer-reviewed publications that demonstrate high accuracy. Natera operates ISO 13485-certified and CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) in
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this press release are forward-looking statements and are not a representation that Natera’s plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. These forward-looking statements represent Natera’s expectations as of the date of this press release, and Natera disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including with respect to whether the results of clinical or other studies will support the use of our product offerings, the impact of results of such studies, our expectations of the reliability, accuracy and performance of our tests, or of the benefits of our tests and product offerings to patients, providers and payers. Additional risks and uncertainties are discussed in greater detail in "Risk Factors" in Natera’s recent filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q and in other filings Natera makes with the SEC from time to time. These documents are available at www.natera.com/investors and www.sec.gov.
References
-
Temkin SM, Kohn EC, Penberthy L, Cronin KA, Rubinsak L, Dickie LA, et al. Hysterectomy-corrected rates of endometrial cancer among women younger than age 50 in
the United States . Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29:427–33. - Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, and Jemal A. "Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33.
- National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer stat facts: uterine cancer. Accessed February 2, 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html.
- Siegenthaler F, Lindemann K, Epstein E, et al. Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(2):230-238.
- Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12-39.
- Abu-Rustum N, Yashar C, Arend R, et al. Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(2):181-209.
- Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(3):744-51.
- Nout RA, Smit VT, Putter H et al. Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9717):816-23.
- Group AS, Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, and Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):125-36.
- de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):295-309.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240205986663/en/
Investor Relations: Mike Brophy, CFO, Natera, Inc., 510-826-2350, investor@natera.com
Media: Lesley Bogdanow, VP of Corporate Communications, Natera, Inc., pr@natera.com
Source: Natera, Inc.
FAQ
What is the ticker symbol for Natera, Inc.?
What was the key finding of the study in endometrial cancer?
Who is the chief medical officer of oncology at Natera, Inc.?