MEI Pharma Reports Initial Data from Clinical Study Evaluating ME-344 in Combination with Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Relapsed Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
- Positive results from Cohort 1 of the Phase 1b study with 25% of patients showing no disease progression at Week 16.
- Exceeded the 20% threshold to add more patients to the study, indicating promising efficacy.
- ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab was generally well-tolerated with no overlapping toxicities.
- Decision to advance ME-344 via a new formulation to increase biological activity and commercial opportunities.
- Encouraging results from the research and development of the new formulation.
- Focus on improving patient outcomes and treatment convenience while reducing expenditures on the program.
- None.
Insights
An analysis of the recent report from MEI Pharma regarding their Phase 1b study of ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab presents a noteworthy development in the oncology drug landscape. The achievement of a 25% non-progression rate at 16 weeks among evaluable patients with relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a positive indicator, surpassing the study's protocol threshold of 20%. This suggests a potential efficacy signal that could be significant for patients with limited treatment options after standard therapies have failed. The strategic shift to focus on a new formulation of ME-344, rather than expanding patient cohorts, hints at the company's confidence in the compound's mechanism of action—targeting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to induce synthetic lethality in tumors.
From a clinical research perspective, the decision to halt cohort expansion in favor of formulation development could streamline the path to commercialization if the new formulation enhances biological activity or patient convenience. However, it also raises questions about the underlying data not disclosed in the report, such as detailed safety profiles, the robustness of the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit and the durability of response. The median PFS of 1.9 months and median overall survival of 6.7 months provide a benchmark for future comparisons, but additional data would be needed to fully assess the clinical benefit of this combination therapy.
Furthermore, the oncology community will be interested in the long-term implications of this strategy on the drug's development timeline, potential market entry and how it aligns with the current competitive landscape in mCRC treatments. The focus on a new formulation could either be a strategic move to differentiate ME-344 or a response to challenges encountered with the current formulation. The impact of these developments on MEI Pharma's valuation will hinge on subsequent clinical outcomes and the ability to achieve regulatory milestones.
From a market perspective, MEI Pharma's announcement carries implications for investors and stakeholders. The initial positive response to ME-344's efficacy in a challenging patient population—those with relapsed mCRC—could be seen as a value inflection point for the company. However, the decision to not proceed with Cohort 2 and instead focus on a new formulation may be interpreted in various ways. It could signal an attempt to maximize the drug's commercial potential by improving its profile or a strategic pivot to address unforeseen limitations of the current formulation.
Investors will be keen on understanding how this decision affects the company's burn rate and resource allocation. The short-term reduction in expenditures on the ME-344 program could improve MEI Pharma's financial position, but it also postpones potential revenue from this asset. The long-term success of this strategy will rely on the new formulation's ability to outperform existing treatments and capture a significant share of the mCRC market, which is already crowded with several established therapies.
It is also essential to consider the partnership and licensing potential of ME-344. A new, improved formulation could attract collaboration with larger pharmaceutical companies seeking innovative oncology drugs. However, delays in development timelines could also impact these opportunities. Investors should monitor subsequent announcements for updates on the new formulation's progress, as well as any partnership or funding announcements that could validate the company's strategic direction and enhance its market position.
– Cohort 1 Exceeds Predetermined Non-Progression Threshold in the Ongoing Phase 1b Study –
– ME-344 in Combination with Bevacizumab was Generally Well-tolerated with no Evidence of Overlapping Toxicity –
– MEI to Continue Advancing ME-344 via Development of a New Formulation with the Potential to Increase Biological Activity, Patient Convenience and Commercial Opportunity –
"The data reported today, including progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety results of the combination, represent an important development supporting the potential of ME-344 in combination with Avastin to induce synthetic lethality in tumors using a completely novel therapeutic strategy,” said Richard Ghalie, chief medical officer of MEI Pharma. “The development of a new formulation with enhanced biologic activity is aimed at further improving patient outcomes and treatment convenience in a well-tolerated manner.”
“At MEI we are committed to our mission of developing novel drug candidates to address known resistance mechanisms to standard-of-care cancer therapies, and ME-344 holds significant potential as a novel therapeutic strategy to advance this mission,” said David Urso, president and chief executive officer of MEI Pharma. “We believe that the best approach to optimize the potential of ME-344 for patients, prioritize resource utilization, and build value for shareholders, is to continue advancing the program via development of a new formulation of ME-344. In the short term, this plan will reduce expenditures on the ME-344 program and ultimately, if successful, create an improved formulation for continued clinical development.”
Phase 1 Study Details
The ongoing Phase 1b study is evaluating ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (“mCRC”) after failure of standard therapies. The combination of ME-344 and bevacizumab is intended to create metabolic synthetic lethality by leveraging the ability of antiangiogenics like bevacizumab to reduce glycolysis, forcing tumors to switch to mitochondrial respiration via OXPHOS, which is inhibited by ME-344.
The study was designed to evaluate ME-344 plus bevacizumab in up to two cohorts of approximately 20 patients each. The option to enroll the second cohort was conditioned upon Cohort 1 reaching a predetermined non-progression threshold of at least
ME-344 is administered at 10 mg/kg once weekly for 3 weeks in combination with bevacizumab every two weeks in 28-day cycles. Cohort 1 enrolled a total of 23 patients with relapsed mCRC, with a median age 58 years (range 42-83). Patients were generally heavily pretreated; the median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 1-8), 18 (
In the first cohort, 5 of 20 (
The Phase 1b study is being conducted at member centers of the Academic GI Cancer Consortium (AGICC), an oncology consortium dedicated to identifying new drugs to treat gastrointestinal cancers.
ME-344 Plus Bevacizumab Combination: Initial Safety and Tolerability Data
ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab at the dose and schedule evaluated was generally well tolerated with no overlapping toxicities observed. Two patients (
ME-344 Plus Bevacizumab Combination: Initial Efficacy Data
Of the 23 patients enrolled in Cohort 1, three patients were not evaluable for 16-weeks disease progression analysis due to early discontinuation prior to first disease assessment on therapy. Of the 20 patients that were evaluable, 5 (
About ME-344
ME-344, an investigational drug candidate, is a novel inhibitor of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), a fundamental metabolic pathway involved in the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the mitochondria. ATP provides energy to drive many metabolic cell processes, including division, proliferation, and growth. By disrupting the production of ATP, ME-344 has been shown to induce cancer cell death in nonclinical models and was associated with antitumor activity in clinical studies.
The two main sources of ATP production in cells are OXPHOS and glycolysis; the latter is highly active in most tumors. Anti-angiogenics, like the vascular endothelial growth factor (“VEGF”) inhibitor bevacizumab (Avastin®), have the potential to normalize vasculature and decrease reliance on glycolysis. The resulting reduction in glycolysis may trigger an increased dependence on mitochondrial ATP production for energy to support continued tumor proliferation. In such cases of tumor plasticity, the combination of ME-344 and bevacizumab may induce metabolic synthetic lethality, providing a novel therapeutic strategy. Specifically, leveraging the ability of antiangiogenics like bevacizumab to reduce glycolysis and force tumor cells to switch to mitochondrial respiration via OXPHOS, which is inhibited by ME-344, may reduce access to ATP needed for cell division and growth in tumors.
This approach was first clinically evaluated in a multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, window of opportunity clinical study, evaluating ME-344 (3 doses) plus bevacizumab (1 dose) in 42 women with early HER2-negative breast cancer. Study results demonstrated significant biological antitumor activity as measured by a reduction in the proliferative biomarker Ki-67 compared to placebo. The combination appeared to be generally well tolerated. The data from this study were consistent with preclinical data suggesting that combining ME-344 can augment anti-angiogenic therapy and provided support for continued evaluation of the combination of ME-344 with bevacizumab and other VEGF inhibitors. An earlier Phase 1 clinical study evaluating ME-344 as a single-agent in patients with refractory solid tumors also demonstrated anti-tumor activity, further supporting the potential of inhibition of OXHPOS by ME-344 as a promising therapeutic modality.
About MEI Pharma
MEI Pharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: MEIP) is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company committed to developing novel and differentiated cancer therapies. We build our pipeline by acquiring promising cancer agents and creating value in programs through development, strategic partnerships, out-licensing and commercialization, as appropriate. Our approach to oncology drug development is to evaluate our drug candidates in combinations with standard-of-care therapies to overcome known resistance mechanisms and address clear medical needs to provide improved patient benefit. The drug candidate pipeline includes voruciclib, an oral cyclin-dependent kinase 9 ("CDK9") inhibitor, and ME-344, a novel small molecule inhibitor of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). For more information, please visit www.meipharma.com. Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) @MEI_Pharma and on LinkedIn.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this press release that are not historical in nature are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without limitation, statements regarding: the potential, safety, efficacy, and regulatory and clinical progress of our product candidates, including the anticipated timing for initiation of clinical trials and release of clinical trial data and our expectations surrounding potential regulatory submissions, approvals and timing thereof, our business strategy and plans; the sufficiency of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments to fund our operations; and our ability to fund future capital returns. You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to our failure to successfully commercialize our product candidates; the availability or appropriateness of utilizing the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway for our product candidates; final data from our pre-clinical studies and completed clinical trials may differ materially from reported interim data from ongoing studies and trials; costs and delays in the development and/or FDA approval, or the failure to obtain such approval, of our product candidates; uncertainties or differences in interpretation in clinical trial results; uncertainty regarding the impact of rising inflation and the increase in interest rates as a result; potential economic downturn; geopolitical conflicts; activist investors; our inability to maintain or enter into, and the risks resulting from, our dependence upon collaboration or contractual arrangements necessary for the development, manufacture, commercialization, marketing, sales and distribution of any products; competitive factors; our inability to protect our patents or proprietary rights and obtain necessary rights to third party patents and intellectual property to operate our business; our inability to operate our business without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of others; general economic conditions; the failure of any products to gain market acceptance; our inability to obtain any additional required financing; technological changes; government regulation; changes in industry practice; and one-time events. We do not intend to update any of these factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements. Under
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240411126658/en/
David A. Walsey
MEI Pharma
Tel: 858-369-7104
investor@meipharma.com
Source: MEI Pharma, Inc.
FAQ
What is the Phase 1b study evaluating ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab for?
What percentage of patients had no disease progression at Week 16 in Cohort 1 of the study?
What is the primary endpoint of the study?
Why did the Company decide not to initiate a second cohort?
What are the common drug-related adverse events observed in the study?
What is the goal of developing a new formulation of ME-344?
Where is the Phase 1b study being conducted?
How was the safety and tolerability of ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab?
What percentage of patients completed at least 16 weeks of therapy without disease progression?