Infinity Pharmaceuticals Provides MARIO-3 Update in Patients with Front Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Suggesting Potential Long-Term Patient Benefit of Eganelisib
Infinity Pharmaceuticals reported promising results from its MARIO-3 study of eganelisib in combination with atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel for treating front-line metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The study showed a 52% increase in one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates compared to the IMpassion130 benchmark. A total of 62 patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 10.0 months. No new safety signals were found, and the treatment profile remained consistent with expectations. This data supports earlier findings regarding eganelisib's potential to improve long-term patient outcomes.
- 52% increase in one-year PFS rates compared to IMpassion130 benchmark.
- 61.4% of patients had PD-L1(-) tumors, showing efficacy across different PD-L1 statuses.
- No new safety signals were observed, maintaining a consistent treatment profile.
- 74% of patients remained on treatment, lower than the 81% in IMpassion130.
- Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were higher at 66.1% compared to 50.7% in IMpassion130.
–Encouraging one-year progression free survival rates in MARIO-3 1L TNBC study regardless of PD-L1 status–
-
“Given our goal of improving long-term patient outcomes, we are particularly pleased to see that the addition of eganelisib to standard of care therapy showed benefit in the one-year progression free survival rate in MARIO-3 regardless of PD-L1 status,” said
MARIO-3 mTNBC Updated Data:
-
62 patients were enrolled and evaluable for safety, and 57 patients were evaluable for efficacy, with a median duration of follow-up of 10.0 (8.1,14.2) months. Of the 57 evaluable patients:
-
35 patients (
61.4% ) had PD-L1(-) tumors -
18 patients (
31.6% ) had PD-L1(+) tumors -
4 patients (
7.0% ) had tumors of undetermined PD-L1 status
-
35 patients (
- With an additional year of data maturity since the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2021, there is now encouraging evidence of a long-term patient progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with improved one-year PFS rates in MARIO-3, including in patients with both PD-L1(+) and PD-L1(-) tumors, compared to the benchmark IMpassion130 study.
|
ITT |
PD-L1 (+) |
PD-L1 (-) |
|||||||||
|
MARIO-3 n=57^ |
IMpassion130 n=451^^ |
MARIO-3 n=18 |
IMpassion130 n=185 |
MARIO-3 n=35 |
IMpassion130 n=266 |
||||||
One-Year PFS Rate, % ( |
(23.7, 49.3) |
(19.6, 27.9) |
(16.8, 60.9) |
(22.2, 36.1) |
(19.6, 51.6) |
NR* |
||||||
One-Year PFS Rate improvement compared to IMpassion130 |
relative improvement |
relative improvement |
NE**
[ |
|||||||||
Median duration of follow up, months ( |
10.0 (8.1, 14.2) |
13.0 (NR*) |
9.9 (5.5, NA) |
NR* |
9.3 (5.9, 14.2) |
NR* |
||||||
Data Snapshot: |
||||||||||||
^4 patients of unknown PD-L1 status |
||||||||||||
^^ Schmid et |
||||||||||||
* NR = Not Reported |
||||||||||||
**NE = Not Evaluable |
- Additional data from the MARIO-3 study, by patient population and relative to IMpassion130 benchmarks:
|
PD-L1 (+) |
PD-L1 (-) |
|||||||
|
MARIO-3 n=18 |
IMpassion130^ n=185 |
MARIO-3 n=35 |
IMpassion130^ n=265 |
|||||
CR, % (n)^^ |
16.7 (3) |
10.3 (19) |
5.7 (2) |
4.9 (13) |
|||||
ORR, % (n)^^ |
66.7 (12) |
58.9 (109) |
54.3 (19) |
54.0 (143) |
|||||
mDOR (mos) n ( |
11.7 n=12 (1.8, NA) |
8.5 n=109 (7.3, 9.7) |
7.4 n=19 (3.7, NA) |
NR* |
|||||
mDOR increase compared to IMpassion130 |
3.2 mos
( |
NE** |
|||||||
mPFS, mos
( |
6.4
|
7.5
|
7.3
|
5.6
|
|||||
Data Snapshot: |
|||||||||
^Schmid et |
|||||||||
^^ Includes unconfirmed and confirmed responses for MARIO-3 |
|||||||||
*NR = Not Reported |
|||||||||
** NE = Not Evaluable |
|
- No new safety signals were observed during the extended period on treatment, and the MARIO-3 safety profile continued to be consistent with expectations for the three component drugs.
-
Most Common Treatment-Related TEAEs in ≥
10% of All Treated Patients^* (n=62)
Preferred
|
Treatment
|
Treatment-related
|
Fatigue |
30 (48.4) |
4 (6.5) |
Skin AEs |
29 (46.8) |
7 (11.3) |
Nausea |
28 (45.2) |
0 (0.0) |
Hepatic AEs** |
24 (38.7) |
15 (24.2) |
Diarrhea |
18 (29.0) |
3 (4.8) |
Alopecia |
16 (25.8) |
0 (0.0) |
Neutropenia AEs |
16 (25.8) |
9 (14.5) |
Vomiting |
13(21.0) |
1 (1.6) |
Pyrexia |
10 (16.1) |
0 (0.0) |
Peripheral neuropathy |
19 (30.6) |
7 (11.3) |
Stomatitis |
9 (14.5) |
0 (0.0) |
Decreased appetite |
8 (12.9) |
0 (0.0) |
Headache |
8 (12.9) |
0 (0.0) |
Weight decreased |
7 (11.3) |
1 (1.6) |
Dysgeusia |
7 (11.3) |
0 (0.0) |
Constipation |
7 (11.3) |
0 (0.0) |
Data Snapshot: |
||
Presented in descending order of All Treatment-Related TEAE |
||
^ Treatment-related is related to any of the study drugs (eganelisib, atezolizumab, nab-paclitaxel) |
||
* No treatment-related Grade 5 AEs |
||
** One Grade 4 event and no event met Hy’s Law criteria |
||
Hepatic, skin, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy represent grouped preferred terms. |
-
Treatment Discontinuation:
74% of patients were able to remain on treatment with the MARIO-3 TNBC triplet regimen compared to81% of patients with the IMpassion130 doublet.
|
MARIO-3
|
IMpassion130*
Atezo+Nab-Pac |
||
(n=62), |
n (%) |
(n=460), |
n (%) |
|
All-causality AEs |
|
|
|
|
Any grade |
61 |
(98.4) |
457 |
(99.3) |
Grade 3 or 4 |
41 |
(66.1) |
233 |
(50.7) |
Grade 5 |
5 |
(8.1) |
6 |
(1.3) |
Serious AEs |
22 |
(35.5) |
110 |
(23.9) |
AE leading to any drug withdraw |
16 |
(25.8) |
88 |
(19.1) |
AE leading to Atezo withdraw |
14 |
(22.6) |
37 |
(8.0) |
AE leading to Nab-Pac withdraw |
11 |
(17.7) |
85 |
(18.5) |
Treatment-related AEs** |
|
|
|
|
Any grade |
60 |
(96.8) |
444 |
(96.5) |
Grade 3 or 4 |
42 |
(67.7) |
191 |
(41.5) |
Grade 5 |
0 |
(0.0) |
2 |
(0.4) |
Serious AEs |
9 |
(14.5) |
58 |
(12.6) |
Data Snapshot: |
||||
* Emens et al., Annal of Oncology 2021 |
||||
** MARIO-3 data listed are for TEAEs related to any study drug |
About Infinity and Eganelisib
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include the Company’s guidance with respect to the therapeutic potential of eganelisib and the Company's ability to execute on its strategic plans. Such statements are subject to numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from the Company's current expectations. For example, there can be no guarantee that eganelisib will successfully complete necessary preclinical and clinical development phases or will be successful in establishing a strategic partnership to further the development of eganelisib. Further, there can be no guarantee that any positive developments in Infinity's product portfolio will result in stock price appreciation. Management's expectations and, therefore, any forward-looking statements in this press release could also be affected by risks and uncertainties relating to a number of other factors, including the following: results of clinical trials and preclinical studies, including subsequent analysis of existing data and new data received from ongoing and future studies; the cost, timing and results of clinical trials; the content and timing of decisions made by the
Opdivo® is a registered trademark of Bristol Myers Squibb.
Tecentriq® is a registered trademark of
Abraxane® is a registered trademark of
Avastin® is a registered trademark of
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221114005336/en/
Investor Relations:
Real Chemistry
lheagle@realchemistry.com
Source:
FAQ
What are the results of the MARIO-3 study for INFI?
How many patients were involved in the MARIO-3 study by INFI?
What was the follow-up period for the MARIO-3 study results from INFI?
What safety profile was observed in the MARIO-3 study for INFI?