ISS Unanimously Supports All Oasis Shareholder Proposals for Fujitec EGM
Oasis Management Company, which owns over 16.5% of Fujitec, seeks to remove six incumbent directors and nominate six independent directors. The proposal comes amid ISS's endorsement, citing shareholder discontent over governance failures and insufficient value creation. ISS highlights Fujitec's poor performance metrics, including a return on equity (ROE) of 9.1%, significantly trailing peers like Kone and Schindler. Oasis urges shareholders to vote against the management's proposal, advocating for complete board renewal to restore accountability and improve corporate governance at Fujitec, which has suffered from mismanagement and a lack of strategic direction.
- ISS supports Oasis's proposals for board overhaul, highlighting the need for independent oversight.
- Oasis has nominated qualified independent directors to improve governance.
- Fujitec's ROE of 9.1% significantly lags behind competitors, indicating suboptimal performance.
- The company experienced multi-year operational underperformance, resulting in a depressed valuation compared to peers.
- Governance failures have led to a lack of shareholder confidence and accountability.
- Leading independent proxy advisor, ISS, endorses all of Oasis’s shareholder proposals to remove the incumbent Fujitec Outside Directors and appoint the six Oasis nominated independent Directors to replace them
- ISS acknowledges shareholder dismay at recent breaches to their most basic rights, condemning the Fujitec Board’s record on corporate governance and failed value creation
-
ISS recommends shareholders support all of Oasis’s proposals, otherwise risk “keeping the status quo” and not bringing “desired change” at
Fujitec
Oasis welcomes the recently published research report from the leading independent proxy advisory firm,
At the 2022 Annual General Meeting (“AGM”), Fujitec’s shareholders were disappointed to witness the extent to which the Uchiyama Family abused its control to exploit
In doing so, Fujitec’s incumbent Outside Directors made a bad situation much worse by making Uchiyama no longer accountable to shareholders while continuing to be in a position of influence. In ISS’s view, “the board’s recent conduct” has led to an “irreparable loss of faith in the leadership”, which extended their view to the questionable nominations of two additional directors, which they conclude “do not warrant support”.
ISS’s support for the full independent oversight refresh as proposed by Oasis reflects substantial independent assurance of the case for the collective removal of the individual incumbent Fujitec Outside Directors, and the appointment of each of the independent Outside Directors put forward by Oasis to a shareholder vote. Fujitec’s shareholders, especially those that are signatories to Japan’s Stewardship Code, have an important role to play in this referendum on corporate governance in
Today,
In this age of transparency and accountability, institutional investors need to protect the assets they steward on behalf of their underlying clients and ensure that portfolio companies are governed in a manner that remains accountable and does not misappropriate corporate assets.
Oasis continues to campaign for the benefit of all stakeholders, and reaffirms its recommendation to shareholders, which has now been unanimously supported by leading independent proxy advisor, ISS, to:
Vote AGAINST Agenda 1 (Fujitec’s Proposal)
Vote FOR Agenda 2-7 (Oasis’s Proposals)
Key statements by ISS in its voting recommendation FOR Oasis’s proposals and AGAINST the management sponsored Outside Directors include:
-
“Fujitec's Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.1 percent for the fiscal year ending
March 2022 is substantially below Kone and Schindler's ROE of 31.9 percent and 20.2 percent, respectively (per data from Refinitiv). Furthermore, the company has underperformed peers in terms of ROE by 10.3-18.7 percentage points over the last five years.” - “Fujitec's ROIC has lagged behind each of its peers in any given year over the selected performance period. The company's chronic underperformance vs. peers in terms of ROE and ROIC is at least partly due to its suboptimal capital structure.”
- “Fujitec's multi-year suboptimal operational performance under the leadership of former president and CEO Uchiyama appears to have resulted in its depressed valuation compared to peers. The company's inferior ROE and ROIC when compared to peers reflects its suboptimal capital structure.”
-
“Instead of setting up a third-party investigation committee composed of independent outsiders to conduct an in-depth investigation and provide a detailed report, as is usually the practice in such situations,
Fujitec opted for an investigation led by a single attorney from a law firm, which had in the past provided advisory services and was currently retained on a per-project basis. Even more troubling was the timeline of events disclosed by the company, which confirmed that the board received Hirao's final report onMay 25 , several days after it had announced that there were no concerns with the related-party transactions.” - “The board's unprecedented actions not only undermined shareholders' most basic right, the right to vote and elect directors, but were also in stark contrast to the company's commitment and purported intention to improve governance.”
- “The company claims that it is among the most progressive Japanese listed companies, citing the high proportion of outsiders and female directors on the board. Nonetheless, the outside directors' inappropriate and insufficient response to shareholder concerns reveals a different reality, in which a long-tenured president/CEO exerts so much influence over the board that the board kept him in control of the company even after a large number of shareholders have rejected his presence on the board.”
- “Given the irreparable loss of faith in the leadership and the incumbent board's apparent inability to overcome Uchiyama's strong influence at the company, as shown by their decision to re-appoint him despite shareholder's objections, there appears to be merit to the dissident's argument for a complete board overhaul.”
- “Given Uchiyama's presence at the company, it is unlikely that a minority presence of the dissident candidates would bring the desired change.”
- “Based on these considerations, a vote for the removal of the six targeted incumbents and support for all dissident nominees is warranted. In the context of board's flawed governance practices, and considering its overall conduct after last year's contentious AGM, the company's two new outside director nominees do not warrant support.”
More information and our original presentation describing the nominees can be found on our website: www.ProtectFujitec.com.
For more information please visit our website www.ProtectFujitec.com or email us at info@protectfujitec.com with questions, comments, or feedback.
About Oasis
Important Disclaimer
The information contained in this press release (referred to as the "Document") is an information resource for shareholders in
This material is not intended to solicit voting in favor of Oasis’ proposals, to which rules concerning solicitation of proxies applies.
Oasis is not in any way soliciting or requesting shareholders to jointly exercise their voting rights together with Oasis. Shareholders that have an agreement to jointly exercise their voting rights are regarded as “Joint Holders” under the Japanese large shareholding disclosure rules, and they must file notification of their aggregate share ownership with the relevant Japanese authority for public disclosure.
Oasis disclaims its intention to be treated as a Joint Holder with other shareholders under the Japanese Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (“FIEA) by virtue of its act to express its view or opinion or other activities to engage in dialogue with other shareholders in or through this Document or any website.
This statement and related materials exclusively represents the opinions, interpretations, and estimates of Oasis in relation to the upcoming EGM. Oasis is expressing those opinions solely in its capacity as an investment advisor to the Oasis Funds.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230209005811/en/
Media
Taylor Hall
media@oasiscm.com
Japan Media
Tadashi Shiokai and
Phone: +81 03-5425-7220
Email: oasisac@ashton.jp
Source:
FAQ
What did ISS recommend regarding Fujitec's board?
When is the extraordinary general meeting for Fujitec shareholders?
What is the main concern raised by ISS about Fujitec?
How does Fujitec's return on equity compare to its peers?