Clarivate Launches New Global Research Report on Managing Academic Publication Credit in a Collaborative World
Clarivate Plc (NYSE:CLVT) released a report from its Institute for Scientific Information™, proposing a new method for analyzing credit attributed to academic authors via citations. As the number of collaborative research papers grows, existing credit analysis methods can become skewed. The report introduces the 'Collaborative CNCI' (Collab-CNCI) to address this issue. It emphasizes that this innovation aims to improve acknowledgment of research achievements and enhance global research collaboration. The report invites feedback from research users to evaluate Collab-CNCI's benefits compared to existing metrics.
- Introduction of a new indicator, 'Collaborative CNCI,' aims to enhance credit analysis in academic publishing.
- The report addresses the distortion in credit perception due to high author counts in collaborative papers.
- Improves acknowledgment of research achievements, potentially benefiting institutions and researchers.
- Existing citation methods are highlighted as flawed, indicating a systemic issue in credit attribution.
- The report suggests a need for improvement, implying current metrics may misrepresent research value.
LONDON, Jan. 26, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Clarivate Plc (NYSE:CLVT), a global leader in providing trusted information and insights to accelerate the pace of innovation, today released a new report from the company's Institute for Scientific Information™ which proposes a new method for analyzing the credit authors of academic papers receive via citations.
Across the research landscape, receipt of credit via the citation of sources influences motivation and reputation. Credit for publishing academic research often affects employment, promotion and funding at the individual level, as well as funding and decision making for academic research institutions and nations.
In an increasingly global and collaborative world, where the number of articles naming dozens or even hundreds of researchers as authors is rapidly increasing, the need for informed, data-driven analysis on credit that works across research disciplines and regions is essential. However, existing methods for analyzing credit can become distorted by exceptionally high author counts.
Making it count: Research credit management in a collaborative world proposes a new indicator, the 'Collaborative CNCI' (Collab-CNCI) as one possible solution.
Jonathan Adams, Chief Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Information said: "This new indicator is a vital innovation for the 21st Century, as international collaboration becomes a dominant feature of global research. In studying existing and innovative analytical methods we aim to help the global research community deliver more, better research, and we believe that improving the system of credit with an indicator such as Collab-CNCI would help accurately acknowledge research achievement and excellence- to accelerate the pace of innovation."
The report not only confirms that highly collaborative papers can distort summary results at a national and institutional level - but also shows how that happens. It highlights key aspects of achievement and shows where institutions generate significant academic credit from citations to their more domestic papers.
Collab-CNCI complements the already existing Category Normalized Citation Impact indicator created by CWTS at Leiden University. But the accumulated citation count for each paper is normalized against other papers of the same publication year, the same subject category, the same document type and – critically – the same collaboration type.
Ludo Waltman, Professor of Quantitative Science Studies at the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University said: "The increasing level of collaboration in global science raises challenging questions concerning the design and interpretation of bibliometric indicators. Developing a better understanding of the complex interplay between scientific collaboration and citation impact is absolutely essential. I welcome the contribution from the Institute for Scientific Information, part of Clarivate to address this difficult issue."
The Institute for Scientific Information invites research users and managers to comment on the relative benefits of the Collab-CNCI in comparison and as a complement to other methods for enabling balanced and timely decisions at the individual, institutional and national levels. Please send all feedback to ISI@clarivate.com.
About Clarivate
Clarivate™ is a global leader in providing solutions to accelerate the lifecycle of innovation. Our bold Mission is to help customers solve some of the world's most complex problems by providing actionable information and insights that reduce the time from new ideas to life-changing inventions in the areas of science and intellectual property. We help customers discover, protect and commercialize their inventions using our trusted subscription and technology-based solutions coupled with deep domain expertise. For more information, please visit clarivate.com.
Media Contact
Amy Bourke-Waite, Director of External Communications
Media.relations@clarivate.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/clarivate-launches-new-global-research-report-on-managing-academic-publication-credit-in-a-collaborative-world-301468523.html
SOURCE Clarivate Plc
FAQ
What is the new report from Clarivate about?
What is the purpose of the 'Collaborative CNCI' introduced by Clarivate?
How does the new indicator 'Collaborative CNCI' affect researchers?
When was the report released by Clarivate?
What issues does the report identify with existing credit analysis methods?
