Breach Inlet Capital Sends Public Letter to Board of Liberty Media
Breach Inlet Capital has publicly urged Liberty Media to spin off Liberty Braves (BATRK) to enhance shareholder value. The firm asserts that BATRK is undervalued by approximately 60% compared to its fair value. It highlights that BATRK operates as a mini-monopoly in a growing market, with a robust 5-year revenue growth rate of around 15% and increased demand for MLB teams. The investment firm cites recent sales of MLB teams at significantly higher revenue multiples, suggesting BATRK trades at only 3.5x revenue, indicating a major pricing discrepancy.
- Breach Inlet Capital believes BATRK's fair value is ~60% above its current price.
- BATRK has a 5-year Baseball Revenue CAGR of ~15%.
- Increasing institutional demand for MLB team ownership stakes supports BATRK’s value.
- Recent MLB transactions show higher valuation multiples, indicating potential for BATRK.
- BATRK trades at approximately 3.5x revenue, significantly discounting its value compared to peers.
- Liberty Media's complex business structure may obscure accurate valuation of BATRK.
Expresses Belief that Liberty Braves is Materially Undervalued as a Monopoly with Secular Tailwinds
Recommends that the Board immediately spinoff Liberty Braves to Maximize Shareholder Value
The full text of the letter follows:
Members of the Board of Directors
Dear Members of the Board:
We have a history of constructively engaging public company boards to create value for shareholders. Consistent with this approach, we previously sought to privately express our views through a private letter we delivered to Liberty Media’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) in
Your lack of meaningful response over this extended period has led us to this point. Now, we send this second and public letter outlining our recommendations for value creation that we believe will benefit all shareholders.
To summarize, we believe that i) BATRK’s fair value is ~
Background on BATRK
BATRK is an Increasingly Valuable Asset
We believe BATRK is a mini-monopoly because i) history indicates that baseball will exist and continue to grow for the foreseeable future, ii) MLB controls the most profitable baseball market, iii) no MLB teams have been added in 24 years, and iv) the
In addition to being a monopoly, BATRK benefits from multiple secular tailwinds. First, TV contracts represent ~
As a second tailwind, global economies continue to create new billionaires. Billionaires create demand and bidding wars for ownership of professional sports teams. Professional sports leagues, however, rarely launch new teams. As mentioned before, MLB has created zero new teams in the last 24 years. Said differently, the gap between demand (prospective buyers of teams) and supply (the number of teams) keeps widening, which is why MLB valuations keep rising and likely continue to rise. As evidence, the value of the
Against this favorable backdrop of increasing demand, BATRK is also the beneficiary of a new and related tailwind. Beginning in 2019, MLB began to allow investment funds to “take minority stakes in multiple clubs, a move that lets the league capitalize on sky-high team valuations”.4 As a result, institutional investors have an increasingly strong appetite to acquire ownership stakes in sports teams.5 This institutional interest, in turn, provides an additional stamp of approval to this asset class and should therefore attract more billionaire buyers. Plus, institutional investors can help write the large checks necessary to acquire teams.
In addition to the sources cited above, we also spoke with two prominent and experienced sports franchise advisors who further confirmed that BATRK is an increasingly valuable asset.
BATRK Remains Materially Mispriced
BATRK continues to trade at a meaningful discount to its intrinsic value, as implied by precedent MLB transactions. More specifically, the
Yet, we estimate BATRK trades for only ~3.5x Baseball Revenue.10 Conservatively assuming the equity contributed to the Battery is valued at cost and the
Liberty Media’s (“LM”) Current Structure Does Not Appear to Maximize Shareholder Value
We appreciate that the Board has a fiduciary duty to all shareholders, which includes the shareholders of BATRK as well as FWONK and LSXMK. However, we believe your inaction is harming all shareholders.
Currently, LM consists of three disparate businesses with intercompany obligations. As a result, LM is a complex collection of intertwined assets that are difficult to accurately value. Furthermore, each tracking stock has multiple share classes and special voting rights for LM management. We believe this adds further complexity and causes market participants to apply an even greater discount to LM’s assets.
As evidence, we would reiterate our prior section that “BATRK Remains Materially Mispriced”. Likely due to LM’s confusing and convoluted structure, the
As a further indication that LM’s structure may not maximize shareholder value, consider the case study of
FWONK is the best performing of LM’s tracking stocks. But, note that the FWONK “A” shares trades at a
Maximizing Shareholder Value by Separating / Spinning Off Assets
Likely similar to most BATRK shareholders, we invested in BATRK because we believed: i) the
Based on public comments and disclosures, LSXMK and FWONK were both Active Trader Businesses (“ATBs”) as of
We believe either of these options would create substantial value for shareholders of BATRK, FWONK, and LSXMK and that the Board has a fiduciary duty to explore them. With Option 1: i) the complexity of LM’s structure would be eliminated, ii) all tracking stocks would become asset-backed stocks, and iii) these could potentially then be tax-efficiently acquired. With Option 2: i) the complexity of LM’s structure would be diminished with one less tracking stock (BATRK), ii) BATRK would be asset-backed, and iii) BATRK could potentially then be tax-efficiently acquired.
Nine months have passed since FWONK became an ATB and the Board has still not publicly outlined a plan to separate these assets in order to maximize shareholder value. Therefore, we recommend the Board immediately announce Option 1 or Option 2 as described above. We are confident that either action would create significant value for all shareholders, which is the Board’s primary fiduciary duty.
We are happy to discuss our recommendation with the Board and look forward to your response.
Best Regards,
Founder and Portfolio Manager
1 Source: LINK
2 Source: LINK
3 Sources: LINK; LINK
4 Source: LINK
5 Sources: LINK; LINK
6
Sources: LINK; LINK
7
Sources: LINK; LINK
8
Source: LINK; LINK
9
Sources: LINK; LINK
10 BATRK Adjusted Enterprise Value (
BATRK Adjusted Enterprise Value:
LTM Baseball Revenue: Forbes 2021 Revenue
Sources: BATRK filings; LINK
11 (6 x
12 TSR: (current share price + dividends) / share price at inception –1
13 Source: Slide 11 of
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221102005674/en/
Founder and Portfolio Manager
info@breachinletcap.com
Source:
FAQ
What is Breach Inlet Capital's position on BATRK?
How much does Breach Inlet Capital think BATRK is undervalued?
What is BATRK's recent revenue growth rate?
What valuation does Breach Inlet Capital suggest for BATRK?