Advent Technologies Reports Q3 2022 Results
Advent Technologies Holdings reported Q3 2022 revenue of $2.4 million, marking a 43% increase year-over-year. The company's net loss was $11.5 million, or $0.22 per share. Cash reserves stood at $42.4 million as of September 30, 2022. Significant developments included the EU's approval of €782.1 million for the Green HiPo project, aimed at hydrogen technology. Advent entered agreements with multiple entities, including the German State of Brandenburg and DEPA Commercial S.A., enhancing its strategic partnerships in hydrogen projects.
- 43% increase in Q3 2022 revenue to $2.4 million.
- Received €782.1 million funding approval from the EU for the Green HiPo project.
- Executed strategic agreements with the German State of Brandenburg and DEPA Commercial S.A.
- Net loss of $11.5 million in Q3 2022.
-
Q3 revenue of
, a$2.4 million 43% increase from the prior year third quarter. Income from grants was , and the total of revenue and income from grants was$0.3 million .$2.7 million -
Net loss in Q3 of
or$11.5 million per share.$0.22 -
Company holds cash reserves of
as of$42.4 million September 30, 2022 .
Summary of Operational Highlights
-
Official ratification received from the
European Commission of theEuropean Union for funding of€782.1 million under the Important Projects of Common European Interest (“IPCEI”) Hydrogen – Technology for Advent’s Green HiPo project. - Three-year agreement with the German State of Brandenburg for the supply of methanol-powered fuel cell systems, which will be installed in select critical communication sites in the region.
- The successful delivery of Advent’s portable fuel cell products to the Hellenic Army’s Special Operations Units.
-
Launch of
Honey Badger 50™, a compact portable fuel cell system and quiet power supply for use in off-grid field applications. -
Memorandum of Understanding with
DEPA Commercial S.A. , the leading importer of pipeline gas and liquefied natural gas inGreece , for the strategic collaboration on hydrogen projects of common interest. -
Memorandum of Understanding with the
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and more than 60 clean hydrogen ecosystem partners, to develop a proposal that will enable theNortheastern United States to become one of at least four regional clean hydrogen hubs designated through the federal Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program, included in the bipartisanInfrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. -
Memorandum of Understanding with
Hydrogen Systems, Inc. , a hydrogen energy solutions company based inRiyadh, Saudi Arabia , to provide integrated hydrogen solutions and value-added support to industrial and renewable energy markets in theMiddle East .
Q3 2022 Financial Highlights
(All comparisons are to Q3 2021, unless otherwise stated)
-
Revenue of
, a$2.4 million 43% year-over-year increase. -
Operating expenses of
, a year-over-year decrease of$10.8 million , primarily due to$3.2 million of executive severance recognized in the prior year third quarter, as well as a year-over-year reduction in stock-based compensation expenses of$2.4 million .$0.6 million -
Net loss was
, and adjusted net loss was$11.5 million . Adjusted net loss excludes a$10.6 million loss from the change in the fair value of outstanding warrants.$0.9 million -
Net loss per share was
.$0.22 -
Cash reserves were
as of$42.4 million September 30, 2022 , a decrease of from$4.1 million June 30, 2022 . In the third quarter of 2022, the Company received in tenant improvement allowances for the Hood Park R&D and manufacturing facility in$3.8 million Charlestown, MA , which is net of additional spending for the build-out of the facility.
“Advent continued to make significant progress in the last quarter. Our Green HiPo project was ratified by the EU in July, which now clears the way for the Greek State to provide the appropriate funding,” said Dr.
Q3 2022 Business Updates
Inaugural Investor Day: On
-
The Company’s
Green HiPo Project , with planned funding of€782.1 million over six years from the Greek State, aimed at producing HT-PEM fuel cells and electrolysers to decarbonize global power production via hydrogen. -
R&D partnerships and collaborations with OEMs, the
U.S. Department of Energy and theU.S. Department of Defense . - Innovations in HT-PEM MEAs and water electrolysis.
- Advent’s commercial activities in global markets aimed at replacing existing power systems with hydrogen alternatives.
Green HiPo Receives Ratification from the EU: On
According to a press release issued by the
-
The project contributes to a common objective by supporting a key strategic value chain for the future of
Europe , as well as the objectives of key EU policy initiatives such as the Green Deal, the EU Hydrogen Strategy, and REPowerEU; - The IPCEI is highly ambitious, as it is aimed at developing technologies and processes that go beyond what the market currently offers and will allow major improvements in performance, safety, environmental impact as well as cost efficiencies;
- The IPCEI also involves significant technological and financial risks, and public support is, therefore, necessary to provide incentives to companies to carry out the investment; and
-
The results of the project will be widely shared by participating companies benefitting from the public support with the European scientific community and industry beyond the companies and countries that are part of the ICPEI. As a result, positive spill-over effects will be generated throughout
Europe .
Over the initial funding period and in accordance with Green HiPo’s parameters, Advent will innovatively develop, design, and manufacture fuel cell systems and electrolyser systems in Greece’s
Launch of the Honey Badger 50™ Fuel Cell System: On
HB50’s unique design allows it to be used in soldier-worn configurations or operated inside a portable backpack or vehicle while charging batteries and powering soldier systems, while its thermal features allow it to operate within an ambient temperature range of -20°C to +55°C. Aside from its optimized compatibility with Integrated Visual Augmentation System (“IVAS”), HB50 can also power devices such as high frequency radios like the model 117G, as well as B-GAN and StarLink terminals. HB50’s durability allows it to be easily deployed in challenging conditions and climates while supporting mission mobility for three to seven days without the need to re-supply.
Since Honey Badger’s fuel cell technology can run on hydrogen or liquid fuels, the system can operate at a fraction of the weight of traditional military-grade batteries to meet the
Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”) with
- Collaborate on the production of environmentally friendly hydrogen as a fuel with the participation of other major industrial partners.
-
Co-develop a proprietary and highly differentiated CHP system ready for mass production with efficiency approaching
90% and with multi-fuel operating capabilities (such as hydrogen, natural gas, efuels) that can address the key current, future, and on-grid, off-grid operation modes and business cases. - Create an innovation hub for the Greek hydrogen and fuel cell industry and develop synergies for promoting hydrogen and related technologies.
Delivery of Advent’s Portable Fuel Cell Products to the Hellenic Army’s Special Operations Units: On
Being lightweight and compact, the portable fuel cell fits in soldier plate carrier systems and rucksacks, maximizing efficiency and portability across a full range of military operations. The portable fuel cell delivers up to 50W of continuous power and up to 85W of peak power, ensuring a reliable charging experience to a wide variety of the high-power electronic devices regularly used by the Hellenic Army’s Special Operations Units in deployment. Advent’s portable fuel cell operates silently and can run uninterrupted off-grid for up to two weeks with a single hot-swappable fuel tank. The portable fuel cells have been deployed successfully within the framework of PARMENION National large-scale Joint Exercise.
Memorandum of Understanding with the
The coalition of six states (
Consortium partners have committed to collaborate with the NYSERDA,
- Define the shared vision and plans for the regional clean hydrogen hub that can advance safe, clean hydrogen energy innovation and investment and address climate change while improving the health, resiliency, and economic development of the region’s residents.
- Advance a hydrogen hub proposal that makes climate and environmental concerns central to its strategy, which will deliver opportunities and improve the quality of life for under-resourced areas in the region.
- Perform research and analysis necessary to support the hydrogen hub proposal and to quantify the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from this project.
- Develop a framework to ensure the ecosystem for innovation, production, infrastructure, and related workforce development is shared across all partner states.
- Support environmentally responsible opportunities to develop clean hydrogen in accordance with the participating states’ policies.
The coalition will continue to focus on the integration of renewables – such as onshore and offshore wind, hydropower, and solar PV – and nuclear power into clean hydrogen production and the evaluation of clean hydrogen for use in transportation, including for medium and heavy-duty vehicles, heavy industry, power generation applications, and other appropriate uses consistent with decarbonization efforts.
Memorandum of Understanding with
Advent’s family of products, including the Serene and M-ZERO® fuel cell systems, realize a significant carbon advantage over conventional diesel remote power generation technology. HT-PEM fuel cells can operate with a range of low or zero-carbon hydrogen fuels and enable more efficient heat management. Such fuel cells can produce power in extreme ambient temperatures (from -40°C to up to +55°C) and conditions such as high air pollution and low humidity, resulting in a longer lifetime and lower total cost of ownership.
Agreement with the German State of Brandenburg: On
Advent’s solution was selected as part of a tender launched by the German State of Brandenburg, which requested that fuel cell and hydrogen technology companies submit proposals for sustainable and reliable emergency power supply solutions. Prior to Advent’s selection, the performance of the Company’s methanol-powered fuel cells was tested at a site of the BOS digital radio network in Brandenburg, providing further proof of concept for the use of HT-PEM fuel cells as an efficient back-up power source for critical infrastructure applications. Advent’s methanol-powered fuel cells deliver reliable power in an environmentally friendly way – reducing CO2 emissions and operating near silently – while having a low impact on the surroundings. Methanol, as a carrier of hydrogen, allows simpler storage than pure hydrogen and enhances the safety of operations.
Conference Call
The Company will host a conference call on
To access the call please dial (888) 660-6182 from
A replay of the call can also be accessed via phone through
About
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “believe,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “goal,” “project,” and other words of similar meaning. Each forward-looking statement contained in this press release is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statement. Applicable risks and uncertainties include, among others, the Company’s ability to maintain the listing of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq; future financial performance; public securities’ potential liquidity and trading; impact from the outcome of any known and unknown litigation; ability to forecast and maintain an adequate rate of revenue growth and appropriately plan its expenses; expectations regarding future expenditures; future mix of revenue and effect on gross margins; attraction and retention of qualified directors, officers, employees, and key personnel; ability to compete effectively in a competitive industry; ability to protect and enhance our corporate reputation and brand; expectations concerning our relationships and actions with our technology partners and other third parties; impact from future regulatory, judicial and legislative changes to the industry; ability to locate and acquire complementary technologies or services and integrate those into the Company’s business; future arrangements with, or investments in, other entities or associations; and intense competition and competitive pressure from other companies worldwide in the industries in which the Company will operate; and the risks identified under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Presentation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to the results provided in accordance with
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Amounts in USD thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|||||
As of |
|||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
42,446 |
|
$ |
79,764 |
Accounts receivable |
1,987 |
|
|
3,139 |
|
Contract assets |
914 |
|
|
1,617 |
|
Inventories |
|
10,933 |
|
|
6,958 |
Prepaid expenses and Other current assets |
5,065 |
|
|
5,873 |
|
Total current assets |
61,345 |
|
97,351 |
||
Non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,030 |
|
|
30,030 |
Intangibles, net |
|
21,338 |
|
|
23,344 |
Property and equipment, net |
9,745 |
|
|
8,585 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
2,918 |
|
|
2,475 |
Deferred tax assets |
1,827 |
|
|
1,246 |
|
Available for sale financial asset |
|
291 |
|
|
- |
Total non-current assets |
66,149 |
|
65,680 |
||
Total assets |
$ |
127,494 |
|
$ |
163,031 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
$ |
3,630 |
|
$ |
4,837 |
Deferred income from grants, current |
|
906 |
|
|
205 |
Contract liabilities |
1,221 |
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
8,097 |
|
|
12,515 |
Income tax payable |
168 |
|
|
196 |
|
Total current liabilities |
14,022 |
|
18,871 |
||
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant liability |
|
3,125 |
|
|
10,373 |
Deferred tax liabilities |
2,159 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
96 |
|
|
90 |
Deferred income from grants, non-current |
|
95 |
|
|
- |
Other long-term liabilities |
600 |
|
|
996 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
6,075 |
|
13,959 |
||
Total liabilities |
20,097 |
|
32,830 |
||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ( |
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
Preferred stock ( |
- |
|
|
- |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
171,842 |
|
|
164,894 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(4,313) |
|
|
(1,273) |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
(60,137) |
|
|
(33,425) |
Total stockholders’ equity |
107,397 |
|
130,201 |
||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ |
127,494 |
|
$ |
163,031 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Amounts in USD thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Three months ended |
Nine months ended |
||||||||||
2022 |
2021 |
2022 |
2021 |
||||||||
Revenue, net |
$ |
2,399 |
|
$ |
1,674 |
|
$ |
5,880 |
|
$ |
4,167 |
Cost of revenues |
(2,339) |
(1,646) |
(6,126) |
(2,663) |
|||||||
Gross profit / (loss) |
|
60 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
(246) |
|
|
1,504 |
Income from grants |
294 |
508 |
1,011 |
632 |
|||||||
Research and development expenses |
|
(2,547) |
|
|
(893) |
|
|
(7,338) |
|
|
(1,561) |
Administrative and selling expenses |
(8,203) |
(13,041) |
(26,657) |
(27,558) |
|||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
(696) |
|
|
(310) |
|
|
(2,113) |
|
|
(467) |
Operating loss |
|
(11,092) |
|
(13,708) |
|
(35,343) |
|
(27,450) |
|||
Fair value change of warrant liability |
|
(911) |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
7,248 |
|
|
15,833 |
Finance income / (expenses), net |
- |
(14) |
(9) |
(27) |
|||||||
Foreign exchange gains / (losses), net |
|
(33) |
|
|
(15) |
|
|
(51) |
|
|
(2) |
Other income / (expenses), net |
1 |
(16) |
(220) |
78 |
|||||||
Loss before income tax |
|
(12,035) |
|
|
(11,331) |
|
|
(28,375) |
|
|
(11,568) |
Income taxes |
567 |
51 |
1,663 |
51 |
|||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(11,468) |
|
$ |
(11,280) |
|
$ |
(26,712) |
|
$ |
(11,517) |
Net loss per share |
|||||||||||
Basic loss per share |
|
(0.22) |
|
|
(0.23) |
|
|
(0.52) |
|
|
(0.26) |
Basic weighted average number of shares |
51,660,133 |
48,325,164 |
51,465,004 |
43,982,039 |
|||||||
Diluted loss per share |
|
(0.22) |
|
|
(0.23) |
|
|
(0.52) |
|
|
(0.26) |
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
51,660,133 |
48,325,164 |
51,465,004 |
43,982,039 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in USD thousands) |
||||||
Nine months ended |
||||||
2022 |
2021 |
|||||
|
|
$ |
(32,166) |
|
$ |
(24,690) |
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,549) |
|
|
(2,659) |
Purchases of intangible assets |
(117) |
- |
||||
Advances for the acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,918) |
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired |
|
|
- |
|
|
(19,425) |
Acquisition of available for sale financial assets |
|
|
(319) |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
(3,985) |
|
$ |
(24,002) |
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Combination and PIPE financing, net of issuance costs paid |
|
|
- |
|
|
141,121 |
Proceeds of issuance of common stock and paid-in capital from warrants exercise |
|
|
- |
|
|
262 |
State loan proceeds |
|
|
- |
|
|
113 |
State refundable deposit repayment |
|
|
(41) |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
(41) |
|
$ |
141,496 |
|
|
|||||
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(36,192) |
|
$ |
92,804 |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(1,126) |
(828) |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
79,764 |
|
|
516 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
$ |
42,446 |
$ |
92,492 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
||||
Cash activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
- |
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
$ |
7,747 |
$ |
4,079 |
Supplemental Non-GAAP Measures and Reconciliations
In addition to providing measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, we present certain supplemental non-GAAP measures. These measures are EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income / (Loss), which we use to evaluate our operating performance, for business planning purposes and to measure our performance relative to that of our peers. These non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may differ from similar measures presented by other companies and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures. We believe these measures are useful in evaluating the operating performance of the Company’s ongoing business. These measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for net income, operating expense and income, cash flows and other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with GAAP. The calculation of these non-GAAP measures has been made on a consistent basis for all periods presented.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
These supplemental non-GAAP measures are provided to assist readers in determining our operating performance. We believe this measure is useful in assessing performance and highlighting trends on an overall basis. We also believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by securities analysts and investors when comparing our results with those of other companies. EBITDA differs from the most comparable GAAP measure, net income / (loss), primarily because it does not include interest, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment, and amortization of intangible assets. Adjusted EBITDA adjusts EBITDA for transactional gains and losses, asset impairment charges, finance and other income and acquisition costs.
The following tables show a reconciliation of net income / (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA |
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
(in Millions of US dollars) |
2022 |
2021 |
$ change |
2022 |
2021 |
$ change |
||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(11.47) |
|
$ |
(11.28) |
(0.19) |
$ |
(26.71) |
|
$ |
(11.52) |
(15.19) |
Depreciation of property and equipment |
$ |
0.35 |
$ |
0.15 |
0.20 |
$ |
1.13 |
$ |
0.18 |
0.95 |
||
Amortization of intangibles |
$ |
0.69 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
0.38 |
$ |
2.11 |
|
$ |
0.47 |
1.64 |
Finance income / (expenses), net |
$ |
0.00 |
$ |
0.01 |
(0.01) |
$ |
0.01 |
$ |
0.03 |
(0.02) |
||
Other income / (expenses), net |
$ |
0.00 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
(0.02) |
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
(0.08) |
0.30 |
Foreign exchange differences, net |
$ |
0.03 |
$ |
0.02 |
0.01 |
$ |
0.05 |
$ |
0.00 |
0.05 |
||
Income taxes |
$ |
(0.56) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
(0.56) |
$ |
(1.66) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
(1.66) |
EBITDA |
$ |
(10.96) |
|
$ |
(10.77) |
(0.19) |
$ |
(24.85) |
|
$ |
(10.92) |
(13.93) |
Net change in warrant liability |
$ |
0.91 |
$ |
(2.42) |
3.33 |
$ |
(7.25) |
$ |
(15.83) |
8.58 |
||
One-Time Transaction Related Expenses (1) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
- |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.87 |
(5.87) |
One-Time Transaction Related Expenses (2) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.89 |
(0.89) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.89 |
(0.89) |
Executive Severance (3) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.44 |
(2.44) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.44 |
(2.44) |
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
(10.05) |
|
$ |
(9.86) |
(0.19) |
$ |
(32.10) |
|
$ |
(17.55) |
(14.55) |
(1) Bonus awarded after consummation of the Business Combination effective
(2) Transaction costs related to the acquisition of SerEnergy/
(3) Former Financial Officer resignation.
Adjusted Net Income / (Loss)
This supplemental non-GAAP measure is provided to assist readers in determining our financial performance. We believe this measure is useful in assessing our actual performance by adjusting our results from continuing operations for changes in warrant liability and one-time transaction costs. Adjusted Net Loss differs from the most comparable GAAP measure, net income / (loss), primarily because it does not include one-time transaction costs and warrant liability changes. The following table shows a reconciliation of net income / (loss) for the three and nine months ended
Adjusted Net Loss |
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
(in Millions of US dollars) |
2022 |
2021 |
$ change |
2022 |
2021 |
$ change |
||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(11.47) |
|
$ |
(11.28) |
(0.19) |
$ |
(26.71) |
|
$ |
(11.52) |
(15.19) |
Net change in warrant liability |
$ |
0.91 |
$ |
(2.42) |
3.33 |
$ |
(7.25) |
$ |
(15.83) |
8.58 |
||
One-Time Transaction Related Expenses (1) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
- |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.87 |
(5.87) |
One-Time Transaction Related Expenses (2) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.89 |
(0.89) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.89 |
(0.89) |
Executive Severance (3) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.44 |
(2.44) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.44 |
(2.44) |
Adjusted Net Loss |
$ |
(10.56) |
|
$ |
(10.37) |
(0.19) |
$ |
(33.96) |
|
$ |
(18.15) |
(15.81) |
(1) Bonus awarded after consummation of the Business Combination effective
(2) Transaction costs related to the acquisition of SerEnergy/
(3) Former Financial Officer resignation.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221114005527/en/
nhussain@advent.energy
press@advent.energy
Source:
FAQ
What was Advent Technologies' revenue for Q3 2022?
What is the net loss for Advent Technologies in Q3 2022?
What funding did Advent Technologies receive from the European Union?
What partnerships did Advent Technologies establish recently?