Vista Gold Corp. Exploration Drilling Program at Mt Todd Outlines Multiple Resource Expansion Targets
Vista Gold Corp. announced the successful completion of its exploration drilling program at the Mt Todd project in Northern Territory, Australia. The program identified four promising targets with a potential resource growth between 1.8 to 3.5 million gold ounces. A total of 26 drill holes, totaling 8,887 meters, were drilled, revealing impressive gold grades, including 21 intervals exceeding 10 g Au/t. This exploration reinforces the continuity of mineralization across the Batman and adjacent deposits, indicating a significant opportunity for future resource growth and extended mine life.
- Identification of four exploration targets with a potential of 1.8 to 3.5 million gold ounces.
- Drilling results showcased 21 assay intervals with gold grades exceeding 10 g Au/t.
- Demonstrated continuity of mineralized structures between Batman and Golf-Tollis deposits.
- None.
Exploration Drilling (Photo: Business Wire)
Highlights
- Identified four exploration targets potentially representing up to an additional 1.8 to 3.5 million gold ounces (see cautionary information below);
- Demonstrated continuity of mineralized structures from the Batman deposit to north of the Golf-Tollis deposit (+2 Km), which is approximately 3 Km south of the Quigleys deposit;
- Drilled 26 holes for a total of 8,887 meters, with depths from 116 to 901 meters;
- 21 assay intervals with gold grades exceeding 10 grams of gold per tonne (“g Au/t”) representing 11.05 meters of drill intercepts;
- 52 assay intervals with gold grades exceeding 5.0 g Au/t (inclusive of the above) representing 34.51 meters of drill intercepts;
- 485 assay intervals with gold grades exceeding 1.0 g Au/t (inclusive of the above) representing 408.42 meters of drill intercepts; and
- 1,165 assay intervals with gold grades exceeding the current Mt Todd resource cut-off grade of 0.4 g Au/t (inclusive of the above) representing 1,083.31 meters of drill intercepts.
Figure 1 provides an aerial view of the drill locations for the holes completed in the program. The image shows the Batman pit located in the lower-left (southwest) corner and the Golf-Tollis pits adjacent to VB21-009 and extending northeast to the Quigleys deposit. VB22-002 represents the initial drill hole into the previously undrilled Penguin target.
Table 1 details the location coordinates of each drill hole, as well as bearing, dip, and final down the hole length.
Table 1 – Drill Hole Program Summary Information |
||||||
Drill Hole ID |
Easting (GDA94) |
Northing (GDA94) |
Elevation (m) |
Dip (°) |
Azimuth (°) TN |
Total Length (m) |
VB20-001 (1) |
187603 |
8435654 |
148 |
-58 |
267.87 |
326.82 |
VB20-002 (1) |
187288 |
8435933 |
143 |
-58 |
267.87 |
280.36 |
VB20-003 (1) |
187272 |
8435933 |
140 |
-55 |
267.87 |
299.82 |
VB20-004 (1) |
187251 |
8435933 |
144 |
-50 |
269.87 |
148.04 |
VB20-005 (1) |
187263 |
8435896 |
151 |
-61 |
269.87 |
197.86 |
VB21-001 (1) |
187290 |
8435899 |
152 |
-61 |
269.87 |
234.45 |
VB21-002 (1) |
187662 |
8436402 |
164 |
-50 |
269.87 |
458.60 |
VB21-003 (1) |
187322 |
8435849 |
158.8 |
-62 |
271.87 |
285.68 |
VB21-004 (1) |
187942 |
8436407 |
148 |
-50 |
87.87 |
410.80 |
VB21-005 (1) |
187586 |
8436404 |
154 |
-50 |
269.87 |
445.68 |
VB21-006 (1) |
187629 |
8435852 |
132 |
-50 |
92.87 |
347.67 |
VB21-007 (1) |
187618 |
8436518 |
148 |
-50 |
272.87 |
299.85 |
VB21-008 (1) |
187758 |
8436406 |
137 |
-50 |
272.87 |
477.34 |
VB21-009 (1) |
188222 |
8436800 |
143 |
-50 |
89.87 |
437.50 |
VB21-010 (1) |
188071 |
8436413 |
153 |
-50 |
85.87 |
417.38 |
VB21-011 (1) |
187728 |
8436500 |
148 |
-50 |
264.87 |
398.78 |
VB21-012 (1) |
188435 |
8436405 |
155 |
-50 |
260.87 |
901.16 |
VB21-013 |
187424 |
8436407 |
169 |
-53 |
86.37 |
311.85 |
VB21-014 |
187385 |
8436200 |
164 |
-50 |
88 |
368.75 |
VB21-015 |
187352 |
8436200 |
164 |
-55 |
264.87 |
341.69 |
VB21-016 |
188936 |
8437334 |
142 |
-68 |
120.87 |
449.53 |
VB22-001 |
187386 |
8436295 |
178.5 |
-56 |
86.87 |
203.76 |
VB22-002 |
188671 |
8437377 |
151 |
-55 |
267.87 |
116.67 |
VB22-003 |
187614 |
8436703 |
173 |
-56 |
84.87 |
281.80 |
VB22-004 |
187520 |
8436600 |
181 |
-55 |
85.87 |
224.71 |
VB22-005 |
187467 |
8436499 |
184 |
-56 |
84.87 |
220.94 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
8,887.49 |
Note (1): Drill holes were disclosed in previous press releases.
Table 2 details the intercepts of interest for drill holes VB21-013, 014, 015, 016, and VB22-001, 002, 003, 004, and 005.
Table 2 – Intercept summary |
|||||||||||||
Hole No. | Grid Co-ordinates | Survey Data | Intersections | ||||||||||
MGA94 Grid Easting |
MGA94 Grid Northing |
Elevation (m) |
Azimuth (°) |
Dip (°) |
Depth (m) |
|
From (m) |
To (m) |
Interval (m) |
True Thickness (m) |
Grade (g/t Au) |
Sample Type |
|
VB21-013 | 187423.0 |
8436409.0 |
169.0 |
86.4 |
-53.0 |
311.9 |
|
130.0 |
136.0 |
6.0 |
3.9 |
1.25 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
144.0 |
156.0 |
12.0 |
7.9 |
3.11 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including |
144.0 |
148.6 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
6.08 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including |
151.0 |
155.0 |
3.9 |
2.5 |
2.03 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB21-014 | 187385.0 |
8436200.0 |
164.0 |
85.0 |
-50.0 |
368.8 |
|
28.0 |
32.0 |
4.0 |
2.6 |
0.90 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
137.0 |
143.3 |
6.3 |
4.0 |
0.49 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
247.2 |
250.0 |
2.8 |
1.8 |
1.74 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
257.0 |
269.0 |
12.0 |
7.7 |
1.48 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including |
264.0 |
269.0 |
5.0 |
3.2 |
2.08 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB21-015 | 187352.0 |
8436200.0 |
164.0 |
264.9 |
-55.0 |
341.7 |
|
84.0 |
85.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
3.50 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
131.0 |
132.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
7.39 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
146.0 |
151.0 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
0.64 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
196.0 |
204.1 |
8.1 |
6.5 |
2.16 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including |
201.0 |
202.0 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
12.34 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB21-016 | 188936.0 |
8437334.0 |
142.0 |
120.9 |
-68.0 |
449.5 |
|
207.0 |
211.0 |
4.0 |
3.5 |
2.23 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
394.0 |
395.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
4.76 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB22-001 | 187386.0 |
8436295.0 |
178.5 |
86.9 |
-56.0 |
203.8 |
|
44.0 |
51.0 |
7.0 |
4.9 |
0.75 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
172.8 |
187.0 |
14.2 |
9.9 |
0.41 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB22-002 | 188671.0 |
8437377.0 |
151.0 |
267.9 |
-55.0 |
116.7 |
|
69.0 |
70.0 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
1.48 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB22-003 | 187614.0 |
8436703.0 |
173.0 |
84.9 |
-56.0 |
281.8 |
|
0.0 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
4.1 |
0.45 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
14.6 |
15.1 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
3.69 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
108.9 |
109.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
17.50 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
172.0 |
173.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
1.53 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB22-004 | 187520.0 |
8436600.0 |
181.0 |
85.9 |
-55.0 |
224.7 |
|
23.0 |
26.0 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
1.41 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
88.9 |
93.0 |
4.1 |
2.9 |
0.69 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
99.0 |
101.0 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
0.84 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB22-005 | 187467.0 |
8436499.0 |
184.0 |
84.9 |
-56.0 |
220.9 |
|
100.0 |
102.0 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
1.14 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
133.0 |
137.0 |
4.0 |
2.8 |
0.53 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
143.0 |
146.0 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
1.99 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
160.9 |
167.0 |
6.1 |
4.2 |
0.61 |
HQ ½ Core |
|
Notes:
(i) |
|
Results are based on 50g fire assay for Au. |
(ii) |
|
Intersections are from diamond core drilling with half-core samples with 1 meter representative samples. |
(iii) |
|
Core sample intervals were constrained by geology, alteration or structural boundaries, intervals varied between a minimum of 0.2 meters to a maximum of 1.2 meters. |
(iv) |
|
Mean grades have been calculated on a 0.4 g Au/t lower cut-off grade with no upper cut-off grade applied, and maximum internal waste of 4.0 meters. |
(v) |
|
All intersections are downhole intervals and reflect approximate true widths. |
(vi) |
|
All downhole deviations have been verified by downhole camera and/or downhole gyro. |
(vii) |
|
Collar coordinates surveyed by |
(viii) |
|
The Company maintains a quality assurance/quality control (“QA/QC”) program, as further described below. |
(ix) |
The assay laboratories responsible for the assays were |
Mining License Exploration Potential
Figure 2 provides a graphical representation of the relationship between the Batman, Golf-Tollis, and Quigleys deposits. The left-hand side of the figure illustrates the geophysical similarities of the deposits. The right-hand side of the figure shows the major connecting structures between the deposits, the previously unidentified connecting structures known as the Northern Cross Lode (“NXLD”) and Southern Cross Lode (“SXLD”), and new suspected fault trends.
The long section in Figure 3 below details historical drilling, Vista’s drilling, and the relationship of the Batman, Golf-Tollis, and Quigleys deposits. As reported in earlier press releases, the historical drilling was nearly all shallow at that 100 meters in depth and drilled using reverse circulation drilling, which made it very difficult to gain a clear understanding of the structural characteristics of the trend. Vista’s exploration program has collected HQ core with holes located and oriented to drill below the historical drilling to prove both vertical and longitudinal continuation of the mineralization.
Based on the most recent exploration program, the Company believes that several of the identified areas in the above long section contain the potential to host additional mineralization.
-
Batman North – has the potential for 500,000 to 1,000,000 oz Au contained within 15.5 to 35 Mt grading 0.8 to 1.2 g Au/t.
-
NXLD and SXLD – have the potential for 400,000 to 800,000 oz Au contained within
10 to 20 Mt grading 1.2 to 1.5g Au/t.
-
Golf-Tollis – has the potential for 210,000 to 320,000 oz Au contained within 3.5 to 6.5 Mt grading 0.9 to 1.4 g Au/t.
-
Quigleys Deposit – has the potential for an additional 700,000 to 1,400,000 oz Au contained within
11 to 16 Mt grading 1.1 to 1.4 g Au/t.
The exploration target potentials were derived by the similarities to the Batman deposit sheeted vein system and their surrounding mineralization, as evidenced by drill intercepts in the exploration target area across vertical cross and long sections. The volume of the modeled areas determines the potential tonnage statement in the exploration target. The grade range given in the exploration target is determined with consideration to the drill results within the modeled exploration target area and consideration of the geological setting in an established mining camp where grades are generally observed to increase with depth. The potential tonnages and grades are conceptual in nature and are based on previous drill results that defined the approximate length, thickness, depth and grade of the portion of the historical resource estimate. There has been insufficient exploration to define a current mineral resource and the Company cautions that there is uncertainty whether further exploration will result in such exploration targets being delineated as a mineral resource.
The upper NXLD / SXLD intercepts represent the high-grade zone within the Batman-Driffield Structural corridor and given that these structures have yet to be targeted or systematically explored, they represent excellent opportunities for discovery of near surface, high-grade mineralization. Structures parallel to the NXLD / SXLD are most likely to host high-grade, near surface mineralization within the Mt Todd package.
Exploration License Exploration Potential
Within the Project Exploration Licenses (ELs), which cover 1,650 contiguous km2, there are a significant number of known mineralization occurrences and indicators. Much of the ELs are not well explored. However, there are a number of similarities to the MLs. The most important of which is the similarity between the Batman-Driffield Structural Corridor (located on the Mining Licenses) and the Cullen-Australis Structural Corridor to the north and east on the Exploration Licenses.
Figure 5 illustrates the structural trend similarities between the known structures within the Batman to Quigleys deposits and the mostly unprospected Cullen-Australis Structural Corridor.
The sampling method and approach for the surface geochemistry and grab samples is as follows:
- Soil samples are planned on a regular grid and a sample sheet is generated.
- GPS is used to locate sample positions and a pelican pick is used to clear debris and any topsoil from the sample location 3.
- The hole is dug to the B horizon and 7 to 10 kg of soil is collected and coarse sieved to remove stones, etc.; a fine mesh is then employed and the entire sample recovered post sieving is bagged.
- Soil sampling is usually undertaken in the dry season; however, if wet samples are obtained, they are dried in the logging shed prior to sieving.
-
Sample bags are calico and purchased pre-numbered; these are then packaged in groups of 5 for transportation to NAL, an independent ISO 9000 certified lab,
Pine Creek , NT andGenalysis Laboratory Services Pty Ltd ,Perth , WA, which is also independent from Vista. - As the site is closed to public access, no special security measures are undertaken.
- A sample submission sheet is sent to the lab, detailing required methodology, and number of samples.
- No identifying data relating to sample location is recorded on the bags submitted or the paperwork beyond bag numbers.
Rock chip and soil geochemical samples are routinely collected to determine if the potential exists for anomalous gold values below the surface. The presence of anomalous gold grades is not a guarantee of subsurface mineralization. While both rock chip and soil samples have sampling procedures, it is not considered rigorous enough to be relied upon for use in the estimation of mineral resources. Surface soil and rock chip samples are merely considered to be potential indicators of subsurface mineralization. Since the rock chip and soil assays are not used in mineral resource estimation, it is rare that any additional QA/QC or check assaying would be completed. The data are used on an as received basis.
It is the QP’s (as defined below) opinion that the sample preparation methods and quality control measures employed before dispatch of samples to an analytical or testing laboratory ensured the validity and integrity of samples taken.
Data Verification and QA/QC
The sampling method and approach for the drillholes are as follows:
- The drill core, upon removal from the core barrel, is placed into plastic core boxes;
- The plastic core boxes are transported to the sample preparation building;
- The core is marked, geologically logged, geotechnically logged, photographed, and sawn into halves. One-half is placed into sample bags as one-meter sample lengths, and the other half retained for future reference. The only exception to this is when a portion of the remaining core has been flagged for use in metallurgical testwork;
- The bagged samples have sample tags placed both inside and on the outside of the sample bags. The individual samples are grouped into “lots” for submission to NAL, a certified lab, for preparation and analytical testing; and
- All of this work was done under the supervision of a Vista geologist.
Processing of the core included photographing, geotechnical and geologic logging, and marking the core for sampling. The nominal sample interval was one meter. When this process was completed, the core was moved into the core cutting/storage area where it was laid out for sampling. The core was laid out using the following procedures:
- One meter depth intervals were marked out on the core by a member of the geologic staff;
- Core orientation (bottom of core) was marked with a solid line when at least three orientation marks aligned and used for structural measurements. When orientation marks were insufficient an estimated orientation was indicated by a dashed line;
- Geologic logging was then done by a member of the geologic staff. Assay intervals were selected at that time and a cut line marked on the core. The standard sample interval was one meter, with a minimum of 0.2 meters and a maximum of 1.2 meters;
- Blind sample numbers were then assigned based on pre-labeled sample bags. Sample intervals were then indicated in the core tray at the appropriate locations; and
- Each core tray was photographed and restacked on pallets pending sample cutting and stored on site indefinitely.
The core was then cut using diamond saws with each interval placed in sample bags. At this time, the standards and blanks were also placed in plastic bags for inclusion in the shipment. A reference standard or a blank was inserted at a minimum ratio of 1 in 10 and at suspected high grade intervals additional blanks sample were added. Standard reference material was sourced from
Samples were placed in crates for shipping with 100 samples per crate (20 shipping bags). The crates were stacked outside the core shed until picked up for transport and shipped to NAL in
The QP is satisfied that sample security measures meet industry standards. Statistical analysis of the various drilling populations and QA/QC samples has not identified or highlighted any reasons to not accept the data as representative of the tenor and grade of the mineralization estimated at the Batman deposit.
About
Vista is a gold project developer. The Company’s flagship asset is the Mt Todd gold project located in the Tier 1, mining friendly jurisdiction of
For further information, please contact
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220612005065/en/
(720) 981-1185
Source:
FAQ
What were the key results from Vista Gold's exploration drilling at Mt Todd (VGZ)?
How many drill holes were completed in the Mt Todd exploration program (VGZ)?
What does the drilling program indicate about resource growth at Mt Todd (VGZ)?