Toshiba to Hold Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders on March 24th
Toshiba Corporation plans to hold an extraordinary general meeting on March 24, 2023, to seek shareholder approval for its Strategic Reorganization plan. The proposal aims to separate Toshiba into two publicly traded entities: Infrastructure Service Co. and Device Co., enhancing shareholder value and operational focus. Toshiba's board urges shareholders to vote in favor of its proposal while rejecting those put forth by 3D Investment Value Master Fund. The reorganization will help streamline operations and facilitate capital allocation tailored to each business’s growth strategy, while also ensuring adherence to carbon neutrality goals.
- Planned separation into two independent companies to enhance operational focus.
- Strategic Reorganization aims to eliminate conglomerate discount and improve shareholder value.
- Projected completion of the reorganization by the second half of fiscal year 2023.
- Concerns regarding regulatory approvals and potential delays in the reorganization process.
Recommends Shareholders Vote in Favor of Toshiba’s Proposal Confirming Support for its Value Enhancing Separation Plan and Against 3D’s Proposals
As previously announced, Toshiba intends to separate into two independent, publicly traded companies:
-
Toshiba/ Infrastructure Service Co. , comprising Toshiba’s Energy Systems & Solutions, Infrastructure Systems & Solutions, Digital Solutions and Battery businesses, in addition to Toshiba’s ownership stake inKioxia Holdings Corporation (“KHC”); and -
Device Co. 1, consisting of Toshiba’s Electronic Devices & Storage Solutions business.
The Strategic Reorganization will create two distinctive companies leading their respective industries in realizing the target of
At the EGM, Toshiba’s shareholders will have the opportunity to vote on three proposals. Proposal 1 is a Toshiba proposal, while Proposals 2 and 3 are shareholder proposals put forth by 3D INVESTMENT VALUE
“We put forward our non-binding EGM proposal to confirm shareholder support and continue to get their feedback as part of our commitment of having an open and constructive dialogue. We will also give shareholders a final voice in the Strategic Reorganization after the details are finalized, and will seek a formal vote at our 2023 annual shareholders’ meeting.”
1 Official name to be announced in due course.
Extraordinary General Meeting Proposals
The Proposals and Toshiba’s recommendations are detailed below. Toshiba urges shareholders to read the “Notice Regarding Convocation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders and the Opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors on the Shareholder Proposals”, which are available on Toshiba’s Investor Relations page.
For more details about Strategic Reorganization, please refer to the link at Toshiba Group’s Strategic Reorganization.
Proposal No.1 (Company Proposal): Confirmation of Shareholders’ Views on Proceeding with the Examination of the Strategic Reorganization.
On
Specifically, Toshiba has determined it will conduct a spin-off of Toshiba's core business domain, Device & Storage Business, into a new publicly listed company (referred to herein as
The Strategic Reorganization includes a policy to monetize shares in
This proposal does not have a legally binding effect; given that the implementation of the Strategic Reorganization is a major strategic decision to improve the shareholder value of
The legally binding resolution of the general meeting of shareholders for the implementation of the Strategic Reorganization will be submitted at a general meeting of shareholders to be convened in 2023 after the details of the Strategic Reorganization have been finalized.
The Strategic Reorganization is planned to be implemented as a qualified reorganization utilizing the tax-qualified spin-off system under the Corporation Tax Act. Toshiba is aiming towards completing the Strategic Reorganization by listing
Overview of the Strategic Reorganization
(A) Summary of each company
-
Infrastructure Service Co. will be formed of the energy system solutions, infrastructure system solutions, digital solutions, and battery businesses. It will also own Kioxia Shares. -
Device Co. will be formed of the electronic devices & storage solutions business.
(B) Summary of the procedures
-
Toshiba is planning to transfer the necessary assets, liabilities, and functions to
Device Co. through an absorption-type demerger etc. - Toshiba will obtain legally binding approvals at the general meeting of shareholders by the first half of fiscal year 2023.
-
Device Co. will submit an application for listing pertaining toDevice Co. to theTokyo Stock Exchange . - Around the second half of fiscal year 2023, Toshiba will distribute Device Co.’s shares by way of a share distribution to the existing shareholders of Toshiba on the record date set by Toshiba (the “Record Date Shareholders”).
(C) Kioxia Shares
- While maximizing shareholders’ value, Toshiba will immediately monetize Kioxia Shares to the extent which is practically possible to conduct, and it will return the net proceeds in full to shareholders, within the limits stipulated by applicable laws and regulations.
The Strategic Reorganization will separate Toshiba into two distinctive companies leading their respective industries in realizing the target of
Toshiba will also steadily move forward with the monetization of Kioxia Shares and the return of the proceeds to shareholders.
- The Board’s Recommendation: The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR this proposal.
Toshiba established the Strategic Review Committee (the “SRC”) in
As the above scheme could be the first spin-off of such size in
(A) Significance of the Strategic Reorganization
As Toshiba announced in
The first point is that this will enable the unlocking of existing value of each business: It will be possible to use the Strategic Reorganization as an opportunity to eliminate conglomerate discount and formulate clear growth strategies optimized for the unique characteristics of each business, including business cycle, market conditions, and CAPEX needs. While examining the strategy in detail, Toshiba carried out a comprehensive review of its portfolio, and as we announced on
Next, this will enable the formulation of capital allocation measures for R&D, CAPEX, M&A, shareholder returns, etc. based on each company’s medium-to-long-term growth strategy. As we announced on
Separation provides an opportunity for the current complicated organizational structure to become specialized, making it possible to establish a management structure comprising members who are equipped with expertise in each business. We believe this will also enable agile and flexible operations according to business characteristics of each in relation to examination of the actual businesses’ operational and R&D structures. A streamlining of the management structure will also make it easier to facilitate strategic alliances with partners interested in a specific business domain.
Finally, the Strategic Reorganization will also allow us to create investment opportunities suited to the investment time horizon and risk-return profiles of each investor, providing more options for potential shareholders.
Toshiba has constantly evolved by changing its corporate structure in accordance with the change of the times over its more than 140-year history. The implementation of the Strategic Reorganization aims to make
This bold strategic reorganization is aimed at becoming the first qualified reorganization by a large Japanese company to utilize the so-called tax-qualified spin-off system under the Corporation Tax Act, and we believe that this will contribute to the vitalization of Japanese industry. We believe that this will realize value for Toshiba Group’s businesses, provide investment opportunities for shareholders and investors, and contribute to the benefit of all stakeholders, including customers, business partners and employees.
(B) Regarding the refinements to the scheme for the Strategic Reorganization
Toshiba refined the scheme for the Strategic Reorganization from a 3-way split to a 2-way split. The reasons are first, that compared to the 3-way split, the 2-way split allows for a more stable financial structure, eliminating uncertainties about maintaining Toshiba’s stock listing.
Next, compared to the 3-way split, the 2-way split makes it easier to establish a strong, disciplined governance structure, by reducing the required number of management structures.
It also turned out that the 2-way split can significantly reduce the separation cost compared to the 3-way split.
The operational burden of the listing review can also be reduced significantly when listing only one company, instead of two, reducing the workload for the personnel in charge handling the listing review.
(C) Regarding governance
With respect to governance of those companies, both
(D) Portfolio review
Since
As announced in “(Update)
(E) Shareholder returns, etc.
As announced in the release titled “Notice Regarding Shareholder Return Policy” dated
The capital structure of
(*Note) For the time being, equity method profit and loss for
Toshiba will continue to examine improvements in shareholder value.
Proposals Nos. 2 and 3 (Shareholder Proposals): The Board respectfully opposes both proposals for the following reasons:
(1) General
As described in Proposal No. 1, “Reasons, etc. for proposal,” the Toshiba’s Board of Directors has received the SRC’s recommendations with regard to the strategic direction of the Company. The Board of Directors has also conducted thorough discussions before announcing the Separation Plan. Thereafter, Toshiba has continued, among other things, to refine the Separation Plan, review the portfolio, and review shareholder returns, based on further input from shareholders and management. Toshiba believes that the proposed Separation Plan is the best course of action for shareholders and other stakeholders of Toshiba.
The SRC, which consists of five independent outside directors, has conducted a thorough and rigorous review with appropriate advice from legal, financial and other advisers. The Board of Directors believes that this review process, including the structure and the proper exercise of business judgement, represents its best efforts.
(2) Opposition to Proposer’s criticism regarding review process, etc. of the SRC
Although the Proposer has criticized the review process, etc. of the SRC, the Toshiba’s Board of Directors does not accept such criticism for the following reasons:
-
The Proposer states that “the process that the SRC followed to arrive at this recommendation was flawed and that the recommendation is therefore not reliable”. As described in “Strategic Review Committee of Toshiba Board of Directors Provides Update to Shareholders on Process Leading to Separation Plan” dated
November 12, 2021 (the “SRC Letter”), however,between June 25 and November 12 , the SRC met 18 times, on a weekly basis. In addition, over 50 ad hoc sessions were held among the SRC members and with outside parties, including shareholders, potential investors and other market participants. As such, the SRC spent a great deal of time and effort reviewing strategic options, thoroughly and comprehensively, including the possibility of a change in ownership of the whole or parts of the Toshiba group, far beyond what is generally expected as a duty of outside directors. Toshiba believes that the Proposer’s criticism is unfounded. - The Proposer states that the exclusion of strategic investors from the review, and the discontinuation of discussions with financial investors regarding potential minority investments in Toshiba are based on “speculation”. As stated in the SRC Letter, however, decisions concerning discussions with such parties were based on responses from strategic investors and after careful discussions with financial investors during the SRC’s deliberations. The reason Toshiba did not provide financial investors with “formal due diligence” opportunities was that, as stated in the SRC letter, running a sales process would have led to a pre-determined outcome that would have precluded a thorough review of a more complete range of alternatives. Toshiba determined that it was not necessarily appropriate to invest a disproportionate amount of time and resources in providing formal due diligence opportunities at a time when the SRC was comparing and exploring the various strategic alternatives. Toshiba believes that the discussions between the selected SRC members and several PE funds, conducted over three rounds, provided a meaningful perspective on the price level at which the private equity funds believed a privatization could be accomplished.
-
The Proposer argues that there are serious questions about the independence of the SRC from executive officers, but the reason for this assertion is not made clear. The SRC ran its own independent process with its own advisers and, as stated above, met multiple times to consider the way forward. In addition, the Proposer argues that “executive officers provided potential private equity investors with an extremely conservative business plan” and pointed out that private equity investors would not find the plan to be sufficiently ambitious to warrant their attention or capital. However, Toshiba’s business plan was diligently prepared by the executive officers balancing feasibility and attainability taking into account the requirements of shareholders, the Board of Directors and the SRC. There is no reason to believe that the business plan presented to the potential equity investors were “extremely conservative” nor was different in any material respect to the plan presented on
November 12, 2021 . - The Proposer has criticized the “concerns” expressed by the executive officers to the SRC regarding the impact on Toshiba’s business following a change in the group’s ownership structure as “pessimistic and undoubtedly led to concerns among potential private equity investors”. However, such concerns were legitimate points to consider associated with a privatization of a listed company and were both considered by the SRC and were discussed with each PE fund. As described in the SRC Letter, the SRC heard the opinions from the PE funds on these points and took them into consideration during its review, decision-making and formulation of recommendations to the Board of Directors. The SRC heard the opinions of the executive officers and the PE funds (and certain of their investee companies) and conducted a fair and balanced assessment of the executive officers’ concern. The Proposer argues that “the SRC process was distorted by an overly conservative business plans and executives that over emphasized certain risks (regulation, employment, customer departure, etc.) associated with a change in ownership”, but such argument is not consistent with the work carried out by the SRC.
- The Proposer concludes that, with respect to the SRC’s recommendation, “there was a ‘rush to judgment’ and insufficient analysis of the opportunity an ownership change could present for Toshiba”. However, the Proposer did not present any specific grounds for reaching this conclusion. For the reasons stated above, Toshiba believes that this conclusion is without foundation.
- Summary of Proposal No.2 and the Board’s Recommendation: This Proposal seeks to add a new chapter to Toshiba’s Articles of Incorporation – Chapter VI “Implementation of Board’s Strategic Reorganization Plans”. The Board recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
Legally binding resolution will be obtained at later stage.
Toshiba believes that the EGM is a forum for constructive discussions with the shareholders, and Toshiba is not reluctant to review and discuss the contents of the Strategic Reorganization with shareholders. Indeed, it has already done so after the
The proposed amendment does not fit in the Articles of Incorporation.
Even if it was appropriate to adopt a legally binding resolution at this time, considering that (i) the Articles of Incorporation are supposed to document the basic matters related to the organization and management of the Company, and (ii) the Strategic Reorganization contains specific matters that should be subject to the business judgment of Toshiba’s Board of Directors and management, Toshiba believes that the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Proposal No. 2 falls outside the scope of the Articles of Incorporation, that is generally understood.
This is an extremely unusual proposal – Even the Proposer is opposing it.
The Proposer who made Proposal No. 2 has indicated that it intends to exercise its voting rights to oppose the relevant proposal. Such a contradicting shareholder proposal is extremely unusual, and it is doubtful whether the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is constructive. Toshiba’s Board of Directors cannot support the proposal which even the Proposer itself opposes. This contradiction begs the question of whether or not this is a proposal at all.
Disapproval of Proposal No. 2 does not mean disapproval of the Strategic Reorganization.
For the avoidance of doubt, support for the Strategic Reorganization should be determined upon approval or disapproval of Proposal No. 1, and even if Proposal No. 2 is disapproved, it does not necessarily imply that “shareholders are not supportive of the current conclusions of the SRC or the Reorganization at this time”, as the Proposer states in its “Reason for the proposal.” Accordingly, if the shareholders with a majority of voting rights agree to Proposal No. 1, regardless of the outcome of Proposal No. 2, Toshiba will respect such shareholders’ intention and proceed with the Strategic Reorganization, for formal approval at a later date. Otherwise, the shareholders with one-third of the voting rights would enjoy negative control and would be able to prevent the possibility of implementing the Strategic Reorganization against the wishes of a majority of shareholders. We believe that the intention of a majority of shareholders should be respected.
-
Summary of Proposal No.3 and the Board’s Recommendation: This Proposal is a request that the SRC and Board of Directors continue their strategic review to ensure all alternatives are fully considered and measured against the Reorganization Plan announced on
November 12, 2021 , including by (i) actively engaging in discussions regarding a take-private or minority investment in the Company, and (ii) regularly reporting in detail to shareholders on all efforts, proposals received, and matters evaluated. The Board recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
Toshiba believes that the Strategic Reorganization is the best course of action
After a thorough examination by the Board of Directors and the SRC, Toshiba believes that the Strategic Reorganization in Proposal No. 1 is the best course of action to enhance its corporate value; however, the Board of Directors and the SRC are continuing to consider measures to increase corporate value. Specifically, Toshiba, including the Board of Directors and the SRC, has continued to discuss individual proposals and portfolios reviews based on the Strategic Reorganization after the announcement of the Strategic Reorganization on
Toshiba will not eliminate other strategic options, but how to consider such options should be left to management decisions
Although it is not clear what “(i) actively engaging in discussions regarding a going-private transaction or minority investment in the Company” means (which is proposed by the Proposer) and considering the reasons for the proposal to Proposal No. 2 by the Proposer, if this means, for example, immediate implementation of a bidding procedure for a going-private transaction or minority investment and providing “formal due diligence” opportunities, Toshiba believes that it is not necessarily appropriate to invest a disproportionate amount of time and resources in providing formal due diligence opportunities at this stage where Toshiba should focus on implementation of the Strategic Reorganization. Or, if this means a dialogue that does not provide “formal due diligence” opportunities and consideration based on such dialogue, it has already been implemented as a part of an objective and thorough review process by the SRC.
Toshiba has thoroughly considered, and will continue to consider, whether this Strategic Reorganization is, compared to other strategic options, in the interests of (i) enhancing the corporate value of the
In addition, as stated before, if a specific, realistic, and bona fide acquisition proposal is made, the Board of Directors will seriously consider it. However, whether to pursue one strategic option (in Toshiba’s case, the Strategic Reorganization) while simultaneously considering other strategic options (in Toshiba’s case, for example, a going-private transaction) is a matter to be decided, taking into account, among other things, time, management resources and likely benefits on a case by case basis, by a company’s board of directors, which is charged with such a responsibility and which should be regarded as the most informed and the most appropriate body to rightfully exercise appropriate business judgment. Toshiba is concerned that if the Board of Directors is directed to follow a certain course of actions decided by a general meeting of shareholders, it would (i) undermine the management’s responsibility to manage Toshiba and exercise its business judgment and (ii) prevent Toshiba from formulating flexible strategic policies for the future, which may hinder enhancement of corporate value and ultimately shareholder value. Such idea also contradicts the basic notion of the separation of ownership and management in publicly traded companies.
Full disclosure of information will work against Toshiba’s and shareholders’ interests
Proposal No. 3 states to “(ii) regularly reporting in detail to shareholders on all efforts, proposals received, and matters evaluated,” but such information is often not suited for disclosure, and is generally subject to third party confidentiality considerations, so it is often not practical to regularly report the details of the proposals received and the review results to the shareholders. Indeed, the disclosure of certain sensitive information would damage the corporate value. Of course, Toshiba will continue to disclose information in a timely and appropriate manner based on reasonable judgment in compliance with laws and regulations, and has disclosed information, including the SRC review process, more frequently and in more detail than those generally required in practice. However, it is extremely unrealistic for a publicly traded company to disclose in detail all information concerning strategic policies. Rather than disclosing all such information, Toshiba believes that it is a common and reasonable approach to allow the directors and management (who are charged with such responsibility and subject to confidentiality obligations to Toshiba) to evaluate and review such information, and make strategic decisions for Toshiba based on such information. If a detailed information disclosure as requested by the Proposer is a prerequisite for the review procedure to compare and examine strategic options against the Strategic Reorganization with other strategic options, Toshiba believes that it may lead to Toshiba missing an opportunity to receive bona fide proposals or other strategic proposals that contribute to the enhancement of corporate value. If Toshiba is required to follow (ii) in Proposal No. 3, it will only make it more difficult to review, improve and implement the Strategic Reorganization.
Extraordinary General Meeting Details
Toshiba’s EGM will be held on
About
Find out more about Toshiba at www.global.toshiba/ww/outline/corporate.html
Forward-looking Statements and Other Cautionary
This document has been prepared solely for the purposes of providing information regarding the strategic reorganization described herein (“Reorganization”) and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security of Toshiba, its subsidiaries or any other company in
This document has been translated from the Japanese-language original document for reference purposes only. In the event of any conflict or discrepancy between this document and the Japanese-language original, the Japanese-language original shall prevail in all respects.
This document contains forward-looking statements and prospects concerning the future plans, strategies, and the performance of Toshiba group.
These statements are not historical facts; rather, they are based on assumptions and judgments formed by the management of Toshiba group in light of currently available information. They include items which have not been finalized at this point and future plans which have yet to be confirmed or require further consideration.
Since Toshiba group promotes business in various market environments in many countries and regions, its activities are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties which include, but are not limited to, those related to economic conditions, worldwide competition in the electronics business, customer demand, foreign currency exchange rates, tax and other regulations, geopolitical risk, and natural disasters. Toshiba therefore cautions readers that actual results may differ from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Please refer to the annual securities report (yuukashoken houkokusho) and the quarterly securities report (shihanki houkokusho) (both issued in Japanese only) for detailed information on Toshiba group’s business risks.
Unless otherwise noted, all figures are 12-month totals on a consolidated basis.
Results in segments have been reclassified to reflect the current organizational structure, unless stated otherwise.
Since Toshiba is not involved in the management of
The execution of the spin-off described in this document is subject to approval at Toshiba's general shareholders’ meeting and the fulfillment of all review requirements of the relevant regulatory authorities.
Depending on the applicable laws and regulations (including securities listing regulations and
|
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220214005361/en/
Investor Contact
Strategic Planning Div.
Phone: +81-3-3457-2096
Email: ir@toshiba.co.jp
Media Contact
For Media in
Media Relations Office
Corporate Communications Div.
Phone: +81-3-3457-2100
Email: media.relations@toshiba.co.jp
For Media in the
Email: Toshiba-SVC@sardverb.com
For Media in
Kekst CNC
Jochen Legewie
Email: toshiba@kekstcnc.com
Source:
FAQ
What is Toshiba's Strategic Reorganization plan?
When is Toshiba's extraordinary general meeting?
What does Toshiba recommend shareholders vote for?
What challenges does Toshiba face regarding the reorganization?