Stifel Survey Finds, Amid Concern Over the Economy and Personal Finances, Sustainability Takes a Back Seat to Price and Value This Holiday Shopping Season
- 80% of U.S. consumers prioritize sustainable brands
- Parity with Europe in consumer views on sustainability
- Top brands in 'Stifel Sustainable Lifestyle Brands Index' identified
- None.
- Four of Five U.S. Consumers Believe It’s Important for Brands to Operate Sustainably
- Cost-Conscious Consumers Prioritizing Good Value and Low Price Over Sustainability
- Three of Four Indicate Willingness to Boycott a Brand Over Stance on Social Issues
- Bombas, Yeti, The North Face Top “Stifel Sustainable Lifestyle Brands Index”
ST. LOUIS, Mo., Dec. 06, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A new Stifel survey finds U.S. consumer views of the importance of brands operating sustainably has reached parity with Europe, but also shows greater consumer concerns about the economy and personal finances. Following three years of near-record inflation, the survey data indicates heightened price sensitivity, just as the holiday shopping season kicks into high gear.
While an overwhelming majority of consumers (
Roughly three of five consumers (
“We know that many consumers regularly consider and value sustainability, especially in the active and casual lifestyle category,” said Jim Duffy, Managing Director and Sports and Lifestyle Brands Analyst at Stifel. “However, our survey found that
Stifel, working with Morning Consult, recently surveyed 6,053 U.S. active/causal lifestyle brand consumers ages 18-55. Other key findings include:
56% (flat versus 2022) of consumers look for information about a brand’s sustainability practices when contemplating a purchase,70% (down from71% in 2022) consider sustainability factors when choosing between brands, and more than half (59% versus58% in 2022) have purchased a new product specifically because of sustainability reasons.- More than three-quarters (
78% ) of consumers indicate they are trying to be more sustainable in their day-to-day life (up from75% in 2022) and70% indicate they care more about the sustainability of products they buy than a year ago (versus67% in 2022). - Most (
58% ) believe that ethical business practices are “very important” for brands to prioritize, and ranked giving workers fair pay and benefits, paying a fair share of taxes, and promoting a healthy work/life balance as leading priorities. - Two-thirds of U.S. category consumers (
67% ) report they are aware of brands receiving negative attention on social media for a statement or action taken on a social issue. - Three of five category purchasers (
60% ) think it’s important for brands to take a stance on social issues but three quarters (74% ) indicate a willingness to boycott a brand if the stance was contrary to their opinion.
“Operating sustainably is a consumer expectation, but brands weighing in on social issues is a high-wire act,” noted Duffy. “Consumers want brands to support their issues, but the majority indicate they would boycott a brand that expresses views opposing their own. Deep understanding of the customer is essential to this risk-reward calculus.”
Global Insights
The survey also questioned 4,096 additional active/causal lifestyle brand consumers ages 18-55 across the UK, Italy, Germany, and France. Similar to findings among U.S. consumers, at least four of five category purchasers across all international markets believe it’s important for brands to operate sustainably, but the figures declined year over year. Similar to the U.S., value and price concerns outweigh sustainability practices as purchasing priorities. Specific findings include:
- Sustainability as a purchasing priority remained essentially flat compared to last year in the UK (
35% ) and Italy (40% ) but declined year to year in France (52% versus59% in 2022) and Germany (36% versus39% in 2022). - “Good value” ranked as the top consideration when making purchasing decisions, with consumers in Italy (
74% versus75% in 2022), France (72% versus70% in 2022), the UK (72% versus69% in 2022), and Germany (71% flat versus 2022) versus68% of U.S. consumers. - The importance of “low price” as a purchasing priority increased over the last year, with French (
55% versus47% in 2022), Italian (45% versus40% in 2022), German (40% versus35% in 2022), and UK consumers (53% versus50% in 2022) listing it as a “top three” purchasing priority versus57% of U.S. consumers (up from52% in 2022). - Brand environmental efforts are viewed as less important year to year across each of the European markets, including using less energy and water, using more renewable or recycled materials, reducing carbon emissions, and advocating for environmental causes publicly.
- In the past year, half or more of consumers have become more concerned about the state of the economy (UK
69% , Italy65% , U.S.62% , Germany59% , and France58% ) and personal finances (UK63% , France62% , U.S.56% , Italy53% , and Germany50% ).
“European markets have historically led the U.S. in concern for brand sustainability, but that gap has narrowed amid economic pressures,” added Duffy. “The broad-based 2023 European declines in perception of the importance of brand focus on environmental efforts may signal ‘sustainability fatigue’ and the peak in European consumer sustainability concern.”
Full survey results can be found here.
Updating the Stifel Sustainable Lifestyle Brands Index
In conjunction with the survey, Stifel is updating the “Stifel Sustainable Lifestyle Brands Index,” which ranks brands based on U.S. active/casual lifestyle consumer perception of brand sustainability practices. Brands were measured according to three metrics of sustainability: environmental, social, and ethical business practices.
For the third year in a row, Bombas was rated the top sustainable brand, followed by Yeti (No. 2) and The North Face (No. 3). In fact, Bombas scored highest in each of the three metrics considered.
Rounding out the top ten are: Carhartt (tied at No. 4), Patagonia (tied at No. 4), Allbirds (No. 6), Adidas (No. 7), Columbia (tied at No. 8), Under Armour (tied at No. 8), and Smartwool + Levi’s (No. 10).
Survey Methodology
Morning Consult conducted n=11,551 online interviews among general population adults ages 18-55 and active/casual lifestyle brand purchasers ages 18-55 in the U.S., UK, Italy, Germany, and France from October 23-30, 2023. Sampling included approximately n=1,000 general population adults in each market, and an oversample of active/casual lifestyle brand purchasers in each market.
General population adults and active/casual lifestyle brand purchasers were separately sampled and weighted to be demographically representative for their age groups according to published population statistics for age, gender, region, education, race, and income in the U.S., and age, gender, region, and education in the UK, Italy, Germany, and France. Active/casual lifestyle brand purchasers are defined as those who purchased at least one of the following types of brands within the past six months: athletic or activewear clothing or footwear brands; casual lifestyle clothing or footwear brands; outdoor clothing or footwear brands (i.e., for hiking, skiing, etc.); or sporting goods or outdoor recreation equipment brands.
Sustainable Lifestyle Brand Index Methodology
Stifel and Morning Consult measured sustainability ratings for 50 active/casual lifestyle brands with leading sustainability practices among n=4,756 active/casual lifestyle brand consumers in the U.S. Active/casual lifestyle brands were measured according to three metrics of sustainability: environmental sustainability, ethical business practices, and social sustainability. Index scores for each of these metrics were calculated according to the following methodology, and then averaged together to compute the overall Sustainable Lifestyle Brand Index Score.
Calculations for each brand focus on those who selected a response on Stifel’s four-point scale, excluding those who selected “Don’t Know/No Opinion.” Raw scores were calculated for each brand by adding value for positive ratings and subtracting value for negative ratings. “Excellent” and “Poor” were given twice the weight of “Good” and “Just Fair” to ensure more polarized views were reflected in the scores. Finally, raw scores were converted to index scores, where the average score for each metric is indexed to 100. This ensures Stifel’s three metrics are uniform, and have equal weight when averaged together to compute the overall Sustainable Lifestyle Brand Index Score.
Stifel Company Information
Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE: SF) is a financial services holding company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, that conducts its banking, securities, and financial services business through several wholly owned subsidiaries. Stifel’s broker-dealer clients are served in the United States through Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, including its Eaton Partners and Miller Buckfire business divisions; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.; and Stifel Independent Advisors, LLC; in Canada through Stifel Nicolaus Canada Inc.; and in the United Kingdom and Europe through Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited. The Company’s broker-dealer affiliates provide securities brokerage, investment banking, trading, investment advisory, and related financial services to individual investors, professional money managers, businesses, and municipalities. Stifel Bank and Stifel Bank & Trust offer a full range of consumer and commercial lending solutions. Stifel Trust Company, N.A. and Stifel Trust Company Delaware, N.A. offer trust and related services. To learn more about Stifel, please visit the Company’s website at www.stifel.com. For global disclosures, please visit https://www.stifel.com/investor-relations/press-releases.
Media Contacts
Neil Shapiro, +1 (212) 271-3447
shapiron@stifel.com
Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7d1e3f9f-3e59-4f8b-b074-5db3ce1b70ef
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/421f4a09-5ae5-4588-96e5-8a6d36df7511
FAQ
What is the ticker symbol for Stifel Financial Corp?
How many U.S. consumers prioritize sustainability in brands according to the Stifel survey?