Legion Partners Comments on Successful Outcome of Litigation Against Primo Water
Legion Partners has successfully pressured Primo Water Corporation (PRMW) to accept its director nominations following a lawsuit filed against the company. Initially, Primo's Board rejected nominations from Legion Partners, leading to legal action. After significant legal expenses, Primo agreed to allow four of Legion's nominees, including Henrik Jelert and Lori Tauber Marcus, to stand for election at the rescheduled Annual Meeting on May 31, 2023.
Legion criticized Primo's previous tactics as harmful to shareholders, causing delays and unnecessary costs. They contended that the board's actions breached fiduciary duties and dissipated shareholder capital. Legion stressed the importance of electing their nominees to institute necessary changes within the company’s governance.
- Legion Partners achieved a significant victory by getting all four of their director nominees accepted for the upcoming Annual Meeting.
- The rescheduling of the Annual Meeting to May 31, 2023, allows shareholders to vote on new board members promptly.
- Primo's initial rejection of Legion's nominees led to unnecessary legal expenses for both parties, costing millions.
- The delay in the Annual Meeting could create confusion among shareholders and disrupt company operations.
Primo Has Capitulated and Accepted Legion Partners’ Position in its Entirety
Views the Entire Episode of
Primo is reversing its position and has agreed to accept the nomination notice submitted by
“This outcome is confirmation of the position we have always taken: the actions by Primo’s Board – first attempting to invalidate our entire campaign and subsequently two of our nominees – were nothing more than a tactic to subvert the rights of shareowners. Primo’s assertion that it has abandoned its efforts to block shareowners from voting on the
If Primo had simply recognized our valid nomination of all four of our nominees two months ago, millions of shareowner dollars would have been saved, the Annual Meeting would not be delayed by almost a month and a newly constituted Board could have been seated in just two weeks. We strongly believe that this Board has breached its fiduciary duties and all four of the directors we have targeted require replacement:
The behavior of Primo’s Board sets a troubling precedent. Companies should not be allowed to weaponize their bylaws in order to reject director nominations with no basis, and then force shareowners to bring costly litigation simply to have their nominees voted on. This is the definition of using corporate resources to the detriment of shareowners. In our view, the fact that the Board was willing to engage in this behavior, while wasting shareowner capital, underscores the need for significant change on the Primo Board.
Further, it’s important to remember that the rejection of our nomination notice was linked to the personal attacks Primo has levied against two of our nominees – attacks that are not true and are arguably defamatory. In our view, Primo’s about-face on the litigation calls into question its credibility on all related issues. Shareowners should send a strong message to this Board that these harmful efforts are unacceptable by electing all four of our nominees.
We are pleased that shareowners now have the chance to vote for all four of our highly-qualified nominees –
About
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230417005692/en/
Investor Contact:
info@saratogaproxy.com
Media Contact:
PRMW@longacresquare.com
Source:
FAQ
What is the outcome of Legion Partners' legal action against Primo Water Corporation?
When is the rescheduled Annual Meeting for Primo Water Corporation?
Who are the nominees put forth by Legion Partners for the Primo Board?