Proposal to Modernize Rooftop Solar Program Would Support Customer Equity and Help Sustain California’s Clean Energy Progress
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PCG), along with SDG&E and SCE, proposed to modernize California’s rooftop solar program to enhance customer equity and support clean energy goals. The plan, submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, focuses on compensating future rooftop solar customers for excess energy exported to the grid. Currently, non-solar customers pay approximately $3 billion more annually to subsidize existing solar customers. The proposal aims to rectify this by ensuring fair cost-sharing among all customers and encouraging solar adoption, especially for lower-income households.
- The proposal aims to ensure fair cost-sharing among solar and non-solar customers, potentially improving customer equity.
- There are provisions for discounts for lower-income customers to enhance their access to solar energy.
- Encouragement for solar with battery storage may increase grid reliability.
- The existing $3 billion cost shift for current solar customers will continue, which impacts non-solar customers' electricity bills.
Today, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) and Southern California Edison (SCE) together proposed to modernize California’s 25-year-old rooftop solar program to support customer equity and help continue California’s success toward a clean energy future.
Submitted today to the California Public Utilities Commission, the joint proposal lays out a new approach for compensating future rooftop solar customers who export excess solar energy to the electric grid. This proposal would only apply to future, new rooftop solar customers, not current solar customers.
The heart of this modernization effort addresses an unfair and growing inequity stemming from earlier versions of the rooftop solar Net Energy Metering (NEM) program. This cost shift leads to electricity customers without solar systems paying about
This proposal to modernize the 25-year-old NEM program would accomplish the following objectives:
- Ensure solar and non-solar customers using the grid pay their fair share for its costs;
- Minimize any new, unnecessary bill increases for customers without solar, many of whom are lower income;
- Help California achieve its climate change and clean energy goals in a more cost-effective and equitable manner; and
- Update the current, outdated structure to align with today’s lower cost of solar energy and changing grid needs.
Joint Proposal from PG&E, SDG&E and SCE
The joint proposal for future rooftop solar customers:
- Updates compensation for excess energy created by customers’ rooftop solar systems and exported to the grid to better align with the actual value of power and to more closely resemble what utilities pay for large-scale renewable energy resources.
- Offers discounts for lower-income customers to ensure greater access to solar for these customers.
- Encourages the adoption of rooftop solar with battery energy storage to increase the ability of customers to support the electric grid at critical times when the sun is not shining.
- Includes a monthly grid charge to ensure solar customers are appropriately contributing to costs for maintaining, operating and improving the grid, and for statewide public purpose programs, such as energy efficiency or programs for lower-income customers.
- Includes a monthly customer charge to pay for costs related to customer service and support such as call center costs, metering and other services benefitting all customers.
While the
Background on California’s Current Solar Incentive Program
The NEM program was established in 1995 to incentivize Californians to install rooftop solar panels to help jumpstart the solar industry, drive down costs and facilitate the transition to a clean energy future – and it worked.
- In 1995, there were 10,000 home-based solar systems. Today, there are more than 1 million.
-
The cost of solar technology has fallen more than
70% ii since the program began 25 years ago. -
Today,
50% of California’s electricity is from clean, renewable sources including15% from rooftop solar.iii
How the Current NEM Program Works
A customer’s rooftop solar equipment is connected to the electric grid. Solar customers use energy produced by their solar panels during the day when solar power is available and from the utilities at night or whenever their solar system is not generating enough power. Even when their solar panels produce energy, customers rely on the electric grid for power and for exporting their excess solar generation to the grid. Customers with both rooftop solar and battery storage systems are also connected to and rely upon the grid.
Rooftop solar customers receive a credit on their electric bills when their system generates more power than they need, and that power is sent to the electric grid. The original goal of the credit was to help customers pay off their system over a reasonable period. Since the NEM program was established, solar costs have fallen dramatically:
- Today, the credit that rooftop solar customers receive for excess energy sent to the grid is 25 cents per kilowatt-hour, on average.
- By comparison, the cost for energy from a large-scale solar farm is 3 cents per kilowatt-hour.
- Customers are able to pay for their system in less than five years but continue to receive this subsidy for 20 years.
The result of this high credit is that rooftop solar customers do not pay their full share for use of the grid that they rely on or for state-mandated, public policy programs that support energy efficiency or lower-income customers.
To view the joint proposal, click here.
About PG&E
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG), is a combined natural gas and electric utility serving more than 16 million people across 70,000 square miles in Northern and Central California. For more information, visit pge.com and pge.com/news.
About SDG&E
SDG&E is an innovative San Diego-based energy company that provides clean, safe and reliable energy to better the lives of the people it serves in San Diego and southern Orange counties. The company is committed to creating a sustainable future by providing its electricity from renewable sources; modernizing natural gas pipelines; accelerating the adoption of electric vehicles; supporting numerous non-profit partners; and, investing in innovative technologies to ensure the reliable operation of the region’s infrastructure for generations to come. SDG&E is a subsidiary of Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE). For more information, visit SDGEnews.com or connect with SDG&E on Twitter (@SDGE), Instagram (@SDGE) and Facebook.
About Southern California Edison
An Edison International (NYSE: EIX) company, Southern California Edison is one of the nation’s largest electric utilities, serving a population of approximately 15 million via 5 million customer accounts in a 50,000-square-mile service area within Central, Coastal and Southern California. For more information, visit newsroom.edison.com or energized.edison.com, or connect with SCE on Twitter (@SCE), Instagram (@SCE) and Facebook.
i “Designing Electricity Rates for An Equitable Energy Transition,” Energy Institute at Haas and Next10, February 2021, bar chart on page 28 on per customer cost impact.
ii “Tracking the Sun Pricing and Design Trends for Distributed Photovaltaic Systems in the United States,” (Data supporting report: “Distributed Solar 2020 Data Update”) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, December 2020, Data: https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/tts_2019_summary_data_tables.xlsx)
iii “CEC Tracking Progress Report: Renewable Energy,” California Energy Commission, February 18, 2020, page 5.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210315005843/en/
FAQ
What is the new proposal submitted by PG&E regarding rooftop solar?
How much do non-solar customers pay due to the existing rooftop solar program?
Will current rooftop solar customers be affected by the new proposal?
What incentives are included for lower-income customers in the proposal?