Newmont Announces Increased 2022 Mineral Reserves of 96 Million Gold Ounces and 68 Million Gold Equivalent Ounces
Newmont Corporation (NYSE: NEM) reported a notable increase in gold Mineral Reserves, reaching 96.1 million ounces in 2022, up from 92.8 million ounces in 2021, marking a 3.6% growth. The boost is attributed to significant discoveries, including 8.6 million ounces from various operations and enhanced ownership stakes, notably in Yanacocha. The company emphasized its focus on extending mine life and optimizing exploration investments, with projected expenditures of $200 million for 2023. Newmont's production pipeline appears robust, with an average annual gold output of approximately 6 million ounces over the next decade.
- Increased gold reserves to 96.1 million ounces from 92.8 million ounces (2021).
- 8.6 million ounces added through exploration and acquisitions.
- Acquired 100% ownership of Yanacocha, contributing 3.1 million ounces to reserves.
- Projected exploration expenditure of $200 million in 2023 emphasizes growth potential.
- Stable annual gold production of approximately 6 million ounces through the next decade.
- Depletion impacted reserves by 7.2 million ounces in 2022.
- Unfavorable net revisions reduced reserves by 1.2 million ounces.
PERCENTAGE OF GOLD RESERVES BY JURISDICTION
"In 2022,
-
2022 RESERVES & RESOURCES HIGHLIGHTS
- Robust gold reserves of 96.1 million ounces
- Over 90 percent of gold reserves in top-tier jurisdictions
-
Addition of 8.6 million ounces in 2022 primarily due to 4.4 million attributable ounces from additions at
Pueblo Viejo and 2.8 million from exploration atNewmont's managed operations; further improved by 3.1 million ounces fromNewmont's increase in ownership of Yanacocha to 100 percent in 2022 -
Underpinned by a strong base of operating sites with gold reserve life of 10 years or more, including Boddington, Tanami, Ahafo, Peñasquito,
Cerro Negro , Merian,Pueblo Viejo andNevada Gold Mines (NGM), and further enhanced by our six other managed mines and organic project pipeline - Significant gold reserves per share with 120 ounces per 1,000 shares
- Measured & Indicated Gold Mineral Resources of 75.3 million ounces and Inferred Resources of 36.1 million ounces
- Significant exposure to copper with 15.7 billion pounds in reserves, 17.9 billion pounds in Measured & Indicated resources and 8.6 billion pounds in Inferred resources
- Additional exposure to other metals including silver, lead and zinc
PERCENTAGE OF GOLD RESERVES BY JURISDICTION1
Newmont’s reserve base is a key differentiator with over 90 percent of gold reserves located in top-tier jurisdictions, an average reserve grade of 1.09 grams per tonne and an operating reserve life of more than 10 years at six managed sites and two non-managed joint ventures, with significant upside potential from a robust organic project pipeline. In addition,
PROVEN & PROBABLE GOLD RESERVES | ||
In millions of ounces | ||
2021 Gold Reserves | 92.8 |
|
Additions | 8.6 |
|
Acquisitions3 | 3.1 |
|
Net Revisions | (1.2 |
) |
Depletion | (7.2 |
) |
2022 Gold Reserves | 96.1 |
|
For 2022,
Additions before revisions of 8.6 million ounces through exploration and technical studies met the Company’s target despite higher costs. Notable reserve additions for the year from Newmont’s operating sites included:
-
Cerro Negro added 0.8 million ounces primarily due to drilling in the Eastern Districts - Merian added 0.5 million attributable ounces primarily due to drilling at the Merian 2 open pit
-
Tanami added 0.4 million ounces primarily due to drilling at Liberator and
Auron - Ahafo North added 0.2 million ounces primarily due to drilling
-
Newmont’s 40 percent interest in
Pueblo Viejo added 4.4 million attributable ounces, and its 38.5 percent interest in NGM added 1.4 million attributable ounces
Net unfavorable revisions include 0.5 million ounces at Yanacocha due to updated models, technical assumptions and revised mine designs, as well as 0.2 million ounces at Merian and Éléonore due to revised technical assumptions and costs. Additional net negative revisions of 0.7 million ounces were attributable to NGM, mainly at
Newmont’s 38.5 percent interest in NGM represented 18.6 million attributable ounces of gold reserves at year end, compared to 19.3 million ounces at the end of 2021.
Gold reserve grade improved 2 percent to 1.09 grams per tonne compared to 1.06 grams per tonne in the prior year, primarily due to higher grade reserves from the Company’s 40 percent equity ownership in
MEASURED & INDICATED GOLD RESOURCES | INFERRED GOLD RESOURCES | |||||
In millions of ounces | In millions of ounces | |||||
2021 Gold Resources | 68.3 |
|
2021 Gold Resources | 33.2 |
|
|
Additions | 2.8 |
|
Additions | 2.6 |
|
|
Acquisitions3 | 8.2 |
|
Acquisitions3 | 4.3 |
|
|
Divestitures4 | (1.8 |
) |
Divestitures4 | (0.4 |
) |
|
Net Revisions | 4.4 |
|
Net Revisions | (1.8 |
) |
|
Conversions | (6.6 |
) |
Conversions | (1.8 |
) |
|
2022 Gold Resources | 75.3 |
|
2022 Gold Resources | 36.1 |
|
In 2022,
Measured and Indicated Gold Mineral Resources added through exploration programs were 2.8 million ounces and included notable additions before revisions of 0.5 million ounces at Ahafo South underground, 0.5 million ounces at Yanacocha, 0.4 million attributable ounces at NGM, 0.2 million ounces at Cerro Negro, 0.2 million ounces at Peñasquito and 0.2 million ounces at Ahafo North. Acquisitions added 8.2 million ounces, including 7.1 million ounces at Conga and 1.1 million ounces at Yanacocha, while the divestiture of Agua Rica had an impact of 1.8 million ounces.
Measured and Indicated Gold Mineral Resources reported net positive revisions of 4.4 million ounces primarily driven by 0.6 million ounces at Peñasquito, 0.5 million ounces at Tanami, 0.5 million ounces at CC&V, 0.5 million ounces at Musselwhite and 0.4 million ounces at Ahafo South underground. Additionally NGM added 1.4 million attributable ounces, primarily at
Inferred Gold Mineral Resources added through exploration programs were 2.6 million ounces and included notable additions before revisions of 0.4 million ounces at Cerro Negro, 0.4 million ounces at Ahafo South underground, 0.4 million ounces at
Inferred Gold Mineral Resources reported unfavorable net revisions of 1.8 million ounces, primarily driven by negative revisions of 0.3 million ounces at Ahafo South underground, 0.2 million ounces at
Newmont’s Measured and Indicated Gold Mineral Resource grade increased slightly to 0.67 grams per tonne compared to 0.66 grams per tonne in the prior year. Inferred Gold Mineral Resource grade of 0.70 grams per tonne increased slightly compared to 0.69 grams per tonne in the prior year.
OTHER METALS
In 2022, copper reserves increased slightly to 15.7 billion pounds from 15.1 billion pounds in the prior year, primarily due to increased equity at Yanacocha. Measure and Indicated copper resources increased slightly to 17.9 billion pounds from 17.8 billion pounds, primarily due to increased equity at Conga and Yanacocha. Inferred copper resources remained flat at 8.6 billion pounds as compared to the prior year.
Silver reserves increased to 593 million ounces from 568 million ounces in the prior year, primarily due to increased equity at Yanacocha. Measured and Indicated silver resources also increased to 500 million ounces from 422 million ounces in the prior year, primarily due to increased equity at Yanacocha and Conga. Inferred silver resources decreased to 152 million ounces from 163 million ounces in the prior year, primarily due to the divestiture of Agua Rica and resource conversion at Cerro Negro.
Lead reserves decreased to 2.3 billion pounds from 2.6 billion pounds in the prior year, and zinc reserves also decreased to 5.5 billion pounds from 6.3 billion pounds. These decreases were primarily due to depletion at Peñasquito. Measured and Indicated lead resources increased to 1.6 billion pounds from 1.2 billion pounds, while Inferred lead resources decreased to 440 million pounds from 480 million pounds in the prior year. Measured and Indicated zinc resources increased to 3.7 billion pounds from 2.7 billion pounds and Inferred zinc resources decreased to 1.0 billion pounds from 1.1 billion pounds in the prior year. The increases in Measured and Indicated lead and zinc resources were primarily due to positive revision at Peñasquito. The decreases in Inferred lead and zinc resources were primarily due to negative revisions and conversion at Peñasquito.
EXPLORATION OUTLOOK
Newmont’s attributable exploration expenditure for managed operations is expected to be approximately
Additionally, Newmont’s share of exploration investment for its non-managed joint ventures will total approximately
Geographically, the Company expects to invest approximately 32 percent in
________________________________________________
1
2 Gold Equivalent Ounces (GEOs) are calculated using 2022 Mineral Reserve pricing for Gold (
3 In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to
4 In
GOLD RESERVE SENSITIVITY
A
KEY RESERVE AND RESOURCE ASSUMPTIONS |
|||||||
|
At |
||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|||
Gold Reserves ($/oz) |
$ |
1,400 |
$ |
1,200 |
|||
Gold Resources ($/oz) |
$ |
1,600 |
$ |
1,400 |
|||
Copper Reserves ($/lb) |
$ |
3.50 |
$ |
2.75 |
|||
Copper Resources ($/lb) |
$ |
4.00 |
$ |
3.25 |
|||
Silver Reserves ($/oz) |
$ |
20.00 |
$ |
20.00 |
|||
Silver Resources ($/oz) |
$ |
23.00 |
$ |
23.00 |
|||
Lead Reserves ($/lb) |
$ |
1.00 |
$ |
0.90 |
|||
Lead Resources ($/lb) |
$ |
1.20 |
$ |
1.10 |
|||
Zinc Reserves ($/lb) |
$ |
1.20 |
$ |
1.15 |
|||
Zinc Resources ($/lb) |
$ |
1.45 |
$ |
1.40 |
|||
Australian Dollar (A$:US$) |
$ |
0.75 |
$ |
0.75 |
|||
Canadian Dollar (C$:US$) |
$ |
0.80 |
$ |
0.77 |
|||
West Texas Intermediate ($/bbl) |
$ |
85 |
$ |
60 |
For additional details on Newmont’s reported gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc and molybdenum Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, please refer to the tables at the end of this release.
RESERVE AND RESOURCE TABLES
Proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and metallurgical testing from which we determined economic feasibility. The reference point for mineral reserves is the point of delivery to the process plant. Metal price assumptions, adjusted for our exchange rate assumption, are based on considering such factors as market forecasts, industry consensus and management estimates. The price sensitivity of reserves depends upon several factors including grade, metallurgical recovery, operating cost, waste-to-ore ratio and ore type. Metallurgical recovery rates vary depending on the metallurgical properties of each deposit and the production process used. The reserve tables below list the average metallurgical recovery rate for each deposit, which takes into account the relevant processing methods. The cut-off grade, or lowest grade of mineralization considered economic to process, varies between deposits depending upon prevailing economic conditions, mineability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the ore to gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc or molybdenum extraction and type of milling or leaching facilities available. Reserve estimates may have non-material differences in comparison to our joint venture partners due to differences in classification and rounding methodology.
The proven and probable reserve figures presented herein are estimates based on information available at the time of calculation. No assurance can be given that the indicated levels of recovery of gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc and molybdenum will be realized. Ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper, lead, zinc or molybdenum included in the proven and probable reserves are those contained prior to losses during metallurgical treatment. Reserve estimates may require revision based on actual production. Market fluctuations in the price of gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc and molybdenum, as well as increased production costs or reduced metallurgical recovery rates, could render certain proven and probable reserves containing higher cost reserves uneconomic to exploit and might result in a reduction of reserves.
The measured, indicated, and inferred resource figures presented herein are estimates based on information available at the time of calculation and are exclusive of reserves. A “mineral resource” is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade, or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. The reference point for mineral resources is in situ. Mineral resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into inferred, indicated and measured categories. Ounces of gold and silver or pounds of copper, zinc, lead, and molybdenum included in the measured, indicated and inferred resources are those contained prior to losses during metallurgical treatment. The terms "measured resource," "indicated resource," and "inferred resource" mean that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of geological evidence and sampling that is considered to be comprehensive, adequate, or limited, respectively. Market fluctuations in the price of gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead and molybdenum, as well as increased production costs or reduced metallurgical recovery rates, could change future estimates of resources.
We publish reserves annually, and will recalculate reserves at
Please refer to the reserves and resources cautionary statement at the end of the release.
Gold Reserves (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
|
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CC&V Open Pits |
|
100 |
% |
|
49,300 |
0.39 |
620 |
|
12,000 |
0.31 |
120 |
|
61,400 |
0.37 |
740 |
|
57 |
% |
86,100 |
0.43 |
1,180 |
CC&V Leach Pads (4)(5) |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
32,600 |
0.78 |
820 |
|
32,600 |
0.78 |
820 |
|
56 |
% |
31,200 |
0.81 |
810 |
Total CC&V, |
|
|
|
49,300 |
0.39 |
620 |
|
44,600 |
0.66 |
940 |
|
94,000 |
0.52 |
1,560 |
|
56 |
% |
117,300 |
0.53 |
1,990 |
|
Musselwhite, |
|
100 |
% |
|
3,400 |
5.48 |
590 |
|
7,000 |
5.89 |
1,320 |
|
10,400 |
5.76 |
1,920 |
|
96 |
% |
9,500 |
5.77 |
1,770 |
Porcupine Underground (7) |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,800 |
8.50 |
500 |
|
700 |
8.47 |
190 |
|
2,500 |
8.49 |
690 |
|
92 |
% |
3,200 |
7.46 |
770 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
2,600 |
1.60 |
130 |
|
31,900 |
1.44 |
1,480 |
|
34,500 |
1.46 |
1,610 |
|
93 |
% |
39,600 |
1.44 |
1,830 |
Total |
|
|
|
4,400 |
4.44 |
630 |
|
32,600 |
1.59 |
1,670 |
|
37,000 |
1.93 |
2,300 |
|
93 |
% |
42,800 |
1.89 |
2,600 |
|
Éléonore, |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,900 |
5.11 |
310 |
|
7,400 |
5.25 |
1,260 |
|
9,400 |
5.22 |
1,570 |
|
92 |
% |
11,200 |
5.05 |
1,820 |
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
104,500 |
0.58 |
1,960 |
|
212,000 |
0.51 |
3,450 |
|
316,500 |
0.53 |
5,410 |
|
69 |
% |
362,000 |
0.54 |
6,330 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
163,500 |
0.78 |
4,110 |
|
303,700 |
0.89 |
8,640 |
|
467,200 |
0.85 |
12,750 |
|
79 |
% |
542,800 |
0.83 |
14,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Yanacocha Open Pits (11) |
|
100 |
% |
|
27,500 |
0.71 |
630 |
|
119,000 |
0.72 |
2,750 |
|
146,500 |
0.72 |
3,380 |
|
57 |
% |
84,700 |
0.68 |
1,840 |
Yanacocha Underground (12) |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
12,300 |
6.06 |
2,400 |
|
12,300 |
6.06 |
2,400 |
|
97 |
% |
7,000 |
6.20 |
1,390 |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
27,500 |
0.71 |
630 |
|
131,300 |
1.22 |
5,140 |
|
158,800 |
1.13 |
5,780 |
|
73 |
% |
91,700 |
1.10 |
3,230 |
|
Merian, Suriname (14) |
|
75 |
% |
|
31,000 |
1.16 |
1,150 |
|
73,800 |
1.16 |
2,750 |
|
104,800 |
1.16 |
3,900 |
|
93 |
% |
101,600 |
1.22 |
4,000 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
1,600 |
9.46 |
500 |
|
7,800 |
10.13 |
2,530 |
|
9,400 |
10.02 |
3,030 |
|
95 |
% |
9,000 |
8.89 |
2,560 |
Pueblo Viejo Open Pits |
|
40 |
% |
|
23,500 |
2.29 |
1,730 |
|
55,000 |
2.15 |
3,800 |
|
78,500 |
2.19 |
5,530 |
|
90 |
% |
13,200 |
2.28 |
970 |
Pueblo Viejo Stockpiles (16) |
|
40 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
38,200 |
2.17 |
2,670 |
|
38,200 |
2.17 |
2,670 |
|
90 |
% |
37,400 |
2.20 |
2,640 |
Total |
|
|
|
23,500 |
2.29 |
1,730 |
|
93,100 |
2.16 |
6,470 |
|
116,600 |
2.19 |
8,200 |
|
90 |
% |
50,600 |
2.22 |
3,610 |
|
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
341,100 |
0.47 |
5,110 |
|
341,100 |
0.47 |
5,110 |
|
66 |
% |
341,100 |
0.47 |
5,110 |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
598,800 |
0.60 |
11,620 |
|
598,800 |
0.60 |
11,620 |
|
74 |
% |
598,800 |
0.60 |
11,620 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
83,700 |
1.49 |
4,010 |
|
1,245,800 |
0.84 |
33,630 |
|
1,329,500 |
0.88 |
37,640 |
|
80 |
% |
1,192,800 |
0.79 |
30,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
100 |
% |
|
237,400 |
0.68 |
5,190 |
|
209,300 |
0.64 |
4,300 |
|
446,700 |
0.66 |
9,490 |
|
85 |
% |
476,500 |
0.68 |
10,440 |
Boddington Stockpiles (16) |
|
100 |
% |
|
2,000 |
0.71 |
50 |
|
76,200 |
0.43 |
1,040 |
|
78,300 |
0.43 |
1,090 |
|
80 |
% |
81,800 |
0.44 |
1,150 |
Total Boddington, |
|
|
|
239,400 |
0.68 |
5,240 |
|
285,500 |
0.58 |
5,350 |
|
524,900 |
0.63 |
10,580 |
|
84 |
% |
558,300 |
0.65 |
11,590 |
|
Tanami, |
|
100 |
% |
|
11,300 |
5.05 |
1,840 |
|
21,600 |
5.49 |
3,820 |
|
33,000 |
5.34 |
5,660 |
|
98 |
% |
34,800 |
5.15 |
5,780 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
250,800 |
0.88 |
7,080 |
|
307,100 |
0.93 |
9,160 |
|
557,900 |
0.91 |
16,240 |
|
89 |
% |
593,100 |
0.91 |
17,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ahafo South Open Pits (23) |
|
100 |
% |
|
9,000 |
2.42 |
700 |
|
38,600 |
1.67 |
2,070 |
|
47,600 |
1.81 |
2,770 |
|
90 |
% |
51,500 |
1.83 |
3,030 |
Ahafo South Underground (24) |
|
100 |
% |
|
9,300 |
3.68 |
1,100 |
|
13,300 |
2.62 |
1,130 |
|
22,600 |
3.06 |
2,230 |
|
94 |
% |
22,100 |
3.14 |
2,240 |
Ahafo South Stockpiles (16) |
|
100 |
% |
|
22,100 |
0.91 |
640 |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
22,100 |
0.91 |
640 |
|
90 |
% |
28,300 |
0.92 |
830 |
Total Ahafo South, |
|
|
|
40,400 |
1.89 |
2,450 |
|
51,900 |
1.92 |
3,200 |
|
92,300 |
1.90 |
5,650 |
|
92 |
% |
101,900 |
1.86 |
6,100 |
|
Ahafo North, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
50,100 |
2.37 |
3,820 |
|
50,100 |
2.37 |
3,820 |
|
91 |
% |
46,300 |
2.40 |
3,570 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
14,300 |
1.56 |
720 |
|
8,000 |
1.82 |
470 |
|
22,300 |
1.66 |
1,190 |
|
91 |
% |
26,700 |
1.72 |
1,470 |
Akyem Stockpiles (16) |
|
100 |
% |
|
11,900 |
0.71 |
270 |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
11,900 |
0.71 |
270 |
|
92 |
% |
13,900 |
0.78 |
350 |
Total Akyem, |
|
|
|
26,200 |
1.18 |
990 |
|
8,000 |
1.82 |
470 |
|
34,200 |
1.33 |
1,460 |
|
91 |
% |
40,600 |
1.40 |
1,820 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
66,600 |
1.61 |
3,440 |
|
110,100 |
2.12 |
7,490 |
|
176,700 |
1.92 |
10,920 |
|
91 |
% |
188,800 |
1.89 |
11,490 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM Open Pits |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
8,300 |
1.73 |
460 |
|
151,100 |
0.96 |
4,650 |
|
159,400 |
1.00 |
5,110 |
|
76 |
% |
129,500 |
1.26 |
5,250 |
NGM Stockpiles (16) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
10,100 |
2.05 |
670 |
|
15,000 |
2.51 |
1,210 |
|
25,100 |
2.32 |
1,880 |
|
79 |
% |
29,200 |
2.33 |
2,190 |
NGM Underground |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
13,700 |
9.72 |
4,290 |
|
27,500 |
8.26 |
7,320 |
|
41,300 |
8.75 |
11,610 |
|
88 |
% |
41,600 |
8.90 |
11,900 |
Total NGM, Nevada (17)(27) |
|
|
|
32,100 |
5.24 |
5,410 |
|
193,700 |
2.12 |
13,180 |
|
225,800 |
2.56 |
18,590 |
|
84 |
% |
200,300 |
3.00 |
19,340 |
|
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
32,100 |
5.24 |
5,410 |
|
193,700 |
2.12 |
13,180 |
|
225,800 |
2.56 |
18,590 |
|
84 |
% |
200,300 |
3.00 |
19,340 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
596,700 |
1.25 |
24,050 |
|
2,160,400 |
1.04 |
72,100 |
|
2,757,100 |
1.09 |
96,140 |
|
83 |
% |
2,717,800 |
1.06 |
92,840 |
(1) |
Gold reserves, at sites in which |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Ounces are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Ounces may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10,000. |
|
(4) |
Cut-off grades utilized in 2022 reserves were as follows: leach material not less than 0.10 gram per tonne. |
|
(5) |
Leach pad material is the material on leach pads at the end of the year from which gold remains to be recovered. In-process reserves are reported separately where ounces exceed 100,000 and are greater than |
|
(6) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 3.10 gram per tonne. |
|
(7) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 5.00 gram per tonne. |
|
(8) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 0.51 gram per tonne. |
|
(9) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 4.00 gram per tonne. |
|
(10) |
Gold cut-off grade varies with level of silver, lead and zinc credits. |
|
(11) |
Gold cut-off grades utilized in 2022 reserves were as follows: oxide leach material not less than 0.12 gram per tonne and refractory mill material not less than 1.26 gram per tonne. |
|
(12) |
Gold cut-off grades utilized in 2022 were as follows: oxide mill material not less than 2.63 gram per tonne and refractory mill material varies with level of copper and silver credits. |
|
(13) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(14) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 0.31 gram per tonne. |
|
(15) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 4.30 gram per tonne. |
|
(16) |
Stockpiles are comprised primarily of material that has been set aside to allow processing of higher grade material in the mills. Stockpiles increase or decrease depending on current mine plans. Stockpile reserves are reported separately where ounces exceed 100,000 and are greater than |
|
(17) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 for ounces and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
|
(18) |
The |
|
(19) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(20) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(21) |
Gold cut-off grade varies with level of copper credits. |
|
(22) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 2.30 gram per tonne. |
|
(23) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 0.60 gram per tonne. |
|
(24) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 1.60 gram per tonne. |
|
(25) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 0.56 gram per tonne. |
|
(26) |
Cut-off grade utilized in 2022 reserves not less than 0.52 gram per tonne. |
|
(27) |
Reserve estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture. |
|
(28) |
Currently included in Corporate and Other in Note 3 of |
Gold Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
|
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CC&V,Colorado |
|
100 |
% |
|
79,700 |
0.38 |
980 |
|
42,300 |
0.32 |
440 |
|
122,000 |
0.36 |
1,420 |
|
32,200 |
0.34 |
350 |
|
59 |
% |
Musselwhite, |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,300 |
3.92 |
170 |
|
2,600 |
3.93 |
330 |
|
3,900 |
3.93 |
490 |
|
3,000 |
4.15 |
410 |
|
95 |
% |
Porcupine Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
300 |
6.69 |
70 |
|
1,000 |
8.64 |
270 |
|
1,300 |
8.15 |
340 |
|
1,800 |
8.08 |
480 |
|
92 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
200 |
0.51 |
— |
|
73,000 |
1.53 |
3,600 |
|
73,200 |
1.53 |
3,600 |
|
66,000 |
1.36 |
2,890 |
|
91 |
% |
Total |
|
|
|
500 |
4.36 |
70 |
|
73,900 |
1.63 |
3,860 |
|
74,500 |
1.64 |
3,940 |
|
67,900 |
1.54 |
3,370 |
|
91 |
% |
|
Éléonore, |
|
100 |
% |
|
400 |
5.05 |
70 |
|
2,100 |
5.10 |
350 |
|
2,500 |
5.09 |
420 |
|
2,600 |
5.45 |
460 |
|
92 |
% |
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
47,400 |
0.25 |
390 |
|
263,500 |
0.26 |
2,190 |
|
311,000 |
0.26 |
2,570 |
|
84,700 |
0.41 |
1,110 |
|
69 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
19,900 |
0.37 |
240 |
|
19,900 |
0.37 |
240 |
|
1,600 |
0.21 |
10 |
|
50 |
% |
Coffee, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
53,900 |
1.23 |
2,140 |
|
53,900 |
1.23 |
2,140 |
|
7,200 |
1.01 |
230 |
|
80 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
212,800 |
0.29 |
2,010 |
|
385,600 |
0.22 |
2,710 |
|
598,400 |
0.25 |
4,720 |
|
118,900 |
0.19 |
720 |
|
75 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
342,300 |
0.34 |
3,700 |
|
843,900 |
0.45 |
12,230 |
|
1,186,200 |
0.42 |
15,930 |
|
318,100 |
0.65 |
6,650 |
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conga, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
693,800 |
0.65 |
14,590 |
|
693,800 |
0.65 |
14,590 |
|
230,500 |
0.39 |
2,880 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
13,500 |
0.38 |
170 |
|
114,900 |
0.42 |
1,570 |
|
128,400 |
0.42 |
1,730 |
|
189,700 |
0.79 |
4,830 |
|
66 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
4.07 |
70 |
|
6,200 |
4.70 |
940 |
|
6,700 |
4.65 |
1,010 |
|
3,400 |
4.99 |
550 |
|
97 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
14,100 |
0.52 |
240 |
|
121,100 |
0.64 |
2,510 |
|
135,100 |
0.63 |
2,740 |
|
193,100 |
0.87 |
5,380 |
|
72 |
% |
|
Merian, Suriname |
|
75 |
% |
|
5,600 |
0.99 |
180 |
|
35,300 |
1.26 |
1,430 |
|
40,900 |
1.22 |
1,610 |
|
37,000 |
0.86 |
1,020 |
|
89 |
% |
Cerro Negro Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
200 |
6.11 |
30 |
|
1,500 |
7.33 |
360 |
|
1,700 |
7.22 |
390 |
|
5,700 |
6.19 |
1,140 |
|
95 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
1,200 |
3.28 |
130 |
|
1,200 |
3.15 |
120 |
|
2,400 |
3.22 |
250 |
|
300 |
2.46 |
20 |
|
90 |
% |
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,400 |
3.60 |
160 |
|
2,700 |
5.49 |
480 |
|
4,100 |
4.86 |
630 |
|
6,000 |
6.00 |
1,160 |
|
94 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
7,300 |
1.43 |
340 |
|
33,200 |
1.51 |
1,610 |
|
40,600 |
1.49 |
1,950 |
|
3,000 |
1.77 |
170 |
|
88 |
% |
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
4,800 |
0.47 |
70 |
|
118,300 |
0.59 |
2,260 |
|
123,100 |
0.59 |
2,330 |
|
239,800 |
0.40 |
3,050 |
|
68 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
77,200 |
0.61 |
1,510 |
|
596,900 |
0.49 |
9,320 |
|
674,200 |
0.50 |
10,820 |
|
369,600 |
0.37 |
4,360 |
|
76 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
110,400 |
0.70 |
2,490 |
|
1,601,400 |
0.63 |
32,180 |
|
1,711,700 |
0.63 |
34,670 |
|
1,079,200 |
0.52 |
18,030 |
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Boddington, |
|
100 |
% |
|
92,800 |
0.55 |
1,630 |
|
167,400 |
0.54 |
2,900 |
|
260,200 |
0.54 |
4,530 |
|
2,800 |
0.51 |
50 |
|
83 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
9,400 |
1.67 |
500 |
|
23,800 |
1.47 |
1,120 |
|
33,200 |
1.53 |
1,630 |
|
4,200 |
1.13 |
150 |
|
90 |
% |
Tanami Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,700 |
3.26 |
180 |
|
5,400 |
4.29 |
750 |
|
7,100 |
4.04 |
920 |
|
8,800 |
5.19 |
1,460 |
|
97 |
% |
Total Tanami, |
|
100 |
% |
|
11,000 |
1.91 |
680 |
|
29,200 |
1.99 |
1,870 |
|
40,200 |
1.97 |
2,550 |
|
13,000 |
3.88 |
1,620 |
|
94 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
103,800 |
0.69 |
2,310 |
|
196,600 |
0.76 |
4,770 |
|
300,400 |
0.73 |
7,080 |
|
15,800 |
3.28 |
1,660 |
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ahafo South |
|
100 |
% |
|
200 |
0.56 |
— |
|
20,000 |
1.09 |
700 |
|
20,200 |
1.09 |
710 |
|
10,200 |
1.29 |
420 |
|
86 |
% |
Ahafo Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
24,700 |
3.53 |
2,810 |
|
24,700 |
3.53 |
2,810 |
|
11,000 |
3.44 |
1,220 |
|
92 |
% |
Total Ahafo South, |
|
|
|
200 |
0.56 |
— |
|
44,700 |
2.44 |
3,510 |
|
44,900 |
2.43 |
3,510 |
|
21,200 |
2.41 |
1,640 |
|
91 |
% |
|
Ahafo North Open Pits, |
|
100 |
% |
|
2,900 |
1.28 |
120 |
|
12,700 |
1.94 |
790 |
|
15,700 |
1.81 |
910 |
|
10,000 |
1.50 |
490 |
|
92 |
% |
Akyem Open Pits |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,000 |
0.70 |
20 |
|
700 |
0.67 |
20 |
|
1,700 |
0.69 |
40 |
|
1,800 |
1.18 |
70 |
|
92 |
% |
Akyem Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
8,300 |
3.92 |
1,050 |
|
8,300 |
3.92 |
1,050 |
|
5,300 |
3.27 |
560 |
|
92 |
% |
Total Akyem, |
|
|
|
1,000 |
0.70 |
20 |
|
9,000 |
3.68 |
1,060 |
|
10,000 |
3.38 |
1,090 |
|
7,100 |
2.74 |
620 |
|
92 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
4,100 |
1.10 |
150 |
|
66,400 |
2.51 |
5,360 |
|
70,500 |
2.43 |
5,510 |
|
38,300 |
2.23 |
2,750 |
|
91 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM Open Pits and Stockpiles |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
23,200 |
1.89 |
1,410 |
|
175,200 |
0.99 |
5,600 |
|
198,400 |
1.10 |
7,000 |
|
129,900 |
0.69 |
2,880 |
|
73 |
% |
NGM Underground |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
9,800 |
6.48 |
2,040 |
|
16,600 |
5.84 |
3,110 |
|
26,400 |
6.08 |
5,150 |
|
19,500 |
6.63 |
4,150 |
|
86 |
% |
Total NGM, Nevada (9) |
|
|
|
33,000 |
3.25 |
3,450 |
|
191,700 |
1.41 |
8,700 |
|
224,800 |
1.68 |
12,160 |
|
149,300 |
1.47 |
7,040 |
|
79 |
% |
|
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
33,000 |
3.25 |
3,450 |
|
191,700 |
1.41 |
8,700 |
|
224,800 |
1.68 |
12,160 |
|
149,300 |
1.47 |
7,040 |
|
79 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
593,600 |
0.63 |
12,080 |
|
2,900,000 |
0.68 |
63,250 |
|
3,493,600 |
0.67 |
75,330 |
|
1,600,700 |
0.70 |
36,130 |
|
79 |
% |
Gold Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
|
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CC&V,Colorado |
|
100 |
% |
|
54,000 |
0.41 |
700 |
|
24,100 |
0.38 |
300 |
|
78,100 |
0.40 |
1,000 |
|
12,700 |
0.39 |
160 |
|
62 |
% |
Musselwhite, |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,400 |
3.58 |
160 |
|
2,300 |
3.55 |
270 |
|
3,700 |
3.56 |
430 |
|
3,200 |
4.22 |
440 |
|
96 |
% |
Porcupine Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
300 |
5.25 |
50 |
|
900 |
6.12 |
180 |
|
1,200 |
5.92 |
230 |
|
1,100 |
6.43 |
220 |
|
92 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.49 |
10 |
|
83,200 |
1.40 |
3,750 |
|
83,700 |
1.40 |
3,760 |
|
77,000 |
1.24 |
3,070 |
|
92 |
% |
Total |
|
|
|
800 |
2.33 |
60 |
|
84,100 |
1.45 |
3,930 |
|
84,900 |
1.46 |
3,990 |
|
78,100 |
1.31 |
3,290 |
|
92 |
% |
|
Éléonore, |
|
100 |
% |
|
300 |
5.72 |
50 |
|
1,700 |
4.73 |
260 |
|
2,000 |
4.86 |
310 |
|
3,800 |
5.28 |
650 |
|
91 |
% |
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
31,400 |
0.27 |
280 |
|
176,600 |
0.27 |
1,500 |
|
208,000 |
0.27 |
1,780 |
|
89,800 |
0.40 |
1,160 |
|
69 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
21,000 |
0.37 |
250 |
|
21,000 |
0.37 |
250 |
|
1,600 |
0.21 |
10 |
|
50 |
% |
Coffee, |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,000 |
— |
60 |
|
54,500 |
1.19 |
2,080 |
|
55,500 |
1.20 |
2,140 |
|
6,800 |
1.07 |
230 |
|
80 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
128,400 |
0.36 |
1,500 |
|
423,400 |
0.23 |
3,130 |
|
551,800 |
0.26 |
4,630 |
|
99,100 |
0.21 |
670 |
|
73 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
217,300 |
0.40 |
2,810 |
|
787,700 |
0.46 |
11,720 |
|
1,005,000 |
0.45 |
14,530 |
|
295,100 |
0.70 |
6,610 |
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conga, |
|
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
356,300 |
0.65 |
7,490 |
|
356,300 |
0.65 |
7,490 |
|
118,400 |
0.39 |
1,480 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
51.35 |
% |
|
5,500 |
0.42 |
70 |
|
52,400 |
0.46 |
770 |
|
57,900 |
0.46 |
840 |
|
96,700 |
0.80 |
2,470 |
|
66 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
|
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
6.29 |
10 |
|
1,800 |
6.28 |
370 |
|
1,800 |
6.28 |
380 |
|
1,900 |
4.93 |
300 |
|
97 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
5,500 |
0.45 |
80 |
|
54,200 |
0.65 |
1,140 |
|
59,700 |
0.64 |
1,220 |
|
98,600 |
0.87 |
2,770 |
|
70 |
% |
|
Merian, Suriname |
|
75 |
% |
|
4,500 |
0.94 |
140 |
|
32,600 |
1.14 |
1,200 |
|
37,100 |
1.12 |
1,340 |
|
28,500 |
1.01 |
920 |
|
88 |
% |
Cerro Negro Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
5.48 |
20 |
|
1,300 |
7.38 |
300 |
|
1,400 |
7.25 |
320 |
|
7,500 |
6.85 |
1,650 |
|
93 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
900 |
4.40 |
120 |
|
1,000 |
4.09 |
130 |
|
1,900 |
4.24 |
250 |
|
100 |
3.49 |
10 |
|
90 |
% |
Total |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,000 |
4.51 |
140 |
|
2,300 |
5.96 |
430 |
|
3,300 |
5.52 |
570 |
|
7,600 |
6.82 |
1,660 |
|
93 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
37,300 |
2.01 |
2,410 |
|
57,100 |
1.89 |
3,470 |
|
94,400 |
1.94 |
5,880 |
|
25,400 |
1.72 |
1,410 |
|
89 |
% |
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
4,800 |
0.47 |
70 |
|
118,300 |
0.59 |
2,260 |
|
123,100 |
0.59 |
2,330 |
|
239,800 |
0.40 |
3,050 |
|
68 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
77,200 |
0.61 |
1,510 |
|
596,900 |
0.49 |
9,320 |
|
674,100 |
0.50 |
10,830 |
|
369,600 |
0.37 |
4,360 |
|
76 |
% |
Agua Rica, |
|
18.75 |
% |
|
141,900 |
0.25 |
1,150 |
|
137,400 |
0.15 |
650 |
|
279,300 |
0.20 |
1,800 |
|
139,900 |
0.09 |
410 |
|
35 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
272,200 |
0.63 |
5,500 |
|
1,355,100 |
0.60 |
25,960 |
|
1,627,300 |
0.60 |
31,460 |
|
1,027,800 |
0.49 |
16,060 |
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Boddington, |
|
100 |
% |
|
96,200 |
0.53 |
1,640 |
|
180,500 |
0.54 |
3,110 |
|
276,700 |
0.53 |
4,750 |
|
3,300 |
0.50 |
50 |
|
84 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
10,200 |
1.88 |
620 |
|
16,600 |
1.69 |
900 |
|
26,800 |
1.76 |
1,520 |
|
2,900 |
1.62 |
150 |
|
90 |
% |
Tanami Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
1,400 |
3.11 |
140 |
|
4,900 |
4.25 |
660 |
|
6,300 |
4.00 |
800 |
|
9,600 |
5.39 |
1,670 |
|
97 |
% |
Total Tanami, |
|
100 |
% |
|
11,600 |
2.03 |
760 |
|
21,500 |
2.27 |
1,560 |
|
33,100 |
2.18 |
2,320 |
|
12,500 |
4.53 |
1,820 |
|
97 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
107,800 |
0.69 |
2,400 |
|
202,000 |
0.72 |
4,670 |
|
309,800 |
0.71 |
7,070 |
|
15,800 |
3.68 |
1,870 |
|
89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ahafo South |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.56 |
10 |
|
30,000 |
1.16 |
1,120 |
|
30,500 |
1.15 |
1,130 |
|
13,500 |
1.33 |
570 |
|
93 |
% |
Ahafo Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
16,600 |
3.99 |
2,120 |
|
16,600 |
3.99 |
2,120 |
|
10,800 |
3.34 |
1,160 |
|
90 |
% |
Total Ahafo South, |
|
|
|
500 |
0.56 |
10 |
|
46,600 |
2.16 |
3,240 |
|
47,100 |
2.15 |
3,250 |
|
24,300 |
2.21 |
1,730 |
|
91 |
% |
|
Ahafo North Open Pits, |
|
100 |
% |
|
2,800 |
1.21 |
100 |
|
10,400 |
1.90 |
630 |
|
13,200 |
1.76 |
730 |
|
9,800 |
1.60 |
500 |
|
92 |
% |
Akyem Open Pits |
|
100 |
% |
|
900 |
0.57 |
20 |
|
1,100 |
0.67 |
20 |
|
2,000 |
0.62 |
40 |
|
1,300 |
1.43 |
60 |
|
91 |
% |
Akyem Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
6,800 |
3.69 |
810 |
|
6,800 |
3.69 |
810 |
|
5,400 |
2.97 |
520 |
|
93 |
% |
Total Akyem, |
|
|
|
900 |
0.57 |
20 |
|
7,900 |
3.27 |
830 |
|
8,800 |
3.00 |
850 |
|
6,700 |
2.69 |
580 |
|
92 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
4,200 |
1.01 |
130 |
|
64,900 |
2.26 |
4,700 |
|
69,100 |
2.18 |
4,830 |
|
40,800 |
2.15 |
2,810 |
|
91 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM Open Pits and Stockpiles |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
18,300 |
1.89 |
1,110 |
|
181,100 |
0.90 |
5,230 |
|
199,400 |
0.99 |
6,340 |
|
101,100 |
0.82 |
2,670 |
|
67 |
% |
NGM Underground |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
8,500 |
5.89 |
1,610 |
|
11,900 |
6.35 |
2,430 |
|
20,400 |
6.16 |
4,040 |
|
15,300 |
6.48 |
3,180 |
|
86 |
% |
Total NGM, Nevada (9)(11) |
|
|
|
26,800 |
3.17 |
2,720 |
|
193,000 |
1.23 |
7,660 |
|
219,800 |
1.47 |
10,380 |
|
116,400 |
1.56 |
5,850 |
|
76 |
% |
|
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
26,800 |
3.17 |
2,720 |
|
193,000 |
1.23 |
7,660 |
|
219,800 |
1.47 |
10,380 |
|
116,400 |
1.56 |
5,850 |
|
76 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
628,300 |
0.67 |
13,560 |
|
2,602,700 |
0.65 |
54,710 |
|
3,231,000 |
0.66 |
68,270 |
|
1,495,900 |
0.69 |
33,200 |
|
76 |
% |
(1) |
Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. Amounts presented may not recalculate in total due to rounding. |
|
(2) |
Resources, at sites in which |
|
(3) |
Ounces are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Ounces may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10,000. |
|
(4) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Teck Resources, the |
|
(5) |
Resource estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of |
|
(6) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(7) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(8) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Yamana, the operator of the Agua Rica joint venture. In |
|
(9) |
Resource estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture |
|
(10) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(11) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 for ounces and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
Copper Reserves (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
|
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Yanacocha Open Pits and Underground, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
111,100 |
0.63 |
% |
1,530 |
|
111,100 |
0.63 |
% |
1,530 |
|
83 |
% |
|
57,700 |
0.61 |
% |
780 |
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
1,118,000 |
0.40 |
% |
9,800 |
|
1,118,000 |
0.40 |
% |
9,800 |
|
88 |
% |
|
1,118,000 |
0.40 |
% |
9,800 |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
598,800 |
0.22 |
% |
2,890 |
|
598,800 |
0.22 |
% |
2,890 |
|
87 |
% |
|
598,800 |
0.22 |
% |
2,890 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
1,827,900 |
0.35 |
% |
14,220 |
|
1,827,900 |
0.35 |
% |
14,220 |
|
87 |
% |
|
1,774,500 |
0.34 |
% |
13,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
100 |
% |
|
237,400 |
0.10 |
% |
510 |
|
209,300 |
0.11 |
% |
500 |
|
446,700 |
0.10 |
% |
1,010 |
|
82 |
% |
|
476,500 |
0.11 |
% |
1,130 |
Boddington Stockpiles, |
|
100 |
% |
|
2,000 |
0.13 |
% |
10 |
|
76,200 |
0.09 |
% |
150 |
|
78,300 |
0.09 |
% |
150 |
|
74 |
% |
|
81,700 |
0.09 |
% |
160 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
239,400 |
0.10 |
% |
520 |
|
285,500 |
0.10 |
% |
640 |
|
524,900 |
0.10 |
% |
1,160 |
|
81 |
% |
|
558,200 |
0.11 |
% |
1,290 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NGM, Nevada (10)(12) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
7,000 |
0.16 |
% |
30 |
|
81,700 |
0.16 |
% |
300 |
|
88,700 |
0.16 |
% |
320 |
|
65 |
% |
|
87,100 |
0.17 |
% |
330 |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
7,000 |
0.16 |
% |
30 |
|
81,700 |
0.16 |
% |
300 |
|
88,700 |
0.16 |
% |
320 |
|
65 |
% |
|
87,100 |
0.17 |
% |
330 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
246,400 |
0.10 |
% |
540 |
|
2,195,200 |
0.31 |
% |
15,160 |
|
2,441,500 |
0.29 |
% |
15,710 |
|
86 |
% |
|
2,419,800 |
0.28 |
% |
15,090 |
(1) |
Copper reserves, at sites in which |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Reserve estimates relate to the undeveloped Yanacocha Sulfides project. Copper cut-off grade varies with level of gold and silver credits. |
|
(5) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(6) |
Currently included in Corporate and Other in Note 3 of |
|
(7) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(8) |
Copper cut-off grade varies with level of gold credits. |
|
(9) |
Stockpiles are comprised primarily of material that has been set aside to allow processing of higher grade material in the mills. Stockpiles increase or decrease depending on current mine plans. Stockpiles are reported separately where pounds exceed 100 million and are greater than |
|
(10) |
Reserve estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture. |
|
(11) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(12) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10 million for pounds and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
Copper Resources (1)(2) - |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
Indicated Resource |
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
50 |
% |
|
212,800 |
0.44 |
% |
2,060 |
385,600 |
0.47 |
% |
4,020 |
598,400 |
0.46 |
% |
6,080 |
118,900 |
0.26 |
% |
690 |
|
93 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
212,800 |
0.44 |
% |
2,060 |
385,600 |
0.47 |
% |
4,020 |
598,400 |
0.46 |
% |
6,080 |
118,900 |
0.26 |
% |
690 |
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Conga, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
693,800 |
0.26 |
% |
3,970 |
693,800 |
0.26 |
% |
3,970 |
230,500 |
0.19 |
% |
950 |
|
84 |
% |
Yanacocha Open Pits |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
94,600 |
0.39 |
% |
810 |
94,600 |
0.39 |
% |
810 |
36,400 |
0.39 |
% |
310 |
|
81 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.18 |
% |
— |
6,200 |
0.12 |
% |
20 |
6,700 |
0.12 |
% |
20 |
3,400 |
0.13 |
% |
10 |
|
97 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
500 |
0.18 |
% |
— |
100,800 |
0.37 |
% |
830 |
101,300 |
0.37 |
% |
830 |
39,700 |
0.37 |
% |
320 |
|
81 |
% |
|
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
164,300 |
0.19 |
% |
700 |
349,900 |
0.34 |
% |
2,650 |
514,100 |
0.30 |
% |
3,360 |
602,200 |
0.39 |
% |
5,170 |
|
89 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
57,600 |
0.24 |
% |
310 |
551,300 |
0.19 |
% |
2,340 |
608,900 |
0.20 |
% |
2,640 |
361,800 |
0.18 |
% |
1,450 |
|
90 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
222,400 |
0.21 |
% |
1,010 |
1,695,700 |
0.26 |
% |
9,790 |
1,918,100 |
0.26 |
% |
10,800 |
1,234,200 |
0.29 |
% |
7,890 |
|
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Boddington, |
|
100 |
% |
|
92,800 |
0.11 |
% |
230 |
167,400 |
0.11 |
% |
420 |
260,200 |
0.11 |
% |
650 |
2,800 |
0.08 |
% |
10 |
|
82 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
92,800 |
0.11 |
% |
230 |
167,400 |
0.11 |
% |
420 |
260,200 |
0.11 |
% |
650 |
2,800 |
0.08 |
% |
10 |
|
82 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NGM, Nevada (8) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
2,600 |
0.14 |
% |
10 |
116,900 |
0.14 |
% |
350 |
119,500 |
0.14 |
% |
360 |
19,900 |
0.13 |
% |
60 |
|
65 |
% |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
2,600 |
0.14 |
% |
10 |
116,900 |
0.14 |
% |
350 |
119,500 |
0.14 |
% |
360 |
19,900 |
0.13 |
% |
60 |
|
65 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
530,600 |
0.28 |
% |
3,310 |
2,365,500 |
0.28 |
% |
14,580 |
2,896,100 |
0.28 |
% |
17,890 |
1,375,800 |
0.28 |
% |
8,640 |
|
88 |
% |
Copper Resources at |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Measured Resources |
|
Indicated Resources |
|
Measured and Indicated Resources |
|
Inferred Resources |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Cu%) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
50 |
% |
|
128,400 |
0.72 |
% |
2,030 |
|
423,400 |
0.39 |
% |
3,630 |
|
551,800 |
0.47 |
% |
5,660 |
|
99,100 |
0.27 |
% |
600 |
|
91 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
128,400 |
0.72 |
% |
2,030 |
|
423,400 |
0.39 |
% |
3,630 |
|
551,800 |
0.47 |
% |
5,660 |
|
99,100 |
0.27 |
% |
600 |
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Conga, |
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
356,300 |
0.26 |
% |
2,040 |
|
356,300 |
0.26 |
% |
2,040 |
|
118,400 |
0.19 |
% |
490 |
|
84 |
% |
Yanacocha Open Pits |
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
48,600 |
0.39 |
% |
420 |
|
48,600 |
0.39 |
% |
420 |
|
18,700 |
0.39 |
% |
160 |
|
80 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
1,800 |
0.09 |
% |
— |
|
1,800 |
0.09 |
% |
— |
|
1,900 |
0.13 |
% |
10 |
|
96 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
50,400 |
0.38 |
% |
420 |
|
50,400 |
0.38 |
% |
420 |
|
20,600 |
0.37 |
% |
170 |
|
81 |
% |
|
NuevaUnión, |
50 |
% |
|
164,300 |
0.19 |
% |
700 |
|
349,900 |
0.34 |
% |
2,650 |
|
514,200 |
0.30 |
% |
3,350 |
|
602,100 |
0.39 |
% |
5,150 |
|
89 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
50 |
% |
|
57,600 |
0.24 |
% |
310 |
|
551,200 |
0.19 |
% |
2,340 |
|
608,800 |
0.20 |
% |
2,650 |
|
361,700 |
0.18 |
% |
1,450 |
|
90 |
% |
Agua Rica, |
18.75 |
% |
|
141,900 |
0.51 |
% |
1,580 |
|
137,400 |
0.36 |
% |
1,100 |
|
279,300 |
0.43 |
% |
2,680 |
|
139,900 |
0.23 |
% |
710 |
|
86 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
363,800 |
0.32 |
% |
2,590 |
|
1,445,200 |
0.27 |
% |
8,550 |
|
1,809,000 |
0.28 |
% |
11,140 |
|
1,242,700 |
0.29 |
% |
7,970 |
|
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Boddington, |
100 |
% |
|
96,200 |
0.11 |
% |
220 |
|
180,500 |
0.11 |
% |
450 |
|
276,700 |
0.11 |
% |
670 |
|
3,300 |
0.09 |
% |
10 |
|
82 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
96,200 |
0.11 |
% |
220 |
|
180,500 |
0.11 |
% |
450 |
|
276,700 |
0.11 |
% |
670 |
|
3,300 |
0.09 |
% |
10 |
|
82 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NGM, Nevada (8)(10) |
38.5 |
% |
|
3,100 |
0.14 |
% |
10 |
|
111,500 |
0.14 |
% |
340 |
|
114,600 |
0.14 |
% |
350 |
|
19,900 |
0.13 |
% |
60 |
|
66 |
% |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
3,100 |
0.14 |
% |
10 |
|
111,500 |
0.14 |
% |
340 |
|
114,600 |
0.14 |
% |
350 |
|
19,900 |
0.13 |
% |
60 |
|
66 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
591,500 |
0.37 |
% |
4,850 |
|
2,160,600 |
0.27 |
% |
12,970 |
|
2,752,100 |
0.29 |
% |
17,820 |
|
1,365,000 |
0.29 |
% |
8,640 |
|
88 |
% |
(1) |
Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. Amounts presented may not recalculate in total due to rounding. |
|
(2) |
Resources, at sites in which |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Teck Resources. |
|
(5) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(6) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(7) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Yamana, the operator of the Agua Rica joint venture. In |
|
(8) |
Resource estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture |
|
(9) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(10) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10 million for pounds and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
Silver Reserves (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
|
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (3) (000) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Peñasquito Open Pits, |
|
100 |
% |
|
103,900 |
38.00 |
126,990 |
|
184,500 |
33.04 |
196,020 |
|
288,500 |
34.82 |
323,000 |
|
86 |
% |
|
326,300 |
34.73 |
364,410 |
Peñasquito Stockpiles, |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
37.88 |
660 |
|
27,500 |
25.33 |
22,390 |
|
28,000 |
25.57 |
23,050 |
|
86 |
% |
|
35,700 |
25.67 |
29,480 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
104,500 |
38.00 |
127,640 |
|
212,000 |
32.04 |
218,410 |
|
316,500 |
34.00 |
346,050 |
|
86 |
% |
|
362,000 |
33.84 |
393,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Yanacocha Open Pits and Underground, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
93,400 |
19.90 |
59,760 |
|
93,400 |
19.90 |
59,760 |
|
54 |
% |
|
50,100 |
18.80 |
30,280 |
Yanacocha Stockpiles and Leach Pads, |
|
100 |
% |
|
2,800 |
31.48 |
2,820 |
|
93,600 |
— |
24,190 |
|
96,400 |
8.71 |
27,010 |
|
13 |
% |
|
48,700 |
8.85 |
13,850 |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
2,800 |
31.48 |
2,820 |
|
187,000 |
13.96 |
83,950 |
|
189,800 |
14.22 |
86,770 |
|
41 |
% |
|
98,800 |
13.85 |
44,130 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
1,600 |
74.72 |
3,940 |
|
7,800 |
62.31 |
15,550 |
|
9,400 |
64.47 |
19,490 |
|
75 |
% |
|
8,900 |
57.51 |
16,550 |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
23,500 |
12.94 |
9,780 |
|
55,000 |
12.84 |
22,680 |
|
78,500 |
12.87 |
32,460 |
|
65 |
% |
|
13,200 |
11.65 |
4,950 |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
38,200 |
15.10 |
18,520 |
|
38,200 |
15.10 |
18,520 |
|
65 |
% |
|
37,400 |
15.49 |
18,630 |
Total Republic (15) |
|
|
|
23,500 |
12.94 |
9,780 |
|
93,100 |
13.76 |
41,200 |
|
116,600 |
13.60 |
50,980 |
|
65 |
% |
|
50,600 |
14.49 |
23,580 |
|
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
1,118,000 |
1.31 |
47,170 |
|
1,118,000 |
1.31 |
47,170 |
|
66 |
% |
|
1,118,000 |
1.31 |
47,170 |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
598,800 |
1.52 |
29,340 |
|
598,800 |
1.52 |
29,340 |
|
74 |
% |
|
598,800 |
1.52 |
29,340 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
27,900 |
18.41 |
16,540 |
|
2,004,700 |
3.37 |
217,210 |
|
2,032,600 |
3.58 |
233,750 |
|
58 |
% |
|
1,875,100 |
2.67 |
160,770 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM, Nevada (13)(15) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
5,300 |
7.46 |
1,280 |
|
60,100 |
6.24 |
12,060 |
|
65,500 |
6.34 |
13,340 |
|
38 |
% |
|
65,200 |
6.43 |
13,480 |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
5,300 |
7.46 |
1,280 |
|
60,100 |
6.24 |
12,060 |
|
65,500 |
6.34 |
13,340 |
|
38 |
% |
|
65,200 |
6.43 |
13,480 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
137,800 |
32.84 |
145,460 |
|
2,276,900 |
6.12 |
447,680 |
|
2,414,600 |
7.64 |
593,140 |
|
74 |
% |
|
2,302,300 |
7.68 |
568,140 |
(1) |
Silver reserves, at sites in which |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Ounces are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Ounces may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10,000. |
|
(4) |
Silver cut-off grade varies with gold, lead and zinc credits. |
|
(5) |
Stockpiles are comprised primarily of material that has been set aside to allow processing of higher grade material in the mills. Stockpiles increase or decrease depending on current mine plans. Stockpile reserves are reported separately where ounces exceed 100,000 and are greater than |
|
(6) |
Silver cut-off grade varies with gold and copper credits. |
|
(7) |
Leach pad material is the material on leach pads at the end of the year from which silver remains to be recovered. In-process reserves are reported separately where ounces exceed 100,000 and are greater than |
|
(8) |
Silver cut-off grade varies with gold credits. |
|
(9) |
The |
|
(10) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(11) |
Currently included in Corporate and Other in Note 3 of |
|
(12) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Reserve estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(13) |
Reserve estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture. |
|
(14) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(15) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 for ounces and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
Silver Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
|
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
47,400 |
23.94 |
36,510 |
|
263,500 |
23.99 |
203,240 |
|
311,000 |
23.98 |
239,740 |
|
84,700 |
27.24 |
74,220 |
|
86 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
19,900 |
13.99 |
8,970 |
|
19,900 |
13.99 |
8,970 |
|
1,600 |
10.98 |
550 |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
212,800 |
4.08 |
27,950 |
|
385,600 |
4.77 |
59,100 |
|
598,400 |
4.52 |
87,040 |
|
118,900 |
2.60 |
9,940 |
|
73 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
260,300 |
7.70 |
64,460 |
|
669,100 |
12.61 |
271,300 |
|
929,300 |
11.24 |
335,750 |
|
205,200 |
12.84 |
84,700 |
|
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conga, |
|
100 |
% |
|
— |
0.00 |
— |
|
693,800 |
2.06 |
45,910 |
|
693,800 |
2.06 |
45,910 |
|
175,000 |
1.13 |
6,330 |
|
70 |
% |
Yanacocha Open Pits |
|
100 |
% |
|
12,500 |
3.30 |
1,330 |
|
108,100 |
11.11 |
38,610 |
|
120,600 |
10.30 |
39,930 |
|
29,600 |
12.52 |
11,920 |
|
41 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.37 |
10 |
|
6,200 |
37.02 |
7,350 |
|
6,700 |
34.23 |
7,350 |
|
3,400 |
40.45 |
4,390 |
|
83 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
13,000 |
3.19 |
1,330 |
|
114,200 |
12.51 |
45,950 |
|
127,200 |
11.56 |
47,290 |
|
33,000 |
15.38 |
16,310 |
|
49 |
% |
|
Cerro Negro Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
200 |
42.43 |
210 |
|
1,500 |
51.31 |
2,490 |
|
1,700 |
50.51 |
2,690 |
|
5,700 |
35.10 |
6,450 |
|
76 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
1,200 |
6.77 |
260 |
|
1,200 |
6.63 |
250 |
|
2,400 |
6.70 |
520 |
|
300 |
6.68 |
70 |
|
60 |
% |
Total |
|
|
|
1,400 |
10.72 |
470 |
|
2,700 |
31.64 |
2,740 |
|
4,100 |
24.64 |
3,210 |
|
6,000 |
33.66 |
6,520 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
7,300 |
7.68 |
1,810 |
|
33,200 |
8.28 |
8,840 |
|
40,600 |
8.17 |
10,650 |
|
3,000 |
10.49 |
1,030 |
|
74 |
% |
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
164,300 |
0.96 |
5,080 |
|
349,900 |
1.19 |
13,370 |
|
514,100 |
1.12 |
18,440 |
|
602,200 |
1.16 |
22,530 |
|
66 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
77,200 |
1.20 |
2,990 |
|
596,900 |
1.07 |
20,550 |
|
674,200 |
1.09 |
23,540 |
|
369,600 |
0.95 |
11,340 |
|
78 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
263,200 |
1.38 |
11,680 |
|
1,790,700 |
2.39 |
137,370 |
|
2,053,900 |
2.26 |
149,050 |
|
1,188,900 |
1.68 |
64,060 |
|
64 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM, Nevada (9) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
2,400 |
5.33 |
410 |
|
81,700 |
5.46 |
14,340 |
|
84,100 |
5.46 |
14,760 |
|
18,700 |
5.57 |
3,350 |
|
38 |
% |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
2,400 |
5.33 |
410 |
|
81,700 |
5.46 |
14,340 |
|
84,100 |
5.46 |
14,760 |
|
18,700 |
5.57 |
3,350 |
|
38 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
525,900 |
4.53 |
76,550 |
|
2,541,500 |
5.18 |
423,010 |
|
3,067,400 |
5.07 |
499,560 |
|
1,412,800 |
3.35 |
152,120 |
|
75 |
% |
Silver Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
|
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (g/tonne) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
31,400 |
25.71 |
25,990 |
|
176,600 |
26.36 |
149,620 |
|
208,000 |
26.26 |
175,610 |
|
89,800 |
28.00 |
80,840 |
|
87 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
21,000 |
13.94 |
9,400 |
|
21,000 |
13.94 |
9,400 |
|
1,600 |
11.08 |
570 |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
128,400 |
5.79 |
23,900 |
|
423,400 |
3.75 |
51,030 |
|
551,800 |
4.22 |
74,930 |
|
99,100 |
2.65 |
8,440 |
|
64 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
159,800 |
9.71 |
49,890 |
|
621,000 |
10.52 |
210,050 |
|
780,800 |
10.35 |
259,940 |
|
190,500 |
14.67 |
89,850 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Conga, |
|
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
0.00 |
— |
|
356,300 |
2.06 |
23,580 |
|
356,300 |
2.06 |
23,580 |
|
89,900 |
1.13 |
3,250 |
|
70 |
% |
Yanacocha Open Pits |
|
51.35 |
% |
|
4,600 |
3.31 |
490 |
|
44,600 |
13.09 |
18,750 |
|
49,200 |
12.17 |
19,240 |
|
14,400 |
13.09 |
6,070 |
|
43 |
% |
Yanacocha Underground |
|
51.35 |
% |
|
— |
1.13 |
— |
|
1,800 |
64.29 |
3,760 |
|
1,800 |
62.68 |
3,760 |
|
1,900 |
37.56 |
2,260 |
|
87 |
% |
Total Yanacocha, |
|
|
|
4,600 |
3.31 |
490 |
|
46,400 |
15.09 |
22,510 |
|
51,000 |
14.03 |
23,000 |
|
16,300 |
15.90 |
8,330 |
|
55 |
% |
|
Cerro Negro Underground |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
46.22 |
140 |
|
1,300 |
57.30 |
2,360 |
|
1,400 |
56.55 |
2,500 |
|
7,500 |
39.04 |
9,400 |
|
75 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
900 |
8.53 |
240 |
|
1,000 |
7.87 |
250 |
|
1,900 |
8.18 |
490 |
|
100 |
11.07 |
20 |
|
60 |
% |
Total |
|
|
|
1,000 |
12.15 |
380 |
|
2,300 |
35.92 |
2,610 |
|
3,300 |
28.76 |
2,990 |
|
7,600 |
38.80 |
9,420 |
|
74 |
% |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
37,300 |
11.51 |
13,800 |
|
57,100 |
10.85 |
19,940 |
|
94,400 |
11.11 |
33,740 |
|
25,400 |
9.00 |
7,360 |
|
74 |
% |
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
164,300 |
0.96 |
5,080 |
|
349,800 |
1.19 |
13,360 |
|
514,100 |
1.12 |
18,440 |
|
602,100 |
1.16 |
22,520 |
|
66 |
% |
Norte Abierto, |
|
50 |
% |
|
77,200 |
1.20 |
2,990 |
|
596,900 |
1.07 |
20,550 |
|
674,100 |
1.09 |
23,540 |
|
369,600 |
0.95 |
11,340 |
|
78 |
% |
Agua Rica, |
|
18.75 |
% |
|
120,200 |
2.90 |
11,190 |
|
135,700 |
2.41 |
10,520 |
|
255,900 |
2.64 |
21,710 |
|
139,300 |
1.62 |
7,260 |
|
43 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
404,600 |
2.61 |
33,930 |
|
1,544,500 |
2.28 |
113,070 |
|
1,949,100 |
2.35 |
147,000 |
|
1,250,200 |
1.73 |
69,480 |
|
61 |
% |
|
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NGM, Nevada (9)(11) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
2,900 |
5.57 |
520 |
|
84,000 |
5.54 |
14,960 |
|
86,900 |
5.54 |
15,480 |
|
18,900 |
5.60 |
3,410 |
|
38 |
% |
TOTAL NEVADA |
|
|
|
2,900 |
5.57 |
520 |
|
84,000 |
5.54 |
14,960 |
|
86,900 |
5.54 |
15,480 |
|
18,900 |
5.60 |
3,410 |
|
38 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
567,300 |
4.62 |
84,340 |
|
2,249,500 |
4.68 |
338,080 |
|
2,816,800 |
4.66 |
422,420 |
|
1,459,600 |
3.47 |
162,740 |
|
66 |
% |
(1) |
Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. Amounts presented may not recalculate in total due to rounding. |
|
(2) |
Resources, at sites in which |
|
(3) |
Ounces are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Ounces may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10,000. |
|
(4) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Teck Resources. |
|
(5) |
Resource estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the |
|
(6) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(7) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by the Norte Abierto joint venture. |
|
(8) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Yamana, the operator of the Agua Rica joint venture. In |
|
(9) |
Resource estimates provided by Barrick, the operator of the NGM joint venture. |
|
(10) |
In 2022, the Company increased its ownership interest in Yanacocha to |
|
(11) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 for ounces and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the respective Technical Report Summaries provided for certain properties as provided under exhibit 96. |
Lead Reserves (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito Open Pits, |
|
100 |
% |
|
103,900 |
0.36 |
% |
830 |
|
184,500 |
0.31 |
% |
1,270 |
|
288,500 |
0.33 |
% |
2,090 |
|
72 |
% |
|
326,300 |
0.32 |
% |
2,320 |
Peñasquito Stockpiles, |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.16 |
% |
— |
|
27,500 |
0.33 |
% |
200 |
|
28,000 |
0.33 |
% |
200 |
|
72 |
% |
|
35,700 |
0.33 |
% |
260 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
104,500 |
0.36 |
% |
830 |
|
212,000 |
0.31 |
% |
1,470 |
|
316,500 |
0.33 |
% |
2,300 |
|
72 |
% |
|
362,000 |
0.32 |
% |
2,580 |
(1) |
Lead reserves for 2022 and 2021 were estimated at a lead price of |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Lead cut-off grade varies with level of gold, silver and zinc credits. |
|
(5) |
Stockpiles are comprised primarily of material that has been set aside to allow processing of higher grade material in the mills. Stockpiles increase or decrease depending on current mine plans. Stockpile reserves are reported separately where pounds exceed 100 million and are greater than |
Lead Resources (1)(2) - |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
47,400 |
0.26 |
% |
270 |
|
263,500 |
0.23 |
% |
1,360 |
|
311,000 |
0.24 |
% |
1,630 |
84,700 |
0.23 |
% |
440 |
|
72 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
47,400 |
0.26 |
% |
270 |
|
263,500 |
0.23 |
% |
1,360 |
|
311,000 |
0.24 |
% |
1,630 |
84,700 |
0.23 |
% |
440 |
|
72 |
% |
Lead Resources (1)(2)(4) - |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
|
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Pb %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
31,400 |
0.29 |
% |
200 |
|
176,600 |
0.26 |
% |
1,020 |
|
208,000 |
0.27 |
% |
1,230 |
89,800 |
0.24 |
% |
480 |
|
73 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
31,400 |
0.29 |
% |
200 |
|
176,600 |
0.26 |
% |
1,020 |
|
208,000 |
0.27 |
% |
1,230 |
89,800 |
0.24 |
% |
480 |
|
73 |
% |
(1) |
Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. |
|
(2) |
Resources are estimated at a lead price of |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10 million for pounds and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the Technical Report Summary provided under exhibit 96. |
Zinc Reserves (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito Open Pits, |
|
100 |
% |
|
103,900 |
0.94 |
% |
2,160 |
|
184,500 |
0.76 |
% |
3,080 |
|
288,500 |
0.82 |
% |
5,240 |
|
81 |
% |
|
326,300 |
0.81 |
% |
5,850 |
Peñasquito Stockpiles, |
|
100 |
% |
|
500 |
0.95 |
% |
10 |
|
27,500 |
0.46 |
% |
280 |
|
28,000 |
0.47 |
% |
290 |
|
81 |
% |
|
35,700 |
0.50 |
% |
400 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
104,500 |
0.94 |
% |
2,180 |
|
212,000 |
0.72 |
% |
3,360 |
|
316,500 |
0.79 |
% |
5,540 |
|
81 |
% |
|
362,000 |
0.78 |
% |
6,250 |
(1) |
Zinc reserves for 2022 and 2021 were estimated at a zinc price of |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Zinc cut-off grade varies with level of gold, silver and lead credits. |
|
(5) |
Stockpiles are comprised primarily of material that has been set aside to allow processing of higher grade material in the mills. Stockpiles increase or decrease depending on current mine plans. Stockpile reserves are reported separately where pounds exceed 100 million and are greater than |
Zinc Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
47,400 |
0.62 |
% |
650 |
|
263,500 |
0.53 |
% |
3,080 |
311,000 |
0.54 |
% |
3,740 |
84,700 |
0.53 |
% |
1,000 |
|
81 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
47,400 |
0.62 |
% |
650 |
|
263,500 |
0.53 |
% |
3,080 |
311,000 |
0.54 |
% |
3,740 |
84,700 |
0.53 |
% |
1,000 |
|
81 |
% |
Zinc Resources (1)(2)(4) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Zn %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Peñasquito, |
|
100 |
% |
|
31,400 |
0.66 |
% |
460 |
|
176,600 |
0.57 |
% |
2,230 |
208,000 |
0.59 |
% |
2,690 |
89,800 |
0.54 |
% |
1,070 |
|
81 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
31,400 |
0.66 |
% |
460 |
|
176,600 |
0.57 |
% |
2,230 |
208,000 |
0.59 |
% |
2,690 |
89,800 |
0.54 |
% |
1,070 |
|
81 |
% |
(1) | Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. |
|
(2) |
Resources are estimated at a zinc price of |
|
(3) | Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) | Amounts presented herein have been rounded to the nearest 10 million for pounds and 100,000 for tonnes and therefore may not agree to the Technical Report Summary provided under exhibit 96. |
Molybdenum Reserves (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Proven Reserves |
|
Probable Reserves |
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
|
|
|
Proven and Probable Reserves |
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
|
Tonnage (2) (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (3) (millions) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
|
48 |
% |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
— |
— |
% |
— |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
|
48 |
% |
|
776,900 |
0.02 |
% |
270 |
(1) |
Reserves estimates were estimated based on prices set by the NuevaUnión joint venture. The project is currently undeveloped. |
|
(2) |
Tonnages include allowances for losses resulting from mining methods. Tonnages are rounded to nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Currently included in Corporate and Other in Note 3 of |
Molybdenum Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
159,500 |
0.01 |
% |
20 |
|
231,500 |
0.01 |
% |
40 |
391,000 |
0.01 |
% |
70 |
362,300 |
0.01 |
% |
100 |
|
52 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
159,500 |
0.01 |
% |
20 |
|
231,500 |
0.01 |
% |
40 |
391,000 |
0.01 |
% |
70 |
362,300 |
0.01 |
% |
100 |
|
52 |
% |
Molybdenum Resources (1)(2) - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Measured Resource |
|
Indicated Resource |
Measured and Indicated Resource |
Inferred Resource |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Deposits/Districts |
|
Share |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
Tonnage (000 tonnes) |
Grade (Mo %) |
Pounds (millions) |
|
Metallurgical Recovery (3) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
NuevaUnión, |
|
50 |
% |
|
159,500 |
0.01 |
% |
20 |
|
231,500 |
0.01 |
% |
40 |
391,000 |
0.01 |
% |
60 |
362,300 |
0.01 |
% |
100 |
|
52 |
% |
Agua Rica, |
|
18.75 |
% |
|
141,900 |
0.03 |
% |
80 |
|
137,400 |
0.03 |
% |
90 |
279,300 |
0.03 |
% |
170 |
139,900 |
0.03 |
% |
90 |
|
44 |
% |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
301,400 |
0.02 |
% |
100 |
|
368,900 |
0.02 |
% |
130 |
670,300 |
0.02 |
% |
230 |
502,200 |
0.02 |
% |
190 |
|
46 |
% |
(1) |
Resources are reported exclusive of reserves. |
|
(2) |
Resources for NuevaUnión are estimated based on a molybdenum price set by NuevaUnión joint venture. Tonnage amounts have been rounded to the nearest 100,000. |
|
(3) |
Pounds are estimates of metal contained in ore tonnages and do not include allowances for processing losses. Metallurgical recovery rates represent the estimated amount of metal to be recovered through metallurgical extraction processes. Pounds may not recalculate as they are rounded to the nearest 10 million. |
|
(4) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by NuevaUnión joint venture. |
|
(5) |
Project is currently undeveloped. Resource estimates provided by Yamana, the operator of the Agua Rica joint venture. In |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Reserve and Resource Estimates:
The reserves stated herein were prepared in compliance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K adopted by the
Estimates of Proven and Probable reserves are subject to considerable uncertainty. Such estimates are, or will be, to a large extent, based on the prices of gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead and molybdenum and interpretations of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other exploration techniques, which data may not necessarily be indicative of future results. If our reserve estimations are required to be revised using significantly lower gold, silver, zinc, copper, lead and molybdenum prices as a result of a decrease in commodity prices, increases in operating costs, reductions in metallurgical recovery or other modifying factors, this could result in material write-downs of our investment in mining properties, goodwill and increased amortization, reclamation and closure charges. Producers use pre-feasibility and feasibility studies for undeveloped ore bodies to derive estimates of capital and operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the predicted configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of metals from the ore, the costs of comparable facilities, the costs of operating and processing equipment and other factors. Actual operating and capital cost and economic returns on projects may differ significantly from original estimates. Further, it may take many years from the initial phases of exploration until commencement of production, during which time, the economic feasibility of production may change. Estimates of resources are subject to further exploration and development, are subject to additional risks, and no assurance can be given that they will eventually convert to future reserves. Inferred resources, in particular, have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of all of the Inferred resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. The Company cannot be certain that any part or parts of the resource will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, if the price of gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead or molybdenum declines from recent levels, if production costs increase, grades decline, recovery rates decrease or if applicable laws and regulations are adversely changed, the indicated level of recovery may not be realized or mineral reserves or resources might not be mined or processed profitably. If we determine that certain of our mineral reserves or resources have become uneconomic, this may ultimately lead to a reduction in our aggregate reported mineral reserves and resources. Consequently, if our actual mineral reserves and resources are less than current estimates, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial position may be materially impaired. For additional information see the “Proven and Probable Reserve" and "Measured and Indicated and Inferred Resource" tables herein and in the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements:
This release may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections and other applicable laws. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, estimates and expectations of future production, reserve estimates, exploration outlook and expected expenditure, and operational and financial performance. Where the Company expresses or implies an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by the “forward-looking statements”. Such assumptions, include, but are not limited to the key assumptions set forth herein. Investors are also encouraged to refer to the Company’s 2022 Form 10-K, filed on
About
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230223005160/en/
Media Contact
786.643.9230
carolina.lucaroni@newmont.com
Investor Contact
303.837.5468
daniel.horton@newmont.com
Source:
FAQ
What were Newmont's gold reserves in 2022?
How much did Newmont increase its gold reserves compared to 2021?
What was the reason for the increase in Newmont's gold reserves?
What is Newmont's projected exploration expenditure for 2023?