Nickel Creek Platinum Announces Positive PFS for its Nickel Shäw Project
- Positive pre-feasibility study results for Nickel Creek Platinum's Nickel Shäw Project with an estimated after-tax NPV of $143 million and an IRR of 5.8%
- None.
Stuart Harshaw, President and CEO of Nickel Creek commented: "The PFS is an important milestone in realizing the opportunity the Nickel Shäw Project represents in the critical mineral space where it can provide nickel and copper to take advantage of the strong nickel market for EV batteries. The sensitivity to energy costs illustrates how working with the different levels of government can lead to a significant improvement in value, especially when combined with the previously announced intention of the Federal government to provide a tax incentive for critical mineral projects such as Nickel Shäw. Moving forward, our focus will be to continue to add value to the project through work on identified key economic areas of opportunity and continued mineral exploration success while advancing towards a feasibility study."
after-tax NPV using a$143 million 5% discount rate and an IRR of5.8% at the following commodity prices: nickel -US /pound ("lb"); copper –$11.00 US /lb; palladium –$4.00 US /troy ounce ("troy oz"); platinum –$2,100 US /troy oz; cobalt –$1,000 US /lb; and gold –$23 US /troy oz, each using a 0.75 Canadian to US exchange rate.$1,800 - Life of mine ("LOM") after-tax cash flow of approximately
with an after-tax payback period of 12.7 years.$1.7 billion - Pre-production capital cost of approximately
, with a construction period of 3.0 years.$1.7 billion
- If paying
Yukon grid rates of /kWhr, the after-tax NPV at a$0.11 5% discount rate increases by to$324 million (see NPV sensitivities section below for additional information).$467 million - The Company's after-tax NPV at a
5% discount rate increases from to$143 million if the Canadian tax incentive for critical mineral companies is enacted (see Investment Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing section below for additional information).$336 million - The Company plans to further investigate the opportunity of carbon tax offsets associated with carbon sequestration in the tailings facility with ongoing testwork and analysis.
On June 1, 2023, the Company announced an updated mineral resource estimate with an effective date of April 3, 2023:
Metal Grades | |||||||||
Ni | Cu | Co | Pd | Pt | Au | Mg | S | ||
Class | Ktonnes | % | % | % | g/t | g/t | g/t | % | % |
Measured | 122,363 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.014 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 16.03 | 0.78 |
Indicated | 314,332 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.014 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 17.26 | 0.64 |
Total M+I | 436,695 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.014 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 16.92 | 0.68 |
Inferred | 114,016 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.015 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 17.46 | 0.69 |
Contained Metal | |||||||||
Ni | Cu | Co | Pd | Pt | Au | ||||
Class | Ktonnes | M Lbs | M Lbs | M Lbs | k Ozs | k Ozs | k Ozs | ||
Measured | 122,363 | 679 | 411 | 38 | 905 | 944 | 184 | ||
Indicated | 314,332 | 1,792 | 871 | 99 | 2,385 | 2,197 | 361 | ||
Total M+I | 436,695 | 2,471 | 1,281 | 137 | 3,290 | 3,141 | 545 | ||
Inferred | 114,016 | 668 | 339 | 37 | 916 | 733 | 128 |
| |
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. | |
Summation errors may occur due to rounding. | |
Effective Date is April 3, 2023. | |
Mineral Resources amenable to open pit extraction are reported within an optimized containing shell. | |
Average grade calculations on this table are impacted by rounding. | |
Tonnages are reported in units of 1,000 metric tonnes (Ktonnes). | |
Contained Base Metal reported in units of 1,000,000 lbs, M Lbs. | |
Contained Precious Metal reported in units of 1,000 troy ounces, K Ozs. | |
Metal Prices for Resource Determination in US$ | |
Nickel: | |
Net Smelter Return (NSR) cut-off grades range from | |
Mining costs, vary by bench, separately for ore and waste: | |
Base waste mining cost @1330m = | |
Base ore mining cost @1330m = | |
Process and G&A costs: Bulk con – | |
Calculated process recoveries by concentrate type: |
Ni | Cu | Co | Pd | Pt | Au | |||||||
Bulk con: | Eq1 | Eq2 | 57.0 % | 54.0 % | 47.8 % | 74.4 % | ||||||
Cu con: | Eq3 | Eq4 | 3.36 % | 3.19 % | 0.91 % | 23.58 % | ||||||
Ni con: | Eq5 | Eq6 | 53.64 % | 50.81 % | 46.89 % | 50.82 % | ||||||
where: | Eq1 = Ni recovery to Bulk Con = MIN (23.21*LN(X)+30.362,88) | |||||||||||
where | X = (%S-%Cu)/%Ni Capped at | |||||||||||
Eq2 = Cu recovery to Bulk Con = ((Cu-0.06)/Cu)) *100, Constant tail at | ||||||||||||
Eq3 = Ni recovery to Cu Con=Ni recovery to achieve | ||||||||||||
Eq4 = Cu recovery to Cu Con = Cu recovery to Bulk Con * 0.623 | ||||||||||||
Eq5 = Ni recovery to Bulk Con – Ni recovery to Cu Con | ||||||||||||
Eq6 = Cu recovery to Bulk Con – Cu recovery to Cu Con | ||||||||||||
Capping of grades varies based on lithology for each metal. | ||||||||||||
The density is assigned based on lithology and varies between 2.76 g/cm3 and 3.38 g/cm3. |
The Company's flagship asset is its
The Nickel Shäw property contains an extensive Ni-Cu-Co-PGM mineralized system hosted by mafic/ultramafic intrusions related to Triassic-age flood basalts. With over 2.4 billion pounds of nickel, 1.2 billion pounds of copper, 6.9 million ounces of PGMs and 137 million pounds of cobalt in the measured and indicated mineral resource categories, Nickel Shäw is one of the largest undeveloped nickel projects in
The PFS contemplates that the Nickel Shäw open pit would be mined using conventional open pit methods, with a LOM of over 19 years. From the open pit the ore would be trucked to a primary crusher located adjacent to the pit and conveyed out of the valley to a concentrator designed to process 45,000 tonnes per day ("tpd") of ore. The ore would be fed into a conventional Ni-Cu-PGM flotation concentrator designed to produce a bulk Ni-Cu-PGM concentrate "Bulk conc" or alternatively into split concentrates. The split concentrates would be a Ni concentrate "Ni conc" and a Cu concentrate "Cu conc", as economics dictate. Average annual LOM concentrates production ("dmt") is expected to be 103,100 dmt of Bulk conc, 95,000 dmt of Ni conc and 19,600 of dmt Cu conc. Total LOM payable metal production includes the following:
- 614.3M lbs nickel;
- 281.5M lbs copper;
- 21.5 M lbs cobalt;
- 626,500 troy ounces platinum;
- 743,400 troy ounces palladium; and
- 174,400 troy ounces gold.
The tailings would be stored in a tailings storage facility adjacent to the concentrator. Concentrate would be transported by truck 480 km to the Port of Skagway Ore Terminal. Power will be primarily sourced from a liquified natural gas ("LNG") power plant.
The Nickel Shäw Project lies within the Kluane First Nation ("KFN") core area as defined under the Umbrella Final Agreement between the Government of
Ultramafic rocks from the project (in the form of tailings and waste rock) are being assessed for their ability to capture and store carbon. Test work conducted in 2022 confirmed the presence of brucite (a magnesium-rich mineral known to react quickly with CO2 in air) in a subset of samples. On a mass basis, from the achieved reactivity in the testwork, this may enable maximum sequestration of 2.1 kt CO2 per Mt tailings. The Company is evaluating further work which will include the creation of a mineralogy model based on the project's geochemical database to assess the spatial distribution of rocks within the Wellgreen deposit that have high potential to sequester carbon (see news release dated December 15, 2022 for additional details).
Pre-Tax NPV ( | |
After-Tax NPV ( | |
Undiscounted After-Tax Cash Flow (LOM) | |
After-Tax Payback Period | 12.7 years |
Life of Mine (LOM) | 19.1 years |
Capital Cost - Initial - Sustaining - Total LOM |
|
Operating Cost | |
Mill Throughput | 45,000 tpd |
Initial 5 Year Annual Average Metal - Nickel - Copper - Cobalt - Platinum - Palladium - Gold |
9.1 M lbs 1.1 M lbs 27,400 troy oz 36,200 troy oz 7,700 troy oz |
Life of Mine Strip Ratio (W:O) | 1.93 |
Based on the assumed commodity prices noted above, the LOM revenue by metal is as follows: nickel –
The discount rate sensitivity is as follows:
Discount Rate | After-tax NPV |
0 % | |
10 % | ( |
The after-tax NPV ($Million's) at a
Nickel Price (US$) | |||||||
Copper (US$) | |||||||
$ 3.00 | (1,003) | (633) | (306) | 14 | 325 | 628 | 925 |
$ 3.25 | (961) | (599) | (273) | 47 | 357 | 658 | 955 |
$ 3.50 | (918) | (566) | (240) | 79 | 388 | 689 | 985 |
$ 3.75 | (876) | (532) | (207) | 111 | 419 | 720 | 1,015 |
$ 4.00 | (834) | (498) | (174) | 143 | 450 | 751 | 1,045 |
$ 4.25 | (796) | (465) | (141) | 175 | 481 | 781 | 1,075 |
$ 4.50 | (762) | (431) | (108) | 207 | 512 | 811 | 1,105 |
The pre-tax and after-tax NPV ($Million's) at a
Power Cost ($kWhr) | ||||||||
Base | ||||||||
Pre-tax NPV | 1,106 | 998 | 891 | 784 | 676 | 547 | 461 | |
After-tax NPV | 543 | 467 | 391 | 314 | 237 | 143 | 80 | |
Pre-tax IRR | 10.4 % | 9.9 % | 9.4 % | 8.9 % | 8.4 % | 7.7 % | 7.3 % | |
After-tax IRR | 8.2 % | 7.7 % | 7.3 % | 6.8 % | 6.4 % | 5.8 % | 5.5 % |
The Canadian 2023 federal budget proposed the introduction of a
As of this date, there are no specific details regarding the proposed Clean ITC and has not been legislated. Based on assumptions on the capital that could be eligible for the ITC, if the Company was able to utilize the
The initial capital expenditure contemplated in the PFS, to be incurred over the three-year pre-production period of the Project, amounts to approximately
Capital ($Million's)
Pre-Production | Sustaining | Total LOM | |
Open Pit | 399 | 205 | 604 |
Processing | 510 | 5 | 515 |
Infrastructure | 353 | 258 | 611 |
Indirects | 245 | 58 | 303 |
Environmental | - | 52 | 52 |
Contingency | 180 | 60 | 240 |
Total | 1,687 | 638 | 2,325 |
Operating Costs
The LOM operating costs are summarized as follows:
$/mt Milled | |
Processing | 17.32 |
Mining | 7.30 |
G&A | 2.43 |
Sub-total | 27.05 |
Concentrate Trucking | 2.34 |
Carbon Tax | 0.83 |
Total | 30.22 |
The PFS also identified a number of potential optimizations to the Project. These include:
- Working with energy providers and
Yukon government and other stakeholders on an energy strategy to reduce the costs for the project; - Additional metallurgical testwork to improve overall recoveries of all payable metals where a
1% recovery improvement represents approximately an after-tax M improvement to the NPV at a$111 5% discount rate; and - Continue drilling on the Arch target to define the potential resource which could provide the opportunity for an early project higher grade feed that may improve overall financial results.
Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. (TSX: NCP; OTCQB: NCPCF) is a Canadian mining exploration and development company advancing its
The Company is led by a management team with a proven track record of successful discovery, development, financing and operation of large-scale projects. Our vision is to create value for our shareholders by becoming a leading North American nickel, copper, cobalt and PGM producer.
The PFS was overseen by AGP and the technical information disclosed in this news release was reviewed and approved by Gordon Zurowski of AGP. Mr. Zurowski is a "qualified person" as defined in NI 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and an independent consultant to the Company. The scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release in relation to metallurgical testing, including with respect to 2022-23 variability testwork, was reviewed and approved by Gordon Marrs, P. Eng., of XPS who is a "qualified person" as defined in NI 43-101 and an independent consultant to the Company.
All other scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release was reviewed and approved by Cameron Bell, Nickel Creek's Geological Consultant and a "qualified person" as defined in NI 43-101. Please see the technical report (September 2018) filed under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com, for a description of the Company's data verification and QA/QC procedures.
This news release includes certain information that may be deemed "forward-looking information". Forward-looking information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intend", "believe", "continue", "plans" or similar terminology, or negative connotations thereof. All information in this release, other than information of historical facts, including, without limitation, regarding the results of technical test work, the estimated mineral resource, the prospect of any future potential economic viability of the Project, future commodity prices and the potential for them to improve, that a feasibility study will ever be commenced and completed, the potential to identify additional mineralization beyond the known resource, timing of further work on the Project, future demand for nickel and copper concentrates, future demand for battery products, statements concerning the availability and impact of the Clean ITC, the ability of the Company to identify additional opportunities to create shareholder value, and general future plans and objectives for the Company and the Project, are forward-looking information that involve various risks and uncertainties. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in such forward-looking information are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking information.
This news release also contains references to estimates of mineral resources. The estimation of mineral resources is inherently uncertain and involves subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation, which may prove to be unreliable and depend, to a certain extent, upon the analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Mineral resource estimates may have to be re-estimated based on, among other things: (i) fluctuations in nickel, copper or other mineral prices; (ii) results of drilling; (iii) results of metallurgical testing and other studies; (iv) changes to proposed mining operations, including dilution; (v) the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimates; and (vi) the possible failure to receive or maintain required permits, approvals and licences.
For more information on the Company and the key assumptions, risks and challenges with respect to the forward-looking information discussed herein, and about our business in general, investors should review the Company's most recently filed annual information form, and other continuous disclosure filings which are available at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nickel-creek-platinum-announces-positive-pfs-for-its-nickel-shaw-project-301909571.html
SOURCE Nickel Creek Platinum Corp.
FAQ
What are the results of the pre-feasibility study for Nickel Creek Platinum's Nickel Shäw Project?
What commodities are included in the study?
What is the potential of the project?
What is the estimated LOM after-tax cash flow?
What is the estimated pre-production capital cost?
What is the estimated payback period?
What is the estimated strip ratio?
What is the estimated mill throughput?
What is the estimated life of mine?
What is the estimated annual metal production for the first 5 years?