STOCK TITAN

Magna Gold Announces Maiden Resource Estimate for the Margarita Silver Project

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Very Positive)
Tags
Rhea-AI Summary

Magna Gold Corp. (MGLQF) announced its maiden mineral resource estimate for the Margarita silver deposit in Chihuahua, Mexico. The Indicated resources are estimated at 1.854 million tonnes at 204.9 g/t Ag, amounting to 12.22 million ounces of silver, while Inferred resources are 0.454 million tonnes at 153.4 g/t Ag for 2.24 million ounces. The high-grade core is estimated at 0.78 million tonnes at 332.1 g/t Ag, equating to 8.32 million ounces. The project shows strong growth potential with additional parallel veins discovered.

Positive
  • Indicated resources of 12.22 million ounces of silver and inferred resources of 2.24 million ounces.
  • High-grade core of 0.78 million tonnes at 332.1 g/t Ag, representing 8.32 million ounces.
  • Excellent growth potential with discoveries of parallel vein systems, enhancing future resource estimates.
Negative
  • None.

TORONTO, April 21, 2022 /PRNewswire/ - Magna Gold Corp. (TSXV: MGR) (OTCQB: MGLQF) ("Magna" or the "Company"), is pleased to report the maiden mineral resource estimate (the "Resource") for the Margarita silver deposit at its 100% owned Margarita Project (the "Margarita Project") in Chihuahua, Mexico.

Highlights
  • Indicated mineral resources are estimated to be 1.854 million tonnes ("Mt") at 204.9 g/t Ag and Inferred mineral resources of 0.454 Mt at 153.4 g/t Ag above a 75 g/t Ag cut-off grade.
  • Includes Indicated resources of 12.22 million ounces ("Moz") of Ag and inferred resources of 2.24 Moz Ag.
  • Margarita Vein High Grade Core – The deposit contains a well-defined high-grade core that demonstrates excellent continuity. Resources contained within this core are estimated to be 0.78 Mt @ 332.1 g/t (Indicated) for a metal content of 8.32 Moz of silver.                                          
  • Strong Resource Growth Potential – Our first pass drill program focussed on defining the mineralization contained within the Margarita vein. This structure remains open in all directions and at depth. Our drill program also discovered and confirmed the presence of multiple parallel vein systems most notable of which were the Juliana and Caido veins. These veins are strongly mineralized, and follow-up drilling will focus on defining additional resources in these parallel veins to be included in subsequent resource updates. The current resource estimate only incudes mineralization in the main Margarita vein.
  • Development Advantages – The Margarita Project is in a mining friendly jurisdiction with great access, infrastructure and availability of skilled workers.

President and CEO Arturo Bonillas commented; "Delivery of a maiden resource estimate is a huge milestone for the Company. The team delivered this robust resource on schedule and on budget. We have unlocked tremendous value through the drill bit and there is great potential for significant resource growth in the near term. Our exploration program defined a high-grade resource and discovered several parallel structures. We look to add the newly discovered structures in our next resource update and anticipate material increases in the mineral inventory."  Mr. Bonillas continues, "We are on track to release a PEA in the coming months and will be making a construction decision before the end of 2022.   Based on what we have seen so far I am confident the Margarita Project will generate significant value for our shareholders for years to come."

Margarita Project Resource Summary April 2022 (75 g/t Ag cut-off)

Resource Category

Margarita Vein

Tonnage (Kt)

Average Grade (Ag g/t)

Metal Content (x1,000 oz)

Total

Indicated

Margarita VEIN_2

1,075

112.8

3,901

Margarita Vein_HG

779

332.1

8,316

Total

1,854

204.9

12,217

Inferred

Margarita VEIN_2

75

100.1

243

Margarita Vein_2S

378

164.0

1,994

Total

454

153.4

2,237

Mineral Resource Notes:

  1. The effective date for the Margarita Project mineral resource estimate is April 08, 2022.
  2. The  report includes only mineralization that is completely inside Magna's 100% owned mining concessions boundaries.
  3. The mineral resources are reported based on an underground mining method scenario, assuming a recoverable crown pillar of 15 m, and constrained reasonable underground prospects for economic extraction.
  4. The mineralized envelopes were modelled at a base case cut-off grade of 25.0 g/t Ag for Vein 2 and Vein 2 South and 300.0 g/t Ag for the High-Grade vein. The High-Grade vein is entirely contained within the south side of the Vein 2 envelope. All modelling work was conducted using Leapfrog Geo Software.
  5. For the purposes of the mineral resource estimate the High-Grade vein resources, while contained within the Vein 2 envelope, are estimated exclusive of the Vein 2 resources.
  6. Grade capping was applied to reduce the influence of outlier samples; 350.0 g/t Ag was used for the Low-Grade envelopes (Vein 2 & Vein 2 South) and 1,000.0 g/t Au was used for the High-Grade vein.
  7. The economic parameters used to define mineral resources is a metal price of US$25.0 per troy ounce silver, an underground mining cost US$20.28/t, a processing cost of US$17.57/t and a G&A cost of US$4.57/t for a total of US$42.42/t mined and processed. The silver recovery was estimated at 78%.
  8. The economic Ag cut-off grade calculated from the economic assumptions is 68.0 g/t Ag, however, Magna decided to report resources at 75.0 g/t Ag given the nature of high-grade continuity of the deposit.
  9. The mineral resource has been categorized in the Indicated category for that portion where 3 or more drillholes are located within 80 m distance along strike and down dip, all remaining blocks remain in the Inferred category.
  10. The mineral resources presented here were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council May 10, 2014.
  11. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
  12. The mineral resource estimate has been prepared without reference to surface rights or the potential presence of overlying public infrastructure.
  13. Figures may not total due to rounding.

Sensitivity Report: By zone and grade without reference to Classification (global)









Zone

Ag_Cut-off Grade

Tonnage (Kt)

Average Grade (Ag g/t)

Metal Content (x1,000 oz)

Cumulative Tonnage (Kt)

Weighted Average Grade (Ag g/t)

Cumulative Metal Content (x1,000 oz)

Margarita VEIN_HG

50

0.2

67.2

0.4

773

331.4

8,235

68

0

0

773

331.5

8,235

75

2

86.9

7

773

331.5

8,235

100

3

119.1

10

770

332.2

8,228

125

11

137.3

49

768

333.0

8,218

150

20

164.5

107

756

335.9

8,169

175

42

189.5

259

736

340.6

8,062

200

135

225.2

976

694

349.8

7,803

250

170

275.1

1,499

559

379.9

6,826

300

389

425.5

5,327

389

425.5

5,327

Total

773

331.4

8,235




Margarita VEIN_2

50

893

58.2

1,671

2,263

86.7

6,308

68

233

71.4

535

1,370

105.3

4,637

75

572

86.2

1,587

1,137

112.2

4,102

100

293

111.1

1,047

565

138.6

2,515

125

138

136.1

602

271

168.2

1,468

150

60

160.6

311

134

201.1

866

175

26

186.0

157

74

234.3

555

200

29

223.7

206

47

260.8

398

250

14

274.1

122

19

317.4

192

300

5

437.3

70

5

437.3

70

Total

2,263

86.7

6,308




Margarita Vein_2S

50

21

59.4

40

406

157.0

2,050

68

7

71.6

15

385

162.4

2,010

75

29

89.2

84

378

164.0

1,994

100

47

112.0

170

349

170.3

1,910

125

54

138.4

242

302

179.4

1,740

150

88

162.8

460

247

188.4

1,498

175

94

188.1

565

159

202.5

1,038

200

54

212.3

367

66

222.8

473

250

12

269.6

105

12

269.6

105

300

0

0

0

0

Total

406

157.0

2,050




*Notes for the Sensitivity Table:

  1. The cut-off grades used in the sensitivity analysis have been reviewed and have been found to meet the test of reasonable prospects of economic extraction.
  2. The sensitivity analysis has been conducted on the global resources prior to classification to illustrate the current potential for each zone at each cut-off grade. This is because the continuity of both the vein and mineralization have been demonstrated.
QA/QC

Drill core and rock samples were shipped to ALS Global in Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico and in North Vancouver, Canada for sample preparation and for analysis at the ALS laboratory in North Vancouver.  The ALS Chihuahua and North Vancouver facilities are ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Silver and base metals were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP finish and gold was assayed by 50-gram fire assay with atomic absorption ("AA") finish. Over limit analyses for silver were assayed by fire assay and gravimetric finish. Over limit analysis for lead and zinc were re-assayed using an ore-grade four-acid digestion with AA finish.

Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.

About Magna Gold Corp.

Magna is a Mexico focused gold/silver production company engaged in acquiring, exploring, developing and operating quality precious metals properties in Mexico. It is committed to advancing its 100% owned flagship San Francisco Mine, the Margarita Project and other highly prospective mineral properties located in Sonora and in Chihuahua. The primary strength of the Company is the team of highly experienced mining professionals with a proven track record of developing properties in Mexico from discovery to production. Magna employs community members and services in its operations.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Arturo Bonillas
President and CEO

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Qualified Person

William J. Lewis (P. Geo.), who works as a Senior Geologist for Micon International Limited and is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has approved the scientific and technical information in this news release.

Cautionary Statements

This News Release includes certain "forward-looking statements" which are not comprised of historical facts. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company's future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as "believes", "anticipates", "expects", "estimates", "may", "could", "would", "will", or "plans". Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management's expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward-looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company's objectives, goals or future plans, exploration results, potential mineralization (including estimates of measured and indicated resources, inferred resources and probable reserves), exploration and mine development plans, production (including gold production expectations and guidance), processing and mining expectations (including statements regarding expansion and advancement of assets) and strip ratio trends and expectations. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital, operating and reclamation costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry,  risks related to the effects of COVID-19 on the Company; and those risks set out in the Company's public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/magna-gold-announces-maiden-resource-estimate-for-the-margarita-silver-project-301529993.html

SOURCE Magna Gold Corp.

FAQ

What are the mineral resource estimates for Magna Gold Corp's Margarita Project?

The mineral resource estimates include Indicated resources of 12.22 million ounces of silver and Inferred resources of 2.24 million ounces.

When was the mineral resource estimate for the Margarita deposit released?

The mineral resource estimate was released on April 21, 2022.

What is the average grade of silver in the indicated resources for the Margarita Project?

The average grade of silver in the indicated resources is 204.9 g/t Ag.

How much high-grade silver resource is found in the Margarita Project?

The high-grade core is estimated at 0.78 million tonnes at 332.1 g/t Ag, totaling approximately 8.32 million ounces of silver.

What future plans does Magna Gold Corp have for the Margarita Project?

Magna Gold Corp plans to release a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) in the coming months and make a construction decision by the end of 2022.

Magna Gold Corp.

OTC:MGLQF

MGLQF Rankings

MGLQF Latest News

MGLQF Stock Data

734.08k
86.03M
25.24%
10.36%
Gold
Basic Materials
Link
Canada
Toronto