STOCK TITAN

New MetLife Study: Majority of Plan Sponsors Concerned about the Impact of Market Volatility on Near-Retirees and Retirees

Rhea-AI Impact
(Neutral)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Neutral)
Tags

MetLife's Stable Value Study reveals that 69% of plan sponsors are concerned about market volatility's impact on near-retirees, while 61% worry about its effect on retirees. Stable Value funds, offering safety and stability, remain popular with 82% of DC plan sponsors currently offering them. 84% of plan sponsors say stable value was recommended by their advisors, with 76% of advisors citing better historical returns as the top reason.

The study also highlights interest in strategies to manage volatility in Target Date Funds (TDFs). 95% of plan sponsors and 97% of advisors expressed interest in TDF solutions that reduce volatility while maintaining returns. Similarly, 94% of plan sponsors and 95% of advisors showed interest in options that enhance returns while keeping volatility constant.

Lo Stable Value Study di MetLife rivela che il 69% dei responsabili dei piani è preoccupato per l'impatto della volatilità del mercato sui quasi pensionati, mentre il 61% è preoccupato per il suo effetto sui pensionati. I fondi a valore stabile, che offrono sicurezza e stabilità, rimangono popolari con l'82% dei responsabili dei piani di previdenza (DC) che li offrono attualmente. 84% dei responsabili dei piani afferma che i fondi a valore stabile sono stati raccomandati dai loro consulenti, con il 76% dei consulenti che citano rendimenti storici migliori come il motivo principale.

Lo studio evidenzia anche l'interesse per le strategie per gestire la volatilità nei Target Date Funds (TDF). Il 95% dei responsabili dei piani e il 97% dei consulenti hanno espresso interesse per soluzioni TDF che riducono la volatilità mantenendo i rendimenti. Allo stesso modo, il 94% dei responsabili dei piani e il 95% dei consulenti hanno mostrato interesse per opzioni che migliorano i rendimenti mantenendo costante la volatilità.

El Estudio de Valor Estable de MetLife revela que el 69% de los patrocinadores de planes está preocupado por el impacto de la volatilidad del mercado en los casi jubilados, mientras que el 61% se preocupa por su efecto en los jubilados. Los fondos de valor estable, que ofrecen seguridad y estabilidad, siguen siendo populares, con el 82% de los patrocinadores de planes de contribución definida (DC) que los ofrecen actualmente. El 84% de los patrocinadores de planes dicen que los fondos de valor estable fueron recomendados por sus asesores, con el 76% de los asesores citando mejores rendimientos históricos como la principal razón.

El estudio también destaca el interés en estrategias para gestionar la volatilidad en los Fondos de Fecha Objetivo (TDF). El 95% de los patrocinadores de planes y el 97% de los asesores expresaron interés en soluciones TDF que reduzcan la volatilidad mientras mantienen los rendimientos. De manera similar, el 94% de los patrocinadores de planes y el 95% de los asesores mostraron interés en opciones que mejoren los rendimientos manteniendo constante la volatilidad.

메트라이프의 안정 가치 연구에 따르면, 69%의 계획 후원자가 시장 변동성이 가까운 은퇴자에게 미치는 영향에 대해 우려하고 있으며, 61%는 은퇴자에 대한 영향에 대해 걱정하고 있습니다. 안정 가치 펀드는 안전성과 안정성을 제공하며, 현재 82%의 DC 계획 후원자가 이를 제공하고 있으며 여전히 인기가 높습니다. 84%의 계획 후원자는 안정 가치가 그들의 고문에 의해 추천되었다고 말하며, 76%의 고문이 더 나은 역사적 수익률을 주요 이유로 언급했습니다.

이 연구는 또한 목표 날짜 펀드(TDF)의 변동성을 관리하기 위한 전략에 대한 관심을 강조합니다. 95%의 계획 후원자와 97%의 고문이 수익률을 유지하면서 변동성을 줄이는 TDF 솔루션에 대한 관심을 표명했습니다. 비슷하게, 94%의 계획 후원자와 95%의 고문이 변동성을 일정하게 유지하면서 수익률을 높이는 옵션에 관심을 보였습니다.

La Stable Value Study de MetLife révèle que 69% des sponsors de plans sont préoccupés par l'impact de la volatilité du marché sur les futurs retraités, tandis que 61% sont inquiets de son effet sur les retraités. Les fonds à valeur stable, offrant sécurité et stabilité, restent populaires avec 82% des sponsors de plans de cotisation (DC) qui les proposent actuellement. 84% des sponsors de plans affirment que la valeur stable a été recommandée par leurs conseillers, avec 76% des conseillers citant de meilleurs rendements historiques comme la principale raison.

L'étude souligne également l'intérêt pour des stratégies de gestion de la volatilité dans les fonds à date cible (TDF). 95% des sponsors de plans et 97% des conseillers ont exprimé un intérêt pour des solutions TDF qui réduisent la volatilité tout en maintenant les rendements. De même, 94% des sponsors de plans et 95% des conseillers ont montré un intérêt pour des options qui améliorent les rendements tout en maintenant la volatilité constante.

Die Stable Value Studie von MetLife zeigt, dass 69% der Planverantwortlichen besorgt über die Auswirkungen der Marktvolatilität auf nahende Rentner sind, während 61% sich um deren Auswirkungen auf Rentner sorgen. Stable Value Fonds, die Sicherheit und Stabilität bieten, sind mit 82% derzeitig angebotenen DC-Planverantwortlichen nach wie vor beliebt. 84% der Planverantwortlichen geben an, dass Stable Value von ihren Beratern empfohlen wurde, wobei 76% der Berater bessere historische Renditen als Hauptgrund anführen.

Die Studie hebt auch das Interesse an Strategien zur Volatilitätsbewältigung in Zielterminfonds (TDF) hervor. 95% der Planverantwortlichen und 97% der Berater äußerten Interesse an TDF-Lösungen, die die Volatilität reduzieren und gleichzeitig die Renditen aufrechterhalten. Ähnlich zeigten 94% der Planverantwortlichen und 95% der Berater Interesse an Optionen, die die Renditen steigern und die Volatilität konstant halten.

Positive
  • 82% of DC plan sponsors currently offer Stable Value funds
  • 84% of plan sponsors say stable value was recommended by their advisors
  • 95% of plan sponsors and 92% of advisors view stable value funds as valuable for participants seeking a safe haven
  • 95% of plan sponsors and 97% of advisors are interested in TDF solutions that reduce volatility while maintaining returns
  • 94% of plan sponsors and 95% of advisors are interested in TDF options that enhance returns while keeping volatility constant
Negative
  • 69% of plan sponsors are concerned about market volatility's impact on near-retirees
  • 61% of plan sponsors are concerned about market volatility's impact on retirees
  • Only 12% of plan sponsors have implemented strategies to manage volatility in target date funds

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- As macroeconomic uncertainty continues, the impact of market volatility is a key consideration for today’s workforce and retirees as they manage their retirement savings. Plan sponsors recognize this and share their concern as MetLife’s Stable Value Study, launched today, finds 69% of plan sponsors are concerned about the impact of market volatility on those within 10 years of retirement and 61% are concerned about the impact on retirees. Stable Value funds are a capital preservation option designed specifically for, and available only within, qualified defined contribution (DC) plans and offer safety and stability for both plan participants and retirees.

“Stable Value has a nearly 50-year history as a capital preservation option in DC plans and provides protection against market volatility in uncertain environments,” says Tom Schuster, senior vice president and head of Stable Value and Investment Products with MetLife. “This is essential for those participants near or at retirement looking for earnings stability and liquidity, along with a guarantee of principal and interest.”

Stable Value: A DC Plan Mainstay

Stable Value remains a popular capital preservation option among plans sponsors, with 82% of DC plan sponsors currently offering these funds. The Study found that the large majority of plan sponsors (87%) have offered stable value for more than a year, and 66% have offered this solution for at least three years.

Eighty-four percent of plan sponsors say stable value was recommended by their DC plan’s investment or financial advisor. Eight in 10 advisors (76%) say the top reason for recommending stable value is that it historically offers better returns than money market or other capital preservation options.

“Plan sponsors and advisors recognize and appreciate stable value’s long-term historical performance across all market cycles,” says Schuster. “Because of this compelling track record, stable value remains a popular choice and its outlook is strong.”

According to the Study, a majority of plan sponsors and advisors (83% and 84%, respectively) view stable value as a good capital preservation option for their plans because of its long-term historical performance versus money market funds. An overwhelming majority of plan sponsors, 95%, and advisors, 92%, say stable value funds are valuable to participants seeking a safe haven, especially those who are interested in maintaining their principal.

Stable Value and Target Date Funds

As target date funds (TDFs) remain popular within DC plans, a critical consideration is whether participant savings in these funds are adequately protected from market volatility. The Study found that more than a third of plan sponsors, 37%, are considering adopting strategies to manage volatility but only 12% of plan sponsors to date have implemented these strategies, which may range from the diversification of asset classes to the addition of investment options.

“The good news is that there are new solutions available in the market that apply the volatility smoothing principles of stable value to TDFs,” says Warren Howe, national director, Stable Value Markets. “These solutions allow plan sponsors to optimize the risk/return profile of their TDFs by either lowering volatility while maintaining returns or enhancing returns while maintaining volatility.”

When presented with an example of the first approach—the TDF provider delivers comparable returns, net of fees, while reducing volatility by approximately 40% for certain vintages—the Study found that 95% of plan sponsors would be interested in this option, with 97% of advisors expressing interest. Plan sponsors and advisors were also presented with a second option—the TDF provider generates net returns four times more than the cost associated with delivering those incremental returns while keeping volatility constant (e.g., 60 basis points enhanced net returns for a cost of 15 basis points). The Study found 94% of plan sponsors would be interested in this option while 95% of advisors are interested.

“Plan sponsors can apply these strategies to custom TDFs to reduce the fund’s volatility, particularly for participants who are near or in retirement,” says Howe. “By doing so, they can create better retirement outcomes.”

About the Study

MetLife commissioned Greenwald Research to conduct surveys of plan sponsors and advisors between February 26 and March 21, 2024. A total of 238 interviews were completed among plan sponsors who offer a 401(k), 457 or 403(b) plan. Assets under management for plans included in the study ranged from under $10 million to over $1 billion. Each respondent had to work for a company that offers a DC plan with TDFs or target risk options, offer a capital preservation option, and have at least a moderate amount of influence over decisions regarding stable value or related funds for their company’s DC plan(s). Online surveys were also completed by 50 DC plan advisors who have worked as a plan advisor for at least three years and have clients with DC plans that currently offer capital preservation options. To read the full report, visit http://metlife.com/svstudy2024.

About MetLife

MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), through its subsidiaries and affiliates (“MetLife”), is one of the world’s leading financial services companies, providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management to help individual and institutional customers build a more confident future. Founded in 1868, MetLife has operations in more than 40 markets globally and holds leading positions in the United States, Asia, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East. For more information, visit www.metlife.com.

MetLife Contact:

Judi Mahaney

jmahaney@metlife.com

646-238-4655

Source: MetLife, Inc.

FAQ

What percentage of plan sponsors are concerned about market volatility's impact on near-retirees according to MetLife's Stable Value Study?

According to MetLife's Stable Value Study, 69% of plan sponsors are concerned about the impact of market volatility on those within 10 years of retirement.

How many DC plan sponsors currently offer Stable Value funds as per the MetLife study?

The MetLife study found that 82% of DC plan sponsors currently offer Stable Value funds.

What percentage of plan sponsors view stable value as a good capital preservation option due to its long-term historical performance?

According to the study, 83% of plan sponsors view stable value as a good capital preservation option because of its long-term historical performance versus money market funds.

How many plan sponsors are interested in TDF solutions that reduce volatility while maintaining returns?

The study found that 95% of plan sponsors would be interested in TDF solutions that deliver comparable returns while reducing volatility by approximately 40% for certain vintages.

What percentage of advisors recommend stable value funds due to better historical returns compared to other options?

The study reveals that 76% of advisors say the top reason for recommending stable value is that it historically offers better returns than money market or other capital preservation options.

MetLife, Inc.

NYSE:MET

MET Rankings

MET Latest News

MET Stock Data

57.39B
692.42M
16.41%
76.93%
1.22%
Insurance - Life
Life Insurance
Link
United States of America
NEW YORK