Lumina Gold Announces Positive Cangrejos Pre-Feasibility Study; US$2.2 Billion NPV, 26 Year Mine Life and Production of 371,000 Gold Ounces Per Year and 41 Million Pounds of Copper Per Year
Lumina Gold Corp. (OTCQX: LMGDF) announced positive findings from its Preliminary Feasibility Study (PFS) for the Cangrejos Project, confirming the expansion of gold reserves and resources. The study indicates:
- Probable gold reserves have increased to 11.6 million ounces.
- The after-tax NPV is estimated at
US$2,238 million . - Annual payable production is projected at 371,000 ounces of gold and 41 million pounds of copper.
- The project is poised to begin permitting and negotiation for an Investment Protection Agreement.
- With a mine life of 26 years, the project ranks as the 26th largest primary gold asset globally.
Overall, the study suggests significant potential for future growth and profitability for stakeholders.
- Increase in probable gold reserves to 11.6 million ounces
- After-tax NPV of US$2,238 million
- Annual production forecast of 371,000 ounces of gold and 41 million pounds of copper
- Project's ranking as 26th largest primary gold asset globally
- 26-year mine life with robust infrastructure
- None.
- Probable gold reserves increased to 11.6 million ounces (see Table 4)
- The indicated gold mineral resource increased to 16.8 million ounces from 10.4 million ounces (see Table 3)
- Project after-tax NPV of
US at$2,238 million US /oz gold and$1,650 US /lb copper$3.75 - The mineral resource expansion makes Cangrejos the 26th largest primary gold asset in the world by contained gold in mineral resources (Source:
S&P Capital IQ )
PFS Summary
The PFS was initiated in 2022 and was produced by a team of independent consultants that possess extensive expertise in their respective fields. Details on the contributors can be found in the "Qualified Persons" section below.
All amounts are in
The PFS highlights include the following estimates:
- Life of mine ("LOM") average annual payable production of 371 thousand ounces gold ("koz")
- LOM average annual payable by-product production of 41 million lbs copper
- 469 koz of average annual gold equivalent production over the LOM
- 26-year mine life with a LOM revenue mix of
79% gold,20% copper and1% silver - 30,000 tonnes per day processing operation from years 1-3, with an expansion to 60,000 in year 4 and 80,000 in year 7
- After-tax NPV (
5% ) of and$2.2 billion IRR 17 .2% using base case prices - Average cash operating costs of
/oz and all-in sustaining costs of$602 /oz, net of by-product credits$671 - LOM processed grades of 0.55 grams per tonne ("g/t") gold and
0.10% copper - Years 1-6 processed grades of 0.71 g/t gold and
0.12% copper - Initial capital costs of
include working capital and exclude refundable value added tax ("VAT")$925 million
Table 1: Summary of Cangrejos Economic Results by Gold and Copper Price
Percentage of Base Case Prices | 80 % | 100 % | 120 % |
Gold Price (per oz) | |||
Copper Price (per lb) | |||
Pre-Tax NPV ( | |||
Pre-Tax IRR | 13.1 % | 21.3 % | 28.2 % |
Post-Tax NPV ( | |||
Post-Tax IRR | 10.0 % | 17.2 % | 23.1 % |
Table 2: Comparison of the 2020 PEA to the PFS
Assumption / Value | Comments | ||
Gold Price | |||
Copper Price | |||
Post-Tax NPV ( | |||
Post-Tax IRR | 16.2 % | 17.2 % | |
Processed Tonnes | |||
Processed Gold Grade Yr 1-5 | 0.76 g/t Au | 0.71 g/t Au | |
Processed Copper Grade Yr 1-5 | |||
Processed Gold Grade LOM | 0.56 g/t Au | 0.55 g/t Au | |
Processed Copper Grade LOM | |||
Contained Gold LOM | 11.4 Moz | 11.6 Moz | |
Contained Copper LOM | 1.5 Blbs | 1.4 Blbs | |
Average Annual Gold Production | 366 koz | 371 koz | |
Average Annual Copper Production | 46 Mlbs | 41 Mlbs | |
Average AISC LOM (net copper) | |||
25 years | 26 years | ||
Strip Ratio | 1.14 | 1.26 | Assumes saprolite and saprock are treated as waste material in the PFS |
Building 30ktpd vs. 40ktpd in Phase 1 | |||
Two expansion periods in the PFS vs. one in the 2020 PEA | |||
Sustaining Capital (excluding VAT) | |||
Import Duties on Capex | 7 % | 0 % | Reduced by government subsequent to 2020 |
Ecuadorian Corporate Tax | 22 % | 20 % | Reduced by government subsequent to 2020 |
Ecuadorian NSR Royalty | 3.0 % | 3.0 % |
Mineral Reserves and Resources
Table 3: Estimate of Mineral Resource – Cangrejos & Gran Bestia Deposits (0.25 g/t Au Eq Cut-off) – Inclusive of Mineral Reserves
Category | Million Tonnes | Average Grade | Contained Metal | ||||||
Au (g/t) | Cu | Ag | Mo | Au | Cu | Ag | Mo | ||
Indicated | 1,079.9 | 0.48 | 0.09 | 0.7 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 2,166 | 24.3 | 42.4 |
Inferred | 296.3 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.7 | 11.7 | 3.7 | 483 | 7.0 | 7.6 |
Mineral Resource Estimate Notes: |
(1) The mineral resource estimate has an effective date of |
This mineral resource estimate was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and was based on a total of 98,759 metres of diamond drilling in 280 holes. Of these, 90,142 metres in 248 holes were drilled by Lumina, 5,595 metres in 22 holes were drilled by the Project's previous operator, Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont"), in joint venture with Lumina's predecessor company,
Table 4: Probable Mineral Reserves – Cangrejos & Gran Bestia Deposits (Declining NSR Cut-off from
Probable Reserves | Tonnes (Mt) | NSR ($/t) | Grade | Contained Metal | ||||
Au | Cu | Ag | Au | Cu | Ag | |||
(g/t) | ( %) | (g/t) | (Moz) | (Mlbs) | (Moz) | |||
Saprolite & Saprock | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Partially Oxidized | 18 | 23.07 | 0.57 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.34 | 36 | 0.48 |
Fresh Rock | 639 | 24.80 | 0.55 | 0.10 | 0.68 | 11.22 | 1,384 | 13.90 |
Total Mineral Reserves | 659 | 24.76 | 0.55 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 11.56 | 1,421 | 14.38 |
Mineral Reserve Estimate Notes: |
(1) The mineral reserve estimate has an effective date of |
This mineral reserve estimate was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. The mineral reserves are contained within an engineered pit design. The engineered pit was designed based on the geotechnical slope guidance provided by
Mining and Processing Facility
The proposed processing plant for Cangrejos is a conventional copper-gold flotation concentrator and hybrid leach-carbon-in-leach ("L/CIL") circuit. It has been designed to treat 30,000 tonnes per day (10.95 Mtpa) during the first three years of operation, expanded to 60,000 tonnes per day (21.9 Mtpa) during the next three years and then expanded to 80,000 tonnes per day (29.2 Mtpa) thereafter.
The run of mine ore is trucked from the open pit and is direct dumped into the primary crusher adjacent to the pit and an overland conveyor transports the crushed ore to uncovered course ore stockpile. The processing facility consists of secondary crushing, high pressure grinding rolls ("HPGR"), ball mills, copper-gold flotation circuits, L/CIL treatment, cyanide detox and thickening, and filtering of the combined L/CIL and flotation tailings. The tailings are conveyed to the dry stack tailings facility. The plant is designed to produce precious metal (gold and silver) doré and a copper-gold concentrate. The copper-gold concentrate that makes up most of the Project revenue will be trucked to an Ecuadorian port approximately 40 km away,
Table 5: Mined Material Summary
Mining Material Summary (Mt) | |
Ore Material | 659 |
Waste Material | 827 |
Total Mined | 1,486 |
Strip Ratio | 1.26 |
Note: Totals may not add up due to rounding. |
Table 6: Processing and Production Schedule
Years 1-3 | Years 4-6 | Years 7-26 | LOM | |
Avg. Processed Tonnes (Mt/a) | 10 | 21 | 28 | 26 |
Avg. Gold Grade (g/t) | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.55 |
Avg. Copper Grade (%) | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
Avg. | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
Avg. Gold Production (koz) | 190 | 401 | 394 | 371 |
Avg. Copper Production (Mlbs) | 20 | 40 | 45 | 42 |
Avg. Silver Production (koz) | 68 | 181 | 262 | 236 |
Avg. Gold Eq. Production (koz) | 237 | 493 | 498 | 469 |
Note: Equivalents calculated using |
Table 7: Cangrejos LOM Capital Expenditure Estimate Breakdown
Process Plant, Infrastructure & Dry Stack Tailings Storage Facility | ||
Equipment (Mining and Ancillary Facilities) | ||
Other Direct and Indirect Costs, | ||
Sub Total | ||
Contingency ( | ||
Freight, Duties and Taxes | ||
Refundable Taxes ( | ||
30 to 60 ktpd | 60 to 80 ktpd | |
Contingency ( | ||
Freight and Duty | ||
Refundable Taxes ( | ||
Sustaining Capital and Closure Costs ($M) | ||
Average Annual | ||
Net Closure Costs (Closure, Severance and Salvage) |
Note: Totals may not add up due to rounding. |
(1) The contingency allowance was developed on an area-by-area assessment of estimate confidence. The assessment considered scope, quantification, and pricing factors to assign a contingency amount to each area. |
(2) VAT is recoverable on |
Table 8: Summary of Cangrejos Operating Cost Estimates and Cash Costs
Average Operating Costs | Years 1-3 | Years 4-6 | Years 7-26 | LOM |
Mining Costs per Tonne Mined | ||||
Per Tonne Milled | ||||
Mining Costs | ||||
Processing and Tailings Management Costs | ||||
General, Administrative, Environmental and Site Costs | ||||
Total Operating Costs | ||||
Average Net Cash Costs per Ounce | Years 1-3 | Years 4-6 | Years 7-26 | LOM |
Operating Costs | ||||
Refining and Transport | ||||
By-Product Credits | ( | ( | ( | ( |
Government | ||||
C1 Cash Cost Net of By-products | ||||
Sustaining Capital and Net Closure Costs | ||||
All-in Sustaining | ||||
Average Gold Equivalent Cash Costs per Ounce | Years 1-3 | Years 4-6 | Years 7-26 | LOM |
Operating Costs | ||||
Refining and Transport | ||||
Government | ||||
C1 Gold Equivalent Cash Cost | ||||
Sustaining Capital and Net Closure Costs | ||||
All-in Sustaining Gold Equivalent Cash Cost |
Note: Totals may not add up due to rounding. By-products and equivalents calculated using |
Gold Equivalent Cash Cost: (Operating costs including transportation and refining costs + Royalties) / Payable Au Eq oz. |
All-in Sustaining Cash Cost: Adds sustaining capital and closure costs to the Net Cash Cost and Gold Equivalent Cash Cost. |
Metallurgical Recoveries and Test Work Summary
Test work (2015-2023) was completed by
Comminution tests indicate that the materials are hard and moderately abrasive. The average Bond Ball Work Index for all the Cangrejos and Gran Bestia composites was 15.5 kWh per metric tonne.
Locked-cycle flotation indicates that copper-gold flotation results in recoveries of
Whole rock cyanidation tests using fresh rock samples extracted
Table 9: Selected Metallurgical Recoveries Summary
Total Recoveries | |||
Processed Material Type | Au | Cu | Ag |
Fresh Rock w/ Partially Oxidized Blend | 85 % | 79 % | 55 % |
Total Recovery | 85 % | 79 % | 55 % |
Table 10: Recoveries by Product Type
Recovered Metal Distribution by Product Type | |||
Product | Au | Cu | Ag |
Doré | 7 % | - | 2 % |
Copper Concentrate | 78 % | 79 % | 53 % |
Total Recovery | 85 % | 79 % | 55 % |
Dry Stack Tailings and Waste Rock Storage Facilities
Similar to the 2020 PEA, a siting and tailings storage study was performed for the PFS with the goal of balancing capital costs, operating costs and non-monetary considerations such as environmental and social impacts. Ausenco identified several potential sites and evaluated their suitability. The result of the study, similar to the 2020 PEA, indicated that the Dry Stack Tailings Facility ("DSTF") should be shifted to the north-west of the previous location. The new location is in a more favorable location with flatter terrain and a drier climate. The DSTF approach has a smaller footprint, positive environmental and social benefits, as well as reduced overall costs when compared to conventional tailings dam storage facility options.
The DSTF is proposed to be located several kilometers from the process plant site. Tailings will be pumped from the process plant to the filter plant next to the DSTF via a slurry pipeline and reclaimed water from the filtration process will be pumped back to the process plant for reuse. An overland conveyor will transport filtered tailings from the filter plant to the edge of the DSTF and a stacking system with mobile conveyors will be used to place filtered tailings along with using dozers and compactors to spread and compact the tailings to provide additional stability to the facility. As lifts are completed, it is planned that they will be progressively closed by grading the outer slopes and covering them with a growth media and revegetating them to reduce erosion and help stabilize the slopes from environmental elements. The facility is expected to contain approximately
The Waste Rock Storage Facility ("WRSF") and Saprolite Storage Facility for the Project will be located in a closed drainage basin south of the Cangrejos open pit and will store approximately
Geochemistry work to date indicates that both the DSTF and WRSF are non-acid generating based on results of acid-based accounting tests, as well as onsite kinetic barrel leaching tests and humidity cells of up to three years duration. The tailings and waste rock contain low sulphide concentrations and naturally occurring neutralizing minerals which prevent acid rock drainage.
Power Infrastructure and Water Requirements
Connected power requirements for the 30 ktpd, 60 ktpd and 80 ktpd phases require 77 megawatts ("MW"), 140 MW, and 150 MW respectively. Actual power draw, or demand, is approximately
Hydrogeology and water balance studies have determined there will be adequate water for the Project from on-site or nearby water sources, even in drought conditions. The majority of the water for the Project will come from pit dewatering and runoff and collection of underdrain water from the WRSF along with storing water from the rainy season. Water consumption is unlikely to impact local water users, because the selection of a dry-stack tailings alternative permits large-scale water reuse and recycling. Water storage ponds will be located at the toe of the WRSF and between the MIA and Process Plant for processing needs during the dry season.
Employment, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
During the construction period, peak full-time employees and construction workers combined are anticipated to be approximately 1,255, which does not include outside contractors. Over the 26-year mine life it is expected that the Project will employ approximately 700 to 1,150 people depending on the production phase.
Lumina is committed to earning and maintaining a robust social license to continue its Cangrejos mineral exploration and mine development operations in
Several of the Project's innate characteristics and design elements serve to minimize its environmental impacts:
- The majority of electrical power comes from renewable hydroelectric sources.
- Proximity to port minimizes transportation-based greenhouse gas emission impacts.
- The dry stack tailings filtration plant helps recycle a substantial portion of tailings water for reuse in the processing plant.
- Dry stack tailings deposition virtually eliminates carbon emissions associated with conventional tailings design.
- No acid rock drainage conditions are present in either the waste rock storage facility or the dry stack tailings facility.
- Aerial ore conveyor minimizes land clearance.
- Progressive reclamation and revegetation of tailings and waste rock facilities.
- Reforestation of previously impacted concession lands outside of mining facilities to serve as offsets of disturbed areas.
Taxes Applied in the Economic Model
The PFS incorporates a
Qualified Persons
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release pertaining to the Project has been reviewed and verified by the following Qualified Persons as defined by NI 43-101: Adrian Karolko,
Additional details regarding data verification and any limitations on the data verification process will be included in the technical report supporting the PFS.
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by
Quality Assurance
All Lumina core sample assay results have been independently monitored through a quality control / quality assurance ("QA/QC") program including the insertion of blind standards, blanks and the reanalysis of duplicate samples at a second umpire laboratory. In addition, Lumina conducted a comprehensive core duplicate sampling program on the historic Newmont drill core. The results of the QA/QC program and the resampling program indicate that the sample database is of sufficient accuracy and precision to be used for the generation of mineral resource estimates.
All the metallurgical samples were assayed by Plenge and SGS Peru. Assay results between the two testing facilities were consistent. The lock cycle flotation products, rougher tails and cleaner scavenger tails were also submitted for re-assay at the same analytical facility. Flotation optimization tests using design of experiment included no less than four duplicate tests to obtain lack of fit and pure error estimates. A good reconciliation was found between the calculated head grades and the assay head grades.
Lumina is not aware of any factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data referred to herein.
About
Follow us on: Twitter, Linkedin or Facebook.
Further details are available on the Company's website at https://luminagold.com/. To receive future news releases please sign up at https://luminagold.com/contact.
Signed: "Marshall Koval"
Neither the
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements and information herein, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements or information include but are not limited to statements or information with respect to the timing and ability to file a technical report for the PFS; the Company's ability to negotiate terms for its Investment Protection Agreement and begin the permitting process for the Project; the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates relating to the PFS; the development, operational and economic results of the PFS, including grade or quality of mineral deposits, processing and production schedules, LOM projections and estimates, cash estimates and costs, mined and processed material estimates, and future exploration and expansion potential; the realization of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; the engineered pit designs providing satisfactory access and sufficient working room for the planned fleet and optimize increasing metal prices; the copper-gold flotation concentrate that makes up the majority of the Project revenue being trucked to an Ecuadorian port approximately 40 km away,
With respect to forward-looking statements and information contained herein, the Company has made numerous assumptions including among other things, assumptions about general business and economic conditions; the prices of gold, copper and silver; the accuracy and reliability of technical data, forecasts, estimates and studies, including the PFS; the accuracy of slope guidance underlying the engineered pit design; estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves; anticipated costs and expenditures; future results of operations; ability to satisfy power infrastructure and water capacity requirements; availability and ability to procure personnel, machinery, supplies, and equipment from local sources where possible; the characteristics of the Project producing innate positive environmental impacts; tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the Project; the relationship between the Company and the local communities and its business partners; ability to operate in a safe and effective manner; and the success of exploration, development and processing activities. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.
Although management of the Company believes that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that a forward-looking statement or information herein will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements and information by their nature are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. These factors include, but are not limited to: risks relating to exploration activities and accurately predicting mineralization; the timing and ability of the Company to obtain necessary permits; risks relating to inaccurate geological and engineering assumptions (including with respect to the tonnage, grade and recoverability of reserves and resources); risks relating to unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, and unanticipated events related to health, safety and environmental matters); capital costs varying significantly from estimates; business and economic conditions in the mining industry generally; risks associated with the business of the Company; the supply and demand for labour and other project inputs; changes in commodity prices; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; inflation and credit risks; risks relating to adverse weather conditions; political risk and social unrest; changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets; and other risk factors as detailed from time to time in the Company's continuous disclosure documents filed with Canadian securities administrators. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lumina-gold-announces-positive-cangrejos-pre-feasibility-study-us2-2-billion-npv-26-year-mine-life-and-production-of-371-000-gold-ounces-per-year-and-41-million-pounds-of-copper-per-year-301799335.html
SOURCE
FAQ
What were the findings of the Lumina Gold Corp. Preliminary Feasibility Study on April 17, 2023?
What is the projected annual production from the Cangrejos Project as per the PFS?
How long is the mine life for the Cangrejos Project according to the PFS?
What is the stock symbol for Lumina Gold Corp.?