Engine Capital Sends Letter to the Board of Directors of Kohl's Regarding Significant Opportunities for Value Creation
Engine Capital LP urges Kohl's Corporation (NYSE: KSS) to conduct a strategic review, including the potential separation of its ecommerce and legacy retail businesses. The ecommerce arm is estimated to hold a valuation of at least
- Engine Capital argues for a strategic review that could highlight the value of Kohl's ecommerce business.
- Kohl's has generated
$1.7 billion in free cash flow over the last twelve months, indicating underlying financial strength.
- Total shareholder return has decreased by -10.5% since
Michelle Gass became CEO. - Kohl's stock has underperformed the S&P 500 by 90% and peers by 19.1% since May 2018.
- Current market valuation is low, indicating a lack of investor confidence in management and strategy.
Asserts the Board Should Publicly Commit to Running a Review of Strategic Alternatives, Including a Separation of the Ecommerce Business and a Sale of the Company
Believes Kohl’s' Standalone Ecommerce Business Could be Conservatively Valued at
Expects Well-Capitalized Financial Sponsors Could Pay a
***
Dear Members of the Board:
As you likely know, since
Given leadership’s failure to create value through operational excellence and strategic initiatives over long periods of time, it is time for the Board to accept the fact that the public market is not appreciating Kohl’s in its current form. Even the most patient long-term shareholders cannot be expected to endure the punishing underperformance and perpetual value disconnect seen at Kohl’s. This is why we are urging the Board to publicly commit to conducting a full review of strategic alternatives. Our own analysis and interactions with an array of market participants lead us to believe there are two viable paths for the Board to explore:
-
First, separating the legacy retail business (“LegacyCo”) and the ecommerce business (“DigitalCo”) so that the market can assign the proper valuation multiple to each business. The Board is hopefully aware that the public market is growing increasingly fond of simpler, more defined corporate structures. This is why an increasing number of large companies are spinning or splitting off assets that are best suited to operate as independent companies. As explained below, we believe a standalone Kohl’s ecommerce business could be conservatively valued at
or more, an amount that dwarfs the Company’s current market capitalization.$12.4 billion
-
Second, given that the Company trades at a massive discount to intrinsic value and its strategy has not resonated with the public market, we believe it is essential to run a market test to see how much well-capitalized financial sponsors would pay for the entire Company. Our own diligence leads us to believe there are financial sponsors who will be able to pay a significant premium of
50% , or at least per share, for the reasons outlined below.$75
These paths should be evaluated in parallel so that the Board can make the most informed decision to maximize value on a risk-adjusted basis at the end of the review process. As we will show, there is no excuse for the Board to cling to the status quo.
An Overview of Shareholder Returns and Valuation
The Board has had ample time to create shareholder value, but the results speak for themselves:
|
|||||||||||||
Since Ms.
|
Since Mr.
|
Since new
|
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
|||||||
Peer Median |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
|
||||||
S&P 500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Kohl's |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||||||
Kohl's Relative to Peers |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
||||||
Kohl's Relative to S&P 500 |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
||||||
Source: Bloomberg; total shareholder return calculated as of the close on |
Kohl’s has significantly underperformed the S&P 500 and its peers over the most relevant time periods, including since
It would be tempting to conclude that Kohl’s' fortunes and outlook have changed because the Company has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year and since the new strategy was disclosed 14 months ago. We believe, however, this would be an incorrect inference. The reason the Company has outperformed the S&P 500 over this recent horizon is simply because retailers’ stocks underperformed massively during the first phase of the pandemic and then outperformed during the recovery phase. Kohl’s' outperformance relative to the S&P 500 since the new strategy was disclosed is not a stamp of approval for the Board’s strategy, but rather the result of good timing. In our view, the fact that the Company has massively underperformed peers since the new strategy was disclosed (Kohl’s is up
The Strategic and Financial Rationale for Separating the Ecommerce Business
As noted, one path toward realizing the value trapped in Kohl’s' assets is separating DigitalCo from LegacyCo. We firmly believe a separate digital business could raise money at a significantly higher valuation, have a significantly lower cost of capital and accelerate its growth as a standalone entity. Under this construct, the two entities could contract to keep the omnichannel experience for the customer seamless. The separation would also allow investors to value both companies and their respective income streams at more appropriate valuations. This is particularly timely considering the high valuations the market continues assigning to ecommerce and technology businesses.
“So look, our focus is to ensure the omnichannel behavior of customers is going to be respected at all costs. I think the omnichannel behavior is irrefutable, and we need to respect that. But we're looking at a range of things, including the net of cost, benefits and execution that's associated with operating as 1 integrated business versus operating as 2 separate businesses. And ultimately, we just need to see that the additional shareholder value can be unlocked beyond the potential of our current approach with our digitally-led omnichannel Polaris strategy.
So we're working with our Board and our advisers for some time on this. But based on how the market is assigning value e-commerce businesses, we just added
Assuming online sales revenue of around
The Need to Assess a Full Sale of the Company
Given Kohl’s' unacceptable long-term stagnation, the Board must also consider a sale of the Company to a buyer who can pay a meaningful premium. Our analysis and interactions with market participants lead us to believe the private market value of Kohl’s is far superior to where it currently trades. Perhaps in the private market, buyers will be better positioned to take advantage of Kohl’s' assets.
A private equity buyer would likely take advantage of Kohl’s' prodigious free cash flow and run the Company with significantly more leverage than the Board is willing to, which would lower its cost of capital and therefore put a buyer in a position to pay significantly more for the Company than where it currently trades. Our interactions with these types of buyers suggest they would aim to take advantage of the Company’s real estate to lower their equity checks and further increase their internal rate of return, which again would allow them to pay more to public shareholders.
Naturally, the Board may argue this is not the right time to evaluate a sale of the Company and that more time is necessary to see the fruits of the new framework. We would disagree with this assessment. As highlighted above, since the announcement of the new strategy, the Company has significantly underperformed its peers – perhaps because it is one of the very few retailers that has been unable to grow its sales compared to 2019. The Board should be aware that compared to the third quarter of 2019, Macy’s' and Dillard’s, Inc.’s 2021 third quarter sales were up
We contend the private market value of Kohl’s is at least 5.5x forward EBITDA, which would imply a conservative purchase price of around
In conclusion, it is the Board’s job to drive value and the Board has had ample opportunities to do so over long periods. We are not pushing for one of the aforementioned solutions over the other, but we – and other shareholders, clearly – do not believe the status quo is acceptable. During last year’s proxy contest waged by four shareholders, the Company made several commitments, including that the Board has and will continue to be an agent of change and that the Board is open to new ideas that could enhance shareholder value. We urge the Board to be this agent of change and publicly commit to a review of strategic alternatives to create value for shareholders.
We request a meeting with the Board at its earliest convenience to discuss the initiatives summarized in this letter. On behalf of Engine, we look forward to working cooperatively with you to maximize long-term shareholder value. A review of our numerous engagements with public companies, including the many that have resulted in board representation and cooperation agreements, should signal our desire to be a constructive advocate for all of our fellow shareholders and stakeholders.
Very truly yours,
|
|
|||||||||||||
Managing Partner |
Partner |
About
_________________________________ |
1 Total shareholder return calculated as of the close on |
2 Assumes 135 million shares outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2021. |
3 Free cash flow and share repurchases calculated over 40 quarters from Q4 2011 to Q3 2021. |
4 Returns calculated since |
5 Assumes |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211206005263/en/
For Investors:
aajdler@enginecap.com
For Media:
MKA
bkirpalani@mkacomms.com
Source:
FAQ
What is the main request from Engine Capital LP regarding Kohl's Corporation (KSS)?
How does Engine Capital value Kohl's ecommerce business?
What premium does Engine Capital expect for a potential sale of Kohl's Corporation?