GRAIL CCGA Discovery Results Published in Cancer Cell Reveal Methylation as Promising DNA Hallmark for Multi-Cancer Early Detection
GRAIL, LLC announced findings from its CCGA study, revealing that methylation techniques demonstrated the highest cancer signal detection sensitivity at 98% specificity, outperforming other approaches. This research supports the development of the Galleri® multi-cancer early detection blood test, capable of identifying signals from over 50 cancer types. The study involved 2,800 participants and emphasized the importance of rigorous genomic measures for cancer detection. The findings will refine the Galleri test, enhancing its capability in early cancer diagnosis.
- Methylation approaches showed 98% specificity in detecting cancer signals.
- Galleri test predicts cancer signal origin with high accuracy.
- Research involved 2,800 participants, enhancing data reliability.
- The findings support the potential for improved early cancer detection.
- None.
Methylation Approach Had One of the Highest Cancer Signal Detection Sensitivities and Best Predicted Cancer Signal Origin of the Evaluated Technologies
Analysis is Part of Extensive and Systematic Comparison of Cancer Specific Cell-Free DNA Features for Multi-Cancer Early Detection
“Results from the CCGA study formed the basis for how we developed and refined the Galleri test—it’s our origin story and the foundation of our work to transform cancer care with a simple blood test,” said Amoolya Singh, Ph.D., Senior Vice President of Data Science and Chief Scientific Officer at GRAIL. “This defining study made it possible to carefully design a population screening test with a high specificity and low false-positive rate for cancer detection. When combined with standard screenings, this test has the potential to improve detection of cancer in asymptomatic individuals.”
The CCGA Discovery Substudy, the first of three pre-planned substudies of the case-controlled CCGA study, evaluated multiple potential approaches to blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) in a cohort of 2,800 individuals. These approaches included whole-genome sequencing, whole-genome methylation sequencing, and ultra deep targeted sequencing. Together this covered eight classifiers including methylation, somatic copy number alterations, somatic mutations, and a ninth pan-feature classifier. Criteria for evaluation included sensitivity (a test’s ability to correctly identify people with cancer) at high (
The CCGA Discovery Substudy showed that among the evaluated classifiers, those using whole-genome methylation had one of the highest cancer signal detection sensitivities at
Findings from CCGA Discovery, along with the other substudies, were instrumental in developing, refining and validating the targeted methylation platform used in the Galleri® MCED test, which applies next-generation genomic sequencing, advanced data science and machine learning to detect a shared cancer signal across more than 50 types of cancer at
CCGA Discovery evaluated various cfDNA measures in three prototype assays and nine prototype machine learning classifiers to determine the most promising approach for an MCED test with a low false-positive rate and sufficient sensitivity to improve outcomes for individuals who undergo screening. The substudy included 2,800 participants—1,628 with cancer and 1,172 without cancer (non-cancer). Blood samples from individuals with cancer were demographically matched to non-cancer individuals to reduce statistical uncertainty. Patients with cancer diagnosed by screening or by clinical presentation were enrolled before starting definitive therapy.
The substudy implemented innovations in cancer detection evaluation, including study design, custom distributed and cloud computing, and the introduction of a novel measure: circulating tumor DNA allele fraction, defined as the fraction of tumor-distinguishing methylation marks in a cfDNA sample (i.e., the available signal). Furthermore, it introduced the metric of clinical limit of detection (cLOD) to measure cancer detection as a function of cfDNA tumor fraction—a more robust performance metric than sensitivity, which is highly dependent on study cancer type and stage composition.
“To be able to meaningfully compare ct-DNA assays in the future, the clinical limit of detection must be assessed,” added Singh. “The CCGA Discovery analysis is the first direct head-to-head comparison of multiple approaches that we are aware of. Notably, CCGA Discovery identified methylation features in ct-DNA as having the leading combination of cancer detection and cancer signal origin performance. This motivated the development of an improved targeted methylation platform that underlies Galleri today with substantially improved performance.”
About the CCGA Study
The CCGA study is a prospective, multi-center, case-controlled, longitudinal study designed to characterize the landscape of genomic cancer signals in the blood of people with and without cancer.
The study is collecting de-identified biospecimens and clinical data from more than 15,000 participants across 142 sites in the
About GRAIL’s MCED Clinical Development Program
The Galleri clinical development program consists of studies that collectively include more than 335,000 participants together with what is believed to be the largest linked datasets of genomic and clinical data in the field of cancer research. GRAIL’s program includes the foundational CCGA development and validation study, the interventional PATHFINDER and PATHFINDER 2 studies, the
About GRAIL
GRAIL is a healthcare company whose mission is to detect cancer early, when it can be cured. GRAIL is focused on alleviating the global burden of cancer by developing pioneering technology to detect and identify multiple deadly cancer types early. The company is using the power of next-generation sequencing, population-scale clinical studies, and state-of-the-art computer science and data science to enhance the scientific understanding of cancer biology, and to develop its multi-cancer early detection blood test. GRAIL is headquartered in
For more information, visit grail.com.
About Galleri®
The earlier that cancer is detected, the higher the chance of successful outcomes. The Galleri multi-cancer early detection test can detect signals across more than 50 types of cancer, as defined by the
For more information about Galleri, visit galleri.com.
Important Galleri Safety Information
The Galleri test is recommended for use in adults with an elevated risk for cancer, such as those aged 50 or older. The Galleri test does not detect all cancers and should be used in addition to routine cancer screening tests recommended by a healthcare provider. Galleri is intended to detect cancer signals and predict where in the body the cancer signal is located. Use of Galleri is not recommended in individuals who are pregnant, 21 years old or younger, or undergoing active cancer treatment.
Results should be interpreted by a healthcare provider in the context of medical history, clinical signs and symptoms. A test result of “No Cancer Signal Detected” does not rule out cancer. A test result of “Cancer Signal Detected” requires confirmatory diagnostic evaluation by medically established procedures (e.g., imaging) to confirm cancer.
If cancer is not confirmed with further testing, it could mean that cancer is not present or testing was insufficient to detect cancer, including due to the cancer being located in a different part of the body. False-positive (a cancer signal detected when cancer is not present) and false-negative (a cancer signal not detected when cancer is present) test results do occur. Rx only.
Laboratory/Test Information
GRAIL’s clinical laboratory is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) and accredited by the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221117006029/en/
For GRAIL
Corporate Communications
pr@grail.com
Investor Relations
ir@grail.com
Source:
FAQ
What were the key findings of the GRAIL study on methylation and cancer detection?
How does the Galleri test utilize findings from the CCGA study?
What is the significance of the CCGA study for early cancer detection?
How many participants were involved in the GRAIL CCGA Discovery Substudy?