Jury Awards Huntsman $94 Million in Case Against Praxair/Linde
Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) has been awarded $93.9 million by a New Orleans jury in a lawsuit against Praxair/Linde, stemming from supply failures at Huntsman's Geismar, Louisiana site. The total damages, including interest, are expected to exceed $125 million. The lawsuit, initiated in 2014, highlighted Praxair's failure to maintain its facility and fulfill contractual obligations. This verdict follows a previous victory against Albemarle, marking significant legal success for Huntsman in recent months, reinforcing its commitment to ensuring shareholder value.
- Award of $93.9 million in damages, potentially exceeding $125 million with interest.
- Strengthened legal position after winning previous case against Albemarle for over $600 million.
- Demonstrated perseverance and effective legal strategy, increasing shareholder confidence.
- None.
Total Damages to Exceed
THE WOODLANDS, Texas, May 2, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) today announced that a New Orleans jury awarded it
Peter R. Huntsman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented on the case after the jury verdict was returned: "This lawsuit was filed in 2014 and justice was a very long time coming. I could not be prouder of the entire Huntsman team – from our PU division and purchasing personnel who managed the constant operational and commercial upsets occurring when Praxair's poorly-maintained facilities went down from 2004 through 2013, to our corporate legal and finance teams that pursued the litigation through trial after we filed suit. They displayed the integrity, professionalism, perseverance, and ingenuity – hallmarks of Huntsman associates around the world – needed to take on and defeat an irresponsible and better-funded adversary on the ground at Geismar and in the courts in New Orleans. I'd like to recognize all of them and thank the 12 members of the jury and the trial judge for their time and commitment to fairness in the courtroom.
Mr. Huntsman continued: "After winning more than
The case against Praxair was first filed in 2014 but owing to Covid-19 among other matters, did not go to trial until this April. After a three-week trial, the 12-person jury took less than three hours to render its verdict, unanimously finding that Praxair repeatedly breached its promises to Huntsman and that those breaches directly caused Huntsman substantial financial damages. Huntsman was represented in the case by Vinson & Elkins and the New Orleans-based trial firm of Chehardy, Sherman & Williams. James M. Williams of Chehardy and Jim Thompson of V&E were co-lead counsel during the trial.
About Huntsman:
Huntsman Corporation is a publicly traded global manufacturer and marketer of differentiated and specialty chemicals with 2021 revenues of approximately
Social Media:
Twitter: www.twitter.com/Huntsman_Corp
Facebook: www.facebook.com/huntsmancorp
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/huntsman
Forward-Looking Statements:
Certain information in this release constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on management's current beliefs and expectations. The forward-looking statements in this release are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances and involve risks and uncertainties that may affect the company's operations, markets, products, services, prices and other factors as discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in the Huntsman companies' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Significant risks and uncertainties may relate to, but are not limited to, volatile global economic conditions, cyclical and volatile product markets, disruptions in production at manufacturing facilities, reorganization or restructuring of Huntsman's operations, including any delay of, or other negative developments affecting the ability to implement cost reductions, timing of proposed transactions, and manufacturing optimization improvements in Huntsman businesses and realize anticipated cost savings, and other financial, economic, competitive, environmental, political, legal, regulatory and technological factors. The company assumes no obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by applicable laws.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jury-awards-huntsman-94-million-in-case-against-praxairlinde-301537125.html
SOURCE Huntsman Corporation
FAQ
What was the jury award amount for Huntsman in the case against Praxair?
When was the jury verdict announced for the Praxair case?
What were the reasons for Huntsman's lawsuit against Praxair?
How long did the trial against Praxair last?