Outerbridge Issues Presentation Detailing the Need for Board Refreshment at Comtech
Outerbridge Capital Management, a significant stakeholder in Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (CMTL), is advocating for substantial changes in the company's Board of Directors due to persistent underperformance and poor governance. The firm nominated Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs as candidates for election at the upcoming Annual Meeting on December 17, 2021. Outerbridge's presentation criticizes the Board's lack of independence, ineffective capital allocation, and a history of failed strategies, urging shareholders to support the nominated candidates to enhance corporate governance and accountability.
- Outerbridge nominated experienced candidates Wendi Carpenter and Sidney Fuchs for the Board, promising a fresh outlook.
- The nominees have significant industry knowledge in satellite communications, which could benefit Comtech's strategic direction.
- Comtech experienced a loss of over $700 million in shareholder value due to mismanagement since 2016.
- The company has faced consistent underperformance with negative price reactions for earnings announcements over the past eight quarters.
- The recent PIPE transaction diluted share value and voting rights for common shareholders.
- The current Board lacks operational expertise and has a poor track record of capital management.
Believes Board Lacks the Expertise and Independence to Hold Management Accountable for Consistently Poor Performance, Failed Strategies, and Dilutive Transactions
Highlights Board’s Entrenchment Maneuvers, Severe Lack of Necessary Relevant Experience, and Poor Corporate Governance Practices
Urges Shareholders to Vote on the White Proxy Card for the Election of Highly Qualified and Fully Independent Nominees
The presentation is available here and additional materials are available at: https://www.restorecomtech.com/stockholder-materials.
The presentation highlights the following:
- Comtech’s Persistent Underperformance, Strategic Failures, and Lost Credibility – The Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) has underperformed relative to peers and relevant indices on a 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year basis, while revenue and adjusted EBITDA have been stagnant. The fact that earnings announcements have resulted in negative 1-day price reactions for the past eight consecutive quarters seriously calls into question management’s and the Board’s credibility.
-
A Long History of Poor Capital Allocation and Failed M&A – Since 2016, management has spent
on acquisitions and$600 million on R&D, resulting in over$350 million of shareholder value destruction – with the most recent failed acquisition attempt costing shareholders a$700 million termination fee. Further, return on invested capital has failed to exceed the Company’s weighted average cost of capital of$70 million 7.5% in each of the past five years.
-
A
Track Record of Poor Corporate Governance and Lack of True Independence on the Board – The flawed Board refreshment process has resulted in the addition of directors with no real independence or relevant experience needed to push back on management’s failed strategies and instill accountability in the boardroom. What’s more,Comtech is appointing new directors after the Annual Meeting, thus depriving shareholders of a voice on these candidates.
-
A Disappointing Pattern of Dismissive Engagement and Entrenchment Maneuvers – The Board’s decision to appoint as its next CEO 20-year
Comtech executiveMichael Porcelain , who contributed significantly to the Company’s poor performance as both CFO and COO, is highly questionable and will likely perpetuate the status quo atComtech . Additionally, the Board approved a highly dilutive PIPE transaction following Outerbridge's engagement and nomination, allowing preferred shares to be voted on an as-converted basis and effectively securing ~13.5% of the voting shares in favor of the Board at the Annual Meeting.
- A Board Underqualified to Guide Comtech or Evaluate Strategic Offers – The Board has been almost exclusively comprised of financial professionals who lack the technical and operational expertise relevant to the core business. The terms of the recent PIPE transaction – which included no premium, was highly dilutive, and diminished the voting rights of common shareholders – raises doubts as to whether the current Board will act in the best interest of all shareholders.
-
Outerbridge Nominees Represent the Best Choice for Shareholders – The Outerbridge nominees were recruited and selected with the help of an independent recruitment firm based solely on their relevant industry and board experience, and after a thorough conflict check. Unlike
Comtech's nominees and recent appointee who have no relevant industry experience, the Outerbridge nominees have extensive knowledge of and experience in Comtech’s end-markets, as well as a proven track record of success in leading large organizations involved with satellite communications, aerospace & defense, public safety, and government contracting.
Vote on the WHITE proxy card to elect Outerbridge’s highly qualified and fully independent nominees to the Comtech Board.
About
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211123005766/en/
Investor:
Chief Investment Officer
(347) 493-0350
rory@outerbridgecapital.com
info@outerbridgecapital.com
OR
(212) 468-5384 / (212) 468-5380
jkovler@harkinskovler.com / rwareham@harkinskovler.com
Media:
dzacchei@sloanepr.com / jgermani@sloanepr.com
Source:
FAQ
What issues did Outerbridge Capital Management raise regarding Comtech (CMTL)?
Who has Outerbridge nominated for Comtech's Board of Directors?
When is Comtech's Annual Meeting scheduled?
What is the significance of the PIPE transaction mentioned in the press release?