Clarivate Report on U.S. Research Emphasizes Need for Continued International Collaboration and Domestic Regional Investment

Rhea-AI Summary

Clarivate Plc (NYSE:CLVT) released a report highlighting the impact of globalization on U.S. research, urging for continued investment and collaboration to sustain its position as a science leader. The analysis, drawn from the Institute for Scientific Information, points out that U.S. research growth has not kept pace with global counterparts, particularly in Asia and the EU. Key findings include a doubling of international collaboration, particularly with Mainland China, and a decline in the diversity of research subjects due to faster budget increases in biomedicine. Furthermore, research output is unevenly distributed across the U.S., necessitating focused funding in weaker areas. The report warns that the U.S. no longer dominates global research, with other nations producing increasingly impactful papers.

Positive

• The U.S. remains an influential player in global research despite increasing competition.
• International collaboration in U.S. research has doubled for traditional partners and quadrupled with Mainland China.

Negative

• U.S. research growth has lagged compared to other global regions, particularly Asia and the EU.
• The diversity of research subjects is declining, with increased funding skewed towards biomedicine.

Institute for Scientific Information prompts the U.S. to address shrinking domestic research capacity or risk its position as a leading science and technology power

LONDON, April 27, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Clarivate Plc (NYSE:CLVT), a global leader in connecting people and organizations to intelligence they can trust to transform their world, today released an in-depth report from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)™ which examines the impact of globalization on United States research. The report emphasizes the importance of continued investment and collaboration to maintain the country's position as a leading science and technology power.

"U.S. research trends: The impact of globalization and collaboration" draws on data from the Web of Science™ to analyze the trajectory of U.S. research over the past 15 years. It reveals that while the U.S. remains a strong and influential player in the global research community, it faces increasing competition from new science-based economies in Asia and an expanded EU network. The report also raises important questions about how past investment has prepared the U.S. scientific enterprise to achieve its goals.

Jonathan Adams, Chief Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Information said: "The U.S. remains a leading science and technology power, but it no longer stands alone. It needs to acknowledge its shrinking domestic research capacity and work pragmatically with resourceful competitors to maintain its position."

Key findings of the report include:

• U.S. research investment, domestic research student numbers, and the output of research articles and reviews have not grown at the same rate as other parts of the world, resulting in increasing competition.
• Most growth in U.S. research publication output is attributable to international collaboration, which has doubled for major traditional partners such as the United Kingdom and Germany and quadrupled with Mainland China.
• The physical sciences and technology areas are the subjects where the U.S. has the greatest degree of international collaboration and the smallest component of purely domestic research output. Mainland China is the U.S.'s most frequent partner in technology research and is as frequent as the U.K. and Germany in physical sciences.
• The U.S.'s research portfolio remains extensive and diverse, but its research subject diversity has declined due to the science budget expanding much faster in biomedicine than in technology areas.
• U.S research activity is unevenly spread across the country, but the U.S. has sought to address over-concentration of its innovation and development resources by structured funding directed to areas of relatively weak research capacity.
• The U.S. is strong but no longer dominates the research landscape as it did in the past. This is because other G7 nations are producing papers of the highest citation impact, while more U.S. papers are now of world average citation impact.

Notes to editors:

Our Global Research Reports from the Institute for Scientific Information at Clarivate draw on our unique industry insights to offer analysis, ideas and commentary to enlighten and stimulate debate. Each one demonstrates the huge potential of research data to inform management issues in research assessment and research policy and to accelerate development of the global research base.
https://clarivate.com/the-institute-for-scientific-information/isi-reports/

About Clarivate

Clarivate is a leading global information services provider. We connect people and organizations to intelligence they can trust to transform their perspective, their work and our world. Our subscription- and technology-based solutions are coupled with deep domain expertise and cover the areas of Academia & Government, Life Sciences & Healthcare and Intellectual Property. For more information, please visit clarivate.com.

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/clarivate-report-on-us-research-emphasizes-need-for-continued-international-collaboration-and-domestic-regional-investment-301809381.html

SOURCE Clarivate Plc

FAQ

What does the Clarivate report say about U.S. research capacity?

The report emphasizes that the U.S. faces a shrinking domestic research capacity and needs to invest and collaborate to maintain its leading position.

How is U.S. research competition evolving according to the report?

The report highlights that U.S. research investment growth is not keeping pace with nations in Asia and the EU, leading to increased competition.

What are the key findings related to international collaboration in U.S. research?

International collaboration has doubled with traditional partners and quadrupled with Mainland China, indicating a reliance on global partnerships.

How has the trend of U.S. research output changed in recent years?

U.S. research output growth has slowed compared to other regions, and a significant portion of new publications comes from international collaborations.

What does the report indicate about the diversity of U.S. research subjects?

The report notes a decline in research subject diversity, with an imbalance in funding favoring biomedicine over other technology areas.