Avoro Capital Issues Open Letter to Fellow Acceleron Pharma Shareholders
Avoro Capital Advisors, holding approximately 7% of Acceleron Pharma, opposes Merck's proposed acquisition of Acceleron at $180 per share, deeming it undervalued. Avoro believes Acceleron has significant potential as a standalone entity, especially with upcoming Phase 3 STELLAR trial results expected by end of 2022 that could enhance share price. The letter emphasizes monetizing existing royalties from Reblozyl and exploring better strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value, criticizing the Board's decision-making process and urging fellow shareholders to reject the tender offer.
- Expectation of a value inflection point from Phase 3 STELLAR trial data by end of 2022.
- Potential for significant revenue through Reblozyl royalties, with peak sales estimated over $4B.
- Merck's offer of $180 per share considered significantly undervalued by 38% based on recent share price performance.
- Concerns over the Board's limited market exploration before accepting Merck's offer.
Remains Opposed to Sale of Acceleron to
Believes Company Has Strong Momentum and Continuing as Standalone Entity is Superior Path to a Transaction at the Proposed Price, Particularly with Major Value Inflection Point Coming from Phase 3 Data
Outlines Alternatives by Which Acceleron Could Maximize Shareholder Value as
Ready and Willing to Assist with Change in Board Composition to
The full text of the letter follows:
Dear Acceleron Shareholders,
After reviewing Merck’s Tender Offer Statement and the Company’s Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, we continue to believe that the proposed sale of Acceleron to
Based on the information currently available, we will not tender our shares in support of the transaction.
We ask you to consider the following:
Why sell now, at an undervalued price, when Acceleron has positive momentum and appears to be so close to a value inflection point?
As we stated previously, we believe that Acceleron’s management team has done an excellent job creating value for shareholders until now and that the Company has great potential as a standalone entity. We also believe
As we expected, Acceleron’s Schedule 14D-9 filing reveals that Acceleron’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) initially only received an offer from one party (
We expect that, by the end of 2022, Acceleron will have results from its Phase 3 STELLAR trial that is enrolling the prevalent PAH population, which we believe will support a higher share price – a notion also voiced publicly by other shareholders and sell-side analysts such as a recent Raymond James analyst note that stated, “if successful in Phase 3, we believe XLRN shares could easily be worth ~
While we of course understand that XLRN bears some degree of risk in waiting for at least some of these results versus taking the money on the table from
In addition to sotatercept, Acceleron also has great potential to create value with Reblozyl. Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMY”) has guided to more than
Others Agree that the Price is Too Low for a Sale at this Time
Since our initial letter on
Further, numerous sell-side analysts have noted that the value assigned to Acceleron by the Merger is too low. Examples include:
Raymond James (
-
“We think
for XLRN is a steal.”$11.5B -
“…we share the view of many investors in XLRN that this deal-price is too low (<
40% premium over 200-day moving average)”
Cowen (
-
“M&A speculation driving stock — we see
/sh as too low to get deal done”$180 - “We believe that the stock could see much higher values as a stand-alone company either based on 35x P/E multiple on EPS or a more traditional 4-6x multiple on peak sales which would provide an even higher valuation.”
Barclays (
- “With that backdrop, and sotatercept’s significant commercial potential, we would be somewhat surprised to see Acceleron proceed here without a greater premium…”
Jefferies (
-
“The deal price of
/share is a bargain…”$180
Better Alternatives Exist at this Valuation Level
If XLRN’s Board did feel the need to pursue a monetization avenue following the
Should the tender not receive sufficient shareholder support, one pathway would be for Acceleron to remain independent and pursue complete or partial monetization of its Reblozyl royalty to a variety of potentially interested parties that seek lucrative royalties such as Party A, who has already demonstrated interest in the Reblozyl royalty as indicated in the Schedule 14D-9 filing. In fact, based on what we have heard from market participants, we strongly believe there is tremendous continued interest in this royalty stream, and it appears from our reading of the Schedule 14D-9 that the Company failed to properly explore this avenue as a means to unlock shareholder value.
Merck’s comments on the conference call following the Merger announcement about Reblozyl and its associated royalty demonstrate its inherent value:
“And with regards to the royalty stream, we are confident in Reblozyl's commercial potential and ability to expand into new indications. We believe it will become a cornerstone therapy across a range of heme indications and has the potential for multibillion-dollar peak revenue. The royalty cash flows are financially attractive and provide the opportunity for this acquisition to be accretive in the near term.”4
In the scenario of remaining independent, Acceleron could use proceeds from Reblozyl royalty monetization to fund the continued development of sotatercept in PAH and other indications through multiple valuation inflection points for the Company.
***
We appreciate that some shareholders may feel pressure to tender their shares simply because the Company’s disclosures give the sense that the current Board may not be willing to go back to work and continue to lead the Company forward absent this transaction. If this is indeed the case, and the current Board is unwilling to forego this undervalued deal and to pursue a standalone strategy, Avoro would stand ready to take the steps necessary to help modify the Board’s composition and add directors with relevant experience and expertise to create improved shareholder value – including recommending a new group of independent directors for appointment to the Board.
We look forward to engaging constructively with Acceleron management, as well as our fellow shareholders, in order to understand other viewpoints and to further articulate our rationale in the hope that we can be part of identifying a better path forward.
Sincerely,
Managing Partner and Portfolio Manager,
About
Forward-Looking Statements and Additional Information
This communication contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and may include projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives, intentions and expectations with respect to future financial results, events, operations, services, product development and potential, and statements regarding future performance. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “will be” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the planned completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger. Although Avoro believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Avoro,
_______________
1
2 Available at https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211013006045/en/Holocene-Advisors-Believes-Merck%E2%
3 Available at https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211020005321/en/Darwin-Global-Urges-Acceleron-Shareholders-Not-to-Tender-Their-Shares-to-Merck
4 Webcast, “Acceleron Pharma Inc Acquired by
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211028005411/en/
Media
dzacchei@sloanepr.com / jgermani@sloanepr.com
Source:
FAQ
Why is Avoro Capital against the Merck acquisition of Acceleron (XLRN)?
What is the expected value inflection point for Acceleron (XLRN)?
How much revenue is expected from Reblozyl royalties for Acceleron (XLRN)?
What alternatives does Avoro propose for maximizing shareholder value in Acceleron (XLRN)?