Xcel Energy First Quarter 2021 Earnings Report
Xcel Energy reported a robust performance for Q1 2021, achieving GAAP earnings of $362 million or $0.67 per share, up from $295 million or $0.56 per share in Q1 2020. This growth was primarily driven by increased electric and natural gas margins, despite higher depreciation and interest expenses. The company reaffirmed its annual earnings guidance and marked a significant milestone with a 51% reduction in carbon emissions since 2005. Their proposed Colorado Clean Energy Plan aims to enhance renewable energy by 5,000 megawatts and targets an 85% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030.
- Q1 2021 earnings increased to $362 million, or $0.67 per share.
- Achieved a 51% reduction in carbon emissions from 2005 levels.
- Proposed Colorado Clean Energy Plan to add 5,000 megawatts of renewable energy.
- Plan aims for 85% carbon emission reduction in Colorado by 2030.
- Increased depreciation and interest charges impacting overall profitability.
Xcel Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: XEL) today reported 2021 first quarter GAAP and ongoing earnings of
Earnings reflect higher electric and natural gas margins, which more than offset additional depreciation, interest charges and less allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC).
“Xcel Energy had a strong first quarter and we are reaffirming our expectation to deliver earnings within our annual guidance range,” said Ben Fowke, chairman and CEO. “We are also pleased to have achieved a significant milestone, reducing carbon emission
“We recently proposed significant measures in Colorado that will transform the energy landscape and help the state continue its clean energy leadership. Our Colorado Clean Energy Plan adds more than 5,000 megawatts of renewable energy and accelerates the retirement of our coal plants. The plan will reduce carbon emissions
At 9:00 a.m. CDT today, Xcel Energy will host a conference call to review financial results. To participate in the call, please dial in 5 to 10 minutes prior to the start and follow the operator’s instructions.
US Dial-In: |
(888) 394-8218 |
|
International Dial-In: |
(400) 120-9101 |
|
Conference ID: |
7731118 |
The conference call also will be simultaneously broadcast and archived on Xcel Energy’s website at www.xcelenergy.com. To access the presentation, click on Investor Relations. If you are unable to participate in the live event, the call will be available for replay from 12:00 p.m. CDT on April 29 through 12:00 p.m. CDT on May 2.
Replay Numbers |
|
|
US Dial-In: |
(888) 203-1112 |
|
International Dial-In: |
(719) 457-0820 |
|
Access Code: |
7731118 |
Except for the historical statements contained in this report, the matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such forward-looking statements, including the 2021 EPS guidance, long-term EPS and dividend growth rate objectives, future sales, future expenses, future tax rates, future operating performance, estimated base capital expenditures and financing plans, projected capital additions and forecasted annual revenue requirements with respect to rider filings, expected rate increases to customers, expectations and intentions regarding regulatory proceedings, and expected impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of resettlement calculations and credit losses relating to certain energy transactions, as well as assumptions and other statements are intended to be identified in this document by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “possible,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions. Actual results may vary materially. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information. The following factors, in addition to those discussed in Xcel Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020 and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations as suggested by such forward-looking information: uncertainty around the impacts and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic; operational safety, including our nuclear generation facilities; successful long-term operational planning; commodity risks associated with energy markets and production; rising energy prices and fuel costs; qualified employee work force and third-party contractor factors; ability to recover costs, changes in regulation and subsidiaries’ ability to recover costs from customers; reductions in our credit ratings and the cost of maintaining certain contractual relationships; general economic conditions, including inflation rates, monetary fluctuations and their impact on capital expenditures and the ability of Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries to obtain financing on favorable terms; availability or cost of capital; our customers’ and counterparties’ ability to pay their debts to us; assumptions and costs relating to funding our employee benefit plans and health care benefits; our subsidiaries’ ability to make dividend payments; tax laws; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts of terrorism; cyber security threats and data security breaches; seasonal weather patterns; changes in environmental laws and regulations; climate change and other weather; natural disaster and resource depletion, including compliance with any accompanying legislative and regulatory changes; and costs of potential regulatory penalties.
This information is not given in connection with any
sale, offer for sale or offer to buy any security.
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) |
||||||||
(amounts in millions, except per share data) |
||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Natural gas |
|
647 |
|
|
583 |
|
||
Other |
|
24 |
|
|
25 |
|
||
Total operating revenues |
|
3,541 |
|
|
2,811 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric fuel and purchased power |
|
1,386 |
|
|
797 |
|
||
Cost of natural gas sold and transported |
|
299 |
|
|
285 |
|
||
Cost of sales — other |
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
||
Operating and maintenance expenses |
|
584 |
|
|
579 |
|
||
Conservation and demand side management expenses |
|
73 |
|
|
74 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
521 |
|
|
463 |
|
||
Taxes (other than income taxes) |
|
163 |
|
|
149 |
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
3,034 |
|
|
2,356 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
507 |
|
|
455 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income (expense), net |
|
5 |
|
|
(11 |
) |
||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
14 |
|
|
11 |
|
||
Allowance for funds used during construction — equity |
|
14 |
|
|
23 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest charges and financing costs |
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest charges — includes other financing costs of |
|
205 |
|
|
199 |
|
||
Allowance for funds used during construction — debt |
|
(5 |
) |
|
(10 |
) |
||
Total interest charges and financing costs |
|
200 |
|
|
189 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
340 |
|
|
289 |
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
(22 |
) |
|
(6 |
) |
||
Net income |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
538 |
|
526 |
||||
Diluted |
|
539 |
|
527 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per average common share: |
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Diluted |
|
0.67 |
|
|
0.56 |
|
||
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Investor Relations Earnings Release (Unaudited)
Due to the seasonality of Xcel Energy’s operating results, quarterly financial results are not an appropriate base from which to project annual results.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following discussion includes financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures such as ongoing return on equity (ROE), electric margin, natural gas margin, ongoing earnings and ongoing diluted EPS. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of a company’s financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are adjusted from measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Xcel Energy’s management uses non-GAAP measures for financial planning and analysis, for reporting of results to the Board of Directors, in determining performance-based compensation and communicating its earnings outlook to analysts and investors. Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to supplement investors’ understanding of our performance and should not be considered alternatives for financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. These measures are discussed in more detail below and may not be comparable to other companies’ similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures.
Ongoing ROE
Ongoing ROE is calculated by dividing the net income or loss of Xcel Energy or each subsidiary, adjusted for certain nonrecurring items, by each entity’s average stockholder’s equity. We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate and provide details of earnings results.
Electric and Natural Gas Margins
Electric margin is presented as electric revenues less electric fuel and purchased power expenses. Natural gas margin is presented as natural gas revenues less the cost of natural gas sold and transported. Expenses incurred for electric fuel and purchased power and the cost of natural gas are generally recovered through various regulatory recovery mechanisms. As a result, changes in these expenses are generally offset in operating revenues. Management believes electric and natural gas margins provide the most meaningful basis for evaluating our operations because they exclude the revenue impact of fluctuations in these expenses. These margins can be reconciled to operating income, a GAAP measure, by including other operating revenues, cost of sales - other, operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses, conservation and demand side management (DSM) expenses, depreciation and amortization and taxes (other than income taxes).
Earnings Adjusted for Certain Items (Ongoing Earnings and Ongoing Diluted EPS)
GAAP diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock (i.e., common stock equivalents) were settled. The weighted average number of potentially dilutive shares outstanding used to calculate Xcel Energy Inc.’s diluted EPS is calculated using the treasury stock method. Ongoing earnings reflect adjustments to GAAP earnings (net income) for certain items. Ongoing diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the net income or loss of each subsidiary, adjusted for certain items, by the weighted average fully diluted Xcel Energy Inc. common shares outstanding for the period. Ongoing diluted EPS for each subsidiary is calculated by dividing the net income or loss of such subsidiary, adjusted for certain items, by the weighted average fully diluted Xcel Energy Inc. common shares outstanding for the period.
We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate and provide details of Xcel Energy’s core earnings and underlying performance. We believe these measurements are useful to investors to evaluate the actual and projected financial performance and contribution of our subsidiaries. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no such adjustments to GAAP earnings and therefore GAAP earnings equal ongoing earnings for these periods.
Note 1. Earnings Per Share Summary
Xcel Energy’s 2021 first quarter earnings were
Summarized diluted EPS for Xcel Energy:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||
PSCo |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
0.24 |
|
|
0.20 |
|
||
SPS |
|
0.11 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
||
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
0.06 |
|
|
0.06 |
|
||
Equity earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
0.01 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
||
Regulated utility (a) |
|
0.73 |
|
|
0.60 |
|
||
Xcel Energy Inc. and Other |
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
||
Total (a) |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
(a) Amounts may not add due to rounding.
PSCo — Earnings increased
NSP-Minnesota — Earnings increased
SPS — Earnings increased
NSP-Wisconsin — Earnings were flat for the first quarter of 2021.
Xcel Energy Inc. and Other — Primarily includes financing costs at the holding company.
Components significantly contributing to changes in 2021 EPS compared to 2020:
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
Three Months
|
||
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS - 2020 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
||
Components of change - 2021 vs. 2020 |
|
|
||
Higher electric margin |
|
0.11 |
|
|
Higher natural gas margins |
|
0.07 |
|
|
Lower ETR (a) |
|
0.06 |
|
|
Higher other income (expense), net |
|
0.02 |
|
|
Higher depreciation and amortization |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
Lower AFUDC |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
Higher interest charges |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Higher O&M |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Other, net |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS - 2021 |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
(a) Includes production tax credits (PTCs) and plant regulatory amounts, which are primarily offset in electric margin.
Note 2. Regulated Utility Results
Estimated Impact of Temperature Changes on Regulated Earnings — Unusually hot summers or cold winters increase electric and natural gas sales, while mild weather reduces electric and natural gas sales. The estimated impact of weather on earnings is based on the number of customers, temperature variances, the amount of natural gas or electricity historically used per degree of temperature and excludes any incremental related operating expenses that could result due to storm activity or vegetation management requirements. As a result, weather deviations from normal levels can affect Xcel Energy’s financial performance.
Degree-day or Temperature-Humidity Index (THI) data is used to estimate amounts of energy required to maintain comfortable indoor temperature levels based on each day’s average temperature and humidity. Heating degree-days (HDD) is the measure of the variation in the weather based on the extent to which the average daily temperature falls below 65° Fahrenheit. Cooling degree-days (CDD) is the measure of the variation in the weather based on the extent to which the average daily temperature rises above 65° Fahrenheit. Each degree of temperature above 65° Fahrenheit is counted as one CDD, and each degree of temperature below 65° Fahrenheit is counted as one HDD. In Xcel Energy’s more humid service territories, a THI is used in place of CDD, which adds a humidity factor to CDD. HDD, CDD and THI are most likely to impact the usage of Xcel Energy’s residential and commercial customers. Industrial customers are less sensitive to weather. Typically, sales are not impacted in the first or fourth quarter due to THI or CDD.
Normal weather conditions are defined as either the 10, 20 or 30-year average of actual historical weather conditions. The historical period of time used in the calculation of normal weather differs by jurisdiction, based on regulatory practice. To calculate the impact of weather on demand, a demand factor is applied to the weather impact on sales. Extreme weather variations, windchill and cloud cover may not be reflected in weather-normalized estimates.
Percentage increase (decrease) in normal and actual HDD:
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|||||||
|
2021 vs.
|
|
2020 vs.
|
|
2021 vs. 2020 |
|||
HDD |
1.3 |
% |
|
(5.5) |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
Weather — Estimated impact of temperature variations on EPS compared with normal weather conditions:
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||||||
|
2021 vs.
|
|
2020 vs.
|
|
2021 vs. 2020 |
||||||
Retail electric |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(0.011 |
) |
|
$ |
0.011 |
|
Decoupling and sales true-up |
0.002 |
|
|
0.006 |
|
|
(0.004 |
) |
|||
Electric total |
$ |
0.002 |
|
|
$ |
(0.005 |
) |
|
$ |
0.007 |
|
Firm natural gas |
0.003 |
|
|
(0.007 |
) |
|
0.010 |
|
|||
Total |
$ |
0.005 |
|
|
$ |
(0.012 |
) |
|
$ |
0.017 |
|
Sales — Sales growth (decline) for actual and weather-normalized sales in 2021 compared to 2020:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
SPS |
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
Xcel Energy |
|||||
Actual (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential |
|
6.3 |
% |
|
5.1 |
% |
|
8.8 |
% |
|
4.7 |
% |
|
6.0 |
% |
Electric C&I |
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
(5.8 |
) |
Total retail electric sales |
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
0.2 |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Firm natural gas sales |
|
4.7 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
N/A |
|
0.8 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
SPS |
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
Xcel Energy |
|||||
Weather-Normalized (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential |
|
4.9 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
3.8 |
% |
|
2.9 |
% |
|
4.4 |
% |
Electric C&I |
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
(6.0 |
) |
Total retail electric sales |
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
(3.0 |
) |
Firm natural gas sales |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
N/A |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 (2020 Leap Year Adjusted) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
PSCo |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
SPS |
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
Xcel Energy |
|||||
Weather-Normalized (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electric residential |
|
6.1 |
% |
|
5.7 |
% |
|
5.0 |
% |
|
4.0 |
% |
|
5.6 |
% |
Electric C&I |
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
(5.0 |
) |
Total retail electric sales |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
0.7 |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Firm natural gas sales |
|
0.2 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
N/A |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
— |
|
(a) Higher residential sales and lower commercial and industrial (C&I) sales were primarily attributable to COVID-19.
Weather-normalized and leap-year adjusted electric sales growth (decline) — year-to-date (excluding leap day)
Each of our utility subsidiaries experienced higher residential sales and lower C&I sales as a result of COVID-19 beginning in March 2020. In addition, the following items impacted sales:
- PSCo — Residential sales rose based on an increased number of customers and higher use per customer. The decline in C&I sales was primarily due to decreases in the manufacturing and service industries, partially offset by an increase in the energy sector.
- NSP-Minnesota — Residential sales growth reflects higher use per customer and increased customer additions. The decline in C&I sales was primarily due to decreases within the manufacturing and service sectors.
- SPS — Residential sales increased due to customer growth and higher use per customer. The decline in C&I sales was driven by decreases within the energy and manufacturing sectors.
- NSP-Wisconsin — Residential sales growth was attributable to customer additions and higher use per customer. The decline in C&I sales was largely related to decreases in the energy and manufacturing industries, partially offset by an increase in the service sector.
Weather-normalized and leap-year adjusted natural gas sales growth (decline) — year-to-date (excluding leap day)
- Natural gas sales primarily reflect lower customer use, offset by an increase in the number of customers.
Electric Margin — Electric revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses are impacted by fluctuations in the price of natural gas, coal and uranium. However, these price fluctuations have minimal impact on electric margin due to fuel recovery mechanisms that recover fuel expenses. In addition, electric customers receive a credit for PTCs generated, which reduced electric revenue and margin. See Note 5 for discussion on the impact of Winter Storm Uri.
Electric revenues and margin:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||
Electric revenues |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Electric fuel and purchased power |
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
(797 |
) |
||
Electric margin |
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,406 |
|
Changes in electric margin:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Three Months
|
||
Non-fuel riders |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Regulatory rate outcomes (Colorado, Texas, New Mexico, Wisconsin and North Dakota) |
|
44 |
|
|
Proprietary commodity trading, net of sharing (see Note 5) |
|
27 |
|
|
Wholesale transmission revenue (net) |
|
11 |
|
|
Estimated impact of weather (net of decoupling/sales true-up) |
|
5 |
|
|
PTCs flowed back to customers (offset by lower ETR) |
|
(37 |
) |
|
Sales and demand (a) |
|
(14 |
) |
|
Other (net) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
Total increase in electric margin |
|
$ |
78 |
|
(a) Sales excludes weather impact, net of decoupling/sales true-up, and demand is net of sales true-up.
Natural Gas Margin — Natural gas expense varies with changing sales and the cost of natural gas. However, fluctuations in the cost of natural gas has minimal impact on natural gas margin due to cost recovery mechanisms. See Note 5 for discussion on the impact of Winter Storm Uri.
Natural gas revenues and margin:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||
Natural gas revenues |
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
Cost of natural gas sold and transported |
|
(299 |
) |
|
(285 |
) |
||
Natural gas margin |
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
Changes in natural gas margin:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Three Months
|
||
Regulatory rate outcomes (Colorado) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
Estimated impact of weather |
|
7 |
|
|
Other (net) |
|
3 |
|
|
Total increase in natural gas margin |
|
$ |
50 |
|
O&M Expenses — O&M expenses increased
Depreciation and Amortization — Depreciation and amortization increased
Other Income (Expense) — Other income (expense) increased
AFUDC, Equity and Debt — AFUDC decreased
Interest Charges — Interest charges increased
Income Taxes — Effective income tax rate:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2021 vs 2020 |
|||
Federal statutory rate |
|
21.0 |
% |
|
21.0 |
% |
|
— |
% |
State tax (net of federal tax effect) |
|
4.9 |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
— |
|
(Decreases) increases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Wind PTCs |
|
(24.6 |
) |
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
(7.4 |
) |
Plant regulatory differences (a) |
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
2.3 |
|
Other (net) |
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
0.7 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
(6.5 |
)% |
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
(4.4 |
)% |
(a) Regulatory differences for income tax primarily relate to the credit of excess deferred taxes to customers. Income tax benefits associated with the credit of excess deferred credits are generally offset by corresponding revenue reductions.
Income tax benefit increased
Note 3. Capital Structure, Liquidity, Financing and Credit Ratings
Xcel Energy’s capital structure:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
March 31, 2021 |
|
Percentage of Total
|
|
Dec. 31, 2020 |
|
Percentage of Total
|
||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
— |
% |
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
1 |
% |
Short-term debt |
|
1,477 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
584 |
|
|
2 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
21,470 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
56 |
|
||
Total debt |
|
22,968 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
20,650 |
|
|
59 |
|
||
Common equity |
|
14,700 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
14,575 |
|
|
41 |
|
||
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
37,668 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
35,225 |
|
|
100 |
% |
Liquidity — As of April 26, 2021, Xcel Energy Inc. and its utility subsidiaries had the following committed credit facilities available to meet liquidity needs:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
Credit Facility (a) |
|
Drawn (b) |
|
Available |
|
Cash |
|
Liquidity |
||||||||||
Xcel Energy Inc. |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
PSCo |
|
700 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
692 |
|
|
144 |
|
|
836 |
|
|||||
NSP-Minnesota |
|
500 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
518 |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|||||
SPS |
|
500 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
541 |
|
|||||
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
150 |
|
|
— |
|
|
150 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
152 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
3,100 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
2,880 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
Term Loan (c) |
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(a) Expires June 2024.
(b) Includes outstanding commercial paper and letters of credit.
(c) Matures February 2022.
Term Loan Agreements — In February 2021, Xcel Energy Inc. entered into a
Bilateral Credit Agreement — In April 2021, NSP-Minnesota extended an uncommitted bilateral credit agreement of
Credit Ratings — Access to the capital markets at reasonable terms is partially dependent on credit ratings. The following ratings reflect the views of Moody’s, S&P Global Ratings and Fitch. The highest credit rating for debt is Aaa/AAA and the lowest investment grade rating is Baa3/BBB-. The highest rating for commercial paper is P-1/A-1/F-1 and the lowest rating is P-3/A-3/F-3. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the credit rating agency and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Credit ratings assigned to Xcel Energy Inc. and its utility subsidiaries as of April 26, 2021:
Credit Type |
|
Company |
|
Moody’s |
|
S&P Global Ratings |
|
Fitch |
Senior Unsecured Debt |
|
Xcel Energy Inc. |
|
Baa1 |
|
BBB+ |
|
BBB+ |
Senior Secured Debt |
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
Aa3 |
|
A |
|
A+ |
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
Aa3 |
|
A |
|
A+ |
|
|
PSCo |
|
A1 |
|
A |
|
A+ |
|
|
SPS |
|
A3 |
|
A |
|
A- |
Commercial Paper |
|
Xcel Energy Inc. |
|
P-2 |
|
A-2 |
|
F2 |
|
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
P-1 |
|
A-2 |
|
F2 |
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
P-1 |
|
A-2 |
|
F2 |
|
|
PSCo |
|
P-2 |
|
A-2 |
|
F2 |
|
|
SPS |
|
P-2 |
|
A-2 |
|
F2 |
2021 Financing Activity — During 2021, Xcel Energy plans to issue approximately
Issuer |
|
Security |
|
Amount |
|
Status |
|
Tenor |
|
Coupon |
|||
PSCo |
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
Completed |
|
10 Year |
|
1.875 |
% |
SPS |
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
250 |
|
|
Completed |
|
29 Year |
|
3.15 |
|
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
425 |
|
|
Completed |
|
10 Year |
|
2.25 |
|
|
NSP-Minnesota |
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
425 |
|
|
Completed |
|
31 Year |
|
3.20 |
|
|
NSP-Wisconsin |
|
First Mortgage Bonds |
|
125 |
|
|
Planned - Q2 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
||
Financing plans are subject to change, depending on capital expenditures, regulatory outcomes, internal cash generation, market conditions and other factors.
Note 4. Rates and Regulation
NSP-Minnesota — Minnesota Relief and Recovery — Recent proposals include:
-
In February 2021, NSP-Minnesota proposed to acquire a 120 MW repowered wind farm from ALLETE for
$210 million . A MPUC decision was requested by July 29, 2021. -
In April 2021, NSP-Minnesota proposed to add 460 MW of solar facilities at the Sherco site with an incremental investment of
$575 million . A MPUC decision is expected in the second half of 2021.
NSP-Minnesota — 2020 North Dakota Electric Rate Case — In November 2020 and revised in March 2021, NSP-Minnesota filed a rate case with the North Dakota Public Service Commission (NDPSC). NSP-Minnesota is requesting an increase in annual retail electric revenues of approximately
PSCo — Wildfire Protection Rider — In 2020, PSCo requested to establish a rider to recover incremental costs associated with system investments to reduce wildfire risk, projected to be approximately
Forecasted annual revenue requirements from 2021 through 2025:
(Millions of Dollars) |
|
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
||||||||||
Forecasted annual revenue requirement |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
PSCo — Pipeline System Integrity Adjustment (PSIA) Rider Extension — In February 2021, PSCo requested to extend its PSIA rider for three years (through the end of 2024). The extension is intended to allow for a wind down of the rider and transition of recovery of the projects included in the rider to base rates in 2025. A CPUC decision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2021.
PSCo — Colorado’s Power Pathway Transmission Expansion — In March 2021, PSCo filed for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Power Pathway transmission project. Xcel Energy proposed a 560-mile, 345 kV double circuit transmission network to enable 5,500 MW of renewable generation in eastern Colorado with an estimated cost of approximately
PSCo — Electric Resource Plan — In March 2021, PSCo filed its 2021 Electric Resource Plan with the CPUC. The filing outlines the proposed future retirements/conversions of PSCo’s remaining coal plants and would result in an
Major components of PSCo's proposed preferred plan include:
- Early retirement of Comanche Generating Station: Unit 3 in 2040 (currently 2070).
- Early retirement of Hayden Generating Station: Unit 1 in 2028 (currently 2030); Unit 2 in 2027 (currently 2036).
- Conversion of Pawnee Generating Station from coal to natural gas in 2028 with retirement in 2041.
- 2,300 megawatts of wind power.
- 1,600 megawatts of large-scale solar power.
- 400 megawatts of energy storage.
- 1,300 megawatts of flexible dispatchable resources (including natural gas).
- 1,200 megawatts of distributed generation solar resources.
The preferred plan proposes to create a regulatory asset to recover costs over their original depreciation lives for the Hayden power plant and the coal handling equipment at Pawnee. It also proposes the use of securitization to finance and recover the remaining book life and decommissioning costs for Comanche 3 upon retirement in 2040.
A CPUC decision on the resource plan is expected by the end of 2021 (Phase I) with the competitive solicitation for resource additions expected in 2022 (Phase II). Incremental generation system costs to meet carbon emission reduction targets are proposed to be recovered through a statutorily-authorized Clean Energy Plan Rider.
SPS — New Mexico 2021 Electric Rate Case — In January 2021, SPS filed an electric rate case with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (NMPRC) seeking an increase in base rates of approximately
The request is based on a historic test year ended Sept. 30, 2020, including expected capital additions through Feb. 28, 2021, a ROE of
The request includes the effect of approximately 400 MW of reduced peak load in 2021 from a wholesale transmission customer and changes to depreciation lives of SPS’ Tolk coal-fired power plant (from 2037 to 2032) and the coal handling assets at the Harrington facility (to 2024).
Procedural schedule expected to be as follows:
- Staff and intervenor testimony — May 17, 2021.
- Rebuttal testimony — June 9, 2021.
- Deadline to file stipulation — June 23, 2021.
- Public hearing or hearing on stipulation — July 26 - Aug. 6, 2021.
- End of nine month suspension — Nov. 3, 2021.
A NMPRC decision and implementation of final rates is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2021.
SPS — Texas 2021 Electric Rate Case — In February 2021, SPS filed an electric rate case with the Public Utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT) and its municipalities with original rate jurisdiction seeking an increase in base rates of approximately
The request is based on an ROE of
The request includes the effect of losing approximately 400 MW from a wholesale transmission customer and changes to depreciation lives of SPS’ Tolk power plant (from 2037 to 2032) and the coal handling assets of the Harrington facility (to 2024).
Procedural schedule expected to be as follows:
- Intervenor testimony — Aug. 13, 2021.
- Staff testimony — Aug. 20, 2021.
- Rebuttal testimony — Sept. 15, 2021.
- Public hearing — Oct. 18 - Oct. 28, 2021.
Once final rates are approved, a surcharge will be requested from March 15, 2021 through the effective date of new base rates. A PUCT decision is expected in the first quarter of 2022.
Note 5. Winter Storm Uri
In mid-February 2021, the central portion of the United States experienced a major winter storm (Winter Storm Uri). Extreme cold temperatures impacted certain operational assets as well as the availability of renewable generation across the region. The cold weather also affected the country’s supply and demand for natural gas. These factors contributed to extremely high market prices for natural gas and electricity. In addition, NSP-Minnesota’s three peak shaving plants, which are used to ensure system reliability under Design Day conditions, have been unavailable since early 2021 due to required repairs to address safety concerns with the units. Despite the extreme conditions, Xcel Energy’s customers experienced minimal disruptions as a result of preemptive infrastructure investments and the response of our employees.
As a result of the extremely high market prices, Xcel Energy incurred net natural gas, fuel and purchased energy costs of approximately
The estimated net impact was as follows:
(in millions) |
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Other
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
Net Market
|
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
NSP-Minnesota |
|
$ |
250 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
230 |
|
NSP- Wisconsin |
|
45 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
45 |
|
|
— |
|
|
45 |
|
||||||
PSCo |
|
305 |
|
315 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
610 |
|
||||||
SPS |
|
— |
|
200 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
80 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
600 |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
(190 |
) |
|
$ |
965 |
|
(a) Net market settlements includes purchases of energy and other charges to serve our customers as well as sales of energy facilitated through Independent System Operators (ISOs) or bilateral transactions, each subject to mechanisms for recovery and sharing with our customers.
In addition, higher market prices resulted in
Certain energy transactions are subject to final ISO re-settlement calculations and the impacts of credit losses shared among market participants. Such adjustments are not expected to be material to our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Regulatory Overview — Xcel Energy has natural gas, fuel and purchased energy mechanisms in each jurisdiction for the purpose of recovering incurred costs. However, the utility subsidiaries have deferred February cost increases for future recovery and are proposing to recover the cost increases over a period of up to two years in order to significantly mitigate the impact to customer bills. Additionally, we are not requesting recovery of associated financing costs in order to further limit the impact to our customers. The following proceedings have been initiated:
Utility Subsidiary |
Jurisdiction |
Regulatory Status |
NSP-Minnesota |
Minnesota |
NSP-Minnesota has filed its report with the MPUC detailing its preparedness and actions during the storm and proposing recovery of incremental costs from natural gas customers over 24 months with no financing charge. Comments are due in May 2021. |
|
South Dakota |
In April, NSP-Minnesota filed a letter with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission noting that we were a net seller in the market, resulting in lower fuel clause costs. |
|
North Dakota |
NSP-Minnesota has filed its report with the NDPSC detailing its preparedness and actions during the storm and proposing recovery of incremental costs from natural gas customers over 24 months with no financing charge. |
NSP-Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
In March, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin staff determined the natural gas costs incurred during the storm were prudent and approved NSP-Wisconsin's proposal to recover these costs over a nine-month period through December 2021 with no financing charge. |
|
Michigan |
In March, NSP-Wisconsin filed testimony in the pending gas recovery plan proceeding to address |
PSCo |
Colorado |
PSCo filed an initial response with the CPUC in March. In May 2021, PSCo intends to file a plan to recover the weather-related costs over 24 months with no financing charge. |
SPS |
Texas |
SPS intends to file for a surcharge in the second quarter to recover fuel costs over 24 months with no financing charge. Prudence of fuel costs will be subject to review in SPS' upcoming fuel reconciliation case. |
|
New Mexico |
The NMPRC approved SPS' requested fuel mechanism variance to permit recovery over 24 months with no financing charge (subject to NMPRC review). |
To enhance liquidity and for the ability to propose recovering the increased fuel costs over a longer time period (i.e., mitigate customer bill impacts), Xcel Energy Inc. entered into a
Note 6. Earnings Guidance and Long-Term EPS and Dividend Growth Rate Objectives
Xcel Energy 2021 Earnings Guidance — Xcel Energy’s 2021 GAAP and ongoing earnings guidance is a range of
Key assumptions as compared with 2020 levels unless noted:
- Constructive outcomes in all rate case and regulatory proceedings.
- Modest impacts from COVID-19.
- Normal weather patterns for the remainder of the year.
-
Weather-normalized retail electric sales are projected to increase ~
1% . - Weather-normalized retail firm natural gas sales are projected to be relatively flat.
-
Capital rider revenue is projected to increase
$100 million to$110 million (net of PTCs). PTCs are credited to customers, through capital riders, fuel clause or base rates and results in a reduction to electric margin. - O&M expenses are projected to be relatively flat.
-
Depreciation expense is projected to increase approximately
$155 million to$165 million . The change in depreciation expense is largely earnings neutral and primarily reflects the timing of deferrals and revenue recognition in the Texas rate case. -
Property taxes are projected to increase approximately
$40 million to$50 million . -
Interest expense (net of AFUDC - debt) is projected to increase
$20 million to$30 million . -
AFUDC - equity is projected to decline approximately
$40 million to$50 million . -
ETR is projected to be (
7% ) to (8% ). The ETR reflects benefits of PTCs which are credited to customers through electric margin and will not have a material impact on net income.
(a) Ongoing earnings is calculated using net income and adjusting for certain nonrecurring or infrequent items that are, in management’s view, not reflective of ongoing operations. Ongoing earnings could differ from those prepared in accordance with GAAP for unplanned and/or unknown adjustments. Xcel Energy is unable to forecast if any of these items will occur or provide a quantitative reconciliation of the guidance for ongoing EPS to corresponding GAAP EPS.
Long-Term EPS and Dividend Growth Rate Objectives — Xcel Energy expects to deliver an attractive total return to our shareholders through a combination of earnings growth and dividend yield, based on the following long-term objectives:
-
Deliver long-term annual EPS growth of
5% to7% based off of a 2020 base of$2.78 per share, which represents the mid-point of the original 2020 guidance range of$2.73 t o$2.83 per share. -
Deliver annual dividend increases of
5% to7% . -
Target a dividend payout ratio of
60% to70% . - Maintain senior secured debt credit ratings in the A range.
XCEL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
EARNINGS RELEASE SUMMARY (UNAUDITED) |
||||||||
(amounts in millions, except per share data) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
||||
Electric and natural gas |
|
$ |
3,517 |
|
|
$ |
2,786 |
|
Other |
|
24 |
|
|
25 |
|
||
Total operating revenues |
|
3,541 |
|
|
2,811 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
539 |
|
|
527 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Components of EPS — Diluted |
|
|
|
|
||||
Regulated utility |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Xcel Energy Inc. and other costs |
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
||
GAAP and ongoing diluted EPS (a)(b) |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Book value per share |
|
$ |
27.29 |
|
|
$ |
25.26 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
0.46 |
|
|
0.43 |
|
||
(a) For the three months ended March 31, 2021, there were no adjustments to GAAP earnings and therefore GAAP earnings equal ongoing earnings for these periods.
(b) Amounts may not add due to rounding.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210429005180/en/
FAQ
What were Xcel Energy's earnings for Q1 2021?
How much have Xcel Energy's carbon emissions reduced since 2005?
What is the Colorado Clean Energy Plan proposed by Xcel Energy?
Did Xcel Energy reaffirm its earnings guidance for 2021?
