VoIP-Pal Files Second Amended Complaints in Federal Court and Serves Defendants
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM) has announced the filing and service of two Second Amended Complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. The legal action, detailed in a new CEO CFO Magazine article featuring CEO Emil Malak, outlines allegations of forced tying, deceptive 'no charge' marketing, and unauthorized deployment of DID-based routing systems.
The complaints consist of a standalone filing and a nationwide class action, seeking $628.41 billion in alleged damages under RICO, Antitrust, and Telecommunications law. The claims center on structural fraud and consumer deception, with the article providing insights into the legal proceedings and judicial trajectory.
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM) ha annunciato la presentazione e la notifica di due Secondi Reclami Emendati presso il Tribunale Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il Distretto di Columbia contro AT&T, Verizon e T-Mobile. L'azione legale, descritta in un nuovo articolo di CEO CFO Magazine con l'intervista al CEO Emil Malak, riporta accuse di vincoli forzati, pratiche di marketing ingannevoli "senza costi" e l'installazione non autorizzata di sistemi di instradamento basati su DID.
I reclami includono una denuncia autonoma e una class action nazionale, richiedendo 628,41 miliardi di dollari di danni presunti ai sensi delle leggi RICO, Antitrust e sulle Telecomunicazioni. Le accuse riguardano frode strutturale e inganno dei consumatori, con l'articolo che offre approfondimenti sul procedimento legale e il percorso giudiziario.
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM) ha anunciado la presentación y notificación de dos Demandas Enmendadas Segunda en el Tribunal de Distrito de los Estados Unidos para el Distrito de Columbia contra AT&T, Verizon y T-Mobile. La acción legal, detallada en un nuevo artículo de CEO CFO Magazine con el CEO Emil Malak, expone acusaciones de ataduras forzadas, marketing engañoso "sin cargo" y la implementación no autorizada de sistemas de enrutamiento basados en DID.
Las demandas consisten en una presentación independiente y una demanda colectiva nacional, buscando 628.41 mil millones de dólares en daños alegados bajo las leyes RICO, Antimonopolio y de Telecomunicaciones. Las reclamaciones se centran en fraude estructural y engaño al consumidor, y el artículo ofrece perspectivas sobre el proceso legal y la trayectoria judicial.
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM)는 AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile을 상대로 콜롬비아 지구 미국 지방 법원에 두 건의 두 번째 수정 소장을 제출하고 송달했다고 발표했습니다. CEO Emil Malak이 소개된 CEO CFO 매거진의 새 기사에서 자세히 다룬 이번 법적 조치는 강제 결합, '무료' 마케팅의 기만적 행위, DID 기반 라우팅 시스템의 무단 배포 혐의를 포함합니다.
소장은 독립 소송과 전국 집단 소송으로 구성되어 있으며, RICO, 반독점법, 통신법에 따라 6284억 1천만 달러의 손해배상 청구를 요구하고 있습니다. 청구 내용은 구조적 사기와 소비자 기만에 초점을 맞추고 있으며, 기사는 법적 절차와 사법 경로에 대한 통찰을 제공합니다.
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB : VPLM) a annoncé le dépôt et la signification de deux Deuxièmes Plainte Modifiées auprès du tribunal de district des États-Unis pour le district de Columbia contre AT&T, Verizon et T-Mobile. L'action en justice, détaillée dans un nouvel article de CEO CFO Magazine avec le PDG Emil Malak, expose des allégations de ventes liées forcées, de marketing trompeur "sans frais" et de déploiement non autorisé de systèmes de routage basés sur DID.
Les plaintes comprennent un dépôt autonome et une action collective nationale, réclamant 628,41 milliards de dollars de dommages-intérêts allégués en vertu des lois RICO, Antitrust et des télécommunications. Les accusations portent sur une fraude structurelle et une tromperie des consommateurs, l'article offrant un aperçu des procédures judiciaires et de la trajectoire judiciaire.
VoIP-Pal (OTCQB: VPLM) hat die Einreichung und Zustellung von zwei Zweiten Abgeänderten Klagen beim United States District Court für den District of Columbia gegen AT&T, Verizon und T-Mobile bekannt gegeben. Die Klage, ausführlich beschrieben in einem neuen Artikel des CEO CFO Magazins mit CEO Emil Malak, enthält Vorwürfe von erzwungenen Kopplungen, irreführendem "kostenlosem" Marketing und unautorisierter Implementierung von DID-basierten Routing-Systemen.
Die Klagen umfassen eine eigenständige Einreichung und eine landesweite Sammelklage, die 628,41 Milliarden US-Dollar an angeblichen Schäden nach RICO-, Kartell- und Telekommunikationsrecht fordert. Die Ansprüche konzentrieren sich auf strukturellen Betrug und Verbrauchertäuschung, wobei der Artikel Einblicke in das Gerichtsverfahren und den juristischen Verlauf bietet.
- Massive potential damages of $628.41 billion if litigation succeeds
- Nationwide class action increases chances of settlement or favorable outcome
- Legal action targets major telecom companies with substantial resources
- Uncertain litigation outcome against powerful telecom companies
- Legal proceedings could be lengthy and costly
- No guarantee of damages being awarded
CEO Emil Malak discusses the litigation strategy and consumer impact in a newly published article featured in CEO CFO Magazine
WACO, Texas, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (“VoIP-Pal,” “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM), announced that it has filed and served two Second Amended Complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.
A recently published article in CEO CFO Magazine features an in-depth Q&A with VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak and provides a comprehensive overview of the Company’s two Second Amended Complaints. The CEOCFO Magazine article captures the essence of both Second Amended Complaints—highlighting the core allegations of forced tying, deceptive ‘no charge’ marketing, and unauthorized deployment of DID-based routing systems, while summarizing the Court’s procedural trajectory and the
In clear terms, the CEOCFO article distills the main causes of action in both filings—VoIP-Pal’s standalone complaint and the nationwide class action—while outlining the legal stakes, judicial path ahead, and the historic scope of damages rooted in structural fraud and consumer deception. Access the article and Q&A at the following link: CEOCFO Magazine article.
About the Second Amended Complaints
The first complaint, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-03051 RDM, is brought by VoIP-Pal individually, asserting claims under antitrust, RICO, and telecommunications law related to exclusion from the Wi-Fi Calling market and the alleged unauthorized use of the company’s patented call routing system. The second, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-03054 RDM, is a nationwide class action, filed on behalf of approximately 373 million U.S. mobile subscribers, alleging systemic overbilling and deceptive bundling of services.
“These filings represent a major step forward in protecting both our intellectual property and the interests of American mobile subscribers,” said VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak. “We are committed to pursuing these claims through the proper legal channels.”
Both complaints are available on the Company’s website www.voip-palusa.com and via the links below:
- VoIP-Pal's Second Amended Antitrust Complaint (April 2025)
- Second Amended Class Action Complaint (April 2025)
About VoIP-Pal.com Inc.
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB: VPLM) headquartered in Waco, TX. The company owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is actively seeking to monetize.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined under securities laws. These statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Litigation outcomes and settlement discussions are unpredictable, and there is no assurance of favorable resolution.
For Further Information
Corporate Website: www.voip-palusa.com
IR Inquiries: IR@voip-pal.com
IR Contact: Rich Inza, (954) 495-4600
FAQ
What is the total amount in damages VoIP-Pal (VPLM) is seeking in its lawsuits against telecom giants?
What are the main allegations in VoIP-Pal's (VPLM) Second Amended Complaints?
Which telecom companies are named as defendants in VoIP-Pal's (VPLM) District of Columbia lawsuit?
How many separate complaints has VoIP-Pal (VPLM) filed in this legal action?
