David Hall, Founder of Velodyne Lidar, Files Lawsuit Against Executives Over Misrepresentations Regarding 2020 SPAC Merger
David and Marta Hall have filed a lawsuit against various directors and legal counsel of Velodyne Lidar (NASDAQ: VLDR), including Michael Dee and Anand Gopalan, asserting they misled stockholders regarding the 2020 SPAC merger with Graf Industrial Corp. The lawsuit claims these individuals conspired to manipulate corporate control, leading to an approximate 80% decline in stockholder value. The Hall's allegations include breach of fiduciary duties and intentional misrepresentation, which they argue deprived stockholders of their rights and resulted in significant financial losses.
- None.
- Allegations of conspiracy to defraud stockholders, leading to a loss of nearly 80% in stockholder value post-merger.
- Misleading statements regarding future financial performance and involvement of key executives.
- Post-merger corporate governance changes that severely limit stockholder rights.
Asserts Defendants Breached Fiduciary Duties by Severely Limiting Stockholders' Rights Following the Reverse Merger
Believes Evidence Shows Defendants Schemed to Seize Corporate Control of Velodyne Lidar Via the SPAC Merger, Resulting in a Nearly
Defendants named in the lawsuit include:
The suit – a copy of which can be accessed here – accuses the Defendants of conspiracy to defraud, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and securities fraud.
In the suit, the Halls assert that the Defendants each, and collectively, carried out a number of unlawful activities, including:
- Messrs. Graf and Dee continually misled stockholders, investors and potential investors about Original Velodyne’s forecasted financial performance prior to the 2020 SPAC merger with GIC. In communications to investors, Messrs. Graf and Dee published false and misleading statements, including overstating revenue projections for 2021 and beyond, and purporting that Ford Motor Company would continue to hold a large equity stake in the Company without consulting or notifying the Halls about such statements.
-
Messrs. Graf and Dee also purposefully misrepresented
Mr. Hall's future involvement in the Company to Original Velodyne stockholders, including the Halls. Messrs. Graf and Dee continually highlighted the importance ofMr. Hall's continued role as executive chairman in public communications yet conspired to eliminate his influence over the Company's operations and push him out of management almost immediately following the merger. Under the current leadership team,Velodyne Lidar has failed to develop LIDAR technology, lost substantial market share, bled significant cash and lacked a credible strategy.
-
Messrs. Graf, Dee, Gopalan and Hamer misled stockholders about
Mr. Hall's departure from the Company. InFebruary 2021 , the Company disclosed thatMr. Hall had been terminated from his position of chairman and thatMs. Hall had been terminated as an employee of the Company following a previously undisclosed investigation. Messrs. Graf, Dee, Gopalan and Hamer previously failed to disclose the investigation when they pre-announced the Company's preliminary fourth quarter and full year 2020 financial results onJanuary 7, 2021 , and instead falsely represented that there was "no change in [the Company's] fundamental outlook for the future,” despite virtually all of the Company’s previousU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings having informed and warned investors that the loss of Mr. Hall would adversely affect Velodyne Lidar’s business. As predicted, stockholders have lost80% of value since the Company oustedMr. Hall as chairman.1
-
Prior to the merger,
Jeffrey Vetter , Original Velodyne’s principal outside legal counsel, breached his legal and fiduciary duties by neglecting to act in the best interests of his client and its stockholders. Instead,Mr. Vetter structured post-merger corporate documents to hand over control of the post-merger entity to the GIC-appointed directors – which included Messrs. Graf and Dee – and deprive Original Velodyne stockholders, including the Halls, of their rights. Notably, the Company's post-merger corporate documents limit stockholders' ability to nominate directors or introduce business at a stockholder meeting, eliminate stockholders' right to act by written consent and provide for a classified board of directors, among other items.
___________________________________
1
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220121005225/en/
ckiaie@longacresquare.com / bkirpalani@longacresquare.com
Source:
FAQ
What is the lawsuit filed by David and Marta Hall against Velodyne Lidar about?
How has Velodyne Lidar's stock value been affected since the merger?
Who are the defendants in the lawsuit against Velodyne Lidar?
What specific allegations are made against the directors of Velodyne Lidar?