David Hall, Founder of Velodyne Lidar, Announces Intent to Nominate Highly-Qualified Director Candidates for Election at the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting
David Hall, the largest stockholder of Velodyne Lidar (NASDAQ: VLDR), issues an open letter criticizing current board leadership under Michael Dee and Christopher Thomas. Hall highlights an 80% stock price decline since the 2020 SPAC merger, citing poor strategic decisions, including a 59% increase in general expenses amidst a 35% drop in product revenues. He announces intentions to nominate qualified candidates to replace the current board members during the 2022 Annual Meeting, aiming to revitalize the company's governance and product innovation.
- Hall's intention to nominate qualified directors may lead to better governance.
- Potential for revitalization of Velodyne Lidar's product offerings.
- Stock price declined 80% since the 2020 SPAC merger.
- General and administrative expenses increased by 59% despite a 35% decline in revenues.
- Current leadership is criticized for poor product innovation and compensation practices.
Issues Letter to Stockholders Recapping the Board’s Strategic Missteps Under Chairman
Fellow Stockholders,
Under my leadership,
Unfortunately, following Velodyne Lidar’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) in 2020, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) made a series of strategic missteps that resulted in the Company’s stock declining as much as
In my view, the only way to turn around
It is important for stockholders to understand that under Messrs. Dee and Thomas, the Board has presided over a series of concerning anti-stockholder actions and strategic missteps that include:
- Failing to increase Velodyne Lidar’s focus on the addition of new research and development personnel to keep pace with innovation.
- Failing to innovate the lidar product, add software or allocate resources toward expanding the product suite.
- Embracing performance mediocracy, large salaries and other egregious compensation practices instead of developing an actionable plan to stem value destruction.
-
Opting to increase G&A expenses by
59% for the three months endedMarch 31, 2021 , from the comparable period of 2020, in the face of Velodyne Lidar’s35% decline in product revenues.2
-
Transitioning
Mr. Thomas from a Class I director to a Class II director in an apparent attempt to avoid having him stand for re-election, which could have resulted in him being voted off the Board by stockholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Putting his performance as a director up to a stockholder vote could have avoided significant loss of stockholder value.
-
Censuring two stockholder aligned directors –
Marta Hall and myself – based on an opaque, secret investigation, seemingly in retaliation for our attempt to hold prior Chief Executive Officer Dr.Anand Gopalan more accountable for the Company’s weak performance and reconstitute the Board with more experienced and highly-qualified public company directors.
-
Awarding prior CEO
Dr. Gopalan with excessive compensation, despite his failure to meet the Company’s financial projections, and grantingMr. Thomas with nearly in stock awards and premature vested stock since$1.2 million July 2020 .3
-
Appointing
Mr. Dee as Chairman of the Board, despite his lack of relevant skillsets or public company board experience and concerning track record.Mr. Dee is currently a named defendant in securities litigation filed against PureCycle Technologies, Inc., where he serves as Chief Financial Officer.
Thankfully, stockholders will have an opportunity at the 2022 Annual Meeting to elect new directors with corporate governance and technology experience to Velodyne Lidar’s Board. I firmly believe that under new leadership, past mistakes can be reversed, and the Company can regenerate, rebuild and grow.
As a stockholder of the Company, it is my absolute right to nominate directors and vote my shares to impact who is elected to the Board. In the coming months, I will be watching the Board very carefully to ensure that it honors the existing ground rules for the 2022 Annual Meeting and does not continue to waste stockholder resources to further entrench itself for its own personal gain - much like it did in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting process.
I want nothing more than for
I look forward to continuing actively engaging with my fellow stockholders and Company leadership in the months leading up to Velodyne Lidar’s 2022 Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
Founder of
***
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
MR. HALL STRONGLY ADVISES ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER PROXY MATERIALS AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SUCH PROXY MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE
The participants in the proxy solicitation are anticipated to be
As of the date hereof,
1 Velodyne Lidar’s stock price declined from
2 For the comparable periods of
3 https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1745317/000162828021008380/vldr-20201231.htm; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1745317/000110465921067171/tm2115166-1_def14a.htm.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211021005686/en/
MKA
ckiaie@mkacomms.com / bkirpalani@mkacomms.com
Source:
FAQ
What led to Velodyne Lidar's stock price decline?
Who is David Hall in relation to Velodyne Lidar?
What changes is David Hall proposing for Velodyne Lidar?
How have Velodyne's board actions impacted stockholders?