Trilogy Metals Reports Best Grade-Thickness Intersection Ever Drilled at the Arctic Project of 42.8 Meters at 7% Copper Equivalent
Trilogy Metals announced the final drilling results from the Arctic Project in Alaska for 2022, revealing significant mineralization. The 2022 drilling program totaled 10,738 meters, with 8,376 meters focused on the Arctic deposit, marking the highest drilling season to date. Noteworthy intersections include hole AR22-0205, which presented 42.77 meters of 3.09% copper, 6.21% zinc, 1.46% lead, and 72.14 g/t silver. CEO Tony Giardini emphasized Arctic's status as a high-grade copper deposit, essential for sustainable resource development. The results support further exploration in the region.
- Drilling program revealed high-grade mineralization, including hole AR22-0205 with 42.77m of 3.09% copper and 7.04% copper equivalent.
- Total drilling of 10,738 meters in 2022, the highest ever at the Arctic Project, advancing resource confidence.
- None.
New Drill Results are Part of the Remaining Holes Drilled in 2022 at the
The UKMP includes
The 2022 field program included 10,738 meters of diamond drilling, of which 8,376 meters was drilled at Arctic, the most ever drilled at Arctic in a single field season, while the remainder of the meterage was used on regional exploration targets in the Ambler VMS Belt and near Bornite. The 2022 field program prioritized advancing the
The first, second and third sets of assay results from the 2022 drill program are available in Trilogy's news releases dated
This release covers an additional 10 holes comprising nine infill and one geotechnical. The infill holes were drilled in the eastern and northern parts of the deposit that will be mined early in the mine life, where previous drill holes were more widely spaced and the deposit less well defined (see Figure 1).
Significant intersections of high-grade copper, zinc, lead, gold, and silver mineralization include:
- Hole AR22-0205: 42.77 meters of
3.09% copper,6.21% zinc,1.46% lead, 0.84 g/t gold and 72.14 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of7.04% . This represents the highest ever grade-thickness intersection of all 237 holes drilled at theArctic Project to date. - Hole AR22-0211: 4.76 meters of
4.39% copper,4.57% zinc,0.60% lead, 0.61 g/t gold and 43.61 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of7.04%
and, 5.34 meters of9.33% copper,7.59% zinc,0.59% lead, 0.21 g/t gold and 59.76 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of12.98% . - Hole AR22-0214: 6.15 meters of
3.97% copper,5.79% zinc,0.60% lead, 0.49 g/t gold and 45.64 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of7.01% . - Hole AR22-0216: 12.33 meters of
3.23% copper,5.16% zinc,1.33% lead, 0.73 g/t gold and 49.75 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of6.48% . - Hole AR22-0221: 45.03 meters of
2.36% copper,2.78% zinc,0.24% lead, 0.30 g/t gold and 21.04 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of3.84% . - Hole AR22-0230: 19.45 meters of
8.71% copper,9.54% zinc,1.84% lead, 1.81 g/t gold and 103.37 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of14.90% . This represents the third highest grade-thickness (sixth highest if corrected for true thickness) intersection of all 237 holes drilled at theArctic Project to date. - Hole AR22-0234: 10.95 meters of
6.53% copper,10.55% zinc,1.32% lead, 0.11 g/t gold and 56.68 g/t silver for a copper equivalent grade of11.43% .
True widths have not been determined for all the above intercepts but are thought to be
The drill results contained in this news release are from 10 drill holes from the 2022 Arctic drill program, which include nine infill holes (AR22-0205, 0211, 0214, 0216, 0217, 0221, 0226, 0230 and 0234) and one geotechnical hole (AR22-0210). All drill holes are sized HQ3 (63.5 mm diameter). The 2022 Arctic infill program was designed to increase confidence from Indicated to Measured in areas of the mineral resource block model that would be mined during the first years of production, with the highest estimated metal value, based on Trilogy's mine plan reflected in the 2023 Arctic feasibility study1 and the Arctic Project S-K Technical Report Summary with an effective date of
Mineralized intervals of high-grade mineralization at a cut-off of
Geotechnical hole AR22-0210, drilled to further define the talc horizon in the northeastern pit wall, unexpectedly intersected copper-zinc mineralization outside the 2022 pit boundary. The mineralization, interpreted to be the northern extension of Zone 3, is located about 200 meters south of hole AR22-0235 that also intersected mineralization outside the 2022 pit boundary (see Trilogy's news release dated
________ |
1 |
Table 1. Drill intercepts from the 2022 Arctic infill drilling program.
Hole | From | To (m) | Length | Cu | Zn | Pb | Au | Ag | CuEq | Zone |
AR22- 0205 | 128.70 | 171.47 | 42.77 | 3.09 | 6.21 | 1.46 | 0.84 | 72.14 | 7.04 | 5 & 3 |
184.06 | 195.88 | 11.82 | 1.13 | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 23.60 | 2.05 | 1 | |
AR22- 0210 | 28.76 | 31.66 | 2.90 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 3.89 | 0.78 | 3 |
37.05 | 41.06 | 4.01 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 3.00 | 0.82 | 3 | |
AR22- 0211 | 104.44 | 109.20 | 4.76 | 4.39 | 4.57 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 43.61 | 7.04 | 5 |
149.02 | 154.36 | 5.34 | 9.33 | 7.59 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 59.76 | 12.98 | 3 | |
174.85 | 180.20 | 5.35 | 1.05 | 0.82 | 0.13 | 0.91 | 32.49 | 2.26 | 2.5? | |
187.63 | 188.72 | 1.09 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 72.10 | 1.10 | 2.5? | |
208.35 | 210.39 | 2.04 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 6.58 | 1.25 | 2 | |
259.41 | 261.02 | 1.61 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 5.23 | 0.72 | 1 | |
AR22- 0214 | 104.00 | 110.15 | 6.15 | 3.97 | 5.79 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 45.64 | 7.01 | 5 |
153.09 | 163.05 | 9.96 | 1.65 | 1.22 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 11.70 | 2.26 | 3 | |
236.47 | 242.10 | 5.63 | 0.70 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 16.14 | 0.97 | 1 | |
AR22- 0216 | 143.99 | 156.32 | 12.33 | 3.23 | 5.16 | 1.33 | 0.73 | 49.75 | 6.48 | 5 |
163.22 | 179.99 | 16.77 | 2.69 | 1.95 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 20.48 | 3.74 | 3 | |
187.25 | 212.48 | 25.23 | 1.05 | 2.00 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 31.66 | 2.37 | 1 | |
216.76 | 221.10 | 4.34 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 16.58 | 1.10 | 1a | |
AR22- 0217 | 27.74 | 34.53 | 6.79 | 0.67 | 4.21 | 1.31 | 0.43 | 19.46 | 3.09 | 1 |
AR22- 0221 | 142.85 | 187.88 | 45.03 | 2.36 | 2.78 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 21.04 | 3.84 | 5 & 3 |
216.46 | 220.19 | 3.73 | 3.87 | 5.13 | 0.84 | 0.40 | 63.15 | 6.85 | 1 | |
AR22- 0226 | 146.96 | 160.27 | 13.31 | 1.64 | 1.55 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 30.45 | 2.89 | 5 |
165.00 | 167.50 | 2.50 | 0.79 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 6.11 | 1.06 | 5 | |
175.16 | 176.74 | 1.58 | 7.67 | 7.54 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 70.54 | 11.49 | 3 | |
181.10 | 184.64 | 3.54 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 4.03 | 0.68 | 3 | |
189.58 | 193.07 | 3.49 | 5.82 | 7.15 | 1.17 | 0.18 | 80.91 | 9.68 | 3? | |
222.05 | 226.47 | 4.42 | 1.63 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 15.59 | 2.09 | 1 | |
250.75 | 257.56 | 6.81 | 1.30 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 13.94 | 1.72 | 1a | |
AR22- 0230 | 101.40 | 120.85 | 19.45 | 8.71 | 9.54 | 1.84 | 1.81 | 103.37 | 14.90 | 5 |
175.56 | 179.16 | 3.60 | 1.42 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 3.02 | 1.49 | 3 | |
184.20 | 186.23 | 2.03 | 1.27 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 4.53 | 1.35 | 3 sub | |
AR22- 0234 | 114.94 | 126.19 | 11.25 | 1.76 | 1.56 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 16.41 | 2.67 | 5 |
158.70 | 169.65 | 10.95 | 6.53 | 10.55 | 1.32 | 0.11 | 56.68 | 11.43 | 3 | |
174.96 | 178.14 | 3.18 | 0.33 | 1.27 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 2.89 | 0.85 | 3 |
Notes:
- Copper equivalent (CuEq) calculations use metal prices assumptions of
/lb for copper,$3.00 /lb for zinc,$1.10 /lb for lead,$1.00 /oz for gold, and$1,300 /oz for silver with$18.00 100% metallurgical recoveries assumed for all metals. - Results are core intervals and not true thickness; true widths have not been determined for the above intercepts but are thought to be greater than
80% of actual drill thicknesses except for hole AR22-0230 that are estimated to be78% of the reported core interval. - Cut-off grade of
0.5% CuEq. - Maximum internal dilution of up to three consecutive meters of <
0.5% CuEq. - Within mineralized zones the minimum sample length was 0.30 m, maximum sample length was 2.66 m, and the average sample length was 1.54 m.
- Core recovery averaged
87.3% . - Mineralized intervals with lengths less than 1.0 m were excluded from the table.
- Some rounding errors may occur.
Table 2. Drill hole locations at the
Hole | Easting | Northing | Elevation | Azimuth | Dip | Length |
AR22-0205 | 613265.4 | 7453193.8 | 907.8 | 35 | 70 | 221.59 |
AR22-0210 | 613543.0 | 7453597.8 | 868.0 | 90 | -82 | 101.8 |
AR22-0211 | 613379.7 | 7453040.8 | 942.7 | 35 | -65 | 288.04 |
AR22-0214 | 613339.7 | 7453032.5 | 923.5 | 35 | -77 | 276.14 |
AR22-0216 | 613300.1 | 7453342.5 | 956.7 | 35 | -70 | 236.83 |
AR22-0217 | 612964.5 | 7453466.3 | 821.1 | 35 | -70 | 47.85 |
AR22-0221 | 613300.2 | 7453341.9 | 956.7 | 60 | -62 | 276.45 |
AR22-0226 | 613299.4 | 7453342.5 | 956.7 | 57 | -49 | 271.12 |
AR22-0230 | 613471.8 | 7453015.6 | 977.0 | 110 | -45 | 234.7 |
AR22-0234 | 613403.2 | 7452994.1 | 968.8 | 40 | -82 | 287.88 |
Coordinates are in |
Within
A comparison of the top five holes drilled at Arctic, including reference to the year drilled, is shown in Table 3. Hole AR22-0205 includes the best grade-thickness ever encountered at Arctic. Its unique thickness of 42.77 meters is caused by Zone 5 being stacked on Zone 3. Hole AR22-0230 has a true thickness of approximately 15.3 meters which if used would place the interval as the sixth highest grade-thickness at Arctic.
Table 3. Top Five Grade-Thickness Drill Holes from the
Hole | Year | From | To | Length | CuEq | Cu | Zn | Pb | Au | Ag | Grade |
AR22- 0205 | 2022 | 128.70 | 171.47 | 42.77 | 7.04 | 3.09 | 6.21 | 1.46 | 0.84 | 72.14 | 301.10 |
AR04- 0079 | 2004 | 136.18 | 163.75 | 27.57 | 10.74 | 5.29 | 7.55 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 76.17 | 296.10 |
AR22- 0230 | 2022 | 101.40 | 120.85 | 19.45 | 14.90 | 8.71 | 9.54 | 1.84 | 1.81 | 103.37 | 289.81 |
AR08- 0122 | 2008 | 159.07 | 187.57 | 28.50 | 8.68 | 4.31 | 6.77 | 1.63 | 1.09 | 72.21 | 247.38 |
AR21- 0176 | 2021 | 127.96 | 147.87 | 19.91 | 11.76 | 6.75 | 7.59 | 1.68 | 1.26 | 97.13 | 234.14 |
Notes:
- All lengths are close to true thickness except for hole AR22-0230 that is estimated to be
78% of the reported core interval. - For more information on previous drilling carried out at the
Arctic Project please refer to "Arctic Project , NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study,Ambler Mining District ,Alaska " with an effective date ofJanuary 20, 2023 and filed onFebruary 14, 2023 .
The drilling program, sampling and assaying protocol, and data verification were managed by qualified persons (QPs) employed by Ambler Metals. The diamond drill holes were completed using HQ3 diameter core, and recoveries averaged
Samples were collected through mineralized zones using a 0.30 m minimum length and 2.66 m maximum length; average sample length is 1.54m. Weights of the drill core samples range from 0.22 to 12.34kg, depending on the size of core, rock type, and recovery.
Each core sample was placed into a bag with a numbered tag and quality control samples were inserted between core samples using the same numbering sequence. Then, samples were grouped into batches for shipping and laboratory submissions. Each batch of 20 samples contains quality control (QC) samples that comprise one certified reference material (CRM), one core blank (BLK), and one crushed or pulp duplicate (DUP). In addition, 1 field duplicate was taken within mineralized intervals for every 20 samples. Chain of custody records are maintained for sample shipments and the custody is transferred from Ambler Metals expeditor to the laboratory upon delivery.
Samples were shipped to ALS Minerals laboratory in
Drill core samples were weighed (
Gold analyses were completed using a 30 g lead fire assay and AAS finish (Au-AA23). Multi-element analyses for 48 elements were completed using a geochemical four acid digestion and ICP-ES/MS finish (ME-MS61). Over-range assays for Ag, Cu, Zn, and S were completed using an ore grade four-acid digestion and ICP-ES finish (ME-OG62). Additional analyses were completed for Ba and Hg.
Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn assays for QC samples were reviewed to ensure that CRMs are within tolerance limits specified on supplier certificates, BLKs are below acceptable thresholds, and DUPs display statistical patterns normally expected for sample types, methods, and elements. CRMs that returned assays outside of tolerance limits and BLKs with assays above thresholds were deemed to have failed. If failures were materially significant then sample batches containing the failed QC samples were re-assayed to ensure that the QC samples returned acceptable results before release. All QC monitoring data are reviewed and signed off by an independent QA/QC geologist.
There is no known relationship between core sample recoveries and assay grades. Ambler Metals will submit
This press release includes certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian and
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/trilogy-metals-reports-best-grade-thickness-intersection-ever-drilled-at-the-arctic-project-of-42-8-meters-at-7-copper-equivalent-301789295.html
SOURCE
FAQ
What are the latest drilling results for Trilogy Metals (TMQ) at the Arctic Project?
How many meters were drilled at the Arctic Project in 2022?
What was the highest copper equivalent grade reported in the latest drilling results for Trilogy Metals?
What implications do the latest drilling results have for Trilogy Metals (TMQ) and South32 (SOUHY)?