Takeda Announces Publication of Data from SOLSTICE, a Pivotal Phase 3 Trial for LIVTENCITY™ (Maribavir) in Post-Transplant Recipients With Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection (Refractory, With or Without Resistance)
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company released results from the pivotal Phase 3 SOLSTICE trial, showing that LIVTENCITY (maribavir) significantly outperformed conventional therapies in treating post-transplant CMV infections. The primary endpoint was met with 55.7% of patients on LIVTENCITY achieving CMV DNA levels below 137 IU/mL compared to 23.9% for conventional therapies. Additionally, the key secondary endpoint of symptom control was also significantly better for LIVTENCITY. Adverse events were similar between groups, but fewer LIVTENCITY patients discontinued due to adverse events.
- LIVTENCITY met its primary endpoint with 55.7% achieving confirmed CMV DNA <137 IU/mL at Week 8 compared to 23.9% for conventional therapies.
- Achieved statistically significant improvement in key secondary endpoint of CMV DNA level
- Lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events in the LIVTENCITY group (13%) versus conventional therapies (32%).
- None.
- Results Of The Global Phase 3 Trial, Now Published In Clinical Infectious Diseases, Show For The Primary Endpoint, LIVTENCITY Was Statistically Superior To Conventional Therapies At Study Week 81
- For The Key Secondary Endpoint, LIVTENCITY Was Statistically Significant To Conventional Therapies In A Composite Achievement Of CMV DNA Level < The Lower Limit Of Quantification (LLOQ) And Symptom Control§ At Week 8 With Maintenance Through Week 161
-
In The SOLSTICE Study, A Higher Proportion Of Patients In the Conventional Therapies Group Discontinued Study Medication Due To An Adverse Event Compared To
The LIVTENCITY Group
“We are pleased that the SOLSTICE trial, which compared LIVTENCITY to conventional antiviral treatments for transplant patients with refractory/resistant cytomegalovirus infections, met its primary endpoint of statistical superiority, as well as the key secondary endpoint,” said
Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between groups (LIVTENCITY,
“Managing CMV post-transplant requires careful balance between managing side effects and reducing viral load,” said study co-author
LIVTENCITY is currently approved for use only in the
The publication can be accessed here: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab988/6448443.
About Cytomegalovirus
CMV is a beta herpesvirus that commonly infects humans; serologic evidence of prior infection can be found in
In transplant recipients, reactivation of CMV can lead to serious consequences including loss of the transplanted organ and, in extreme cases, can be fatal.11,12 Existing therapies to treat post-transplant CMV infections may demonstrate serious side effects that require dose adjustments or may fail to adequately suppress viral replication.13–15 Additionally, existing therapies may require or prolong hospitalization due to administration.13,14
About LIVTENCITY (maribavir)
LIVTENCITY (maribavir), an orally bioavailable anti-CMV compound, is the first and only antiviral agent that targets and inhibits the pUL97 protein kinase and its natural substrates.2 It is approved in the
About Takeda’s SOLSTICE Trial
The TAK-620-303 (SOLSTICE) trial (NCT02931539) was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled superiority trial to assess the efficacy and safety comparing treatment with either LIVTENCITY (maribavir) or conventional antiviral therapy in 352 hematopoietic cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients with CMV infection refractory, with or without resistance, to one or a combination of the conventional antiviral therapies: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet or cidofovir. Adult patients underwent a 2-week screening period, followed by randomization 2:1 to LIVTENCITY (n=235) (400 mg, twice daily) or conventional antiviral therapies (n=117) (as dosed by the investigator) for up to 8-weeks. After completion of the treatment period, subjects entered a 12-week follow-up phase.1
The trial’s primary endpoint was confirmed CMV DNA level <LLOQ (lower limit of quantification, [i.e. <137 IU/mL] in 2 consecutive samples separated by at least 5 days as assessed by COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® CMV test at the end of Week 8). The key secondary endpoint was CMV DNA level <LLOQ and CMV infection symptom control at the end of Study Week 8 with maintenance of this treatment effect through Study Week 16.1
INDICATION
LIVTENCITY is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older and weighing at least 35 kg) with post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease that is refractory to treatment (with or without genotypic resistance) with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, cidofovir or foscarnet.2
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Risk of Reduced Antiviral Activity When Co-administered with Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir
LIVTENCITY may antagonize the antiviral activity of ganciclovir and valganciclovir by inhibiting human CMV pUL97 kinase, which is required for activation/phosphorylation of ganciclovir and valganciclovir. Coadministration of LIVTENCITY with ganciclovir or valganciclovir is not recommended.
Virologic Failure During Treatment and Relapse Post-Treatment
Virologic failure due to resistance can occur during and after treatment with LIVTENCITY. Virologic relapse during the posttreatment period usually occurred within 4-8 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Some maribavir pUL97 resistance-associated substitutions confer cross-resistance to ganciclovir and valganciclovir. Monitor CMV DNA levels and check for maribavir resistance if the patient is not responding to treatment or relapses.
Risk of Adverse Reactions or Loss of Virologic Response Due to Drug Interactions
The concomitant use of LIVTENCITY and certain drugs may result in potentially significant drug interactions, some of which may lead to reduced therapeutic effect of LIVTENCITY or adverse reactions of concomitant drugs. Consider the potential for drug interactions prior to and during LIVTENCITY therapy; review concomitant medications during LIVTENCITY therapy and monitor for adverse reactions. Refer to the full prescribing information of LIVTENCITY for important drug interactions.
Maribavir is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. Drugs that are strong inducers of CYP3A4 are expected to decrease maribavir plasma concentrations and may result in reduced virologic response; therefore, coadministration of LIVTENCITY with these drugs is not recommended, except for selected anticonvulsants.
Use With Immunosuppressant Drugs
LIVTENCITY has the potential to increase the drug concentrations of immunosuppressant drugs that are CYP3A and/or P-gp substrates where minimal concentration changes may lead to serious adverse events (including tacrolimus, cyclosporine, sirolimus and everolimus). Frequently monitor immunosuppressant drug levels throughout treatment with LIVTENCITY, especially following initiation and after discontinuation of LIVTENCITY and adjust immunosuppressant dose, as needed.
Adverse Reactions
The most common adverse events (all grades, >
Please click for Full Prescribing Information.
About
Important Notice
For the purposes of this notice, “press release” means this document, any oral presentation, any question and answer session and any written or oral material discussed or distributed by
The companies in which Takeda directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this press release, “Takeda” is sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Takeda and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release and any materials distributed in connection with this press release may contain forward-looking statements, beliefs or opinions regarding Takeda’s future business, future position and results of operations, including estimates, forecasts, targets and plans for Takeda. Without limitation, forward-looking statements often include words such as “targets”, “plans”, “believes”, “hopes”, “continues”, “expects”, “aims”, “intends”, “ensures”, “will”, “may”, “should”, “would”, “could” “anticipates”, “estimates”, “projects” or similar expressions or the negative thereof. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions about many important factors, including the following, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements: the economic circumstances surrounding Takeda’s global business, including general economic conditions in
Medical information
This press release contains information about products that may not be available in all countries, or may be available under different trademarks, for different indications, in different dosages, or in different strengths. Nothing contained herein should be considered a solicitation, promotion or advertisement for any prescription drugs including the ones under development.
§ CMV infection symptom control was defined as resolution or improvement of tissue-invasive disease or CMV syndrome for symptomatic patients at baseline, or no new symptoms for patients
* The difference in proportion of responders between treatment groups was obtained using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weighted average across all strata and tested using stratum-adjusted CMH method, with transplant type and baseline plasma CMV DNA concentration as two stratification factors
† Refractory defined as documented failure to achieve >1 log10 decrease in CMV DNA level in whole blood or plasma after a 14 day or longer treatment period with IV ganciclovir/oral valganciclovir, IV foscarnet, or IV cidofovir
‡ Resistant defined as refractory CMV and documentation of >1 CMV genetic mutations associated with resistance to ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, and/or cidofovir
References
-
Avery RK, Alain S, Alexander BD, et al. Maribavir for Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infections With or Without Resistance Post-Transplant: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. Published online
December 2, 2021 . doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab988. -
USPI. Takeda Internal Communication (TAK620-INT) Manufacturing Information.
November 2021 . 2021 Takeda PharmaceuticalsUSA Inc All rights reserved. -
Krech U. Complement-fixing antibodies against cytomegalovirus in different parts of the world. Bull
WHO . 1973;49:103-106. - de la Hoz R. Diagnosis and treatment approaches to CMV infections in adult patients. J Clin Virol. 2002;25:S1-S12.
- Azevedo L, Pierrotti L, Abdala E, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients. Clinics. 2015;70(7):515-523. doi:10.6061/clinics/2015(07)09.
-
World Health Organization . International Report on Organ Donation and Transplantation Activities- Executive Summary 2018.; 2020. AccessedNovember 11, 2021 . http://www.transplant-observatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/glorep2018-2.pdf. - Niederwieser D, et al. Blood 2019;134(supplement 1):2035.
- Razonable RR, Eid AJ. A Viral infections in transplant recipients. Minerva Med. 2009;100(6):23.
-
Styczynski J.
Who Is the Patient at Risk of CMV Recurrence: A Review of the Current Scientific Evidence with a Focus on Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Infect Ther. 2018;7:1-16. - Cho S-Y, Lee D-G, Kim H-J. Cytomegalovirus Infections after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current Status and Future Immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(2666):1-17.
- Fishman JA. Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients. N Engl J Med. Published online 2007:14.
-
Kenyon M, Babic A, eds. The European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Textbook for Nurses.
Springer International Publishing ; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50026-3. -
Martín-Gandul C , Pérez-Romero P, González-Roncero FM, et al. Clinical impact of neutropenia related with the preemptive therapy of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. J Infect. 2014;69(5):500-506. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.07.001. - Chemaly RF, Chou S, Einsele H, et al. Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(8):1420-1426. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy696.
- Beyer K. Outpatient Foscarnet Administration Incorporating Home Infusions Is Feasible Greatly Enhancing the Care of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:S18-S391.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211208005325/en/
erin-marie.beals@takeda.com
+1 781-336-9417
Source:
FAQ
What were the results of the SOLSTICE trial for TAK?
Were there any significant side effects reported in the SOLSTICE trial?
What is the primary endpoint of the SOLSTICE trial for LIVTENCITY?