Concerned Shareholders of Rocky Mountain Candidates Rhonda J. Parish, Mark Riegel and Sandra Elizabeth Taylor Issue Letter to Shareholders About Proxy Contest
Three independent director candidates—Rhonda J. Parish, Mark Riegel, and Sandra Elizabeth Taylor—nominated by AB Value Management LLC, seek election to the Board of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Representing about 14.59% of shares, they emphasize their experience in governance and industry knowledge. The candidates plan to address business challenges and propose improvements in corporate governance, highlighting issues with the current Board's decisions, including a controversial 'poison pill' provision. They are committed to enhancing shareholder value through collaboration and transparency.
- The candidates bring extensive industry experience, enhancing potential for effective governance.
- Commitment to transparent communication with shareholders regarding company performance.
- Plans to eliminate the longstanding poison pill provision that may hinder shareholder interests.
- Concerns over the current Board's failure to acknowledge past business challenges.
- Recent decision to reduce the number of Board seats seen as undemocratic.
The full text of the letter follows:
Dear RMCF Shareholders:
On
We are Independent and Experienced
First, we truly value our independence. We have no prior business or personal relationships with any member of the Concerned Shareholders of Rocky Mountain. We agreed to participate in this campaign because we believe in RMCF, and particularly in its brand. Here are brief summaries of our qualifications:
-
Rhonda J. Parish – Has decades of corporate governance, franchising and legal experience in the retail and restaurant industries in her executive leadership at public companies, such as Walmart, Denny’s, Einstein Bagels and Ruby Tuesday;
-
Mark Riegel – Possesses extensive executive expertise specifically within the chocolate and confection industry, particularly with respect to manufacturing and marketing, including atRussell Stover Chocolates ,Ferrara Candy Company , and beginning career in brand management at Kraft; and
-
Sandra Elizabeth Taylor – Brings a much-needed skillset to the Company of corporate social responsibility, combined with her decades of experience serving on public company boards and within executive leadership at DE Master Blenders/Sara Lee (former director), Cappella Education (former director) Starbucks (SVP, Corporate Responsibility) and Kodak (VP, Public Affairs).
We feel that our experience and skill sets are well suited to successfully turnaround the business, which we believe has unfortunately faltered under the current management and the legacy directors. With the void left due to Mary Thompson’s resignation and the subsequent lack of core external experience in franchising, confectionery manufacturing, and retailing, we believe our qualifications have become even more valuable for the pro forma RMCF Board to leverage.
We Will Collaborate with the Incumbent Board and Management
Our professional experience and industry knowledge prepares us well to immediately focus on addressing the Company’s business challenges. That said, having served in senior leadership roles and on other public company boards, we understand the value of collaboration. We intend to work collaboratively with the current management and the legacy directors to forge a new path for the Company—one that would restore the Company, its brand and help create shareholder value.
We Have No Preconceived Notions or Agendas, Except for RMCF to Leverage our Experience to Maximize Shareholder Value
We believe that the Concerned Shareholders of Rocky Mountain have set forth a thoughtful and actionable plan to be executed upon if we are elected. However, we are fully aware that once we are “under the tent” we will need to be nimble and open-minded about the right strategy for RMCF—and we will be. One thing is certain—RMCF is in need of a turnaround, and we will contribute our decades of highly relevant industry-specific experience to help lead this effort.
After reading through the Board’s investor presentation and other materials, we were alarmed to see that there does not appear to be any acknowledgment of past business and financial woes at RMCF. There also does not appear to be any acknowledgement that there is a fractured base at RMCF that needs to be further diagnosed and fixed. This is not acceptable to us. As part of a newly-constituted Board, if elected, we will always be upfront with shareholders—about the “good” and the “bad”—and will impress this communication style throughout management and the whole RMCF organization.
We are Committed to Best-in-Class Corporate Governance
We believe that strong corporate governance serves as a foundation for companies to maximize value for all shareholders. We will strive to maintain an ecosystem in the boardroom that invites robust discourse and supports and challenges management. We will always ask many questions and then question every answer.
We were quite surprised that the Board’s recent investor presentation does not address a shareholder-unfriendly poison pill that has been in place for many years without shareholder approval (particularly because the Concerned Shareholders of Rocky Mountain are proposing it be removed). We will immediately advocate for the termination of the poison pill and the adoption of a clear policy guiding future adoptions should they ever be necessary.
We also plan to examine the Board’s decision-making process surrounding its recent controversial decision to contract from seven to six seats during a contested election and so close to the 2021 Annual Meeting.
The first question we would ask is:
Did the Board rely on the advice of expert lawyers qualified to practice in
It appears prudent for any board to seek out this type of specific advice before taking such an action, particularly in a very hurried timeframe (one business day after a vacancy was created due to a director resignation) during an election contest. We will always seek to make fully informed decisions, availing ourselves of expert advice as appropriate, in a thoughtful and deliberate manner.
The second question we would ask is:
How the Board’s more recently appointed directors ever got comfortable agreeing with the Company’s longer tenured directors in making such an arguably shareholder undemocratic decision to contract the Board in these circumstances?
Though, to be frank, we cannot conceive of any reasonable justification that could constitute an answer to this question.
We are also committed to proactive engagement with shareholders and will be responsive to matters that shareholders have clearly voiced their opposition to through low vote-support and other means as they have done in the past on issues such as compensation and the poison pill.
* * *
Our conviction has never been higher that RMCF is a great brand in desperate need of board, governance and business refreshment. If elected, we will work tirelessly on behalf of all shareholders to position RMCF for great successes in the years to come.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Important Additional Information
Certain Information Regarding the Participants
The Participants in the proxy solicitation are: AB Value Partners, LP, AB
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210922005647/en/
(203) 295-7841
Source: Concerned Shareholders of Rocky Mountain
FAQ
Who are the independent director candidates for RMCF?
What percentage of shares do the Concerned Shareholders of RMCF represent?
What are the key issues raised by the candidate group regarding RMCF's Board?
When is the RMCF Annual Meeting of Shareholders?