Velan-Repertoire Group Files Definitive Proxy Materials in Connection With Radius Health 2022 Annual Meeting
Velan Capital Investment Management and Repertoire Partners, owning approximately 7.7% of Radius Health, Inc. (RDUS), filed a proxy statement for the election of their nominees, Eric Ende, Cynthia Flowers, and Ann MacDougall, to the Board. They criticize the current Board for value destruction, poor governance, and mismanagement. Velan-Repertoire argues that substantial change is essential to unlock the company's potential and urges shareholders to vote for their nominees at the July 8, 2022 Annual Meeting.
- Nomination of experienced candidates, potentially improving governance.
- Proposed strategic focus on TYMLOS commercialization, which could enhance revenue.
- Significant 59% decline in share price over the past year.
- Board's minimal alignment with stockholders, owning only ~0.2% of the company.
- Accumulated deficit of $1.4 billion as of December 2021, indicating financial instability.
- Claims of strategic mismanagement and ineffective oversight by current Board members.
Sends Letter to Fellow Stockholders Detailing the Board’s Record of Persistent Value Erosion and Highlights Pathway to Unlock Tremendous Upside Potential
Cites Lack of Alignment with Stockholders, Poor Corporate Governance, Entrenchment Tactics and Strategic Mismanagement as Evidence that the Current Board Must Be Meaningfully Reconstituted
Urges Stockholders to Send a Clear Message that the Status Quo is No Longer Acceptable by Voting on the WHITE Card FOR the Election of Nominees
The full text of the letter Velan-Repertoire is mailing to Radius stockholders is found below:
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
We are highly concerned by the significant destruction of value that has occurred under the watch of the current Board of Directors of Radius (the “Board”). As experienced healthcare investors, we can recognize when a lack of board oversight and alignment with stockholders has resulted in glaring mismanagement. This is what appears to have taken place at Radius, a company that we believe has tremendous upside potential.
We believe real and urgent change is needed to realize Radius’ intrinsic value and bridge the gap between the Company’s potential and its current share price.
Since 2020, we have engaged extensively with the Company. Our approach as long-term investors in the healthcare sector is to trust boards and management teams until they have given us a compelling reason not to. It is a methodology that has served us well while working with numerous companies, both public and private, to successfully maximize stockholder value. Unfortunately, we believe the time for placing faith in the Radius Board has passed. The Board has fostered a culture characterized by dismal performance, poor corporate governance, entrenchment tactics and a failure to properly oversee management’s strategy and execution. As a result, we believe the current directors have failed to act in the best interest of stockholders and new perspectives are urgently needed in the boardroom.
We are therefore asking for your vote to elect our highly qualified director nominees –
Dismal Share Price Performance & Lack of Alignment with Stockholders
Radius has underperformed over nearly every relevant measurable period since becoming public on both an absolute basis and when compared to relevant indices and the broader market.
Total Return Performance | ||||||||||
1 year |
|
3 year |
|
5 year |
|
Sinco IPO |
Since |
|||
Radius |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
|||||
NBI (NASDAQ Biotechnology) |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|||||
CCMP (NASDAQ Composite) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
RTY (Russell 2000) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|||||
RAY (Russell 3000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
RDUS Relative Returns vs: | ||||||||||
NBI (NASDAQ Biotechnology) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||
CCMP (NASDAQ Composite) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||
RTY (Russell 2000) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||
RAY (Russell 3000) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Source: Bloomberg, calculated as of
Adding insult to injury is the fact that the Board, including President & Chief Executive Officer
This raises an obvious question: why should you continue to trust a Board that has overseen a precipitous decline in share price while remaining largely insulated from the pain we as stockholders have felt?
Poor Corporate Governance and Lack of Effective Corporate Oversight
One of a board’s most important fiduciary responsibilities is to put the most qualified individuals in place as managers to execute a strategy and maximize stockholder value. We believe the
4Q 2020 Earnings Call (
- “...I joined the company [nine months ago], and I can't explain the [TYMLOS patient growth during COVID] dynamics, frankly, whatsoever.”
Wells Fargo Fireside Chat (
- “Look, when I came to this company, I didn't know anything about osteoporosis, really.”
- “…there’s a lot of [patient] churn, as you said, Mohit, underneath that. I didn't fully understand that last year, and some people around me didn't fully understand it.”
RAD011 R&D Day (
-
“I spend…
50% of my time on abaloparatide.”
In addition, the incumbent Board is highly inter-connected, with multiple directors having current and past relationships with each other. Since
Entrenchment Tactics by the Board
The incumbent Board has shown a disturbing pattern of entrenchment.
On
Strategic Mismanagement and Suboptimal Commercial Execution
Radius has not enjoyed historical success and its failures have come at stockholders’ expense – the Company has an eye-popping accumulated deficit of
We believe Radius has made numerous key strategic mistakes. The most detrimental include:
-
A lack of focus on TYMLOS – this product is a differentiated and durable asset in the marketplace with true demand from a patient and demographic standpoint. However, in our view TYMLOS has been underutilized and neglected by a Board and management team that has been unable to successfully maximize the full potential of the asset. TYMLOS was launched almost five years ago yet continues to be underappreciated despite its potential to be a significant cash flow producer for Radius and its stockholders. We believe TYMLOS is an asset with significant capabilities and that the time of being cash flow negative and barely profitable should be a thing of the past.
-
A misguided shift around RAD011 – Radius has transitioned its focus towards RAD011, which we view as a suboptimal asset with a low likelihood of success. Even if Radius were to pivot RAD011 to focus on Angelman Syndrome, we view the cost required from an R&D standpoint and time to reach market as an unfavorable risk/reward profile. We also find it concerning that what was once a company grounded in its endocrinology expertise when
Mr. Martin joined has now shifted to neurology with RAD011. This asset suits his background given the more than a decade he spent atElan Corporation plc working on neurodegenerative diseases. In our view, it seems that the Board has positioned the Company to suit Mr. Martin’s interests at the expense of the Company’s best interests.
-
Neglected Strategy and Unengaged Directors – In 2017,
Ms. Friedman andDr. Garnier represented two of the three members of the Company’s Strategy Committee, which was focused on long-term business strategy including potential strategic transactions and business development opportunities. Unfortunately, it appears thatMs. Friedman andDr. Garnier did not take this committee seriously – they did not meet at all in 2017 despite that being their first year on the committee. Over the next three years, the Strategy Committee would only meet nine times before it was dissolved inOctober 2020 . We find it appalling that the Strategy Committee was of so little importance toMs. Friedman andDr. Garnier . By comparison, the Compensation Committee (of whichMs. Friedman andDr. Garnier are members) met 20 times over the same time period. Notably, the Strategy Committee was dissolved before the Company’s acquisition of RAD011, which Radius proclaims as a lead pipeline asset worthy of an R&D day inApril 2022 . Further, Drs. Garnier andvon Eschenbach each missed33% of the Board meetings and50% of theNominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings last year. Such poor attendance records are not acceptable nor indicative of actively engaged directors focused on creating value for stockholders. Thankfully stockholders have an opportunity to replace each ofMs. Friedman and Drs. Garnier andvon Eschenbach at the Annual Meeting.
We Believe We Have a Superior Path Forward
We have nominated three highly qualified candidates who collectively have the experience and knowledge needed to help steer the Company to value creation and growth. Our nominees –
Our nominees have extensive pharmaceutical public company board experience and are independent of Velan-Repertoire. We believe their collective experience and knowledge will help guide Radius on a value creating path that will lead to commercial and financial success coupled with renewed strategic vision.
We believe significant opportunities exist to unlock value at Radius. Our independent nominees, if elected, are prepared to help Radius execute a plan that prioritizes the following initiatives:
-
Reinvigorate TYMLOS Commercialization Strategy – focus on commercialization efforts to increase patient conversion rates, prolong duration of therapy and promote TYMLOS’ differentiation in the marketplace to drive new patient enrollments.
-
Define Path to Monetizing Elacestrant – establish a clear strategy to monetize the Elacestrant cash flow and extract significant value out of the asset before or after a potential approval scenario.
-
Discontinue Internal Development /Spend for RAD011 and Plot a New Strategic Course – in our view, Radius will unlock significant stockholder value by focusing on true synergistic areas to TYMLOS and avoiding further cash burn on a program that we view with little conviction and that comes with a contentious history.
- Optimize Financial Management and Improve Operational Efficiency – conduct a thorough review of all overhead and administrative spending as well as non-core projects with the goal of reducing spend to conserve capital for product commercialization.
Under a reconstituted and refocused Board, we believe Radius can generate
If elected, our nominees are committed to taking actions to increase value for all Radius stockholders. With improved leadership and oversight, we believe the future can be bright for Radius and its stakeholders. The status quo is unacceptable – embrace change by voting FOR our nominees on the WHITE proxy card.
It is time for accountability at Radius – Velan-Repertoire urges all stockholders to vote for change on the WHITE proxy card to elect
We look forward to engaging further with you and taking this first step for change at Radius.
Sincerely,
Biographies of Velan-Repertoire’s Nominees
We believe Dr. Ende’s scientific background and over 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and life sciences industries, as well as his prior public company board experience, would make him a valuable asset to the Board.
We believe Ms. Flowers’ experience as an operator and her knowledge of strategic leadership priorities in the life sciences, biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries as well as her public company board experience make her well qualified to serve on the Board.
We believe Ms. MacDougall’s knowledge in corporate governance and operational matters highlighted by her many years of experience on the boards and committees of pharmaceutical companies well qualifies her to serve on the Board.
1 Excludes options and performance units.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220607005541/en/
Investor contacts:
(646) 844-0030
campaign@velancapital.com
(212) 297-0720
info@okapipartners.com
Media contacts:
DZacchei@longacresquare.com / JGermani@longacresquare.com
Source:
FAQ
What is the purpose of Velan Capital and Repertoire Partners' proxy statement for RDUS?
What are the qualifications of the nominees for the Radius Health board?
What has been the performance of Radius Health (RDUS) stock recently?
When is the Annual Meeting for Radius Health stockholders?