Global Financial Inclusion Index from Principal® Develops Benchmark for Financial Security and Inclusion Across Global Economies
Principal Financial Group released the inaugural Global Financial Inclusion Index, ranking 42 markets based on financial inclusion indicators. Singapore and the U.S. lead the ranking, while Argentina ranks last. The Index highlights that developed economies generally perform better in government and financial system support, while emerging economies excel in employer support. Key insights suggest a strong correlation between financial inclusion and societal factors such as economic resilience and standards of living.
- Singapore and the U.S. are ranked as top markets for financial inclusion.
- The Index establishes a benchmark for financial security across global economies.
- Strong financial inclusion is linked to improved societal factors like economic resilience and standards of living.
- Argentina ranked last in financial inclusion, indicating significant structural gaps.
- Developed economies scored lower in employer support compared to emerging economies.
New research analyzes and ranks 42 markets on public and private sector indicators of financial inclusion
“Financial inclusion is foundational to global economic progress. As an organization focused on helping more people gain access to financial security, we believe inclusion is an integral component of a market’s ability to prepare for and recover from adversity, grow sustainably, and build a brighter future,” said
The Index examines 42 markets and scores them across three pillars — government support, financial system support, and employer support — using datapoints across public and survey-based sources.
- The government support pillar examines the degree to which governments promote and enable financial inclusion, considering data on public pension support, deposit and consumer protections, employment, education, and financial literacy levels, and online connectivity.
- The financial system support pillar reviews the availability and uptake of various financial products, services, and education, considering data on access to bank accounts and credit, maturation of financial technology and use of real-time payments, and the overall effectiveness of the financial services industry in promoting confidence and small to medium sized business growth.
- The employer support pillar evaluates the availability and impact of employer programs to improve employee financial wellbeing and inclusion across various dimensions such as employee pension contributions, employee insurance programs, and financial guidance.
In its first year, the Index is helping to develop a benchmark for financial security and inclusion across global economies.
Key findings
-
In general, developed economies tend to pool towards the higher end of the Index, and emerging and developing economies cluster at the bottom. Six of the top 10 markets for financial inclusion are European and, within this group, four are Nordic. Europe’s larger economies rank at the bottom of the table, with
Italy as a particular outlier at 37th. The lower half of the ranking consists mainly of countries inLatin America , sub-Saharan Africa, andAsia .Argentina ranks last.
- Economies that provide strong support from their government and financial system tend to provide a lower level of employer support – and the reverse is also true. Developed economies typically score well for government and financial system support, whereas emerging economies generally score better for employer support.
-
When considering this research on an investment basis, the markets analyzed can be broadly grouped into four categories – mature, forward-looking economies; mature, backward-looking economies; young, forward-looking economies; and reliant economies – each of which provides an indication of several of the short-, medium- and long-term risks to which economies are exposed. There are some outliers to these categories – primarily some of the largest economies including the
U.S. ,China , andIndia – which do not fit neatly into a single category.
- The findings suggest financial inclusion may be a powerful indicator of next generation capital and wealth markets globally. When performance in each pillar is strong, it helps promote business growth and confidence and may lead to accelerated development of a capital market. These three pillars can provide insights into its overall economic maturity and development of a market and suggest ways to drive progress.
- Markets which rank highly for financial inclusion tend to also perform well on other societal factors such as food security, productivity, economic and social resilience, standards of living, and climate change adaption. There are strong, positive correlations between the Index rankings and the rankings of markets in several other indices which track the key factors affecting global populations today.
“The Index provides a data-driven, horizontal view for developed and emerging markets to learn from each other when it comes to fostering a financially inclusive citizenry,” said
Global Financial Inclusion Index |
|||
|
Top 10 Scoring Markets |
|
Bottom 10 Scoring Markets |
1 |
|
33 |
|
2 |
|
34 |
|
3 |
|
35 |
|
4 |
|
36 |
|
5 |
|
37 |
|
6 |
|
38 |
|
7 |
|
39 |
|
8 |
|
40 |
|
9 |
|
41 |
|
10 |
|
42 |
|
To read the full report and methodology, please click here.
To view a summary infographic, please click here.
About
1 As of
2 Barron’s, 2022
3 Pensions & Investments, 2021
About
© 2022
Principal®,
The Global Financial Inclusion Index is a proprietary model output based upon certain assumptions that may change, are not guaranteed, and should not be relied upon as a significant basis for an investment decision.
Insurance products issued by Principal National Life Insurance Co (except in NY) and
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220920006272/en/
Source:
FAQ
What does the Global Financial Inclusion Index measure for PFG?
Which markets ranked highest in the Global Financial Inclusion Index by Principal Financial Group?
How does financial inclusion affect economic performance according to the Index?
What were the findings regarding emerging and developed economies in the Index?