Anson Funds Believes Nano Dimension's Board of Directors Requires Change
Anson Funds, holding 5.1% of Nano Dimension's shares, expresses deep concerns over the company's management and board, accusing them of destroying shareholder value. Anson criticizes the board's unilateral decision-making, particularly regarding a proposed acquisition of Stratasys, Ltd. (SSYS), which they believe undermines shareholder interests amidst an ongoing proxy contest. Anson recommends significantly increasing the capital return program, currently at $100 million, as it only represents 9% of available cash. The firm highlights management's failure to demonstrate profitable growth and warns against wasteful spending on M&A. Anson urges adherence to fiduciary duties to shareholders.
- Anson Funds is advocating for an increased return of capital, which could enhance shareholder value.
- Management is criticized for ignoring shareholder concerns and engaging in unilateral decision-making.
- The proposed acquisition of Stratasys is seen as detrimental to shareholder interests and could be perceived as circumventing a necessary vote.
- Management's actions, including hiring an M&A advisor, are viewed as contrary to shareholder wishes for capital preservation.
- The company has seen an over 80% decline in share price since January 2021, indicating poor management performance.
Our primary and immediate concern is that the Company is utilizing most of its cash resources for a contemplated unsolicited takeover of Stratasys.
The Company is engaged in a highly destructive and distracting battle with an activist shareholder which is diverting management from prioritizing the Company's business prospects. As opposed to listening to reasonable return of capital requests from shareholders, management has become aggressive, attempting to grasp at legal technicalities to avoid a democratic vote.
On
Recently, the Company has attempted to appease shareholders by announcing its intention to repurchase up to
only represents$100 million 9% of the Company's cash and investments on hand. Each share repurchased results in immediate and certain value creation for shareholder as the stock trades at a31% discount to their cash and investments value1 (even when attributing zero value to the operating business). The Company should look to deploy a significantly higher amount of capital into this strategy.- Management has yet to demonstrate a meaningful return on its invested capital and we believe that the remaining >
of cash and investments is at risk of being deployed into value destroying mergers and acquisitions ("M&A").$1.1B Nano Dimension is materially overcapitalized for its existing operating business and only a fraction of its cash is required to fund it going forward.
We have urged the Company on multiple occasions to implement a meaningful return of capital program in order to preserve and enhance shareholder value. However, management has repeatedly ignored our requests and instead has continued to erode its valuable working capital position. Discussions recently broke down after we communicated our view that the Company would best serve its shareholders by aggressively utilizing its share buyback program and meaningfully expanding its efforts to return capital to shareholders. Management rebuffed this request and informed us that "[they] control the company", not us, the actual shareholders.
We would like to take this opportunity to publicly remind the Nano Dimension Board of Directors ("Board") that they owe a fiduciary duty to Company shareholders, not to Company management. Boards of public companies are not dictatorships meant to enrich a select few insiders – rather they are required to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
We believe that it is precisely this level of arrogance from management that causes
- The Company hired Lazard as an M&A advisor in what appeared to be a knee-jerk reaction to the activist. As we feared, this has led to large-scale M&A is in direct opposition to shareholder wishes for preservation and return of capital.
- Recently, management and the Board attempted to readjust the strike price of 27.7M warrants issued to its Chairman and CEO to
from$2.46 . If approved, the new exercise price would have been$6.16 46% below the Company's cash and investments per share. This was a slap in the face to all investors who would realize immediate dilution. It also illustrates an attempt by the Company's entrenched management team to effectively siphon away ownership rights from its independent shareholders. Fortunately, the shareholders voted down this proposal. - The Company recently adopted a poison pill and filed a registration statement for an extended new ESOP representing an egregious
20% of outstanding shares.
In addition to the aforementioned, the current management team has presided over the Company while the share price declined >
We urge the Board to adhere to their fiduciary duties owed to shareholders and expand their return of capital program. We also believe the Board should place a moratorium on any M&A activity pending a final resolution of outcome of the ongoing proxy battle.
Chief Investment Officer
Anson Funds:
Anson Funds is a privately held alternative asset manager with
Media Contact:
Anson Funds
General Counsel
lsalvatori@ansonfunds.com
(416) 447-8874
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. These statements reflect
----------
- Includes (i)
of cash and deposits as of$1,030,000 December 31, 2022 and (ii) 9,695,115 shares in SSYS at per share (last close on$14.01 March 9 , 2023).
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/anson-funds-believes-nano-dimensions-board-of-directors-requires-change-301768680.html
SOURCE Anson Funds
FAQ
What concerns does Anson Funds have regarding Nano Dimension's management?
How much of Nano Dimension's shares does Anson Funds own?
What is Anson Funds' recommendation for Nano Dimension?
What has been the impact of management decisions on Nano Dimension's stock price?