Medivir provides update from supportive Type C meeting with the FDA; preparations for enhanced phase 2b in HCC with fostrox + Lenvima continue
- Medivir plans to use the improved capsule formulation of fostrox in the upcoming phase 2b study.
- The primary endpoint in the enhanced study design will be changed to Objective Response Rate (ORR).
- The preparations for the randomized phase 2b study, comparing fostrox + Lenvima with Lenvima alone, are ongoing.
- The study design adjustments aim to strengthen the study in relation to FDA's Project Optimus.
- The study protocol is being finalized before submitting an IND in the US for study initiation in early 2025.
- None.
The key outcome of the Type C meeting was that Medivir's preparations for the randomized phase 2b study, comparing fostrox + Lenvima® with Lenvima alone, continues with two key adjustments to the study design.
Firstly, as Medivir plans to use the improved capsule formulation of fostrox in the upcoming phase 2b study, an initial dose run-in as the first part of the study will be added. This means including 20-25 additional patients in an arm with a lower dose, in addition to the 30 mg dose used in the currently ongoing phase 1b/2a study. This change will also further strengthen the study design in relation to FDA's Project Optimus.
Secondly, Objective Response Rate (ORR) is a validated surrogate endpoint for Overall Survival. In prior HCC studies, ORR has supported accelerated approvals. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the enhanced study design will be changed to ORR with key secondary endpoints, including duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival.
The aim of the study, as well as size and study length, remain similar as previously planned and communicated phase 2b design.
The FDA guidance has been discussed with Scientific Advisory Council members and regulatory experts. The next step is to finalize the study design and study protocol before submitting an IND in the US to enable study start in the beginning of 2025.
- "With the outcome of the Type C meeting, we are confidently moving forward with the enhanced phase 2b study design, including the adjustments informed by the discussion with FDA. Our current phase 1b/2a study, in a similar patient population, is still ongoing and patients are staying on treatment longer than expected. With the planned phase 2b study, we are excited to move forward with the development of a promising treatment alternative to second line HCC patients," says Pia Baumann, CMO at Medivir.
- "We continue to accelerate the development plan for fostrox. Engaging with FDA, to ensure best possible study design for the next phase, is critical for the program and is an important element in partnering discussions. Clarity on study design for phase 2b also allows us to move forward and perform study feasibility with speed as well as finalize CMC preparations," says Jens Lindberg, CEO at Medivir.
Medivir will provide additional details regarding the updated study design at the Quarterly Results webcast on April 30.
For additional information, please contact
Magnus Christensen, CFO, Medivir AB
Telephone: +46 8 5468 3100
E-mail: magnus.christensen@medivir.com
About fostrox
Fostrox is a type of smart chemotherapy that delivers the cell-killing compound selectively to the tumor while minimizing the harmful effect on normal cells. This is achieved by coupling an active chemotherapy (troxacitabine) with a prodrug tail. The prodrug design enables fostrox to be administered orally and travel directly to the liver where the active substance is released locally in the liver. With this unique mechanism, fostrox has the potential to become the first liver-targeted, orally administered drug that can help patients with various types of liver cancer. A phase 1b monotherapy study with fostrox has been completed and a phase 1b/2a combination study in HCC is ongoing.
About primary liver cancer
Primary liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cancer that arises in the liver. Although existing therapies for advanced HCC can extend the lives of patients, treatment benefits are insufficient and death rates remain high. There are approximately 660,000 patients diagnosed with primary liver cancer per year globally and current five-year survival is less than 20 percent1). HCC is a heterogeneous disease with diverse etiologies, and lacks defining mutations observed in many other cancers. This has contributed to the lack of success of molecularly targeted agents in HCC. The limited overall benefit, taken together with the poor overall prognosis for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, results in a large unmet medical need.
About Medivir
Medivir develops innovative drugs with a focus on cancer where the unmet medical needs are high. The drug candidates are directed toward indication areas where available therapies are limited or missing and there are great opportunities to offer significant improvements to patients. Medivir is focusing on the development of fostroxacitabine bralpamide (fostrox), a smart, targeted chemotherapy designed to selectively treat liver cancer cells and to minimize side effects. Collaborations and partnerships are important parts of Medivir's business model, and the drug development is conducted either by Medivir or in partnership. Medivir's share (ticker: MVIR) is listed on Nasdaq Stockholm's Small Cap list. www.medivir.com.
- Rumgay et al.,European Journal of Cancer 2022 vol.161, 108-118.
This information was brought to you by Cision http://news.cision.com
The following files are available for download:
Press release (PDF) |
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/medivir-provides-update-from-supportive-type-c-meeting-with-the-fda-preparations-for-enhanced-phase-2b-in-hcc-with-fostrox--lenvima-continue-302124266.html
SOURCE Medivir
FAQ
What was the outcome of Medivir's Type C meeting with the FDA?
What changes were made to the study design following the Type C meeting?
When is the aim to start the phase 2b study?
Who commented on the outcome of the Type C meeting from Medivir?