ClearBridge Investments Sends Letter Urging Board of Directors of Model N, Inc. to Reconsider Proposed Acquisition by Vista Equity Partners
- None.
- None.
Insights
In an acquisition scenario, the priority is to scrutinize the valuation metrics used to determine the offer price relative to the intrinsic value of the target company. A stakeholder owning 6.97% of a company holds significant influence and can drive critical discussions. If the acquisition undervalues the company, it might not reflect the true future cash flows, growth prospects, or the strategic positioning within the industry. This could lead to a potential underpayment for shareholders, hence it's imperative to examine the acquisition premium, peer transaction multiples and the historical trading range.
Model N's standing in the market, competitive advantages and financial health, including revenue growth patterns and profitability margins, are key factors to consider. One must compare these parameters with industry benchmarks and the known acquisition strategies of Vista Equity Partners to ascertain if there is a mismatch in valuation. It's also noteworthy that such pushbacks can either lead to improved offers or to a re-evaluation of the strategic alternatives available.
From a legal perspective, the fiduciary duties of Model N’s board involve acting in the best interests of all shareholders. Therefore, when significant shareholders voice concerns, it spurs a closer examination of the acquisition terms and fairness opinions. Typically, the board must demonstrate due diligence in considering the offer, which involves understanding the buyer's motivations and any synergies expected from the transaction.
Furthermore, disclosures to shareholders and the accuracy of public statements will come under scrutiny, particularly if the acquisition is challenged. The involvement of equity firms like Vista often indicates a plan for operational or strategic reformation, which may or may not align with the current management's vision for Model N’s future. A shareholder vote introduces another layer of complexity, as it presents an opportunity for dissenting shareholders to formally oppose the deal, potentially leading to renegotiations or, in some cases, to litigation if they perceive a breach of fiduciary duties.
Understanding the broader market context is essential to evaluate such an acquisition offer. Model N operates within a specific market niche and its value proposition may be augmented by industry trends and forecasts. Analysts must investigate how similar deals have been valued and completed in recent times, taking note of the economic conditions, sector-specific challenges and opportunities.
Considering the demand for Model N’s services, the competitive landscape and its customer base are also integral to understanding the long-term potential that an acquirer like Vista Equity Partners may be seeing—or undervaluing. ClearBridge's opposition could either reflect a strong belief in Model N's standalone potential or point to larger industry dynamics that they feel are not being adequately factored into the acquisition price. Market sentiment following ClearBridge's letter could influence other investors and analysts, which may affect the stock's performance leading up to the shareholder vote.
The full text of the letter follows.
Jeffrey Bailin and Aram Green
ClearBridge Investments, LLC
620 8th Avenue, 48th Floor
April 15, 2024
Baljit Dail
Model N, Inc.
777 Mariners Island Boulevard, Suite 300
Dear Mr. Dail and Members of the Model N Board of Directors,
We are writing on behalf of several strategies at ClearBridge Investments, a
About ClearBridge Investments
By way of background, ClearBridge is a global long-only equity asset manager and affiliate of Franklin Templeton. The firm had over
Exploring Maximizing Value for Model N Shareholders
We have been long-term shareholders of Model N, having first acquired a holding in September 2020. Originally, we were attracted to Model N’s unique competitive positioning, dominating a niche, high-value market selling to a resilient customer base in life sciences and high tech. We were aware the company had embarked on a cloud/SaaS subscription transition, something we have lived through in other software business models, and saw the potential for long-term upside in revenue dollars, long-term growth, and profitability. Our diligence uncovered that Model N’s product offering had limited competitive alternatives in life sciences revenue management software. With increasing regulatory burden, we anticipated there would be expansion module opportunities over time, a fact echoed by numerous management statements on the company’s cross-sell potential. The company has executed well on the SaaS transition, new logo additions, and geographic/product expansions with existing customers, all while meaningfully increasing margins. With the heavy lifting of the model transition largely finished, the company is well-positioned for accelerating performance in the medium term.
Over many years, we have had numerous investments in the software space serving life science customers and have seen a variety of consolidation activities in the space by both strategic players and financial private equity buyers. Moreover, we have historically seen vertical software businesses command relatively high valuations, even as the software valuation paradigm has seen froth come out in recent years. We appreciate that the Board of Directors is balancing the risk of execution as a stand-alone entity, which is inherently uncertain and can be impacted by external factors beyond management’s control, with the certainty of a private equity cash offer. With that said, looking at a variety of private equity deals in software over the last two years, to account for the latest valuation regime, the proposed acquisition carries one of the lowest take-out multiples, and is far below the averages we see of 7-9x NTM EV/Sales. While near-term revenue growth is a little slower at Model N, the company’s targeted double-digit revenue growth and mid
We believe the Board of Directors and the company’s advisors should remain open minded to potentially superior offers available from either strategic or financial buyers or Model N shareholders should strongly consider the potential long-term value creation in staying a stand-alone public entity. Continuing to execute on the company’s mid-term targets should offer much higher value for patient shareholders who have endured relative under-performance on a trailing 12-month and trailing 36-month basis.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please let us know if you would like to discuss any of this further.
Best,
Jeffrey Bailin and Aram Green
Portfolio Managers
About ClearBridge Investments
With
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240415886892/en/
Lisa Tibbitts
(904) 942-4451
lisa.tibbitts@franklintempleton.com
Source: ClearBridge Investments, Inc.
FAQ
Why did ClearBridge Investments send a letter to Model N, Inc.?
What percentage of Model N's outstanding common stock does ClearBridge Investments own?