MANDALAY RESOURCES CORPORATION PROVIDES YEAR-END 2022 MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES FOR BJÖRKDAL
Mandalay Resources Corporation announced an updated Mineral Resource and Reserve estimate for its Björkdal gold mine as of December 31, 2022. The report highlights:
- Mineral Reserves increased by 32,000 ounces net of depletion.
- Gold grade of Mineral Reserves rose by 11% to 1.54 g/t.
- Measured and Indicated Resources increased by 72,000 ounces with a grade of 2.27 g/t.
Exploration efforts focused on the Eastern Plunge Extension significantly improved resource confidence. The exploration cost was effectively $31.47 per ounce. This supports Mandalay's strategy of enhancing production and shareholder value through targeted exploration.
- Mineral Reserves increased by 32,000 oz net of yearly depletion.
- Gold grade of Mineral Reserves rose by 11% to 1.54 g/t.
- Measured and Indicated Resources increased by 72,000 oz with a 10% grade improvement to 2.27 g/t.
- Effective exploration cost of $31.47 per ounce demonstrates cost efficiency.
- None.
- Mineral Reserves increased by 32,000 oz net of yearly depletion;
- Mineral Reserves gold grade increased by
11% to 1.54 g/t, predominantly through the exploration of the high grade Eastern plunge extension; and - Mineral Measured and Indicated Resources increased by 72,000 oz net of yearly depletion with an increase in gold grade of
10% to 2.27 g/t.
"Mandalay's near-mine exploration efforts at Björkdal have been designed around the goal of bringing higher grades into the near and medium term mine plan. This goal was realized in 2021 through drilling of the Eastern Plunge Extension of the
"During 2022, this area was further drilled with continued success – improving our confidence in our vein model grade estimations supporting an increase in Indicated Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves. As such, gold grades of our combined Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves increased by
"Since the data cut-off in
"At Costerfield, Mineral Resources and Reserves have not been updated for year-end 2022. The exploration programs in 2022 were more directed towards drill testing of regional targets and large step-outs from the central corridor system. This change in direction came off the back of a large Mineral Reserve increase at year-end 2021, which saw Mineral Reserves grow by
Table 1: Comparison of Björkdal Mineral Reserves and Resources from
Proven and Probable | Measured and Indicated | Inferred Resources | ||||
Year End | Contained |
| Contained |
| Contained |
|
2021 | 542 | 1.39 | 1,146 | 2.07 | 359 | 1.64 |
2022 | 574 | 1.54 | 1,218 | 2.27 | 265 | 1.70 |
Notes: | |
1. | Mineral Reserves and Resources are contained at Björkdal property only. |
2. | See footnotes in tables 2 and 3 for details of Proven and Probable Reserve tonnages and grades, including cut-off grades and Qualified Persons. |
Details of the Mineral Resources and Reserves estimates at Björkdal are related below. Estimates were prepared or verified by
The year-end 2022 estimates of Mineral Resources and Reserves for Björkdal will be fully documented in an independent Technical Report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") to be filed on www.sedar.com and the Mandalay website www.mandalayresources.com within 45 days of this press release.
Since the data cut-off date of
Other than the normal course updating of the mineralization wireframes to account for new drilling and sampling information, the workflow and estimation parameters used to prepare the year end 2022 Björkdal long term block model were largely unchanged.
One of the changes included the addition of a clipping surface to act as a spatial boundary for gold grades. This surface is currently viewed as a fault surface and was created to account for the improved understanding of its impact on the gold distribution in the veins.
A second change included the use of reporting panels as constraints for preparing the Mineral Resource statement for the
A third change implemented for the year end 2022 Mineral Resource reporting was the consideration of Mineral Resources that may be residing as remnant materials that can no longer meet the Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction ("RPEEE") requirement of the
Classification criteria for Measured Resource was changed to include only material of the Aurora veining in near proximity to sampled, on-vein, development drives.
The year end 2022 Mineral Resource statement for the Norrberget deposit is prepared using a revised pit surface that was created using an updated metal price.
Other than the normal course updating of the underground long-term wireframes and the re-optimization of the Björkdal and Norrberget open pits to account for the updated long term resource model, the workflow and modifying factors used to prepare the year end 2022 Björkdal Mineral Reserves were largely unchanged from those used during the previous year.
The reporting cut-off grades for the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve statement were modified slightly to reflect the higher gold prices used to prepare the estimate. Updated operational costs and input parameters based upon Q4, 2021 to Q3, 2022 actual figures, and the 2023 budget, were used in the Mineral Reserve estimation process.
The Mineral Resource estimates are presented in Table 2. The Mineral Reserve estimates are presented in Table 3.
Table 2: Mineral Resources at Björkdal, Inclusive of Mineral Reserves, as of
Category | Area | Tonnage |
| Contained Au |
Measured | ||||
Björkdal Underground | 526 | 2.39 | 40 | |
Indicated | ||||
Björkdal Underground | 11,084 | 2.60 | 926 | |
Björkdal | 2,533 | 2.31 | 188 | |
191 | 2.93 | 18 | ||
Stockpiles | 2,357 | 0.60 | 45 | |
Total Measured & Indicated | 16,691 | 2.27 | 1,218 | |
Inferred | ||||
Björkdal Underground | 1,815 | 2.10 | 123 | |
Björkdal | 3,032 | 1.46 | 142 | |
8 | 3.21 | 1 | ||
Total Inferred | 4,847 | 1.70 | 265 |
Notes: | |
1. | Björkdal Mineral Resources are estimated using drill hole and sample data as of |
2. | CIM (2014) definitions and the 2019 CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines were followed for Mineral Resources. |
3. | Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. |
4. | Mineral Resources are estimated using an average gold price of |
5. | Bulk density is 2.74 t/m3 for veins and host rock. Bulk density is 2.92 t/m3 for skarn ore bodies. |
6. | High gold assays were capped to 30 g/t Au for the Björkdal open pit mine. |
7. | High gold assays for the underground mine were capped at 60 g/t Au for the first search pass and 40 g/t Au for subsequent passes. |
8. | High gold assays at Norrberget were capped at 24 g/t Au. |
9. | Interpolation was by inverse distance cubed utilizing diamond drill, reverse circulation, and chip channel samples. |
10. | Björkdal open pit Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.36 g/t Au and constrained by a resource pit shell. |
11. | Norrberget open pit Mineral Resources are estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au and constrained by a resource pit shell. |
12. | Underground Mineral Resources are estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.82 g/t Au for all veins except the Aurora vein. |
13. | A nominal 2.5 m minimum mining width was used to interpret veins. |
14. | Reported Mineral Resources are depleted for previously mined underground development and stopes and exclude remnant material. |
15. | Stockpile Mineral Resources are based upon surveyed volumes supplemented by production data. |
16. | Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
17. | Numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
18. | The Independent Qualified Person for the Björkdal and Norrberget Mineral Resource estimates is |
Table 3: Mineral Reserves at Björkdal, as of
Category | Area | Tonnage |
| Contained Au |
Proven | ||||
Björkdal Underground | 661 | 1.61 | 34 | |
Total Proven | 661 | 1.61 | 34 | |
Probable | ||||
Björkdal Underground | 5,617 | 2.10 | 379 | |
Björkdal | 2,816 | 1.12 | 101 | |
170 | 2.74 | 15 | ||
Stockpiles | 2,357 | 0.60 | 45 | |
Total Probable | 10,960 | 1.53 | 540 | |
Total Proven & Probable | 11,622 | 1.54 | 574 |
Notes: | |
1. | Björkdal Mineral Reserves are estimated using drill hole and sample data as of |
2. | Norrberget Mineral Reserves are based on a data cut-off date of |
3. | CIM (2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Reserves. |
4. | Open pit Mineral Reserves for Björkdal are based on mine designs carried out on an updated resource model, applying a block dilution of |
5. | Open pit Mineral Reserves for Norrberget are based on |
6. | Underground Mineral Reserves are based on mine designs carried out on an updated resource model. Minimum mining widths of 4.07 m for stopes (after dilution) and 4.75 m for development (after dilution) were used. Stope dilution was applied by adding 0.6 m on each side of stopes as well as an additional |
7. | Stockpile Mineral Reserves are based upon surveyed volumes supplemented by production data as of |
8. | Mineral Reserves are estimated using an average long term gold price of |
9. | Tonnes and contained gold are rounded to the nearest thousand. |
10. | Numbers may not sum due to rounding. |
11. | The Independent Qualified Person for the Björkdal Mineral Reserve estimate is |
A total of 80,400 ounces of gold have been added to Mineral Reserves at an exploration cost in 2022 of
All Qualified Persons listed below have read and approved the contents of this news release as it pertains to the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates disclosed in this news release.
- The Mineral Resource estimates for Björkdal and Norrberget were carried out under the supervision of
Reno Pressacco ,M.Sc .(A).,P.Geo ., Associate Principal Geologist, an employee of SLR and independent of Mandalay. He is a Qualified Person for the purpose of NI 43-101. - The QP is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the Mineral Resource estimate.
- The Mineral Reserve estimate was carried out under the supervision of
Rick Taylor , CP, MAusIMM, PrincipalMining Engineer , an employee of SLR and independent of Mandalay. He is a Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101. - The QP is not aware of any mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimate.
Mandalay's mission is to create shareholder value through the profitable operation and continuing the regional exploration program, at both its Costerfield and Björkdal mines. Currently, the Company's main objective is to continue mining the high-grade Youle vein at Costerfield, bring online the deeper Shepherd veins, both of which will continue to supply high-grade ore to the processing plant, and to extend Youle's Mineral Reserves. At Björkdal, the Company will aim to increase production from the Aurora zone and other higher-grade areas in the coming years, in order to maximize profit margins from the mine.
This news release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by these statements depending on, among other things, changes in commodity prices and general market and economic conditions. The factors identified above are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors that could affect Mandalay. A description of additional risks that could result in actual results and developments differing from those contemplated by forward-looking statements in this news release can be found under the heading "Risk Factors" in Mandalay's annual information form dated
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mandalay-resources-corporation-provides-year-end-2022-mineral-reserves-and-resources-for-bjorkdal-301751426.html
SOURCE