Indaba Capital Issues New Presentation Detailing Opposition to Barely Revised Terms of MDC-Stagwell Combination
Indaba Capital Management, the largest independent shareholder of MDC Partners (NASDAQ: MDCA), has publicly opposed the revised terms of MDC's proposed merger with Stagwell Media, announced on July 9. Indaba criticizes the revised offer for insufficient shareholder consideration, transparency, investor backing, and governance issues. They argue the changes fail to value MDC's public structure adequately and neglect substantial feedback from shareholders, including a request for a 35% ownership stake in the combined entity. Indaba emphasizes the need for credible proposals that reflect shareholder interests and sound financial analysis.
- None.
- Insufficient consideration offering only 31.2% of combined entity shares, below shareholders' expectation of 35%.
- Lack of transparency regarding the new Moelis & Co. fairness opinion and analysis.
- Absence of formal support or voting agreements from unaffiliated shareholders, indicating skepticism.
- Concerns over governance, with majority of the new entity's board being connected to Mark Penn.
Indaba Capital Management L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Indaba” or “we”), which is the largest independent shareholder of MDC Partners Inc. (NASDAQ: MDCA) (“MDC” or the “Company”), today issued a new presentation detailing its opposition to the barely revised terms of the Company’s prospective merger with Stagwell Media LP (“Stagwell”). The revised terms were released by MDC and Stagwell on Friday, July 9th.
Derek Schrier, Managing Partner of Indaba, commented:
“Due to Mark Penn’s unwillingness to compromise and propose revised transaction terms that reflect current equity market valuations and the present health of the advertising industry, we continue to oppose the prospective combination with Stagwell. We are not going to acquiesce to Mr. Penn’s desire to ram through self-serving deal terms that undervalue MDC’s public company structure, lack an appropriate control premium and rely on completely outdated pandemic economics. We made Mr. Penn aware of these lingering concerns earlier in the month, when we also told him Indaba is aligned with certain fellow shareholders who have indicated a willingness to support a deal that includes total consideration equal to
-
Insufficient Consideration - Despite including a third increase in consideration from
30.6% to31.2% of the newly combined entity’s shares, MDC and Stagwell ignored major shareholders’ desire to compromise by not coming close to35% consideration. It appears the revised terms continue to place next to no value on MDC’s public structure, synergies and net operating loss benefits. The revised consideration also fails to take into account the dramatic recovery in the industry, as evidenced by the rising enterprise values of peers highlighted in our updated presentation.
- Insufficient Transparency - The revised terms were not accompanied by an affirmative commitment to release the new Moelis & Co. fairness opinion and the underlying analysis. Indaba only received a verbal commitment (with no timeline) after a follow-up request on Friday.
- Insufficient Investor Support - Once again, MDC and Stagwell have put out revised terms without any formal support or voting agreements from unaffiliated shareholders, indicating to us continued shareholder skepticism. Notably, the market appears to share our view of the revised terms based on the fact that MDC’s shares barely moved in reaction on Friday – a day in which the NASDAQ and industry peers were up.
- Insufficient Governance - The new enhancements are an insult to unaffiliated shareholders. We take no solace in 2/3 of the newly combined entity’s Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee being independent directors who currently serve with Mr. Penn in MDC’s boardroom. These same directors seem to have made no attempt to shop MDC before rushing into a deal with Mr. Penn (after he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer). It is important to reinforce that a majority of the identified directors for the newly combined entity appear to have direct personal or professional overlap with Mr. Penn.
We hope that Mr. Penn, who seems to have mistaken this process for a game of political poker, comes to understand that he cannot rely on bombastic negotiating threats and non-negotiated, immaterial bumps that lack shareholder support to get this deal done. Shareholders are not oblivious to his immense economic incentives and the fact that he stands to receive
About Indaba Capital
Indaba was founded in 2010 to invest in corporate equity and debt. Based in San Francisco, Indaba currently has more than
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210712005400/en/
FAQ
What are Indaba Capital Management's concerns regarding MDC Partners' merger with Stagwell?
What percentage of shares does Indaba Capital believe should be offered in the MDC-Stagwell merger?
What did Indaba Capital say about MDC's revised merger terms announced on July 9?
What impact did the revised merger terms have on MDC's stock performance?